Tag Archives: vancomycin

ESPGHAN Guidelines for PSC in Children

Posted on by

PF van Rheenen et al. JPGN 2024; DOI: 10.1002/jpn3.12378. Open Access! Primary sclerosing cholangitis in children with inflammatory bowel disease: An ESPGHAN position paper from the Hepatology Committee and the IBD Porto group

Recommendations:

  • In children with suspected or confirmed IBD, screening for liver disease is usually performed at 3 to 6 months intervals and a work‐up for underlying liver disease is most commonly initiated when liver enzymes exceed 2x the upper limit of normal
  • Use MRCP as the radiological modality of choice for diagnosing PSC
  • Consider performing a liver biopsy in children with IBD and suspected PSC in the following circumstances: i) Normal biliary tree at MRCP, ii) raised immunoglobulin G and the presence of liver-specific autoantibodies, or iii) clinical uncertainty before steroid induction therapy for IBD
  • Perform fecal calprotectin screening at least once yearly in children with isolated PSC and/or AIH to select patients for diagnostic endoscopy for suspected inflammatory bowel disease (panel recommends cutoff of >150 indicating need for ileocolonoscopy)
  • Surveillance colonoscopy should be considered in children with PSC–IBD and the following risk factors of colorectal cancer: i) persistent active colonic inflammation, ii) longstanding colitis (≥8 years), or iii)  a family history of colorectal cancer in a first-degree relative <50 years. (The overall risk of colon cancer in those <18 yrs of age is very low)
  • UDCA may be prescribed at doses of 15–20 mg/kg/day. Despite evidence of improvement of liver enzymes, its long-term effect on disease progression has not been demonstrated. Consider a 6-months therapeutic trial of UDCA, either immediately after PSC diagnosis or when spontaneous normalization of GGT does not occur in the first 6 months postdiagnosis. Continue UDCA treatment if there is a meaningful reduction or normalization of GGT or improvement of symptoms
  • Oral vancomycin may be prescribed for a potential improvement in liver biochemistry as well as bowel inflammation. Its long-term effect on disease progression has not been demonstrated
  • In children with PSC–IBD and biochemical, serological, and histological features of AIH, the use of corticosteroids and antimetabolites may suppress immune-mediated hepatitis. In the absence of convincing AIH features, the use of corticosteroids and antimetabolites is not indicated to manage PSC
  • Children with PSC, relevant bile-duct strictures and cholestatic symptoms should be assessed for liver transplantation. When their symptoms are likely to improve following biliary intervention, ERCP can be considered
  • Recommended blood testing for children with PSC: At diagnosis: Autoantibodies (ANA, anti-SMA, anti-LKM-1, anti-LC1, and anti-SLA), Every 3-6 months: ALT, AST, GGT, Albumin, INR, Platelets, CRP. Every 12 months: IgG, AFP, and Fat Soluble vitamins. Consider f/u autoantibodies in those with elevated IgG at f/u lab testing

My take: This is a useful position paper; it does not have a zillion recommendations like some other ESPGHAN positions papers. Given the frequency of liver enzyme elevation in patients with IBD, mild to modest elevations may need to be observed before launching an extensive evaluation (see related blog posts below).

Related blog posts:

Key Advances in 2024: An Overview from GutsandGrowth (Part 1)

Posted on by

This year I had the opportunity to give a lecture to our group that reviewed much of the important advances that happened in 2024. Here are some of the slides (if you have any trouble reading the slides, you can search for the original blog post using author name).

Vancomycin for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Patients with Primary Sclerosing Cholantgitis

Posted on by

E Ricciuto et al. Aliment pharmacol ther 2024; 59: 1236-1247. Oral vancomycin is associated with improved inflammatory bowel disease clinical outcomes in primary sclerosing cholangitis-associated inflammatory bowel disease (PSC-IBD): A matched analysis from the Paediatric PSC Consortium

This was a retrospective study from 54 centers with 113 PSC-IBD pediatric patients receiving vancomycin (median age 12.7 years, 63% male). The matched cohort included 70 vancomycin-treated and 210 untreated patients. Clinical remission was defined as physician global assessment (PGA) of zero. It is noted that the Pediatric PSC consortium included 1362 patients at the time of this study; only 11% (n=113) were treated with vancomycin for at least 3 months. The median dose of vancomycin was 17 mg/kg/day and median duration was 2.5 years.

