Tag Archives: Eosinophilic esophagitis

Natural History of EoE -Journal Club (Part 3)

Posted on by

This posting reviews the final article for our eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) journal club: Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013; 37: 114-21.

Design: Cross-sectional study of adult EoE patients (≥ 18 years) who were diagnosed at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.  Patients underwent dysphagia questionnaire, Mayo Dysphagia Questionnaire (MDQ-30), and a patient assessment of upper gastrointestinal disorders quality of life questionnaire (PAGI-QOL). Of 140 eligible patients, 53 completed the questionnaires, 66 were unable to be contacted, and 21 refused to participate.

The MDQ-30 has been validated as a tool for esophageal strictures of 15 mm or smaller.  It has not been confirmed as a EoE dysphagia tool.

Diagnosis: According to the authors, a diagnosis of EoE required a >20 eosinohils/hpf after a 2-month therapeutic trial of proton pump inhibitors.

Results:

  • Mean age 20.5 years.  98% were caucasian and 75% were male.  15% had a history of esophageal dilatation.
  • 6/53 had positive dysphagia scores.  However, 18/47 with negative scores reported ongoing difficulty swallowing.
  • 26 (49.1%) of subjects were receiving proton pump inhibitor therapy and 40 (76%) were following allergy-directed dietary elimination.  Most common allergy in this cohort was dairy (49%) followed by peanuts/tree nuts (23%), eggs (9%), wheat (9%), soy (8%), and seafood (2%).**
  • Overall, dietary QOL scores, but not overall QOL scores, were adversely affected by ongoing EoE.

**With regard to dietary therapy, there is a significant discrepancy in reported allergy avoidance in this cohort compared with some previous data published by this center. For example, Liacouras et al (Clin Gastro Hepatol 2006; 3: 1198) reported a  98% improvement with diet treatment (n=351) (2/3rds were treated with elemental diet, mostly NG, with food reintroduction).  Their protocol included rebiopsy after introduction of last new food.  75/242 responded to elimination of specific foods.  Overall pattern of food avoidance after biopsy: milk 45%, eggs 45%, soy 38%, corn 38%, wheat 30%, beef 30%, chicken 20%, potato /oats/peanuts 15%, turkey/barley 11%, pork 8%, rice 5%, green beans 3%, apples /pineapple 1%.*  The reported allergens in this study match up much more closely to a highly-selected group of patients that was more recently reported from their database and is reviewed separately (Picking the right diet for EoE | gutsandgrowth).  In this group, the authors stated that the most common foods by biopsy were the following: milk (35%), egg (13%), wheat (12%), soy (9%), corn (6%).

Study limitations:

  1. Small number of patients
  2. Low response rate/responder bias
  3. Retrospective cross-sectional study -does not provide longitudinal data
  4. Young age of subjects
  5. MDQ-30 not validated for dysphagia in EoE
  6. Tertiary children’s hospital with research focus on EoE
  7. No recent endoscopies in research cohort

Take-home message: EoE is a chronic disease with “little resolution of either symptoms or oesophageal eosinophilia without ongoing treatment.”

 

EoE -Journal Club (Part 2)

Posted on by

The third article for our journal club: Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013; 37: 1157-64.

This study involved a literature search which identified 10 articles which described the impact of proton pump inhibitor therapy for suspected eosinophilic esophagitis.  In total, these articles describe 258 patients (152 children and 106 adults).  Five of the studies were retrospective series.  The others included two randomized controlled trials, one randomized noncontrolled trial, and two prospective series.

Results: after PPI treatment, a clinical response was noted in 69% overall and histologic remission was evident in a mean of 44%.  Histologic remission was lower in children (23%-40%).  In two adult studies, both randomized controlled trials, PPI therapy (esomeprazole 40 mg/day) outperformed topical steroids (fluticasone 440 mcg bid); histologic remission was seen in 33% with PPI in both trials compared with 15% and 19% with fluticasone.

Key points in discussion:

  • PPI trial “is mandatory not only to confirm the presence of EoE, but to evaluate for PPI responsiveness.”  Yet, in surveys, …”only one-third of physicians thought it is necessary to initiate a PPI trial before diagnosing EoE.”
  • No clinical, endoscopic, histologic features nor pH testing “have demonstrated capacity to predict response to PPI therapy.”
  • PPI-REE “occurs in at least one-third of patients with suspected EoE, with response rates lower in children.”  Adults may have a higher response due to coexisting gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Related blog entry: gutsandgrowth | Pediatric Gastroenterology

EoE -Journal Club (Part 1)

Posted on by

This week our Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) journal club is meeting.  The first article had previously been reviewed on this blog: SFED works for EoE! | gutsandgrowth.

The second article examines the “Effect of Proton Pump Inhibitor on Esophageal Eosinophilia” (JPGN 2013; 56: 166-72). PPI responsive esophageal eosinophilia (PPI-REE) has also been discussed previously on this blog (EoE: Drugs, Diets, Dilatation and PPI–REE | gutsandgrowth); this article adds additional information to this subject and highlights the possibility of transient PPI-REE.

Design: retrospective review of 204 children with EoE (criteria included ≥15 dos/hpf) over an 11 year time span.  Only 35 subjects met the criteria of having an endoscopy before and after an exclusive 8-week trial of PPI (1-2 mg/kg/day).

Results: 8 of 35 subjects had clinical response and 7 had biopsy-confirmed response to PPIs ( 23%).  In five patients with durable response, mean eosinophil count decreased from 92 to 5 eos/hpf.  In addition, eosinophil peroxidase index (EPX) declined from 39.2 to 14.6.  Two patients experienced relapse despite initial PPI-responsiveness.  Clinical and histologic relapse occurred at 17 and 23 months respectively.  However, of the 5 subjects who did not experience relapse, average followup reported in study was only 8 months.

Study limitations: small number of patients, limited geographical area, tertiary medical center study, retrospective study, uncertain compliance with therapy, and variable dosing of PPIs

Take-home points:

  • No clinicopathologic features distinguished patients with PPI-REE from EoE patients or patients with transient PPI-REE. Yet, 23% (8/35) of initial cohort showed resolution of symptoms and 7/35 had resolution of esophageal inflammation after PPI treatment.
  • Potential explanations for transient PPI-REE: lack of PPI adherence, missed detection of EoE after PPI trial (patchy disease), variation in allergenic exposure, diminished effect of PPIs over time, fluctuation in EoE disease course unrelated to PPI usage

Related blog entries:

Also, for those of you who read all the way to the bottom, here’s a link to a culturally significant (aka viral video) advertisement that I thought was amusing (potty humor):

Kmart Big Gas Savings Ad (Video) – Daily Picks and Flicks

Limiting Cow’s Milk for EoE

Posted on by

A small retrospective study suggests that eliminating cow’s milk, without other interventions, can be effective in the treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) (JPGN 2012; 55: 711-16).

Out of 161 children with EoE, 17 patients were identified who excluded only cow’s milk from their diet.  Remission was noted in 65%.  Complete histologic remission (≤1 eosinophil/hpf) was noted in 7 patients (41%) and 4 (24%) had “significant remission” (defined as peak eosinophil count of 2-15/hpf).

This study, conducted in Chicago, took place between 2006-2011.  The majority of the patients treated at this institution are treated with dietary elimination: 61% with empiric elimination diet, 8% empiric elimination diet with topical steroids, and 7% with elemental diet.

The authors suggested that younger children may be more likely to benefit from this approach but cautioned against drawing firm conclusions due to the small ‘scope’ of this retrospective study.

 Related posts:

Lessons on Stature from Asthma Treated with Steroids

Posted on by

A study of the effects of budesonide for the treatment of asthma should be carefully considered by those of us who treat eosinophilic esophagitis with “topical” steroids; also, this study has applicability to Crohn’s disease patients receiving chronic glucocorticoids.  Mean adult height was 1.2 cm lower in the budesonide-treated asthmatics than in the placebo group (NEJM 2012; 367: 904-12).

This was the main finding at the end of the Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) clinical trial.  This report examined 943 of 1041 (90.6%) participants  who had received either 0.4 mg of budesonide, 16 mg of nedocromil or placebo daily for 4 to 6 years.  Treatment with these agents began between ages 5 to 13.

