Tag Archives: stricture

ESPGHAN Eosinophilic Esophagitis Guidelines

Posted on by

Yesterday was “National Dog Day.” Here’s our pooch:

J Amil-Dias et al. JPGN;79:394–437. Open Access! Diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis in children: An update from the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN)

This report makes 52 statements and 44 recommendations. Overall this is a helpful report but there are many statements and recommendations that have NO value for pediatric gastroenterologists (except for those trapped in a cave for the last 10 years). Here are a couple examples of that:

  • “ESPGHAN EGID WG recommends that pediatricians should be aware of the higher incidence of EoE in relatives.”
  • “ESPGHAN EGID WG recommends that a high index of suspicion for EoE must be maintained in children with concomitant atopic disease.”
  • “ESPGHAN EGID WG recommends the peak value of 15 eos/HPF as the cut‐off value in esophageal biopsy specimens, for the histological diagnosis of EoE in an appropriate clinical context”

Some helpful recommendations:

  • “ESPGHAN EGID WG recommends against using available allergy tests to predict dietary triggers of EoE.” This is not new information but helpful to have clearly stated in guidelines.”
  • “ESPGHAN EGID WG recommends maintenance therapy to all patients after achieving histological remission” Commentary: “There are no prospective data on the best duration of maintenance therapy in pediatric EoE…[In a large study of adults} sustained untreated combined remission was seen in only 1.3% of patients who discontinued treatment.”
  • “ESPGHAN EGID WG suggests endoscopic and histological re‐evaluation after 1‐3 years during the maintenance phase in cases of stable clinical remission”
  • “ESPGHAN EGID WG recommends that dupilumab can be used in selected cases of children over1 year old weighing >15 kg with EoE refractory to conventional treatment and in those with concomitant atopic burden with approved indications for biologics”
  • “ESPGHAN EGID WG suggests that a short course of systemic steroids be considered as an alternative to dilation in the presence of moderate to severe esophageal strictures with severe symptoms.” “Treatment with short term systemic steroids can significantly reduce the need for mechanical esophageal dilation in moderate to severe strictures associated with pediatric EoE”
  • Suggested drug dosing is noted in Table 3 (see below)

Related blog posts:

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Evidence-Based Algorithm for Surveillance in Esophageal Atresia Patients

Posted on by

JL Yasuda et al. J Am Coll Surg 2024; 238: 831-843. Surveillance Endoscopy in Pediatric Esophageal Atresia: Toward an Evidence-Based Algorithm

This retrospective study examined 546 children with esophageal atresia (EA) who underwent 1,473 surveillance endoscopies (2004-2023). The authors defined a hiatal hernia as at least 1 cm of gastric folds present above the level of the diaphragmatic pinch. “Actionable findings” were any finding that prompted a change in management.

Key findings:

  •  A total of 770 endoscopies (52.2%) in 394 unique patients (72.2%) had actionable pathology
  • The most common actionable finding was esophagitis which lead to escalation of therapy (484 endoscopies in 32.9% of patients). However, de-escalation of therapy was common as well; this occurred in 233 patients (after 310 endoscopies)
  • Barrett’s esophagus (intestinal metaplasia) was identified in 7 unique patients (1.3%) at a median age of 11.3 years. 6 of 7 patients with Barrett’s were receiving acid suppression at time of diagnosis
  •  Actionable findings leading to surgical intervention were found in 55 children (30 refractory reflux and 25 tracheoesophageal fistulas).
  • Significant predictors of actionable pathology included increasing age, long gap atresia, and hiatal hernia.
  • Symptoms were not predictive of actionable findings, except dysphagia (OR 5.80), which was associated with stricture.
  • Acid suppression was associated with a reduced odds of actionable findings (OR 0.78); however, there was still a high rate of actionable findings in this group. 51% of endoscopies while a patient had been receiving acid suppression had actionable findings.
  • Fundoplication was NOT associated with protection against actionable findings (OR 1.42)
  • Table 2 notes that 52 (3.5%) patients had eosinophilic esophagitis therapy escalated. Infrequently, non-esophageal diseases were identified: Celiac in 3 patients (0.2%), Crohn’s disease in 2 patients (0.1%), eosinophilic gastritis and/or duodenitis in 2 (0.1%), and H pylori in 4 patients (0.3%).

Proposed Management Algorithms:

Discussion Points (from authors):

Take multiple levels of esophageal biopsies: “Any surveillance esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) should at minimum include 2 to 3 levels of esophageal biopsies”

Acid suppression recommendations: “Barrett’s esophagus is proposed to be an absolute contraindication to acid suppression wean; relative contraindications to weaning acid suppression include earlier erosive esophagitis, earlier failed acid suppression discontinuation attempt(s) with rebound esophagitis, or hiatal hernia; if acid suppression is weaned in these high-risk situations, we believe close follow-up endoscopy is warranted to assess for rebound pathology [which happened in nearly 20%].” And, “our practice is to empirically de-escalate acid suppression in children without contraindications to doing so when there is no gross esophagitis and biopsies show no or minimal inflammation (generally less than 5 eosinophils per high powered field).”

Consider doing endoscopy off acid suppression for approximately three months: “To maximize the information yield from the initial endoscopy, a patient may first wean off acid suppression approximately 3 months before endoscopy to permit evaluation for both anatomy and esophagitis off acid suppression. Subsequent surveillance is performed
according to our algorithm and within at most 6 to 12 months of any acid suppression changes.”

The authors do not generally recommend pH-Impedance. “There are no consensus “normal” values for pH-impedance reflux parameters in either healthy or EA children, and pH-impedance has failed to show any predictive correlation with actual esophagitis in multiple pediatric studies. In particular, children with EA with “normal” numbers of reflux events cannot adequately clear their refluxate in the context of poor esophageal motility and can still develop reflux injury. pH-impedance tracings in EA require manual review by an experienced reader, with automated analysis being highly unreliable in the setting of low baseline impedance values.”

Limitations: 1. Some of the actionable findings may have been expected based on prior endoscopies (e.g. prior stricture) and could influence value of symptoms like dysphagia. 2. This population was skewed to patients with more severe EA as it is a subspecialty center. One indicator was that their group had 24% with long-gap EA compared to an overall expected rate of 10% in the general EA population 3. Retrospective study 4. Many of the patients were not truly “surveillance” endoscopies but were done due to reported symptoms

My take: It’s unfortunate that this article did not get published in a more mainstream pediatric journal (e.g. JPGN, J Pediatr, Pediatrics) or a more mainstream gastroenterology journal (eg. Gastroenterol, Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, AJG) as this article provides a lot of great data and useful advice. More than 70% of subjects had actionable findings during the course of their follow-up, including more than 40% of 1 year-olds.

The algorithms above suggest that at minimum, EA patients should have endoscopy every 5 years (likely starting between 12-18 months). More frequent endoscopy (every 2-3 years) may be worthwhile in those with risk factors (e.g. long gap EA, hiatal hernia, and prior esophagitis) and follow-up endoscopy is needed sooner if change in therapy (stricture dilation, esophagitis treatment or treatment de-escalation).

Related blog posts:

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Practical Tips for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Posted on by

We recently had Glenn Furuta, MD give our group a terrific lecture on eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).

Some of the key points:

  • The burden of EoE continues to increase.
  • There are clearly several phenotypes of EoE. Some patients may never develop stricturing/fibrostenotic disease  but natural history data continues to evolve.
  • After treatment response, many patients can continue with symptoms. In adults and adolescents, this has been termed ‘esophageal hypervigilance.’ Feeding therapy may be helpful in this circumstance.
  • Adrenal insufficiency: Currently their group tries to screen for this after 4 months of topical corticosteroids and then yearly. It is unusual for them identify adrenal insufficiency if the patient is receiving only a single steroid agent; patients receiving steroids for other conditions like asthma are at higher risk.
  • An esophagram with a barium coated pill can be a useful adjunct to determine if there is esophageal narrowing (this can be missed on endoscopy).
  • For select patients, endoFLIP can characterize distensibility/esophageal function
  • Esophageal strictures: Their group uses Bougie dilators and has had a good experience. No perforations. ~15% with chest pain afterwards.
  • Corticosteroids (topical) can reduce the risk of food impactions in adults.
  • Reviewed use of Dupilimab and its recent approval in EoE for children as young as 1 yr of age (>15 kg)

Some selected slides:

Related blog posts:

CCFA 2023 (Atlanta) Part 5

Posted on by

Another very good review by David Schwartz on The Daunting Duo: Management of Stictures and Fistula. Below are some of my notes and some slides; my notes may contain errors in transcription or omission. Can get access to all 49 slides here: IBD Pro CCFA 2023 Atlanta