Key findings:

  • Vancomycin was associated with greater odds of IBD clinical remission (odds ratio [OR] 3.52, 95% CI 1.97-6.31; adjusted OR [aOR] 5.24, 95% CI 2.68-10.22).
  • Vancomycin was associated with increased odds of endoscopic remission (aOR 2.76, 95% CI 1.002-7.62; N = 101 with data), and with lower CRP (p = 0.03) and higher hemoglobin and albumin (both p < 0.01).
  • At baseline, prior to vancomycin, 34% (30/88) were in clinical remission; this increased to 60% (52/86) after 6 months of treatment. After ~ 1 year, 71% (55/78) of children treated with vancomycin were in remission, compared with 35% who had not receive the antibiotics.
  • Ursodeoxycholic acid use: 53% for vancomycin-treated and 82% of control group (P<0.001). Other cotherapies were similar including infliximab (36% vs. 27%) and vedolizumab (13% vs 7%)
  • Only 28 vancomycin-treated patients had baseline and f/u colonoscopy data available. 46% of this subgroup had endoscopic remission compared to 26% of matched untreated controls.

In the discussion, the authors acknowledge the limitations of a retrospective observational study. RCTs are quite difficult with rare disorders, especially in children. In addition, the exact mechanisms for vancomycin efficacy remain unclear -possibly microbial changes or its effects on bile acids. They note that many patients treated with vancomycin had mild clinical activity at baseline. Though, even this population may benefit with resolution of clinical inflammation which could reduce the risk of colorectal cancer.

My take: In patients with PSC-IBD, the use of vancomycin for IBD should be a consideration especially in those who have not responded adequately to other treatments.

Related blog posts:

IBD Updates: Treat-to-Target Uptake, Long-Term Data on Ustekinumab Intensification, and Low Rates of C diff with Tofacitinib (& Clinical Pearl)

Posted on by

JL Yang et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023; 29: 735-743. Utilization of Colonoscopy Following Treatment Initiation in U.S. Commercially Insured Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease, 2013-2019

In this study with 39,734 commercially-insured initiators of IBD medications (18-64 year old), 34% had a colonoscopy by 12 months and 42% at 15 months. The authors state that “it is evident that patients without any colonoscopy during this interval are not being followed under an optimal long-term T2T (treat-to-target) paradigm.”

RS Dalal et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023; 29: 830-833. Long-Term Outcomes After Ustekinumab Dose Intensification for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

This retrospective study examined 123 patients with Crohn’s disease and 40 with ulcerative colitis who had dose intensification with ustekinumab (to either every 4 weeks, n=91, or every 6 weeks, n=72). Dose escalation was effective in both achieving and maintaining corticosteroid-free clinical remission for 61% of patients with Crohn’s disease and 40% with ulcerative colitis at 24 months; endoscopic remission was noted in 43% with Crohn’s disease and 55% with ulcerative colitis.

EV Loftus et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023; 29: 744-751. Open Access! Clostridium difficile Infection in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis Treated with Tofacitinib in the Ulcerative Colitis Program 

Using data from multiple studies with 1157 patients, only 9 tofacitinib patients developed Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) which was lower than the placebo group. CDI were all mild–moderate in severity and resolved with treatment in 8 patients. Six of 9 patients continued tofacitinib treatment without interruption. The low rate of infection was likely in part due to screening for CDI prior to treatment. In addition, “it is possible than the lower rates of CDI …may be due to better-controlled disease…, thus reducing susceptibility to infection.”

One clinical pearl in the discussion: “When considering treatment [for CDI], initial therapy with oral vancomycin should be considered instead of metronidazole, and treating for at least 21 days should also be considered [in patients with IBD due to]…lower rates of CDI recurrence.”

Related blog posts:

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Lego Art at Tucson Botanical Gardens

Data on Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Ulcerative Colitis and Case Report of Vancomycin for Refractory Ulcerative Colitis

Posted on by

NEH Chehade et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023; 29: 808-817. Efficacy of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in the Treatment of Active Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trials

HS Almomen, B Al-Bawardy. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023; 29: 837-838. Oral Vancomycin Induced and Maintained Clinical and Endoscopic Remission in Ulcerative Colitis and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Post-liver Transplantation

In the first study by Chehade et al, the authors analyzed six RCTs involving 324 patients. Key findings:

  • Compared with placebo, FMT has significant benefit in inducing combined clinical and endoscopic remission (odds ratio, 4.11; 95% confidence interval, 2.19-7.72; P < .0001)
  • clinical remission with FMT was 46.2% compared 22.5% for placebo
  • clinical response with FMT was 51.6% compared to 30.1% for placebo
  • endoscopic remission with FMT was 18.9% compared to 6.1% for placebo
  • endoscopic response with FMT was 36.7% compared to 22.4% for placebo

Discussion Points:

  • “The studies included in our article indicate that there is a shift in the microbiota composition of responders in the FMT group to resemble the profile of healthy donors”
  • FMT delivery via upper GI tract was equally effective as delivery via lower GI tract in these studies in inducing combined remission
  • “The understanding of FMT effectiveness for IBD is in its infancy.”

