“Bacterial Penetration Cycle Hypothesis”

Initially, this blog was titled: “Even More Work for Our IBD Nutritionists?”  If you get to the bottom of this post, you will know why.

A provocative study (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2014; 20: 1353-60) describes the use of partial enteral nutrition (PEN) as effective for induction of remission in children and young adults with Crohn’s disease (CD).  I’m a little wary commenting on this study as many individuals may take a glimmer of information and subject themselves to empiric trials.  In fact, a recent case report (N Engl J Med 2014; 371:668-675) described an adult who without medical advice used fecal transplant therapy (obtained from spouse and infant) to self-treat his ulcerative colitis.  In the case report, this patient ultimately was diagnosed with a secondary cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and the fecal transplant was not effective.

With regard to the PEN study, the authors treated 47 patients (34 children) with up to 50% of their diet as a polymeric formula (Modulen or Pediasure) along with dietary counseling/changes.  The authors note that CD “may arise from a sequence of events involving changes in the microbiome, intestinal permeability leading to bacterial adherence or penetration of the epithelium, and subsequent stimulation of the adaptive immune response leading to tissue damage.  We have termed this sequence the Bacterial Penetration Cycle Hypothesis.”  Given the compelling improvements noted with exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN), the authors sought to modify the diet after an initial clinical response in two patients who could not adhere to EEN.

Design: Strict diet for 6 weeks with 50% of calories from formula, then less restricted diet for next 6 weeks (25% of calories from formula).  Also, diet required exclusion of gluten, dairy, animal fat, processed meats, products containing emulsifiers, candies, chocolates, gum, packaged snacks, sauces, and canned goods.  A more extensive listing of the foods is given in the appendix (page 1360).  The authors measured the clinical response with PCDAI, Harvey Bradshaw index, and bloodwork (eg. CRP, ESR, albumin, and hemoglobin).

Key finding:

  • 33 (70.2%) achieved a remission on this PEN diet; 78.7% (n=37) had a clinical response.
  • Normalization of CRP occurred in 21 of 30 patients (70%) of those with a clinical remission.

Take home message: A PEN diet needs more study.  I would not advise someone to radically change their diet without the instruction of a qualified nutritionist, unless the individual wants to be another case report of something gone awry.

Related Blog Posts:

 

 

1 thought on ““Bacterial Penetration Cycle Hypothesis”

  1. Pingback: Head-to-Head: Nutritional Therapy versus Biological Therapy in Pediatric Crohn’s Disease | gutsandgrowth

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.