NPR: “Should You Trust That New Medical Study?”

A quick read from NPR: “Should You Trust That New Medical Study?”  No.

Here’s an excerpt:

As historian of science Naomi Oreskes says …, “What makes it news is that it’s new…My view would be that brand new results would be the most likely to be wrong.”

… We should infer the efficacy of a new drug or the benefits or harms of foods from a sample of studies, not a single new one. Of course, most people don’t have the time or the inclination to go through the exercise. When it comes to health, we want to believe in a new cure, for obvious reasons. Our skepticism must be doubled precisely to prevent being misled by hope. (Although hope and a positive attitude are known contributors to healing.) The responsibility, thus, rests with scientists and the media to promote the news carefully — and with the general consumer to keep the news in perspective.

Unrelated link: Nuts Associated with Improved Longevity (from NY Times)

Baseball Season!

Baseball Season!

Related blog posts:

“Why Health Care Tech is Still So Bad” -NY Times

Here’s the link on this thoughtful article: “Why Health Care Tech is Still So Bad

This article highlights the problems including physicians distracted from patients due to data entry, problems with workflow, and alert fatigue. The author argues that we need to keep working on electronic health records; “the digitization of health care promises, eventually, to be transformative.”

Related blog posts:

 

NPR: “Craptastic Voyage” and Fart Analysis

Surely a story for every gastroenterologist: “Before The Gas is Passed, Researchers Aim to Measure it in The Gut.”

An excerpt:

Kalantar-Zadeh and his colleagues propose in a paper in Trends in Biotechnologyonline Thursday two new devices that could keep a vigilant eye, or a nose in this case, on what’s going on deep in the gut….

The jar is pretty straightforward. A spoonful of poop goes in and a technician squeezes on a lid containing a sensor that detects the molecules of gas fuming inside and at what concentration…but he’s most excited about their other invention.

It’s a robotic pill that sniffs its way along a craptastic voyage through the gut. As the pill tumbles through, a membrane on the pill lets gasses pass onto a small molecular sensor inside that serves as its nose. The membrane blocks the other stuff sloshing around in the gut.

The pill notes the gasses that gut microbes produce, including oxygen, methane, hydrogen and hydrogen sulfide, which smells like rotten eggs. The pill’s sensor figures out how much of each gas is present, and beams the information out of the patient’s body through a tiny antenna…

The researchers aim to detect changes in gas content. As people’s health waxes or wanes because of stress or disease their intestinal ecosystems change too. Certain microbes may thrive in the new conditions while others struggle. As the populations shift, so will the concentrations of their distinctive gassy waste products.

My Take: This story reminds me about the joke I heard from a mentor about how can you tell if a person is an optimist.  An optimist is a person who finds a pile of manure under the tree on Christmas morning and declares: ‘Oh boy, I’m getting a pony.’

This story shows us that some researchers are true optimists as well; they see a lot of opportunity in studying stool and intestinal gases. Will this research will be useful or wind up being a pile of stool?

Also on NPR: Why Is Insulin So Expensive in the U.S. -summarizes recent commentary (N Engl J Med 2015; 372:1171-1175). This article is important for anyone concerned about escalating medicine costs.

Related blog post“There is No ‘Healthy’ Microbiome” | gutsandgrowth

Can Apple Make Research Cool?

For anyone who has looked at Apple’s March presentation, there is big news with regard to research (thanks to Seth for this information).  Here’s a link to the March announcement –around minute 16 there is the research presentation: Apple March Event

Screenshot: Rationale for Apple iPhone for Research -Large Research Pool

Screenshot: Rationale for Apple iPhone for Research -Large Research Pool

The presentation makes it clear that Apple wants to dramatically increase the participation in research studies by leveraging 700 million iPhone users.  Using an app called, “ResearchKit”, Apple has partnered with leading academic centers to help study Parkinson’s, Diabetes, Asthma, Cardiovascular disease, and Breast Cancer.  For the GI community, I hope that someone will work collaboratively to add inflammatory bowel disease to the list.

