NEJM: Analysis of the Graham-Cassidy Plan

NEJM: The Graham-Cassidy Plan -The Most Harmful ACA-Repeal Bill Yet

An excerpt:

The Graham–Cassidy bill would begin by repealing the individual and employer mandates retroactive to 2016. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) previously estimated that repeal of the individual and employer mandates would immediately increase the number of uninsured Americans by 15 million or more and increase individual market insurance premiums by 20%…

The Graham–Cassidy formula would shift money from states that expanded Medicaid coverage under the ACA or increased take-up among previously eligible groups to those that did not. It would also shift money from high-cost to low-cost areas…

the bill would permit states to waive the ACA requirements that insurance sold in the individual market cover essential health benefits and that insurers not vary premiums on the basis of health status, thereby restoring the ability of insurers to engage in “medical underwriting” and effectively deny coverage or limit services on the basis of preexisting health condition..

All told, we estimate that under Graham–Cassidy, an additional 21 million people would be without insurance coverage in 2020 and later years, and this figure may be conservative..

It replaces effective coverage programs with a block grant that is inadequate in the aggregate and blind to variations in local costs, shifting considerable risk onto states. It would slash the program that provides health insurance coverage for the poor.