  • Fistula healing rates are poor
  • 78% have complex fistulas
  • Long-term healing: 67% with simple fistulas but only 37% with complex fistulas
  • Seton placement prior to biologic therapy increases likelihood of better outcomes
  • Antibiotic therapy recommended until Seton removed (not short-term treatment) –improved healing rates along with medical therapy
  • Anti-TNF therapy effective in ~40% long-term; higher rates of healing with higher anti-TNF levels
  • MRI and/or EUS helpful in improving fistula healing rates
  • Ustekinumab and Vedolizumab both had fistula healing rates ~40%
  • Adipose derived stem cells with ~50% healing rates (study with high placebo healing rate too ~37%); changes local cytokine profile, cells gone in about 2 weeks but goal for changing trajectory

Strictures

  • 5-24% with stricturing phenotype
  • No effective medical treatments
  • Endoscopic balloon dilatation in shorter strictures (<5 cm) without associated abscess or fistula (needs imaging prior)
  • One-third of balloon dilated strictures will still wind up needing surgery despite dilatation. 5-10% risk of complication. Goal is 15 mm or more (Dr. Schwartz typically does not increase by more than 3 sizes from baseline in one session)

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Do We Know How To Dilate Strictures Associated With Pediatric Crohn’s Disease?

Posted on by

O Ledder et al. JPGN 2023; 76: 799-806. Approach to Endoscopic Balloon Dilatation in Pediatric Stricturing Crohn Disease: A Position Paper of the Endoscopy Special Interest Group of ESPGHAN

This position paper regarding dilatation of strictures in Crohn’s disease provides mostly vague advice.

Here are a few examples:

  • Imaging: “The need for fluoroscopy is dependent on the stricture phenotype and the treating team…The advantage of live imaging is obvious: it provides greater certainty of balloon position and dilatation success; however, it is difficult and impractical in some centers…In simple strictures, where balloon passage and deployment can be performed with reasonable confidence under direct vision,…it is reasonable to dispense with imaging.”
  • Dilatation Size: “In the recent pediatric case series…a median of 15 mm was used” as a target dilatation….”It is wise to set reasonable goals for dilatation…Inherited wisdom recommended limiting esophageal dilatation to no more than 3 mm per session. However,…subsequently challenged in several studies demonstrating safe dilatation up to 5 mm per session…As an informal rule, the authors limit dilatation to 2 balloon sizes per session which roughly translates to 5-6 mm. An alternative approach…is to dilate to a maximum of three times the initial stricture diameter; however, neither of these approaches are based on any robust data.”

The main clear cut recommendations are to obtain careful consent, expecting a complication rate of ~4% (eg. bleeding, sepsis, perforation), and to have surgical backup.

My take: This “position paper” offers very few positions on management advice and gives little clear guidance in terms of dilating strictures in Crohn’s disease.

Related blog posts:

Frequency of Strictures in Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Posted on by

D Burnett et al. JPGN Reports 2021; Free Access: Incidence of Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Characterization of the Stricturing Phenotype in Alberta, Canada doi: 10.1097/PG9.0000000000000136

This retrospective study (2015-2018) identified 185 new cases of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).

Key findings:

  • Eight of 185 (4%) patients had endoscopically confirmed esophageal strictures, 4 of which required mechanical dilation. (The authors note a Dutch study which demonstrated a 14% stricture rate)
  • Eleven of 185 (5.9%) patients had more subtle signs of esophageal narrowing, but no focal strictures
  • Pain was reported after 15% of all scopes, including 50% of the 28 scopes with focal strictures
  • For patients <15 years old living in Edmonton, the incidence over the 4 years was 11.1 cases per 100,000 person years
  • EoE was more common in urban setting: incidence 10.6 versus 4.1 per 100,000 person-years, respectively

My take: This article provides useful data on the likelihood of stricturing EoE in the pediatric population in an area with a high incidence of EoE.

Related blog posts:

Using FLIP

Posted on by

A recent review article (E Sararino et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115: 1786-06. Use of the Functional Lumen Imaging Probe in Clinical Esophagology) is a terrific article for understanding Functional Lumen Imaging Probe (FLIP) techonology and uses. Thanks to Ben Gold for this reference.

Link to patient explanation of EndoFLIP at Univ Michigan

The FLIP “measures luminal cross sectional area (CSA) and pressure in the esophagus using impedance planimetry and serves as an adjunct to existing esophageal investigative tests. A distensible balloon encasing a catheter with multiple pairs of impedance electrodes is used, and the balloon is distended with fluid of known conductivity and volume.”

FLIP can be done at time of endoscopy.

  • Distensibility index (DI). This is the ratio of EGJ cross sectional area to intraballoon pressure is generally considered the most useful FLIP metric. Normal DI values in adults range from 3.1 to 9.0 m3/mm Hg. Lower values indicated reduced EGJ opening.
  • FLIP can complement the diagnosis of achalasia when manometry and barium studies are inconclusive or negative in patients with typical symptoms.
  • FLIP can be used to assess fibrostenotic remodeling of the esophagus in eosinophilic esophagitis.
  • Lumen diameter measured using FLIP in complex strictures can potentially guide management.

This review has several helpful figures to illustrate the type of visual data available. It also provides a standard protocol for using FLIP. The current limitations for FLIP include the lack of real-time software analysis of the data which hinders reporting, and limited data supporting use.

Related blog post: #NAASPGHAN17 Eosinophilic Esophagitis Session

While this picture makes me look like a scofflaw, in fact one can sit on the sand below the median high tide mark. So there!

IBD Briefs August 2019

Posted on by

A Levine et al. Gastroenterol 2019; 157: 440-50.  This study found that a Crohn’s Disease Exclusion Diet plus partial enteral nutrition induced sustained remission in a 12-week prospective randomized controlled trial with 74 children.  At week 12, “76% of 37 children given CDED plus PEN were in corticosteroid-free remission compared with 14 (45.1%) of 31 children given” EEN followed by PEN.  The associated editorial on pages 295-6 provides a useful diagram of various dietary therapy components for a large number of diets that have been given for IBD.  The editorial recommends:

“For now, simple dietetic recommendations such as consuming a well-balanced diet prepared largely from fresh ingredients and thereby avoidance of emulsifiers and additives and processed foods are appropriate for all patients.  In select patients,…a trial of dietary therapy alone with a diet such as CDED could be attempted for a short period of time, with close follow-up, and with agreement with the patient that failure to fully respond is an indication to escalate therapy.”  More dietary trials are ongoing.

Related blog posts:

NJ Samadder et al Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17: 1807-13. In this cohort from Utah 1996-2011 with 9505 individuals with IBD, 101 developed colorectal cancer.  Standardized incidence ratio (SIR) for CRC in patients with Crohn’s disease was 3.4, in ulcerative colitis 5.2, in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis 14.8.  A family history of CRC increased the risk of CRC in patients with IBD to 7.9 compared to general population.  Family hx/o CRC increased the SIR by about double the CRC risk in IBD patients without a family hx/o CRC.

CR Ballengee et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17: 1799-1806. In this study with 161 subjects from the RISK cohort, the authors found that elevated CLO3A1 levels in subjects with CD was associated with the development of stricturing disease but was not elevated in those with strictures at presentation and in those who did not develop  strictures.

AL Lightner et al IBD 2019; 25: 1152-68.  Short- and Long-term Outcomes After Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review.  This review included 42 papers.

  • Rates of superficial surgical site infection, pelvic sepsis, and small bowel obstruction at <30 days were 10%, 11%, and 14% respectively.
  • Rates of pouchitis, stricture, chronic fistula, incontinence and pouch failure were 30%, 17%, 12%, 20% and 8% respectively with followup between 37-109 months.
  • Mean 24-hour stool frequency was 5.

MC Choy et al IBD 2019; 25: 1169-86.  Systematic review and meta-analysis: Optimal salvage therapy in acute severe ulcerative colitis.  Among 41 cohorts (n=2158 cases) with infliximab salvage, overall colectomy-free survival was 69.8% at 12 months.  The authors could not identify an advantage of dose-intensification in outcomes, though this was used more often in patients with increased disease severity, “which may have confounded the results.”

Hood River, OR

NASPGHAN Postgraduate Course 2017 (Part 1): Strictures, GI Bleeding, Pancreatic Fluid Collections

Posted on by

Over the next 2 weeks or so, I am posting my notes/pictures from this year’s annual meeting.  The first few days will review the postgraduate course.  For the most part, I find the postgraduate course reassuring that I have kept up with current approaches; there is usually not a lot of new information but a solid review of the topics.

Here is a link to postgraduate course syllabus: NASPGHAN PG Syllabus – 2017

This blog entry has abbreviated/summarized these presentations. Though not intentional, some important material is likely to have been omitted; in addition, transcription errors are possible as well.

Strictures beyond the esophagus

Petar Mamula, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia

Some useful points:

  • Fluoroscopy very useful with most strictures –may improve safety and effectiveness. Helps define anatomy
  • Reviewed strictures in stomach –rare. May be due to caustic ingestion, Crohn’s disease or chronic granulomatous disease
  • Intestinal/colonic strictures (or narrowing): duodenal webs -can be treated with needle knife, Crohn’s disease strictures -can be balloon dilated, Short gut syndrome, Graft versus host disease

GI Bleeding Update

Diana Lerner  Medical College of Wisconsin

Useful points

Upper GI Bleeding:

  • IV PPIs reduce risk of transfusion and reduce risk of re-bleeding
  • IV PPI BID treatment has been shown to be noninferior to continuous drip
  • Conservative transfusion therapy
  • Erythromycin can be helpful
  • Lecture had good videos with review of techniques: clipping, heater probe, epinephrine injection (not recommended as monotherapy), argon plasma coagulation, and bipolar electrocautery

Cleveland et al. World J Pediatr 2012

Lower GI Bleeding:

  • Etiologies include the followiing: Post-polypectomy, Solitary Rectal Ulcer syndrome, Blue Rubber Bleb syndrome, anastomotic ulcer bleeding, Meckel’s diverticulum
  • Lower GI evaluation is best after prep –much higher yield

Management of Pancreatic Fluid Collections

Matt Giefer Seattle Children’s Hospital

Key points:

  • Imaging in first 7 days of diagnosis may miss the development of fluid collections
  • With necrotizing pancreatitis, fluid collections are either ANC: acute necrotic collection (<4 weeks) or WON: walled off necrosis (>4 weeks); Bryan et al. Radiographics 2016; 36: 675
  • With interstitial edematous pancreatitis, fluid collections are either acute peripancreatic fluid collection (<4 weeks) or Pseudocyst: >4 weeks,
  • Fluid collections do not preclude feeding patients
  • Drainage often needed if fluid collection becomes infected or if fluid collection causes obstruction
  • Endoscopic drainage is first-line approach: equally effective as surgery, fewer complications, equal efficacy, and lower cost

 

 

The Story Behind a 30 Year Esophagitis Study

Posted on by

A recent retrospective study ( SS Baker et al. JPGN 2015; 61: 538-40) reported on changes in esophagitis over a 30 year period at one center.  While the authors focus on the fluctuating percentage of esophagitis noted during three periods, in my opinion, they miss the opportunity to discuss more relevant findings.

Specifically, the authors note the following:

  • From 1980-88 (n=186 over 8 years) that 26.9% had esophagitis and 4.8% had >15 eos/hpf.  Normal pathology in the esophagus was noted in 73.1%.
  • From 2000-2002 (n=321 over 2 years), 41.2% had esophagitis and 8.5% had >15 eos/hpf.  Normal pathology in the esophagus was noted in 58.8%.
  • In the most recent period, 2011, (n=675 over 1 year), 31%* had esophagitis and 12.7% had >15 eos/hpf.  Normal pathology in the esophagus was noted in 69%.     *erroneously reported as 33%

What is baffling to me are the following:

  • Why the authors assert that there has been a fluctuating prevalence.  In absolute terms, the increase in cases is marked, though one can argue that in earlier periods there may have been many undiagnosed cases.
  • Why the authors do not comment on the tremendous increase in the use of endoscopy in their discussion.  In the first period, they were averaging ~23/year, the second period ~95/year and in the most recent period, they performed 675 in one year.

My take: This study shows that esophageal eosinophilia has been present for a long time and that identification of cases has increased considerably over 32 years.  In addition, the use of endoscopy has increased markedly, yet the yield of abnormal findings remains similar.

Briefly noted: C Menard-Katcher et al. JPGN 2015; 61: 541-46.  This retrospective study of 22 children showed that 55% had esophageal strictures identified by esophagram but not endoscopy.

Related blog posts:

Bamboo