Pediatric Gastroenterology Hospitalists –Job Wanted?

A recent article (M Latorre et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19: 871-875) describes “A Practical Guide to Establishing a Gastroenterology Hospitalist Program (in adult GI)”

Our group had flirted with the idea of a GI Hospitalist (GIH) many years ago when one of the partners expressed some interest. To establish this type of job takes a lot of planning.

Some of the key points:

  • “Proactively incorporating scheduling measures to provide the GIH with coverage and backup is important; otherwise the job can become easily overwhelming.” Outpatient faculty have to provide coverage to assure the individual is protected and covered for emergencies, weekends, and holidays. “Creating dedicated shifts with daily start and stop times allow for more control over the GIH’s hours.”
  • The authors note that when they began their GIH, the outpatient faculty rotated and assisted with afternoon consults/procedures to protect GIH from long days and burnout.
  • In adult medicine, a GIH can help improve GI practice profitability by allowing outpatient doctors to increase office revenue and endoscopic procedures. In pediatrics, it is possible that a GIH would generate more billings than outpatient counterparts due to increased procedural demands for inpatients.
  • GIH can improve patient care (timely endoscopy, focus on inpatient problems), improve continuity, and reduce costs similar to other hospitalists.

My take: If there is adequate help, especially to prevent long days and increased night call, this model could work in pediatric GI as well.

Related blog posts:

This story below was NOT from ‘The Onion.’ NPR 6/10/21:

The Indispensable Physician

A recent pair of commentaries (RM Wachter, L Goldman. NEJM 2016; 375: 1009-1011, R Gunderman. NEJM 2016; 375; 1011-13) provides some insight into what has been gained and what has been lost with the proliferation of hospitalist care in the past 20 years.

The growth of hospitalist care has developed due to numerous factors:

  • evidence of cost savings/better outcomes
  • need for rapid evaluation of acutely ill patients/repeated evaluations which would be disruptive to efficient outpatient physician practices

Decline of comprehensive care:

  • at times of extreme vulnerability when admitted to the hospital, patients have a physician assigned to them who they have probably never met.  This has led to a diminishment of the patient-physician relationship.
  • increasing number of physicians creates opportunities for miscommunication, particularly on admission and discharge, but also at every step of hospital care during “handoffs”

The second commentary, in particular, challenges the way medicine is evolving.  This article stresses the central role of the physician as opposed to the hospital filling that role.

“The reality is that medicine can be practiced without hospitals, but hospitals cannot function without physicians.”

The goal of developing personal relationships with our patients is often at odds with work-life balance.  Thus, having hospitalists and other ways of having cross-coverage, when we are unavailable, often conflict with being able to provide the best care.

My take (from 2nd commentary): “The true core of good medicine is not an institution but a relationship — a relationship between two human beings.”

Related blog posts:

Glacier Nat'l Park

Glacier Nat’l Park