Besides increased participation, iPhone-based research has the ability to lower research costs, collect data at frequent intervals, and allow a wider demographic representation.

A shorter ~4 minute video on a separate area of the website explains ResearchKit: ResearchKit video

 Screenshot: Research Kit


Screenshot: ResearchKit

NBC News provides a condensed summary along with the caveat that there will be concerns about accuracy of data collected with ResearchKit.  That being said, most critics have not always appreciated the impact of previous Apple innovations.

Has someone from our national organization (NASPGHAN) or from ImproveCareNow started working with Apple? If not, this looks like a great opportunity.

Lost Decade from Smoking

A recent study (NEJM 2015; 372; 631-40) showed that smoking is more deadly than previously estimated.  Key points:

  • Deaths per year due to smoking: a new analysis suggests the true figure may be closer to 575,000.  That equates to 1 death in every 5 in the United States.
  • Smoking is thought to shorten life expectancy by more than one decade!
  • The 21 causes of death that have been officially blamed on smoking accounted for only 83% of the actual deaths among smokers

Here’s a link to a summary of the article:  Cigarette Smoking is Even More Deadly Than You Thought (from LA Times)

Related blog post:

From NPR: Enormous Ice Formations at Niagara Falls:

From NPR

From NPR

How to Reduce Suffering

A recent NY Times article (yesterday) discussed ways to reduce patient suffering and improve physician/hospital evaluations: Doctors Strive to Do Less Harm

  • Minimize waking patients up at night.  Eliminate waking patients up for vital signs and blood draws.
  • Reduce waiting times.
  • Spend more time listening.

Related blog posts:

 

 

How Bilingual Studies Reflect a Deeper Scientific Flaw

A recent story on NPR explored the purported advantages of bilingual acquisition.  Previous reports have suggested that individuals with bilingual education attain other advantages in learning and “executive” function.  This may be a bunch of bunk and more related to scientific journals bias of reporting “positive” studies.  If you listen to the report (link below), consider how the problem of reporting bias affects so many fields in medicine and science.

Link: Bilingual Studies Reveal Flaw In How Info Reaches Mainstream

Somewhat related post:

 

“Weekend Effect” –From the Other Side of the Bed

Many times when I’m working at the hospital on a weekend I’ve wondered how long hospitals can continue to offer fewer services during weekends than during the work week.  Usually if I’m there, I don’t want to hear that something has to wait until Monday.  It also puts me in the uncomfortable position of deciding whether something is urgent enough that on-call staff (eg. radiology, anesthesiology) need to be called in.  At the same time, some services in the hospital, for example, interventional radiology may have only one or two people who are qualified and it is unrealistic to expect them to be available 24/7/365.

A recent commentary (Klass P, NEJM 2015; 372: 402-405) helps provide a family’s perspective regarding this situation. Here are some of the key points:

  • “It can be shocking to hear, over and over, about the ways that weekends are slower and things don’t get done.”
  • Often many services are absent like physical therapy and psychiatry.  Most other services are understaffed and “cross-covering” patients with less familiarity.
  • For many conditions, morbidity and mortality are higher on weekends. (J Pediart Surg 2014; 49: 1087-91, NEJM 2001; 345: 1580, JAMA 2008; 299: 785-92))
  • “When you’re sick and scared, Sunday is the same as Tuesday.”

Bottomline: This commentary makes a strong case for saying “the hospital is not actually about patients. It’s about doctors and nurses, physical therapists and nutritionists.”

Question: Do you think weekend staffing should change or will change to address these shortcomings?

