Ten Americas: Examining Health Disparities and Life Expectancy

L Dwyer-Lindgren et al. The Lancet; 2024. Online first. Open Access! Ten Americas: a systematic analysis of life expectancy disparities in the USA

Background: Nearly two decades ago, the Eight Americas study offered a novel lens for examining health inequities in the USA by partitioning the US population into eight groups based on geography, race, urbanicity, income per capita, and homicide rate. That study found gaps of 12·8 years for females and 15·4 years for males in life expectancy in 2001 across these eight groups. In this study, we aimed to update and expand the original Eight Americas study, examining trends in life expectancy from 2000 to 2021 for ten Americas (analogues to the original eight, plus two additional groups comprising the US Latino population), by year, sex, and age group.

Methods: The authors tabulated deaths from the National Vital Statistics System and population estimates from the US Census Bureau and the National Center for Health Statistics from Jan 1, 2000, to Dec 31, 2021.

Key findings: .

  •  At the beginning of the 21st century, there was already a 12.6-year gap in life expectancy among Americas, but this gap grew even larger during the 2000s and 2010s and accelerated to 20.4 years after the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • One’s life expectancy varies dramatically depending on where one lives, the economic conditions in that location, and one’s racial and ethnic identity.
  • There are limitations with the data that were used. For example, there is known to be substantial misreporting of race and ethnicity on death certificates

My take (borrowed from the authors): “The extent and magnitude of health disparities in the USA are truly alarming. In a country with the wealth and resources of the USA, it is intolerable that so many are living in conditions and with health outcomes akin to those of an entirely different country.”

Related blog posts:

Unrelated link: N Kristof NY Times, Gift Ideas That Push Back the Darkness

Gift ideas included the following charities

  • Fistula Foundation which arranges obstetric fistula repair. This restores a woman’s life after this life-altering complication –a corrective surgery that costs just $619 per person
  • Muso Health helps reduce childhood mortality. In Mali, this organization reduced childhood mortality by 95%. The cost of bringing one more person into the Muso health care network is only $22 per year.
  • Reach Out and Read. This U.S-based charity allows doctors to “prescribe” reading to the child. This promotes reading as well as childhood well-child visits.
  • Crisis Text Line is for those who want to volunteer, rather than donate. This organization trains (15-20 hrs) volunteers to help individuals needing mental health support. “More than 90 percent of the volunteers report that their own mental health improves as a result of their participation.”

Unfortunate or Unfair Disparities in Liver Transplantation

In medical school, I took additional courses in bioethics and one of the influential lecturers was Tristramm Engelhardt (Right to Health Care).  “According to him, injuries, disabilities, and diseases arising from natural causes are considered unfortunate. On the other hand, those situations become unfair when brought about by the doing of others. Engelhardt also notes that the result of someone’s unfair action should not be attributed to the society as a whole.”

Two recent articles detail the link between socioeconomics and outcomes in liver transplantation. Are these problems unfair or just unfortunate?

NH Ebel et al. Liver Transplantation 2022; 28: 1521-1529. A review of racial, socioeconomic, and geographic disparities in pediatric liver transplantation

Key points:

  • Disparities remain in pediatric liver transplantation at all time points: from access to referral for transplantation, likelihood of living donor transplantation, use of exception narratives, waitlist mortality, and inequitable posttransplant outcomes
  • Black children are less likely to be petitioned for exception scores, have higher waitlist mortality, are less likely to be the recipient of a living donor transplant, and have worse posttransplant outcomes compared with White children.
  • Children living in the most socioeconomically deprived neighborhoods have worse posttransplant outcomes.
  • Children living farther from a transplant center have higher waitlist mortality

KA Mohamed et al. Liver Transplantation 2022; 28: 1441-1453. Open access! Neighborhood poverty is associated with failure to be waitlisted and death during liver transplantation evaluation

Key points:

  • Based on retrospective analysis of 3454 patients (2011-2018), neighborhood poverty was independently associated with waitlisting (odds ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38–0.82) and death during LT evaluation (hazard ratio 1.49, 95% CI 1.09–2.09)
  • Despite use of the objective prioritization with MELD scores in the allocation of organs, disparities in access for LT continues for vulnerable populations

My take: It is unfortunate but not surprising that poverty and socioeconomic factors adversely affect liver transplantation; the outcomes show stark differences. These issues, however, affect every aspect of health care (& beyond). Though they are not easily addressed, efforts to try to level the playing field are important especially with regard to transplantation to assure optimal use of this life-saving resource.

Related blog posts:

Portage Pass Trail (near Whittier AK) with views of Portage glacier