Calprotectin in Triaging Potential Pediatric IBD Cases

Thanks to KT Park’s Twitter feed for this reference: GA Holtman et al. JAMA Pediatr. Published online August 14, 2017. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1736

An excerpt from abstract:

Results  Of the 16 eligible studies, authors of 8 studies (n = 1120 patients) provided their data sets. All blood markers and fecal calprotectin individually significantly improved the discrimination between pediatric patients with and those without IBD, when added to evaluation of symptoms. The best marker—fecal calprotectin—improved the area under the curve of symptoms by 0.26 (95% CI, 0.21-0.31). The second best marker—erythrocyte sedimentation rate—improved the area under the curve of symptoms by 0.16 (95% CI, 0.11-0.21). When fecal calprotectin was added to the model, the proportion of patients without IBD correctly classified as low risk of IBD increased from 33% to 91%. The proportion of patients with IBD incorrectly classified as low risk of IBD decreased from 16% to 9%. The proportion of the total number of patients assigned to the intermediate-risk category decreased from 55% to 6%.

Conclusions and Relevance  In a hospital setting, fecal calprotectin added the most diagnostic value to symptoms compared with blood markers. Adding fecal calprotectin to the diagnostic workup of pediatric patients with symptoms suggestive of IBD considerably decreased the number of patients in the group in whom challenges in clinical decision making are most prevalent.

From: Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017 Aug 16. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000001202. [Epub ahead of print]

10 thoughts on “Calprotectin in Triaging Potential Pediatric IBD Cases

  1. So is it time for PCPs to routinely include fecal calprotectin in our typical workup of prolonged abdominal pain?

    • Maybe. Calprotectin is not covered by all insurance companies and could cost $200-250. So, families would need to be informed of this. If concerned about Crohn’s disease/IBD, a normal test is helpful and abnormal test (esp if >160 mcg/g) likely indicates need for GI evaluation. A single normal test does not completely exclude IBD but does make it much less likely.

  2. Pingback: Keep the Stool Cool for More Reliable Calprotectin | gutsandgrowth

  3. Pingback: How Often is Arthritis a Presenting Feature of Pediatric IBD & How to Make the Right Diagnosis | gutsandgrowth

  4. Pingback: An Insurance Company Doing the Right Thing (with Calprotectin) | gutsandgrowth

  5. Pingback: What is the Calprotectin Threshold for Disease Progression in Crohn’s Disease? | gutsandgrowth

  6. Pingback: Narrowing the Workup for Chronic Abdominal Pain –Carlo DiLorenzo Was Right! | gutsandgrowth

  7. Pingback: New and Improved Biomarker Blood Test for Crohn’s Disease? | gutsandgrowth

  8. Pingback: IBD Update (November 2020) | gutsandgrowth

  9. Pingback: Calprotectin Less Accurate for Isolated Ileal Crohn’s Disease | gutsandgrowth

Comments are closed.