Do We Need to Reimmunize Patients (with IBD or Celiac) with Low Hepatitis B Surface Antibody Levels?

JA Ulrich et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21: 2901-2907. Open Access! Effectiveness of Hepatitis B Vaccination for Patients With Inflammatory Bowel and Celiac Disease

In 2022, a study in JPGN showed that the rate of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination and immunity was similar in individuals with and without celiac disease (CD). In addition, there was no increased risk of HBV infection detected in CD patients. Thus, routinely checking hepatitis B status in all patients with CD was no longer justified. (See: Celiac Disease, Hepatitis B and Paul Harvey).

The same researchers in this study expand their findings to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and CD. In this retrospective cohort (2000-2019), using the Rochester Epidemiology Project which includes data from 162,847 residents. Key findings:

  • 1264 incident cases of IBD/CD, only 6 HBV infections were diagnosed before the index date; 5 of the 6 had risk factors including IV drug use or living in endemic region.
  • No new HBV infection developed in any of 1258 patients with IBD/CD during a median follow-up of 9.4 years
  • The proportion of patients with HBV-protective titers (≥10 mIU/mL) decreased with time before plateauing, with protective titer rates of 45% at 5 up to 10 years and 41% at 15 up to 20 years after the last HBV vaccination. The control population with protective titers also decreased similarly with time though was consistently higher than the levels of patients with IBD/CD within 15 years after the last HBV vaccination

Context/Discussion:

  • Only 16% of vaccine recipients have measurable protective titers by age 18 years, according to the CDC.32
  • “Time-related waning of Ab levels to HBV after vaccination has unclear clinical significance. Although screening persons for HBV immunity by using anti-HBs titers is widely accepted, prior study results have shown that cellular immunity can also provide long-term HBV protection, even in the setting of nonprotective titers.”
  • Reactivation of HBV is a well-documented complication of immunosuppression in patients with IBD, and screening for dormant infection is of paramount importance at diagnosis
  • Limitations: the study population had a low rate of HBV acquisition; thus, the study findings may not apply to areas with higher risk for HBV.

My take: This study shows that treating low hepatitis B surface antibody levels with reimmunization is likely NOT needed in either the IBD or the celiac disease population, except perhaps in those at high risk. Checking HBV status prior to immunosuppressive therapy, though, is still needed to prevent reactivation of HBV in those at risk.

Related blog posts:

Chalk Art in Sandy Springs:

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

CMV in IBD: Tissue Matters

A recent study (P Tandon et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2017; 23: 551-60) was a systemic review regarding the accuracy of blood-based testing for predicting colonic CMV reactivation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.  The review identified 9 studies.  The overall sensitivity of blood-based testing (either pp65 antigenemia or blood PCR) for CMV was 50.8% and the specificity was 99.9%. Blood PCR was better at 60% sensitivity.

My take: Blood-based tests are not sensitive enough to exclude colonic CMV reactivation. The authors recommend the use of immunohistochemistry or tissue PCR for detecting CMV reactivation in inflammatory bowel disease.

Related blog posts:

Palace Gate, Versailles