In the case report by Alomomen et al, a 34 year old with refractory ulcerative colitis and PSC (post-transplant) had not responded to infliximab, vedolizumab, adalimumab, tofacitinib or 10 months of ustekinumab (every 4 weeks). In addition, he was receiving tacrolimus therapy due to his liver transplant. His colonoscopy demonstrated a continuous Mayo 3 colitis. Subsequently, vancomycin therapy was added to his treatment (500 mg BID); he continued ustekimumab. Six months afterwards, his fecal calprotectin had dropped to 277 from 1600 and his CRP and hemoglobin had normalized. Repeat colonoscopy demonstrated complete endoscopic healing.

My take: There are many patients who do not respond to current IBD therapies. These two studies show that both FMT and vancomycin could be useful in selected patients.

Related blog posts:

Lego Art at Tucson Botanical Gardens
Lego Lion
Lego Panther

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Secondary Prophylaxis of Clostridiodes difficile Infection

Posted on by

H Bao et al. Pediatrics 2021; 148: e2020031807. Oral Vancomycin as Secondary Prophylaxis for Clostridioides difficile Infection. Thanks to Ben Gold for sharing this reference.

Methods: A multicampus, retrospective cohort evaluation was conducted among patients aged ≤18 years with any history of clinical CDI and receiving systemic antibiotics in a subsequent encounter from 2013–2019. This study identified 30 and 44 patients received oral vancomycin prophylaxis (OVP) and no OVP, respectively. Eligible patients had to be >12 months of age and having at 3 unformed stools everyday.

OVP dosing: “vancomycin doses of 10 mg/kg (up to 125 mg per dose) every 12 hours during concomitant antibiotic use. OVP duration was intended to continue while on systemic antimicrobial agents and for 5 days after completion of antimicrobial agents (extended prophylaxis tail), but practice varied, and duration was ultimately left to the discretion of the provider.”

Key finding:

The incidence of CDI recurrence within 8 weeks of antibiotic exposure was significantly lower in patients who received OVP (3% vs 25%; P = .02) despite this group having notably more risk factors for recurrence.   After adjustment in a multivariable analysis, secondary OVP was associated with less risk of recurrence (odds ratio, 0.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.01–0.86; P = .04).

This study is in agreement with studies in adults (Brown CC, et al. Oral Vancomycin for Secondary Prophylaxis of Clostridium difficile Infection. Ann Pharmacother. 2019 Apr;53(4):396-401). In this review, the authors state: “Variable dosing regimens and lack of safety data are limitations.. clinicians can consider vancomycin 125 mg orally once or twice daily in high-risk patients receiving broad-spectrum antibacterial agents.”

My take: In patients at high risk of recurrent CDI, OVP should be considered as secondary prophylaxis when receiving systemic antibiotics.

Related blog posts:

Tortuous Path to Watersound Beach, FL

Moving Beyond “Red Man Syndrome”

Posted on by

A recent commentary explains why the term for a vancomycin infusion reaction, “Red Man Syndrome,” is problematic: S Alvarez-Arango et al. NEJM 2021; 384: 1283-1286. Vancomycin Infusion Reaction — Moving beyond “Red Man Syndrome

Key points:

  • “Red Man” syndrome “calls up historical narratives that endorse and reinforce discrimination against Native American and Indigenous peoples”
  • Vancomycin infusion reactions are more readily documented in white males than in females and black patients. The combination of rash, itching, flushing and hives may be less apparent in some groups and/or mistaken as a true allergy.
  • “We recommend using the term “infusion reaction” for all non-immune-mediated drug reactions”

My take: I agree with the authors that the term “red man syndrome” should be dropped. It is both an insensitive term and also hinders appropriate diagnosis of vancomycin infusion reactions.

Gibbs Gardens, April 3, 2021

Antibiotic Selection for Suspected Central Line Infections

Posted on by

A recent study (BP Raphael et al. JPGN 2019; 70: 59-63) describes 309 central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) in 90 children were dependent on parenteral nutrition (median age 3.8 years).

Key findings:

  • 60% of isolated organisms were gram-positive, 34% were gram-negative, and 6% fungi.
  • For gram-positive organisms, 51% were sensitive to methicillin
  • For gram-negative organisms, 71% were sensitive to piperacillin-tazobactam, 97% to cefepime, and 99% to meropenem

Based on these findings, the authors advocate the following:

  • “Vancomycin and cefepime provide improve coverage over vancomcyin piperacillin-tazobactam for” CLABSI
  • Empiric use of vancomycin and meropenem “may be justified” in septic shock “where maximal probability of cure outweighs risks of long-term drug resistance”
  • If there is an increased fungemia risk, such as prior fungal infections, shock, or immunodeficiency, the authors recommend adding fluconazole

Another advantage of cefepime over piperacillin-tazobactam is a reduced risk of acute kidney injury which has been associated with the latter.

My take: Individual institutions may have variable organism sensitivity.  In the absence of institutional data, this recommendations are a good starting point.

Related blog post: #NASPGHAN19 Intestinal Failure Session Part 1

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Old Montreal

Fecal Microbioata Transplantation for Recurrent Clostridium difficile — Position Paper

Posted on by

A recent position paper (ZH Davidovics et al. JPGN 2019; 68: 130-43) from NASPGHAN/ESPGHAN on Fecal Microbioata Transplantation (FMT) for Recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) provides a pretty good review. Though, I think a summary table of recommendations would have made this publication much more helpful.

Here is a full-text link: Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection and Other Conditions in Children: A Joint Position Paper

A couple key points/excerpts:

In general, we concur with current adult guidelines  when considering FMT for the treatment of rCDI in children and propose FMT be considered in children with one of the following:
1. rCDI (recurrence of symptoms within 8 weeks of treatment for CDI) (either a or b)
a. At least 3 episodes of mild to moderate CDI and failure of a 6- to 8-week taper with vancomycin with or without an alternative antibiotic (eg, rifaximin, nitazoxanide).
b. At least 2 episodes of severe CDI resulting in hospitalization and associated with significant morbidity.

2. Moderate CDI not responding to standard therapy (including vancomycin) for at least 1 week. We recommend caution, however, in such cases, with repeated testing for etiologies other than CDI such as IBD.

3. Severe CDI or fulminant C difficile colitis with no response to standard therapy after 48 hours.

My take:  I think the IDSA 2017 guidelines are more useful: Clostridium difficile Guidelines (2017 IDSA/SHEA)

More related blog posts:

Clostridium difficile Infection in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Expert Updates

Posted on by

A recent clinical practice update (S Khanna et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017; 15: 166-74) provides some succinct recommendations regarding Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD).

Background: In 2011, the authors note that CDI was associated with 29,000 deaths and is now the most lethal enteric pathogen in the U.S.

Differences in pathogenesis of C diff in IBD compared to those without IBD:

  • Younger age
  • Less frequent antibiotic exposure
  • More often community onset (rather than hospital onset)
  • Higher recurrence (may be related to dysbiosis)

Key recommendations:

  • In patients with IBD flare, test for CDI
  • In patients with CDI and IBD, clinicians should consider “using vancomycin instead of metronidazole.”
  • In patients with recurrent CDI and IBD, consider fecal microbiota transplantation

Figure 4 proposes a management algorithm (for adults).  If uncomplicated CDI, recommended dose of vancomycin was 125 mg q6h. If no improvement in 3-4 days, then “consider escalation of immunosuppression.” For complicated CDI, consider oral vancomycin at 500 mg q6h and IV metronidazole 500 mg q8.  In addition, consider rectal vancomycin and surgery consult.

Complicated CDI includes ICU admission, hypotension, T >38.5, ileus/megacolon, mental status changes, leukocyte count >35,000  or < 2000, or lactate >2.2 mmol/L

Another review article (Y Chen et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2017; 23: 200-07) is a meta-analysis that identified six studies.  One of these studies was a case-control study with nearly 400,000 patients (and about 7000 cases of C diff). Key finding: CDI results in nearly a doubling of the risk of colectomy (OR 1.90), mainly in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Related blog posts

Disclaimer: These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.