Category Archives: hepatitis C

Looking ‘Sily’ taking this herb?

Posted on by

Taking milk thistle (silymarin) does not seem to improve disease status or symptoms with chronic hepatitis C (JAMA 2012; 308: 274-82).

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study examined 154 patients with chronic hepatitis C (HCV).  Mean age was 54 years (71% male).  The study required participants to have an ALT ≥ 65 U/L and all patients had been previously unsuccessfully treated with interferon-based therapy.

Silymarin (Silybum marianum) is an extract of milk thistle.  In the HALT-C trial, 33% of patients with chronic HCV and cirrhosis reported current or past use of silymarin.  It has been shown to have anti-inflammatory and immunomodulator properties via inhibition of NG-κB; in addition, it may have direct effects on HCV replication.

Of the 154 patients, 52 received placebo, 50 received 420-mg silymarin dose, and 52 received 700-mg dose. The trial name was ‘Silymarin in NASH and C Hepatitis’ or SyNCH.  All patients were instructed to take medication three times a day. Only 2 patients in each group (~4%) met the primary outcome of an ALT ≤ 45 U/L.  In addition, HCV RNA levels remained unchanged and were similar between placebo-treated patients and silymarin-treated patients.

In addition, there were no significant changes in physical or mental health components of quality-of-life scores: CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression), CLDQ (Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire), and SF-36 (Short-Form 36).

Adverse effects were similar, though silymarin-treated patients had increased GI adverse effects,12% vs 5% among placebo-treated patients.   Though, the study was not powered to detect significant differences with respect to adverse effects.

The major limitation of the study was the patient selection; that is, patients not responsive to interferon may not be representative of all patients with chronic HCV.  While newer HCV therapies have become much more effective, due to their expense, effective less-costly therapies would be helpful.

Unfortunately, milk thistle/silymarin is not likely therapeutic for HCV and thus not cost-effective either.

Related blog entries:

Sirolimus and transplant mortality

Posted on by

A surprise to me was a recent study which identified sirolimus as a risk factor for increased mortality and graft loss in HCV-positive liver transplant patients (Liver Transpl 2012; 18: 1029-36, commentary 1003-1004).

Sirolimus mechanism of action: inhibits mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) which is a phosphoinositide 3-kinase which affects cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and immune function.  For transplant patients, sirolimus blocks interleukin-2-induced stimulation of T lymphocytes.

Black box warnings for sirolimus: FDA warns that sirolimus can increase risk of hepatic artery thrombosis, graft loss, and death with de novo sirolimus-based treatment.

What’s different about HCV transplants? HCV reinfection occurs immediately during liver transplantation and “unlike all other indications, graft survival and patient survival have not improved” (between 1991-2001).  HCV transplant survival continues to be 10-15% lower than non-HCV transplant survival.  Immunosuppression allows more rapid progression of HCV; this allows ~20% of recipients to develop cirrhosis within 5 years of transplantation.

The authors of the study analyzed 26,414 patients (12,589 with hepatitis C virus) from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database; all recipients were >18 years.  Among this database, 1685 liver transplant recipients received sirolimus; in the majority, it was administered along with a calcineurin inhibitor.  A multivariate analysis of patient mortality showed the following were risk factors for increased mortality:

  • recipient age
  • donor age
  • hepatocellular carcinoma
  • diabetes
  • creatinine

Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression was associated with superior survival. Whereas, the use of sirolimus was associated with increased mortality in patients with HCV, even when adjusting for confounding variables (eg. renal function, and cancer).  In patients who received sirolimus at baseline, the adjusted HR for mortality at 3 years was 1.29 (p=0.0053).  In non-HCV patients, the adjusted HR for the sirolimus group was 1.09  (p=0.40).  Also, duration of exposure to sirolimus was directly correlated with worse outcomes.  Why?

This is not clear.  It is recognized that the study has several limitations.  Due to the nature of the SRTR database, there is not adequate information on how sirolimus may have affected viral load, histologic progression or causes of death.  Despite attempts to control for risk factors, it is possible that the sirolimus group did have higher disease severity.  Nevertheless, sirolimus effects on multiple cellular functions may have deleterious consequences in certain subsets of patients.

Case finding for hepatitis C

Posted on by

A previous post noted the failure of risk-based screening for hepatitis C virus (HCV) (Unknown unknowns for Hepatitis C).  Because risk-based screening has not been effective, the CDC has proposed a different strategy, one time testing of all baby boomers:

http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/HepTestingRecsPressRelease2012.html

“On the eve of the first ever National Hepatitis Testing Day (May 19), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is issuing draft guidelines proposing that all U.S. baby boomers get a one-time test for the hepatitis C virus. One in 30 baby boomers – the generation born from 1945 through 1965 – has been infected with hepatitis C, and most don’t know it.”

Pediatric HCV Guidelines

Posted on by

A useful recent article, ‘NASPGHAN Practice Guidelines for pediatric HCV’ (JPGN 2012; 54: 838-55) needs to be a handy reference.  However, given the rapid changes in the HCV field, it is likely that this reference will need to be updated soon to incorporate new information (eg. IL28b) as well as emerging therapies.

Highlights:

Epidemiology: 0.2% of children & 0.4% of adolescents are HCV-infected; primary mode is mother to child (vertical) transmission which occurs in 5-7% if mother not coinfected with HIV

Testing: For infants of HCV-infected mothers, check HCV antibody after 18 months or HCV RNA at younger ages.  Need two negative HCV RNAs to exclude infection (guidelines suggest checking 6 months apart).  Most individuals should be screened with antibody testing and confirmed with RNA test.

Screening for HCC (U/S, AFP): suggested only “for those with significant liver disease (ie. cirrhosis)” due to rarity of HCC in pediatric HCC.

Treatment:

  • Not if patient younger than 3 years
  • Probably Pegylated-interferon with ribavirin –references for pediatric studies indicate response rates of about 50% for genotype 1 and about 80% for types 2 & 3.
  • Who should be treated? Not always clear.  Probably those with elevated aminotransferases or progressive disease based on liver biopsy.  Possibly those with mild disease to eradicate virus.
  • Dosing: ribavirin  15/kg/day divided twice daily; weekly PEG-IFN-α-2a 180 microgram/1.73 m2 or weekly PEG-IFN-α-2b 60 microgram*m2

Treatment monitoring (Table 8):

  • CBC/diff, Hepatic panel, glucose 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 weeks, then every  4-8 weeks
  • T4/TSH 0, 12, 24, 36, 48 weeks
  • Urine HCG 0, 24 weeks (if female >12 years)
  • Prothrombin, Urinalysis at week 0
  • HCV RNA 0, 24, 48, 72 weeks

Anticipatory Guidance: “no legal requirement” to disclose HCV infection in U.S.; however, CDC suggests revealing this information to sexual partners (http://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis/hcv/)

  • Avoid sharing toothbrush, shaving equipment with household contacts, unprotected sexual activity with multiple partners, tattooing/piercing
  • Do not need to screen household or casual contacts

Special issues:

  • Vaccines: HCV patients should receive all standard vaccines
  • Obesity and alcohol both can worsen the outcome
  • Fetal scalp probes and prolonged rupture of membranes but not route of delivery may increase risk of HCV transmission
  • Breastfeeding is not contraindicated but should be avoided during mastitis/bleeding

Additional related blog links:

HCV now more deadly than HIV

The cost of progress in treating Hepatitis C

Increased ferritin predicts poor response in Hepatitis C

Curing Hepatitis C without interferon

Looking for trouble

Additional references:

  • –Hepatology 2011; 54: 1433. AASLD guidelines.  See teleprevir & boceprevir as well.-http://www.aasld.org/eweb/docs/hepatitisc
  • -Hepatology 2011; 53: 1468. PEG/RBV have minimal effect on QOL/cognitive/emotional outcomes, n=114.
  • -Gastroenterology 2011; 140: 389, 450-58. HEP-C STUDY. Comb RBV (15mg/kg div BID) & PEG-2a (180mcg/1.73m2 body surface q week) is better than PEG monotherapy. 53% SVR in combo group. Neutropenia in 40% –needed to reduce dose see below). “The Combination of Ribavirin and Peginterferon Is Superior to Peginterferon and Placebo for Children and Adolescents With Chronic Hepatitis C.”
  • -Hepatology 2009; 49: 1335. Comprehensive review and guidelines
  • -J Hepatology 2010; 52: 501-07. n=107. Pediatric study. Wirth et al. Efficacy of PEG alfa-2b (1.5/g/d) & RBV (15/kg/day): Genotypes 2/3 96% SVR, genotype 1 55%.
  • -JPGN 2006; 43: 499.  Study of PEG-IFN-α-2a in children.  dose BSA m2/1.73 x 180microgm weekly x 48 weeks.  6/14 (43%) had sustained response.  all genotype 1.  Article states that IFN (3/week) + RBV has now been approved by FDA for those over 3 years

PEG-Interferon Dosing:

Dosing adjustment from hep C study in children –needed in ~40%

PEG -2a
original: 180mcg/1.73m2
1. level 1: 135 mcg, level 2: 90mcg, level 3: 45 mcg

If ANC 750-999 week 1-2: level 1 adjustment, weeks >3: no adjustment
If ANC 500-749: week 1-2: hold dose ’til >750, then level 1; weeks >3, level 1 adjustment
If ANC 250-499: week 1-2, hold until >750, then level 2 adjustment, weeks >3, then hold ’til 750, then level 1 adjustment
If ANC <250, stop drug

If PLTs 35-49K, hold til >50, then level 1
If PLTs 25-34, hold til >50, then level 2
If PLTs <25, stop drug

If Hgb <10, reduce RIBA dose by 1/2 & increase dose when hgb>10
If hgb <8.5, stop RIBA

If indirect bili >5, stop drug.  If <2.5, restart dose at one-half and if remains less than 2.5, can resume full dose after 4 weeks.

IF ALT 5-10 ULN, recheck in 1 week.  If stays high, level 1 adjustment.
IF ALT10 ULN for more than 1 week, then if drops to 5-10, level 1 but if remains >10 ULN, then stop drug.

Side effect frequency:
flu symptoms: 91%, h/a, 62%, GI symptoms 56%, injection pain 45%, muscle aches 36%, irritable 31%, fatigue 27%, rash 20%, itching 15%, anorexia 13%, trouble sleeping 11%, depression 4-12%

Curing Hepatitis C without interferon

Posted on by

In the face of increasing morbidity and mortality, better therapies for Hepatitis C have emerged which if applied broadly have an opportunity to change the outcome.  Recently, several articles have highlighted the possibility of treating individuals without interferon.

  • Lok et al. NEJM 2012; 366: 216-224
  • Chayam et al. Hepatology 2012; 55: 742-48
  • Zeuzem et al. Hepatology 2012; 55: 749-58.

In the Lok study, 21 null responders (patients who failed to achieve ≥2log10 decline in HCV RNA after ≥12 weeks of peginterferon and ribavirin) were divided into two groups. In Group A, 36% of patients were able to achieve SVR12 using a combination direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) with non-overlapping resistance profiles — without the use of interferon. Group A patients received BMS-790052 (an oral, first-in-class, NS5A replication complex inhibitor) and BMS-650032 (an oral NS3 protease inhibitor). In Group B which included peginterferon and ribavirin the SVR12 was 100%. There were no serious adverse events, or discontinuations.  The most common side effects were diarrhea, fatigue, headache, and nausea.

In the Chayam study, the combination of BMS-790052 (now called daclatasvir) and BMS-650032 (now called asunaprevir) examined this combination of DAAs in null HCV responders with genotype 1B (in Japan).  Ten patients received both drugs for 24 weeks. All nine who completed treatment had an SVR.  One patient stopped the medication due to elevated bilirubin and lymphopenia which occurred following an apparent infectious gastroenteritis.

In the Zeuzem study, tegobuvir (a nonnucleoside polymerase inhibitor) and GS 9256 (an NS3 serine protease inhibitor) with RBV (n=15), with PEG/RBV (n=15) and without ribavirin (n=16) were administered in three arms for 4 weeks, followed by dual therapy with PEG and RBV.  The primary end point was rapid virologic response (RVR), defined as HCV RNA <25 IU/mL.  Reductions (mean) for HCV RNA were -4.1 log10 IU/mL for dual therapy, -5.1 log10 IU/mL for triple therapy, and -5.7 log10 IU/mL for quadruple therapy.  RVR was noted in 7% of dual Rx, 38% of triple therapy, and 100% of quadruple therapy.

These studies indicate that even for difficult to treat HCV patients that new oral medications are on the horizon that will increase cure rates and may allow effective regimens that do not include interferon.  This is good news because until recently regimens with interferon were more likely to provoke adverse reactions that to guarantee a cure.

Links to relevant blog entries on HCV:

HCV now more deadly than HIV

The cost of progress in treating Hepatitis C

Looking for trouble

Another life-threatening complication of HCV

Posted on by

Epidemiological studies have shown a causal relationship between B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) (Hepatology 2012; 55: 634-641).  This is not simply an association but a cause and effect.

The cited reference reviews several aspects of this relationship including the mechanisms of lymphoproliferation, the epidemiology, the clinical manifestations, the treatment, the prognosis, and preventive measures.

  • With regard to epidemiology, the odds ratios are between 2.4 and 5.2.  This is a small risk compared to hepatocellular carcinoma.
  • Management: Lymphoma may regress with HCV treatment, indicating a role for HCV in pathogenesis.   HCV treatment may prevent the occurrence of B-NHLs as well.  For aggressive lymphomas, patients require systemic treatment with rituximab-based regimens (1st line treatment).
B-NHLs are not nearly as important as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in terms of mortality and morbidity in patients with HCV.  It is nevertheless quite significant considering the number of infected persons worldwide.
Other related posts on HCV:

Additional references:

  • -Gastroenterology 2011; 140: 1182. Increasing HCC/Cirrhosis in HCV pts.
  • -Clinical Gastro & Hep 2008; 6: 451. HCV associated with increased risk of non-Hodgkins lymphoma. OR was 1.8 among n=4784 cases of NHL/n=6269 controls
  • -Clinical Gastro & Hep 2008; 6: 459. Overweight & obesity increase risk of HCC. n=1431 chronic HCV patients; 36% developed HCC over 10 year f/u. OR 1.9 of HCC if overweight & 3.1 OR of HCC if obese.
  • -NEJM 2002; 347: 89-95. regression of splenic lymphoma w HCV treatment.

HCV now more deadly than HIV

Posted on by

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) now kills more people in the United States than HIV (Ann Intern Med 2012; 156: 271-78).  Data from the CDC followed the mortality burden of Hepatitis B (HBV), HCV, and HIV from 1999 to 2007.    The data were derived from death certificates & a limitation was that these are often completed by individuals other than the primary physician.  Sometimes the exact cause is difficult to discern.  However, this is more likely to result in underreports of deaths from viral hepatitis compared with those from HIV.

In total, 21.8 million death certificates were analyzed.

  • HBV death rate stayed relatively constant –in 2007: 1815 deaths*
  • HCV death rate increased steadily –in 2007: 15106 deaths*
  • HIV death rate improved –in 2007: 12734 deaths*

*When infection was cause or underlying contributor of death

One in 33 baby boomers are infected with HCV; most do not know they are infected.  Three-fourths of the deaths for HCV are in this age group as well.  In addition, it is expected that mortality from HCV will grow over the next 10-15 years without a major intervention. http://www.ajc.com/health/hepatitis-c-deaths-up-1356460.html

Given the increasing HCV disease burden, this strengthens the rationale for more aggressive case finding and the use of more effective & more expensive therapies (see previous blog: The cost of progress in treating Hepatitis C.  Among patients with HCV with advanced disease/cirrhosis, monitoring for HCC is important (Looking for trouble).

Additional references:

  • -Hepatology 2011; 54: 1547. Excess mortality (6x gen population) in those who achieve SVR
  • -Gastroenterology 2010; 138: 513. Predicts peak cirrhosis due to HCV in year 2020; peak HCV prevalence was year 2000.
  • -Clin Gastro Hep 2010; 8: 924. Epidemiology 2010.
  • -Hepatology 2010; 52: 1543. Visceral adiposity is associated with increased histological findings and higher viral loads.
  • -Gastroenterology 2010; 138: 136. Predicting clinical outcomes: plt<99, Alb <3.5, AST/ALT ratio >1.2, & TB>2 all assoc with 40-50% risk of developing ‘clinical outcome’ in next 3.5yrs. Outcomes: ascites, variceal hemorrhage, decompensation according to CTP (66%), peritonitis, death (2%), encephalopathy
  • -Hepatology 2009; 49: 729. 5-yr f/u after successful HCV RX, n=150. 2 developed HCC.
  • -Gastroenterology 2009; 136: 138, 39(ed). HCC occurring c HCV ~1%/yr in HALT-C study. prolonged Rx -not helpful. n=1005
  • -Hepatology 2008; 47: 1128. Increasing mortality of HCV between 1995-2004. Due to aging of infected individuals.
  • -Hepatology 2008; 47: 1371. Genotype 4 review.
  • -Hepatology 2008; 47: 836. 2/121 bx of children had cirrhosis.
  • -J Pediatr 2007; 150: 168. n=60. Looked at two populations: look back after transfusion and referrals. mean age at infection 7 months, mean time with infection 13yrs. 12% developed significant fibrosis.
  • -Hepatology 2007; 45: 1076. Large study: Lancet 2006; 368: 938. 39,109 c HBV, 75,834 c HCV, 2,604 c both. death rate: 3.2%, 5.3%, 7.1% respecively. Increased rate of dying c HCV due to drug use rather than liver dz.
  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2006; 4: 1190-1191, 1271-78, 1278-1282. slow progression of HCV in 184 untreated women infected in 1977 (mean 27 years) — 2.1% developed cirrhosis. genotype 1B ALT values correlated with change in histology.
  • -JPGN 2006; 43: 209. Review of 91 cases; 7 c cirrhosis at presentation (mean 11.7yrs)
  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2005; 3: 910. cirrhosis in 71% after 60 years in Asian patients; 25% in Caucasian pts 61-80 who presumably had disease for shorter interval.
  • -Gastroenterology 2003; 125: 1695. obesity/insulin resistance worsens fibrosis in HCV
  • -Gastroenterology 2002; 123: 483-491. IFN Rx improved survival; n=2889. retrospective study.
  • -JPGN 2001;33: 22A. spontaneous clearance in 30% during short f/u; n=145.
  • -Hepatology 2000; 32: 91-96. Low likelihood of progression in cohort followed for 20yrs.