The reduction in adult height was to similar in adulthood as it was after 2 years of treatment; there was not catch up growth.  With regard to the adult measurements, 96.8% of the adult women were at least 18 years and the adult men were at least 20 years of age.

Other findings:

  • Larger daily dose: each microgram per kilogram was associated with -0.1 cm drop
  • Other risk groups: Hispanic ethnic group, female sex, greater body mass index, longer duration of asthma, and higher Tanner stage at initiation

The authors note that 0.2 mg dosage of budesonide has been shown to be effective to control asthma symptoms in children 5-11 years.  The “lowest effective dose” should be used; “the effect on adult height must be balance against the large and well-established benefit of these drugs in controlling persistent asthma.”

Related links:

Looking better or feeling better in EoE?

Guidelines for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Choosing topical therapy for EoE

The undiscovered country

Choosing topical therapy for EoE

Posted on by

A brief report adds useful information for topical therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) (Gastroenterol 2012; 143: 321-24).  This study involved 25 subjects in a prospective randomized open label design that compared budesonide delivered via either as a metered nebulized form (NEB) or as oral viscous solution (1 mg BID).  The mean age of the subjects was 35 years, 60% were male, 88% were caucasian, and all had dysphagia.

Findings:

  • Orally administered viscous budesonide (OVB) was more effective at lowering esophageal eosinophilia.  After treatment, eosinophil count per high power field was 11 for OVB compared with 89 for NEB formulation.
  • Nuclear scintigraphy showed that OVB had a significantly higher level of esophageal exposure to the therapeutic agent than NEB and did not result in lung exposure (which occurred in NEB group)
  • Both groups had improvement in dysphagia.  Poor correlation of symptoms and histology has frequently been reported.

These findings along with the fact that budesonide has less systemic corticosteroid effects, due to a high first-pass metabolism, makes OVB a logical choice for patients treated with topical steroids.

Previous related blog entries:

Guidelines for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Looking better or feeling better in EoE?

Look of improvement on an EoE diet

Eosinophilic Esophagitis -Six Food Group Diet

MicroRNA signature for eosinophilic esophagitis

The undiscovered country

Comparing diets in EoE

Posted on by

There remains a limited number of therapeutic options with EoE.  Dietary therapy can be effective as well as burdensome.  A closer look at dietary treatment effectiveness was recently published (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012; 129: 1570-8 –thanks to Seth Marcus for alerting me to this article).

Due to eligibility requirements, only 98 patients of an initial 513 met criteria.  The findings from this study may be difficult to generalize because of the following:

  • Highly selected patient population
  • Retrospective study.   Dietary therapy was NOT chosen randomly.
  • Study originates from a specialized center (Cincinnati) which attracts atypical cases of EoE

That being said, the study asks some important questions. What is the remission rate for skin test-directed elimination diet in comparison to six food group elimination diet (SFED) and to an elemental diet?  The SFED actually composed two groups (in my opinion, this is a significant flaw in the study design & has a limiting effect on the conclusions).  The ‘classical’ SFED (42% or 11/26) eliminated the six most common food groups (milk, soy, wheat, egg, nuts, fish/shellfish) whereas a ‘modified’ SFED (58% or 15/26)  combined the classical SFED with foods eliciting positive skin-testing.

Some of the authors terminology:

  • Complete remission: 1 or fewer eosinophils/hpf
  • Partial remission: 2-5 eos/hpf
  • Partial resolution: 6-14 eos/hpf
  • Remission: <15 eos/hpf
  • Non-remission: >15 eos/hpf

Skin prick tests (SPFs) were performed to as many as 62 foods and 11 environmental allergens and graded 0-4.  0 equated to negative control & 4 equated to histamine control -all interpreted at 15 minutes after placement.

Atopy patch tests (APTs) were interpreted at 48 hours with scoring between 0-4.  A score of 2 indicated “erythematous with generalized induration.”  Any score of 2 or higher was considered positive.

Food reintroduction process: “Food reintroductions were initiated only when the peak eosinophil count was less than 15 eosinophils/hpf. If symptoms occurred after reintroduction of a food, patients were instructed to discontinue that food, wait approximately 10 to 14 days, and then reintroduce another food…. A food reintroduction was considered successful if no symptoms were reported and the postpeak eosinophil count was less than 15 eosinophils/hpf.”

Why were so many patients excluded?  The main causes were 181 patients did not meet strict EoE criteria, 122 patients received glucocorticoids, and 52 patients had another eosinophilia-associated condition; less common reasons included patient age >21, being part of a separate drug trial, obvious noncompliance, different diet regimen, and not having 2 consecutive EGDs separated by dietary intervention.

How many endoscopies are needed for dietary therapy?   In this study, the average patient had 8.5 EGDs at Cincinnati.  The greatest number of EGDs took place among patients assigned to an elemental diet (average >11); these patients also had a longer followup period compared to the other two groups: 2.9 years compared with 1.1 for SFED and 2.1 for directed diet.

  • All three diets resulted in improvement in eosinophil count.
  • Overall Remission rates: 96% elemental, 81% SFED, 65% directed diet
  • Complete Remission rates:  59% elemental, 39% SFED, 30% directed diet

One interesting set of data is in Table 4.  This gives the pass rate for various foods with single and multiple food reintroductions.  Milk for example had a pass rate of 35% among the 17 patients who had this as a single food reintroduction.  The values ranged from a low pass rate of 29% for strawberries to a high pass rate of 78% for cocoa and 75% for pork. Soy, eggs, and wheat all hovered near 60% pass rate.

Conclusions by authors:

1. “SFED is no less successful than directed diet and consistent with unreliability of skin testing …Our data…undermine the value of skin test-directed dietary management. ” This is due to the fact that the disease mechanism is not an IgE-mediated disease (skin testing primarily detects IgE-mediated allergens).

2. Elemental diet is superior at inducing histologic remission. However, “multiple studies indicate that adherence is inversely related to the number of foods eliminated.”

Previous related posts:

Guidelines for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Looking better or feeling better in EoE?

Look of improvement on an EoE diet

Eosinophilic Esophagitis -Six Food Group Diet

MicroRNA signature for eosinophilic esophagitis

The undiscovered country

 

Looking better or feeling better in EoE?

Posted on by

When seeing a new diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), I often try to explain that there are two potential goals of treatment: clinical remission (improvement in symptoms) and histologic remission (improvement in appearance of esophagus with microscope).  Unfortunately, these two outcomes are not always synchronous; more proof of this comes from a recent study (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 742-49, 750-52 [editorial]).

In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of fluticasone in adult patients with a new diagnosis of EoE, 19 patients were treated with fluticasone (880 μg BID) and 15 patients were treated with placebo inhaler –for six weeks.  Initially, 21 patients were assigned to each group; 2 dropped out of treatment group and 6 dropped out of placebo group before completion of followup EGD.   The average age in the treatment group was 37 years versus 38 years in the placebo group.  A complete histologic response was defined as >90% reduction in mean eosinophil count; this occurred in 62% of fluticasone patients and in none of the placebo group, based on an intention-to-treat analysis.  Another measure of eosinophil activity, eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN), was reduced by 81% on intracellular staining in the treatment group compared with 8% in the placebo group.  Figures 1 through 3 show this staining –it’s pretty cool!

Yet, the clinical response was not statistically different.  Dysphagia was reduced by 57% in the treated subjects compared to 33% in the placebo subjects in an intention-to-treat analysis.  Results were improved modestly in those who actually were treated: 63% (12 of 19) compared to 47% of placebo patients.  A complete response for dysphagia was noted in 42.9% of fluticasone group compared with 28.6% of control group based on an intention-to-treat analysis.  A fairly high rate of candidiasis was noted in treated patients 26%;  no placebo patients developed candida.

Another interesting finding was that among those who continued PPIs for heartburn symptoms the response to fluticasone was not improved.  40% of PPI users had a complete histologic response compared with 79% of non-PPI users.

So what are the reasons for the discrepancy between clinical and histologic response?

  • Established strictures and small-caliber esophagus may require dilation rather than medicines to relieve dysphagia
  • Esophageal fibrosis and subsequent esophageal compliance may not respond to topical therapy or take a lot longer to improve
  • Secondary candidiasis may reduce clinical response –though in this study, 5 of 6 patients with candida did in fact have symptom resolution
  • Compensatory behaviors may improve clinical symptoms –chewing food, cutting up food better, drinking more fluids, and avoiding some foods.  This may make it harder to detect important differences.

Patient information link: (Eosinophilic esophagitis – CCDHC Home)

Related posts:

Look of improvement on an EoE diet

Guidelines for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Eosinophilic Esophagitis -Six Food Group Diet

The undiscovered country

MicroRNA signature for eosinophilic esophagitis

Look of improvement on an EoE diet

Posted on by

In this month’s Gastroenterology, 50 adults with Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) were treated with a 6-food elimination diet (SFED) (Gastroenterology 2012; 142: 1451-1459).  Repeat endoscopy after 6 weeks determined responsiveness.  Histologic response was defined by having <5 eosinophils/high power fields (eos/hpf).  In 20 patients, reintroduction of foods followed by repeat endoscopy was undertaken.

After SFED, 32 (64%) had peak eosinophil counts <5 eos/hpf.  Symptom scores decreased in 94%.  After trigger food reintroduction, eosinophil counts returned to pretreatment values.  The changes are clearly visible in Figure 5.  The pictures are almost like the weight loss commercials on TV –striking improvement.  I contemplated putting in a scan of the Gastroenterology cover, but have not received permission from the publisher.  Check out this link to view it yourself:

http://download.journals.elsevierhealth.com/pdfs/journals/0016-5085/PIIS0016508512006257.pdf

Based on reintroduction, the foods most commonly associated with EoE were wheat (60%), and milk (50%).  Skin-prick testing predicted only 13% of foods associated with EoE.  In general, these study results mirror results from pediatric studies, with the exception that milk allergy has been found to be more common in some pediatric studies.

Only 20 patients completed the reintroduction process.  This process involved adding 1 food group every 2 weeks.  If the patient had symptoms during reintroduction or remained on regimen for 4 weeks, then  endoscopy with biopsies was performed.  If recurrence noted based on symptoms or histology, this required a 6 week washout before additional food reintroduction.  Of note, median time for recurrence of symptoms was 3 days after reintroduction.

Six foods: milk, wheat, eggs, soy, shellfish/fish, nuts.

This study shows that, as in children, adult EoE is predominantly a food-allergy disease

Related blog entries:

Eosinophilic Esophagitis -Six Food Group Diet

Guidelines for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

MicroRNA signature for eosinophilic esophagitis

The undiscovered country

MicroRNA signature for eosinophilic esophagitis

Posted on by

In a previous post discussing MicroRNAs (miRNAs) (MicroRNAs and biliary atresia), I stated that “Despite this intriguing research, it not clear whether or when miRNAs will have an important role in bedside management.”  Well, as more articles emerge on miRNAs, it is becoming clear that miRNAs will have a role in clinical medicine; the questions are when and what cost.

The latest study (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012; 129: 1064-75) by Lu et al from Cincinnati shows how this technique can identify a specific signature for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and how miRNAs can serve as a biomarker for disease response.  The investigators took plasma and esophageal biopsy specimens from patients with EoE, reflux esophagitis, and healthy controls; they used an array comprising 677 miRNAs.  254 miRNAs were expressed at greater than background levels, but 21 upregulated miRNAs and 11 downregulated miRNAs were markedly different.

To quickly understand how useful this technology could become requires a glance at the “heat maps” showing the expression profile of the 21 upregulated miRNAs and the 11 downregulated miRNAs, comparing EoE with healthy controls (Figures 1 & 3).  In addition, in Figure 3, it is readily apparent that the expression pattern is completely different from reflux esophagitis.  Furthermore, this figure demonstrates visually a normal-appearing pattern in patients who respond to fluticasone.

Other figures in the article and in the appendix demonstrate the complex relationships between these specific miRNAs and target genes.

Key points:

  • miRNAs from tissue or blood could serve as biomarkers for the presence of EoE and response to therapy
  • Of the identified miRNAs, miR-21 and miR-223 strongly correlate with esophageal eosinophilia as well as previously described EoE transcriptome
  • Plasma miRNAs that are most differentiated in EoE include miR-146a, miR-146b, and miR-223.

Related posts:

Guidelines for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Eosinophilic Esophagitis -Six Food Group Diet

The undiscovered country