Rashelle Berry: From Tube to Taste

We had a terrific lecture given to our group by Rashelle Berry. She is a pediatric dietitian specializing in feeding disorders, enteral nutrition, and tube weaning. She practices within the Feeding Program at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, partnering closely with a wide variety of disciplines to care for children with significant feeding challenges and GI-related nutrition concerns. My notes below may contain errors in transcription and in omission.

Key Points:

  • Families expectations are often at odds with dealing with tube feeding which makes it more difficult
  • Parents have strong desire to achieve all oral feedings and often look for advice outside of clinical visits
  • Hunger alone is not sufficient to transition off tube feedings
  • Prior to attempts to stop tube feedings, it is important to assess safety and to align feeding patterns to be more physiologic. This includes offering feeds via bolus typically every 3 hours and stopping continuous feedings
  • Hyperosmolar feedings can contribute to GI symptoms
  • Changing formula to improve tolerance can result in quick symptom improvement (1-2 days)
  • Many children with tube feedings are overfed. This can contribute to poor hunger as well as initial weight loss when transitioning off tube feeds
  • Two main options to advance oral feedings: 1. Offer oral feeds prior to tube feeds and reduce tube feedings based on oral intake 2. Plan to reduce tube feedings by a set amount, typically 10-30% and follow to see if oral intake improves
  • Expect some weight loss during transition; if mild weight loss, most often continue to follow closely
In Step 2, these are some of the aspects indicating tolerance

Related blog posts:

Data on Bridles -They Work!

JA Lavoie et al. JPEN 2022; https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.2409. Nasogastric Bridles are Associated with Improved Tube-Related Outcomes in Children

Retrospective study: 582 children had NGTs secured traditionally and 173 received nasal bridles 

Key findings:

Children with bridled NGTs were compared to their non-bridled NGT counterparts (all results below with p values <0.02):

  • 16.67 times less likely to experience ≥1 dislodgement (OR=0.06)
  • 2.5 times less likely to have one more ED visit (OR=0.4)
  • 4.76 times less likely to require one more radiographic exposure (OR=0.21)

My take: After learning about bridles at N2U in 2015 (thanks Praveen Goday), they quickly became popular in our institution. They improve NG/NJ outcomes.

Related blog posts:

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition