Tag Archives: ethics

The Elephant in the Transplant Room: Personhood

Posted on by

A recent study and related editorial discuss the ethics and utilization of transplantation for children with intellectual disability.

In the study by Wightman et al, the researchers performed a retrospective cohort analysis of children receiving a first kidney, liver, or heart-alone transplant in the United Network for Organ Sharing dataset from 2008 to 2017. Key findings:

  • Definite intellectual disability accounted for 594 of 6747 (9%) first pediatric kidney-alone, 318 of 4566 (7%) first pediatric liver-alone, and 324 of 3722 (9%) first pediatric heart-alone transplant recipients. 
  • Children with intellectual disability account for 7%-9% of pediatric transplant recipients with comparable long-term outcomes to other pediatric recipients.
  • The article had a number of limitations including a lack of a standardized assessment of cognitive development.

In the editorial, the author “opposes the absolute exclusion of patients with intellectual disability and end-stage organ disease from transplantation waitlists provided that the candidates are expected to gain a predefined minimum benefit threshold of life-years and quality-adjusted-life years. Intellectual disability is one of many factors that should be considered in determining transplant eligibility and each candidate should have an individualized interdisciplinary assessment.”

In this commentary, it is noted that “the vast majority (85%) of individuals classified as having intellectual disability are able to live independently with minimum levels of support.” While the author would exclude those in a persistent vegetative state and those who were minimally conscious, otherwise he advocates “the candidate with intellectual disability should be given equal priority for organ transplantation.”

My view: The suitability for transplantation of individuals with intellectual disability centers on the issue of personhood; those who meet the threshold of personhood should be eligible to receive organ transplants without discrimination.  Wikipedia-Personhood: “Defining personhood is a controversial topic in philosophy and law and is closely tied with legal and political concepts of citizenship, equality, and liberty.”

Related blog posts:

Ethical Dilemmas and Digestive Symptoms –Common with COVID-19

Posted on by

Ethical Dilemmas:

Full link: NEJM: Facing Covid-19 in Italy — Ethics, Logistics, and Therapeutics on the Epidemic’s Front Line

That truth is rather grim. Though Italy’s health system is highly regarded and has 3.2 hospital beds per 1000 people (as compared with 2.8 in the United States), it has been impossible to meet the needs of so many critically ill patients simultaneously…

If protecting patients is difficult, so is protecting health care workers, including nurses, respiratory therapists, and those tasked to clean the rooms between patients…

Though approaches vary even within a single hospital, I sensed that age was often given the most weight.

In the midst of the outbreak’s peak in northern Italy, as physicians struggled to wean patients off ventilators while others developed severe respiratory decompensation, hospitals had to lower the age cutoff — from 80 to 75 at one hospital, for instance…

The first and most important is to separate clinicians providing care from those making triage decisions. The “triage officer,” backed by a team with expertise in nursing and respiratory therapy, would make resource-allocation decisions and communicate them to the clinical team, the patient, and the family.

Digestive Symptoms:

From ACG: Full Link: ACG Media Statement

Excerpt:  (March 18, 2020) – Digestive symptoms are common in COVID19, occurring as the chief complaint in nearly half of patients presenting to hospital according to a new
descriptive, cross-sectional multicenter study from China by investigators from the Wuhan Medical Treatment Expert Group for COVID-19 published today in The American Journal of Gastroenterology

Key findings:

  • Compared to COVID-19 patients without digestive symptoms, those with digestive symptoms have a longer time from onset to admission and a worse clinical outcome according to this analysis by investigators from several hospitals and research centers in China who gathered data on 204 patients with COVID-19 presenting to three
    hospitals in Hubei province from January 18, 2020 to February 28, 2020.
  • Patients with digestive symptoms had a variety of manifestations, such as anorexia (83 [83.8%] cases), diarrhea (29 [29.3%] cases), vomiting (8 [0.8%] cases), and abdominal pain (4 [0.4%] cases)
  • As the severity of the disease increased, digestive symptoms became more pronounced.
  • Link to study: Pan L, et al., Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients with digestive symptoms in Hubei, China: a descriptive, cross-sectional, multicenter study, Am J Gastroenterol 

 

Difficult Boundaries in Patient Care

Posted on by

An interesting article in the NEJM (here’s link to full text: No Appointment Necessary?) explores the ethical and practical challenges of being asked to help in the care of friends and families.  These issues are definitely not abstract.  I would be surprised if most physicians have not received multiple requests for advice or for prescriptions.  Some of the potential problems listed include the following:

  • feeling pressured to practice outside their area of expertise
  • lack of complete information about the problem
  • not asking for sensitive information
  • emotional investment/loss of perspective
  • conflict of interest
  • potential for guilt/remorse if clinical error
  • poor documentation

The article notes that “the very first code of medical ethics drafted by the American Medical Association (AMA) in 1847 recommended against physicians treating family members, stating that “the natural anxiety and solicitude which he [the physician] experiences at the sickness of a wife, a child . . . tend to obscure his judgment, and produce timidity and irresolution in his practice.”

Yet, in practice, “a 1991 study showed that 99% of surveyed physicians reported having received requests from family members for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment, and 83% had prescribed medications for relatives.6  Physicians cite convenience as a key reason to provide this care, but other explanations have included a wish to save the relative money as well as a belief that ‘I provide the best care.’”

Take-home message (from the authors): It is our hope that providers will think through the potential ethical conflicts before offering informal care. We also urge providers who are involved in medical education to help trainees understand the ethical boundaries of care as part of their professional role and encourage them to refrain from treating friends, family members, and themselves.