Celiac Update September 2015

A useful review (CP Kelly et al. Gastroenterol 2015; 148: 1175-86) summarizes the ‘state of the art” information regarding celiac disease presentation and management. The review notes that some expert organization consensus state that intestinal biopsy is mandatory whereas some do not under certain conditions.

According to ESPGHAN, if anti-TTG >10-fold elevated, anti-EMA positive in separate sample, and +HLA typing, then a biopsy may not be required.  For the WGO (World Gastroenterologic Organization), the exception focuses on available local resources.

The article recommends the following for monitoring:

  • Clinical evaluation -annually or if recurrent symptoms
  • Serology & Nutritional evaluation -every 3-6 months until normal, then every 1-2 years.  Common nutrient deficiencies: iron, vitamin D, vitamin B12, folate, and zinc
  • Bone density -once within first 2 years.  (Some recommend checking after 1 year on gluten free diet)
  • Liver transaminase levels & Thyroid function tests -at diagnosis, then every 1-2 years.  Autoimmune thyroid disorders are “found in approximately 15-20% of adults with celiac disease”

A second retrospective indicates that ESPGHAN criteria for avoiding biopsy in children and adolescents with high titers for anti-TTG (>10-fold) along with positive EMA, and HLA-DQ2/DQ8.are reasonable.  Here’s the abstract:

Are ESPGHAN “Biopsy-Sparing” Guidelines for Celiac Disease also Suitable for Asymptomatic Patients?

CM Trovato, et al.The American Journal of Gastroenterology , (15 September 2015) | doi:10.1038/ajg.2015.285

OBJECTIVES:

In 2012, European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition published novel guidelines on celiac disease (CD) diagnosis. Symptomatic children with serum anti-transglutaminase (anti-tTG) antibody levels ≥10 times upper limit of normal (ULN) could avoid duodenal biopsies after positive HLA test and serum anti-endomysial antibodies (EMAs). So far, both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with anti-tTG titer <10 times ULN should undergo upper endoscopy with duodenal biopsies to confirm diagnosis. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of serological tests to diagnose CD in asymptomatic patients.

METHODS:

We retrospectively reviewed data of 286 patients (age range: 10 months to 17 years) with CD diagnosis based on elevated titer of anti-tTG, EMA positivity, and histology. All patients were distinguished between symptomatic and asymptomatic; histological lesions were graded according to the Marsh–Oberhuber (MO) criteria. Fisher exact test was applied to analyze both groups in terms of diagnostic reliability of serological markers.

RESULTS:

A total of 196 patients (68.53%) had anti-tTG titers ≥10 times ULN. Among them, a group of 156 patients (79.59%) also had symptoms suggestive of CD (“high-titer” symptomatic); of these, 142 patients (91.02%) showed severe lesion degree (3a, 3b, 3c MO). Conversely, 40 out of 196 patients (20.40%) were asymptomatic (“high-titer” asymptomatic) and 37 patients (92.5%) of them showed severe lesion degree (3a, 3b, 3c MO). No difference in histological damage was found between “high-titer” symptomatic and “high-titer” asymptomatic children (Fisher exact test, P=1.000).

CONCLUSIONS:

If confirmed in large multicenter prospective studies, the “biopsy-sparing” protocol seems to be applicable to both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with anti-tTG titer ≥10 times ULN, positive EMA, and HLA-DQ2/DQ8.

Related blog posts:

 

 

Think twice about checking thyroid

Hypothyroidism is not a frequent cause of constipation in children (JPGN 2012; 54: 285-87).  According to this study, the yield on checking for hypothyroidism in pediatric patients with constipation is no greater than in the general population.

This retrospective study examined the records of 873 patients who underwent thyroid testing ordered by pediatric gastroenterology; 443 (51%) had isolated constipation.  In all, 56 had abnormal thyroid function testing though 40 were normal on repeat testing. Of these 16 remaining cases, 7 were known to have hypothyroidism.  Of the nine remaining “new” cases, 3 had slow growth (2 without constipation), 3 had trisomy 21, and 2 were taking medications which affect thyroid function.  This leaves only 1 patient who presented with constipation without a clear risk factor or other indication for testing.

The authors state that 1/443 (0.2%) is quite similar to background incidence of hypothyroidism (0.3%).  The costs of identifying this case would exceed $18,000 but could be considered much higher (~$200,000) when all of the costs of false-positives are considered (eg. endocrinology consultations, followup testing).  In patients with slow growth (with or without constipation), about 2.5% had hypothyroidism.

In short, think twice about checking thyroid status in patients with isolated constipation.

Additional references:

  • -JPGN 2011; 53: S2. 49, 55. ‘Rarely do children with constipation need w/u’–only if alarming features: Delayed meconium, bilious vomiting, bloody stools, fever, bladder disorders, poor growth, NO RESPONSE to conventional treatment, abnormal exam. 25% of functional constipation problems may persist into adulthood.
  • -JPGN 2010; 51: 155. Lack of utility of AXR -suggested only in uncooperative pts, concerns about abuse/concerns about psychologic impact of exam
  • -J Pediatr 2010; 156: 461-5. MRI in children with chronic constipation or not-retentive soiling (n=130, n=28) -MRI showed lumbar sacral abnormalities in 3% –none required neurosurgery (1 w spina bifida occulta, 3 w terminal filum lipomas). Prospective study.
  • JPGN 2006; 43: e1Ye13.  http://www.naspghan.org/user-assets/Documents/pdf/PositionPapers/constipation.guideline.2006.pdf  Guidelines suggest checking thyroid, calcium, celiac and lead if not responding to therapy.