If you think that teaching more self-management to adolescents will lead to better outcomes, you might be wrong. A recent study (RA Annunziato et al. J Pediatr 2018; 193: 128-33) shows that adolescents who reported greater self-management, following liver transplantation, had worse outcomes.
In this study of 9-17 year olds and their parents (213 dyads), the key finding was based on a score derived from the REFILS survey. REFILS is an acronym for “Responsibility and Familiarity with Illness Survey.” This survey was curtailed from 22 items to the following 13 items:
- Understands key aspects of liver disease
- Discusses management plan with team
- Self-manages liver regimen
- Knows names/dose of medications
- Keeps track of medications
- Correctly takes medications
- Calls pharmacy for refills
- Knows different types of providers
- Knows date of next appointment
- Makes appointments
- Know insurance details
- Understands insurance plan
- Keeps healthcare records
Key finding:
- “Negative outcomes were more likely to occur if patients reported that they are ‘in charge.’ A higher [REFILS] score, which denotes a higher level of (self-reported) management, was significantly and consistently correlated with worse adherence and organ rejection.”
The implication is that the transition of responsibilities from the parent/caregiver to the adolescent “may in fact not always be indicated or advisable…education about self-care might actually be harming patients…It is probably prudent to discourage rather than encourage adolescents from assuming self-care in some cases.”
My take: While adolescents and young adults are capable in many aspects, there are hardly any that I would trust to care for our dog (see below) for any protracted period. Thus, in my view, without close parental supervision, entrusting the life of a liver transplant recipient to an adolescent is risky.
Related blog posts:
Pingback: Suboptimal Transitions: Pediatric to Adult Care | gutsandgrowth