Home | About Jay Hochman -Pediatric Gastroenterology Blog | Archives
December 28, 2017 7:04 am
A recent study (MH Vriesman et al. J Pediatr 2017; 190: 69-73) with 1835 children examined the issue of stool consistency, comparing the Bristol Stool Scale (BSS) and the Questionnaire on Pediatric Gastrontestinal Symptoms-Rome III (QPGS-RIII). Most of the patients in this study were older children, with 803 (43.7%) age 8-12 years and 1032 (56.3%) ≥13 years.
Key findings:
These results indicate significant variability in how often pediatric patients considered their stools hard based on the instrument (BSS vs QPGS-RIII). The reason why there is fairly close agreement on functional constipation is due to the fact that Rome III criteria combine the presence of hard stools and painful defecation into a single criteria and the fact that there are multiple criteria needed. “Not all children with hard stools have painful defecation and vice versa, with only 21% of children with painful defecation reporting hard stools.”
My take: This study suggests that painful defecation is more important to ascertain than if the stools are hard. In addition, this may explain why softening the stools as a stand alone strategy is not effective in many children.
Related study: S Muddasani et al. J Pediatr 2017; 190: 74-8. This retrospective study showed that pelvic floor physical therapy was effective in the majority of children (n=64,mean age 8.7 yrs) with fecal incontinence due to pelvic floor dyssynergia. It is notable that there were only two physical therapists involved; thus, in order to replicate these results, one would need quite capable PTs.
Related blog posts:
Posted by gutsandgrowth
Categories: Pediatric Gastroenterology Intestinal Disorder
Tags: Bristol Stool Scale, constipation, hard stools
Mobile Site | Full Site
Get a free blog at WordPress.com Theme: WordPress Mobile Edition by Alex King.