Washington Post: Children Under Fire
Almost two dozen kids are shot every day in the U.S. This 4-year-old was one of them.
Washington Post: Children Under Fire
Almost two dozen kids are shot every day in the U.S. This 4-year-old was one of them.
When it comes to gun violence, the U.S. is the leader among developed nations. It is sad how that despite the magnitude of this problem there are not significant efforts to mitigate this tragedy.
We know from Australia’s experience that changes in gun laws can make a big difference: Link: Gun Law Reforms and Firearm Mortality, Australia 1979-2013
Politico report: The gun lobby: See how much your representative gets
Related blog posts:
Full link: End the Gun Epidemic in America. This editorial published on A1 in the Dec. 5 edition of The New York Times. It is the first time an editorial has appeared on the front page since 1920.
An excerpt:
It is a moral outrage and a national disgrace that civilians can legally purchase weapons designed specifically to kill people with brutal speed and efficiency. These are weapons of war, barely modified and deliberately marketed as tools of macho vigilantism and even insurrection. America’s elected leaders offer prayers for gun victims and then, callously and without fear of consequence, reject the most basic restrictions on weapons of mass killing, as they did on Thursday. They distract us with arguments about the word terrorism. Let’s be clear: These spree killings are all, in their own ways, acts of terrorism.
Related blog posts:
Recent commentaries offer several physician viewpoints on this problem (NEJM 2013; 368: 397-99, 399-400, 401-403). For me, the following points were of most interest:
In a previous blog about the problem of obesity, I referenced the “issue-attention cycle” problem. ”This pattern occurs when initial public alarm over the discovery of a problem and optimism about its quick resolution are replaced by the realization that solving the problem will require some public sacrifice and will displace powerful societal interests.”
Despite the high toll exacted by gun violence, will there be enough staying power to work on these incremental steps?