It has been said that it is easier to feed a child with a gastrostomy tube (GT) than by mouth. Now a study reports improved maternal stress after GT placement (JPGN 2012; 55: 562-66), perhaps because it is easier to provide nutrition.
34 mothers from Norway took part in questionnaires (before, 6 months after, and 18 months after) as part of a study (2003-2005) to see how gastrostomy placement in a child affects maternal stress levels. Median maternal age was 32 years. The study was limited by a suboptimal response rate of 59% (34 of 59) and only 19 mothers answered questionnaires at all 3 timepoints.
While all of the children had some peristomal complications, 85% of the mothers reported that their preoperative expectations were met and that their child had improved quality of life. Mothers had reduced psychological distress at 6 and 18 months following placement, including less anxiety.
Related blog entries:
Pingback: Chronic Care Mode: GJ tube Data | gutsandgrowth
Pingback: PEG Decisions | gutsandgrowth
Pingback: Long-term Outcomes with Pediatric PEG Placement | gutsandgrowth
Pingback: Why I’m Not a Fan of the “1-Step” PEG | gutsandgrowth
Pingback: Helpful Position Paper: Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Children | gutsandgrowth
Pingback: Which kids who aspirate need a gastrostomy tube? | gutsandgrowth
Pingback: Nutrition Week (Day 3) Multidisciplinary Feeding Disorders | gutsandgrowth
Pingback: Nutrition Week (Day 5) What a Gastrostomy Tube Means for Cognition | gutsandgrowth
Pingback: Does Gastrostomy Tube Placement Lower Rates of Hospitalization? | gutsandgrowth