Teddy Rosenbluth NYT 7/10/24: In Constant Battle With Insurers, Doctors Reach for a Cudgel: A.I.
An excerpt:
For a growing number of doctors, A.I. chatbots — which can draft letters to insurers in seconds — are opening up a new front in the battle to approve costly claims, accomplishing in minutes what years of advocacy and attempts at health care reform have not….
Doctors are turning to the technology even as some of the country’s largest insurance companies face class-action lawsuits alleging that they used their own technology to swiftly deny large batches of claims and cut off seriously ill patients from rehabilitation treatment.
Some experts fear that the prior-authorization process will soon devolve into an A.I. “arms race,” in which bots battle bots over insurance coverage. Among doctors, there are few things as universally hated…
Doctors and their staff spend an average of 12 hours a week submitting prior-authorization requests, a process widely considered burdensome and detrimental to patient health among physicians surveyed by the American Medical Association.
With the help of ChatGPT, Dr. Tward now types in a couple of sentences, describing the purpose of the letter and the types of scientific studies he wants referenced, and a draft is produced in seconds.
Then, he can tell the chatbot to make it four times longer. “If you’re going to put all kinds of barriers up for my patients, then when I fire back, I’m going to make it very time consuming,” he said…
Epic, one of the largest electronic health record companies in the country, has rolled out a prior-authorization tool that uses A.I. to a small group of physicians, said Derek De Young, a developer working on the product.
Several major health systems are piloting Doximity GPT, created to help with a number of administrative tasks including prior authorizations, a company spokeswoman said…
As doctors use A.I. to get faster at writing prior-authorization letters, Dr. Wachter said he had “tremendous confidence” that the insurance companies would use A.I. to get better at denying them.
Related blog posts:
- “Denials, Dilly-dallying and Despair”
- NY Times: ‘What’s My Life Worth?’ The Big Business of Denying Medical Care
- How Insurance Companies Save Millions in Denying Care
- High Rates of Denying Medical Care for Medicaid Patients Managed by Health Insurers
- The Consequences of Prior Authorizations
- FDA IBD Workshop -Take-Home Points Off-label does not equate to experimental FDA Statement: The FD&C Act does not, however, limit the manner in which a physician may use an approved drug. Once a product has been approved for marketing, a physician may prescribe it for uses or in treatment regimens or patient populations that are not included in approved labeling. Such “unapproved” or, more precisely, “unlabeled” uses may be appropriate and rational in certain circumstances, and may, in fact, reflect approaches to drug therapy that have been extensively reported in medical literature
- “We Need More Information to Process This Claim” | gutsandgrowth
- More on High Drug Costs (Humor)
- For the Next Insurance Appeal: Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Adalimumab Treatment (Pediatrics) & Satire on Prior Authorizations
- ChatGPT for Colonoscopy Questions Plus One
- ChatGPT Passes the Bar, an MBA exam, and Earns Medical License?
- Chatbots Helping Doctors with Empathy
- Answering Patient Questions: AI Does Better Than Doctors