Related blog post:

Related link:

 

Cool Mirror at High Museum

Cool Mirror at High Museum

What to Fear in 2015

From Parade Magazine,  What to Fear in 2015:

An excerpt:

Here are a few of the things you should and should not fear in 2015:

  • Flu not Ebola
  • Domestic violence not serial killers, pedophiles
  • Heart disease not Mercury in fish
  • Not getting enough dietary fiber not gluten
  • The re-appearance of measles, whooping cough, and other preventable diseases not vaccine side effects
  • Texting while driving not air travel
  • Malware on your cell phone not bulk password theft
  • Gun violence among young people not school shootings/mass murders
  • Sitting too much not heart attacks during exercise

Another link on the measles epidemic from NY Times: Vaccine Critics Defensive. Another editorial remarked on how Ebola which is much less contagious than the measles alarmed so many people in this country; it stated that if a terrorist, rather than parents refusing vaccinations, had unleashed a highly contagious virus on our communities, many would be calling for military retaliation. Unfortunately, it takes a measles epidemic to provide a passionate argument for immunizations. Related blog post1400 Different Immunization Schedules -What Could Go Wrong …

From NBC News Measles Vaccine FAQ

AAP -Behind the Scenes (Part 1)

Recently I was asked to become a board member for the Georgia Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) in the role of chair of the section of nutrition.  My role at this meeting was limited.  I was impressed by the commitment of the participants and by the range of activities that the AAP chapter was working on –all in the efforts of improving the health of children in Georgia.

I only took a few notes but here are some of the details.  Dr. Evelyn Johnson (President) provided the president’s report and an overview of the chapter activities.

Dr. Anu Sheth provided an update on the Medicaid Task Force.  This issue was discussed in some detail.  The issue at stake is the low reimbursement for office visits for children with Medicaid coverage; the rate has not changed in 13 years with one notable exception.  In 2013-2014, the federal government provided a one-time boost in the rates of Medicaid reimbursement with the role out of the ACA (Obamacare) to encourage availability of primary care physicians to see the new enrollees.  There is preliminary evidence that this boost did improve access to care.

According to a recent study (NEJM 2015; January 21, 2015DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa1413299), “Our study provides early evidence that increased Medicaid reimbursement to primary care providers, as mandated in the ACA, was associated with improved appointment availability for Medicaid enrollees among participating providers without generating longer waiting times.”

Since 43.2% of all children in Georgia receive their health insurance through Medicaid this is a big issue.  It is also directly related to another topic of provider access.  61 counties in Georgia have a deficit of needed pediatricians and 23 counties have no pediatrician at all.  Currently, Medicaid rates to physician practices are only about 75% of Medicare rates and compared to commercial insurance plans, they pay only half.

Based on these considerations, the AAP is urging its members to contact their state legislators, particularly those more involved in the budget decision-making process.  While bumping Medicaid rates in the face of other budget constraints may be difficult, default limiting of access results in higher costs through emergency room visits and complications.

Georgia Politicians with Greatest Impact on Healthcare Decisions

Georgia Politicians with Greatest Impact on Healthcare Decisions

Rural communities are more affected by access issues than urban counties.  Dr. Angela Highbaugh-Battle provided an update on the Governor’s Rural Hospital Task Force.  There have been a number of hospital closures and more appear to be imminent.  Communities that are losing hospitals are losing important jobs, access to timely care, and will have difficulty attracting new businesses.

Another related topic was the issue of ‘retail-clinic’ healthcare.  While the ease of access is quite helpful for families, there are numerous concerns about the quality of care.  Several clinicians described their efforts to provide alternatives including extended hours in their practices and weekend hours as well.

Here’s a related article: “Retail clinics are in, traditional primary care practices are out”

One fascinating aspect about the discussion of retail clinics was its juxtaposition with efforts to improve the process of remaining board-certified (See related blog: Resistance to Maintenance of Certification | gutsandgrowth).  Given the increasing use of retail-clinics and midlevel providers, several clinicians emphasized that board-approval is not a strong consideration for families seeking healthcare.  The fact that the board approval process is not tied to a broad effort to show its impact on patient care and/or to market the efforts of pediatricians has led to widespread dissatisfaction.

Take-home message: The issue of adequate access to primary care physicians along with high quality care is important for everyone.  Make your voice heard!

Related blog posts: