Category Archives: Gastroenterology

What to make of FODMAPs

Posted on by

Consumption of FODMAPs (fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols) may trigger irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms.  Some research indicates that a diet low on FODMAPs may be beneficial (J Hum Nutr Diet 2011; 24: 487-95).  This study tried to assess whether a low FODMAPs diet which had been reported from a single center in Australia would be effective for IBS.

In this study, consecutive patients with IBS were divided into two groups.  39 received standard dietary advice based on UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines.  43 patients were placed on a low FODMAP dietary advice.  Patients were selected into each group consecutively (not randomized). This study reported a 76% satisfactory symptom response in the FODMAP group vs a 54% response in the control group (p=0.038).  Overall, 86% of FODMAP group had improved composite score compared with 49% of standard treatment group. Specific improvements were noted in bloating, abdominal pain, and flatulence.  The average age of the study population was 38 and 71% were females.  60% had diarrhea-predominant IBS.

NICE guidelines for IBS:

  • Healthy eating principles: regular eating, taking time to eat
  • Limit high fat foods and fizzy drinks
  • Limit insoluble fiber for diarrhea and gradually increase for constipation
  • Limit sugar-free sweets and foods with sorbitol
  • Limit fruit to 3 portions/day
  • Avoiding ‘resistant’ starch may be useful (eg. sweetcorn, green bananas, part-baked and reheated bread)
  • Addition of oats and linseeds may be helpful

Low FODMAP diet

  • Reduce high fructan foods (eg wheat and onion)
  • Reduction in high galactooligosaccharide foods (eg chickpeas, lentils)
  • Reduce high polyol foods and polyol-sweetened sources.  Replace with suitable fruits and vegetables
  • In patients with lactose malabsorption, reduce high lactose foods (eg milk, yoghurt) to smaller volumes or substitute lactose-free products
  • In those with fructose malabsorption, decrease excess fructose

Of course, reading the author’s description of a low FODMAP diet is confusing.  Translation:

Include more bananas, blueberries, lettuce, potatoes, gluten-free breads or cereals, rice, oats, hard cheeses, lactose-free milk, sugar, molasses, and artificial sweeteners that do not end in “ol.”

Avoid/eliminate apples, pears, canned fruits in natural juices, high-fructose corn syrup, cows’ milk (due to lactose), soft cheese, broccoli, cabbage, pasta, bread, baked goods from wheat/rye, mushrooms, and sweeteners like sorbitol or others that end in “ol.”

Since this diet has attracted more widespread attention, basic familiarity is important for all physicians who treat IBS.  A useful resource to explain this diet is the Wall Street Journal:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204554204577023880581820726.html

This link has a good table illustrating the recommended dietary choices.

Whether FODMAPs will be superior to other dietary advice for IBS is still uncertain.  Though, given the limited number of effective treatments for IBS, this small study is a promising development.

Additional references:

  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2009; 7: 706. n=17. 13 responded to very low carb diet (<20g/day)
  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2008; 6: 765. Dietary triggers for IBS include fructose/fructans: honey, high fructose corn syrup, wheat, fruits.
  • -IBD 2006; 13: 91. Dietary guidelines for IBS.
  • -Clin Gastro Hepatol 2005; 10: 992-996. Obesity increases IBS symptoms; diet with low fat, high fruit/fiber have fewer symptoms
  • -Gut 2004; 53: 1459-1464. Food elimination based on IgG antibodies. Patients did better on diet with implicated foods than with control diet (diet was blinded/randomized).
  • -Am J Gastro 2011; 106: 508-514. randomized, double-blind trial showing efficacy of GFD for non-celiacs.  60% vs 32& placebo response.
  • -Nutr Clin Pract. 2011;26:294-299.  GFD for non-celiacs.
  • -Gastroenterology 2011; 141: 1941./Am J Gastro 2011; 106: 915.  Exercise improves IBS symptoms.

Holes in the fiber theory

Posted on by

Since the 1970s, it has been accepted that diverticular disease is related to low fiber intake and the Western diet.  Problem is that this might not be right (Gastroenterology 2012; 142: 205-10).  In this observational cross-sectional study (n=2104), low dietary fiber was not associated with diverticulosis; just the opposite.  High fiber intake, after adjusting for other factors, had an adjusted prevalence ratio of 1.3.  Due to the nature of the study, there may be potential bias that would not be present with a prospective study, especially with regard to dietary recall.  An editorial in the same issue (pg 205-07) lists three other studies; two of these also could not demonstrate a protective effect of fiber.  In addition to these findings, this study did not find an association between fat, red meat, physical activity and diverticulosis.

Although these data throw a big question mark regarding the pathogenesis of diverticular disease, this does not mean you should throw away your fiber bars quite yet.  Although low fiber may not cause diverticular disease, several large prospective studies have been completed which convincing show an association with lower complications/hospitalizations among individuals with higher fiber intake.  In addition, increased fiber in the diet has been shown to lower cardiovascular complications.

Additional references:

  • -Br Med J 1971; 2: 450-54.  Seminal article on diverticular disease and association with Western countries with low fiber intake.
  • -Am J Clin Nutr 1994; 60: 757-64.  Prospective study showing benefits of fiber in preventing diverticular complications (n=47,888); RR=0.58 for developing symptomatic diverticulitis.
  • -BMJ 2011; 343: d4131.  EPIC study, n=47,033, showing benefit of fiber in reducing hospitalizations due to diverticular dz over 12yrs (0.59 RR)
  • -NEJM 1999; 340: 169. fiber does not decrease Colon Ca risk.
  • -NEJM 2000; 342: 1149 & 1159. fiber does not decrease risk of recurrent adenomas.
  • -Am J Clin Nutr 2000; 70: 1433-1438. Fiber lowers cholesterol & can decrease risk of heart attack by 15%.

Pain changes brain

Posted on by

For several years, there has been research showing changes in PET scans and functional MRI in association with functional abdominal pain.  A recent article goes a step further showing microstructure  brain changes in patients with chronic pancreatitis (Gut 2011; 60: 1554-62).

This study examined 23 patients with pain due to chronic pancreatitis and 14 controls.  Using a 3T MR scanner, apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) and ‘fractional anistotropy’ (FA) values were assessed in numerous parts throughout the brain.  This new technology, uses an MRI for diffusion tensor imaging which assesses changes in white and grey matter microstructure not evident with more conventional imaging.  Chronic pancreatitis patients had increased ADC in the amygdala, cingulate cortex, and prefrontal cortex.  In addition, FA values were reduced in the cingulate cortex and secondary sensory cortex.  These areas of the brain with these changes are known to be involved in the processing of visceral pain.  Microstructural changes were correlated to patients’ clinical pain scores.  Some of the changes can be influenced by other factors including alcohol usage, depression, Alzheimer’s or diabetes.

This study echoes findings from others that demonstrate structural reorganization of the brain in association with chronic pain.

Additional references:

  • -Gastroenterology 2010; 139: 1310. n=15 IBS women, 12 controls.  IBS pts have emotional modulation of neural responses to visceral stimuli (eg rectal stimulation) –based on functional MRI studies.
  • -Gastroenterology 2006; 130: 26 & 34. Functional MRI measured in response to barostat show increased sensitivity in pts c IBS. Also, altered 5-HT signaling in IBS-D & IBS-C.
  • -J Pediatr 2001; 139: 838-843. Pts c IBS, RAP more sensitive to visceral perception in rectum and stomach respectively.
  • -Gastroenterology 2005; 128: 1819. Brain response to visceral aversive conditioning –>similar cortical responses between actual and anticipated stimuli.
  • -Cereb Cortex 2010; 20: 1409-19.  Changes in brain anatomy associated with neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury.
  • -J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2010; 49: 173-83.  White matter microstructure changes in adolescents with major depression.