Yes. But maybe for the reasons one might expect.
In this retrospective study from Australia (P Jacoby et al J Pediatr 2020; 217: 131-8.), the authors analyzed two cohorts with total of 673 children with disabilities who had undergone gastrostomy tube (GT) placement.
- All-cause hospitalizations declined at 5 years after procedure with combined (both cohorts) incidence rate ratio of 0.63
- Admissions for lower respiratory tract infections did not change appreciably
- Admissions for epilepsy were generally decreased (see Table V) –this drop is mainly what accounts for the lower hospitalization rates.
- Fundoplication (which occurred in ~30% with GT insertion) “seemed to decrease the relative incidence of acute LRTI admissions in the combined cohort”
- The specific numbers for hospitalizations are listed in Table V.
In their discussion, the authors noted that in the year prior to GT placement, there had been an elevated number of hospitalizations. With regard to fundoplication, the authors note uncertain benefit for respiratory complications. In previous studies of neonates and children with neurologic impairment and GT placement, there was similar gastrointestinal and respiratory related admissions with or without fundoplication.
My take: GT placement facilitates care for children with disabilities including provision of medication and nutrition. This study confirms subsequent improvement in hospitalization rates but does not show a clear benefit with regard to respiratory infections.
Related blog posts:
- Less stress after gastrostomy tube placement
- Which kids who aspirate need a gastrostomy tube?
- Long-term Outcomes with Pediatric PEG Placement
- GT Placement in Extremely Low Birthweight Premature Infants
- Gastrojejunostomy Complications Frequent
- Does Reflux Lead to Increased Aspiration Pneumonia?
- Chronic Care Mode: GJ tube Data
- Fundoplication effects on esophageal m
- Surgery for Reflux Works Best in Those Who Need it the Least | gutsandgrowth
- Fundoplication in children with neurologic impairment