Tag Archives: fluticasone propionate

Budesonide Looks Better for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Posted on by

A recent retrospective study (JM Fable et al. JPGN 2018; 66: 26-32) found that patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) who were treated with oral viscous budesonide (OVB) had more favorable outcomes than those treated with fluticasone propionate (FP).  This single center study included 68 pediatric patients (mean age 10.6 years) with 20 receiving FP and 48 OVB.

Dosing in study:

  • FP 110 mcg/actuation 2 puffs twice a day if 1-10 years, and 220 mcg/actuation 2 puffs twice a day if >10 years
  • OVB: 0.5 mg twice a day if 1-10 years, and 1 mg twice a day if >10 years
  • The authors noted that Duocal (which contains cornstarch and coconut oil) was a suitable alternative to Splenda.  They note that Neocate Nutra is effective too (limited by cost/coverage) as is pasteurized honey and maple syrup.

Key findings:

  • Histologic response (<15 eos/hpf) was noted in 75% (36/48) of OVB group and 40% (8/20) of FP group
  • Mean post-treatment peak eos/hpf was 12 ± 16 in OVB group and 20 ± 29 in the FP group (P=0.002)
  • Histologic remission (<5 eos/hpf) was noted in 54% OVB group and 35% FP group
  • In OVB-treated patients, those without asthma were more likely to achieve a histologic response (P=0.031)

Since this is a retrospective study, there are several potential limitations, including possible selection bias.  In addition, higher doses of topical agents have been shown to have higher response rates.

My take: Budesonide is probably better than fluticasone for EoE and its high first-pass metabolism indicates that it is probably safer as well.

Related blog posts:

Higher Doses of Topical Steroids for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Posted on by

A recent randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study (Gastroenterol 2014; 147: 324-33) examined “high-dose” fluticasone propionate (FP) for patients, aged 3-30 years, with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).  FP patients received 1760 mcg divided into two doses for three months, then the dose was reduced in half.

Efficacy: Among the 28 FP patients, a complete remission (CR) (≤1 eosinophil/hpf on histology) was evident in 65% compared with 0% CR in 14 placebo patients.  Furthermore, partial response (PR) (multiple definitions of responsiveness -see Figure 2) evident in about 75%.  Reduction in dose to 880 mcg/day resulted in 93% of EoE participants maintaining CR or PR.

Molecular response: The authors also studied the transcriptome prospectively in these patients with the “Eosinophilic esophagitis diagnostic panel” (EDP). “A large portion of the participants receiving FP in phase 1 showed a normalized signature compared with the dysregulated screening and placebo signatures….notably, the 6 FP participants with histologic PR or no remission also had a partial reversal with a signature different from the placebo group…However, there were still a few molecular nonresponders whose signatures failed to normalized upon FP treatment.”

Based on their study findings: the authors recommend assessment at 3 months after initiation of topical steroids because “extending the timeframe for high-dose FP to 6 months does not increase remission status.”

The authors could not identify any demographics or signs/symptoms that predicted response to high-dose FP. In addition, in this small cohort, no difference in adverse effects compared to placebo were found.

My take on this study is that it raises more questions than it answers.

  • Is the higher induction dose of FP really needed or would 880 mcg/day over a 6 month period result in the same findings?
  • Is FP superior to budesonide which is considered to have less systemic absorption?
  • Should we be using higher doses of budesonide as well?
  • Would patients be better off receiving systemic steroids and transitioning to topical steroids?
  • What are the long-term consequences, good and bad, in using higher steroid doses?

Take-home message: In a carefully designed study with molecular correlation, higher doses of Fluticasone achieved high rates of complete remission in EoE patients.  Except for elemental diets, no dietary therapies have shown to have a higher response rate.

Related blog posts:

Disclaimer: These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications/diets (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician/nutritionist.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.