More Proof That Transpyloric Feeds Protect the Lungs

B Srivatsa et al. J Pediatr 2023; 255: 175-180. Transpyloric Feeding is Associated With Improved Oxygenation Compared With Gastric Feeding Among Nonintubated Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants

As noted in a previous blog, transpyloric (TP) feedings are equivalent to a fundoplication in reducing reflux. As such, it is not surprising that it is used in premature infants to minimize reflux-associated respiratory problems including aspiration and potentially mitigate bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

In this retrospective study with 56 extremely low birth weight infants, the authors analyzed oxygen saturation (SpO2) and action of inspired oxygen (FiO2) data (measured at 1-minute intervals) for 96 hours before and after institution of TP feeds.

Key findings:

  • No significant differences were observed in any oxygenation measures during TP vs gastric feeding among 14 intubated infants.
  • Among 42 nonintubated patients, significant improvements were observed in the median SpO2/FiO2 ratios (P = .001), median titration index (P = .05), median number of hypoxemic episodes (P = .02), and median severity of hypoxemic episodes (P = .008) after TP tube placement.

Discussion:

  • The authors note that a prior study (J Perinat Med 2021; 49: 383-387) had shown improvement in SpO2/FiO2 ratios in intubated patients (n=33). This discrepancy between the two studies could be due to differences in patient population, ventilation technique (high frequency vs conventional) and higher level of power due to more intubated subjects in the prior study.
  • The exact mechanism of improvement in oxygenation is a matter of speculation. “Does TP feeding in nonventilated patients result n fewer or less severe GER events, leading to less pulmonary microaspiration or laryngospasm?…Does aerophagia, more common among nonintubated patients on positive pressure support, exacerbate GER events and is it ameliorated with TP feedings?” It is also possible that TP feedings result in improvement due to a reduction in esophageal reflux mediated bronchoconstriction.

My take: TP feedings have been very helpful in clinical practice, especially in infants with feeding difficulties, reflux, and respiratory issues. Most of these problems are transitory. This study provides granular data showing the significant improvements in oxygenation following the initiation of TP feedings among non-ventilated ELBW.

Related blog posts:

Gastrostomy Tube Placement in Extremely Low Birthweight Infants

A recent analysis (MG Warren et al J Pediatr 2019; 214: 41-6) examined gastrostomy tube (GT) placement among 4569 extremely low birthweight (ELBW) infants (birth wt <1000 gm) who were enrolled in the National Instittue of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network (25 centers).

Key findings:

  • 333 (7.3%) underwent GT placement; 76% had GT placed postdischarge from NICU
  • Among patients with GT placement, 56% had weight <10th percentile, 61% had neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI), and 55% had chronic breathing problems
  • At last follow-up, 32% of infants who required GT placement were taking full oral feeds.
  • Rates of fundoplication varied widely between centers, ranging from 0% to 6.4% among the centers.

In the discussion, the authors note the well-recognized associations between feeding difficulties and language delays in ELBW infants.  In addition, “behavioral and emotional problems have …been described in children with feeding problems.”

The authors also state, without evidence, that the high rate of GT placement after discharge suggests that “a large proportion of ELBW infants were first discharged from the NICU orally feeding but could not maintain these skills.”  Alternative explanations include the following:

  • Many infants were sent home with NG (nasogastric) supplementation and after not making progress with oral feedings, elective GT placement was done when the infant was a more suitable candidate (eg. improved respiratory status, better nourished, etc.)
  • Problems with oral feeding became apparent after discharge including poor growth and aspiration.  In fact, the authors note that “orormotor dysfunction and avoidant feeding behaviors at 3 and 12 months corrected age” were nearly twice as likely in infants born <34 weeks
  • While this study did not fully capture data regarding home NG feedings, 14% of patients sent home with NG feedings eventually received a GT

My take: This study indicates that 7% of ELBW infants undergo GT placement and that about one-third out-grow the need for GT supplementation after ~2 years.

Related blog posts:

Probiotics For NEC -More Work is Needed (part 1)

From Kipp Ellsworth’s Twitter Feed:

The Time for a Confirmatory NEC Probiotic Prevention Trial in ELBW Infants is Now. Editorial in J Peds  (The Journal of Pediatrics
Volume 165, Issue 2 , Pages 389-394, August 2014)

This editorial reviews previous studies and recommends implementing a Probiotic Trial in North America. Here’s an excerpt:

An adequately powered double-blinded placebo-controlled trial replicating a previous effective NEC prevention study in VLBW infants was published (the ProPrem trial)…the study revealed a significant reduction of NEC: from 4.4%-2.0% but no effect on mortality (4.9% vs 5.1%)…A closer look at the results of the ProPrem study, however, reveals that the probiotic supplementation did not have any effect on NEC in the ELBW (<1000 g) infants, which is consistent with two small previous studies reporting data on these infants separately.3642 Thus, there is currently no compelling evidence for recommending prophylactic probiotics to prevent NEC in infants with a birth weight <1000 g. Especially important is the lack of safety information in these most immature and highly vulnerable babies…Probiotics appear promising for use as prevention strategy for NEC, but there is still insufficient data for general recommendation of the use of probiotics in the ELBW infant. We argue, therefore, that now is the time to conduct in the North American setting, a high quality confirmative NEC prevention trial using probiotics in at-risk ELBW infants.”

Related blog post: