Likelihood of Celiac Disease with Conflicting Serology Results

R Mandile et al. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2025;81:1482–1487. Advantages of anti-endomysial evaluation in children with low titers of anti-transglutaminase antibodies: A retrospective study

This was a single center retrospective study examining children (n=202) undergoing EGD (2022-2024) to evaluate for celiac. Among those with low anti-TTG IgA titers, Group 1 (n=25) was EMA negative and Group 2 (n=100) was EMA positive.

Key findings:

  • The finding of discordant serology (anti-transglutaminase [anti-TG] positive and EMA negative) is infrequent (12% cases, 25 out of 202), and all patients with discordant serology had anti-TG positive at low titer (<4 times the upper limit of normality).
  • Group 1 (N = 25) had a mean anti-TG titer of 1.86× ULN and villous atrophy (VA) in only 8% (2/25). Group 2 (N = 100) had VA in 35% (35/100)
Percentage of patients with villous atrophy between EMA positive and EMA negative children.

Discussion Points:

  • The diagnosis of CD still requires performing an EGD in at least half of the cases
  • This “study suggests that patients with low levels of anti-TG but EMA positive antibodies should anyway receive an EGDS in the next 6 months, since in around one-third of the cases a duodenal atrophy will be detected”
  • In those with low anti-TG but EMA negative, ” it could be reasonable to initially follow-up patients over time with clinical and serological monitoring (in particular of anti-TG titer), postponing the EGDS to a later stage, when the disease is more advanced and the chance of finding a concomitant VA (and thus the need to start a GFD) is higher”

My take: In patients with minimal symptoms and low level anti-TG, my strategy has been to follow with serological monitoring and if repeatedly abnormal, proceed with endoscopy. This study suggests that obtaining EMA early may influence choice to proceed earlier with endoscopy.

Related blog posts

Celiac Disease: Lower TTG-IgA Titers Associated with Isolated Duodenal Bulb Presentation

QY Wang et al. JPGN 2025; 80:678–685. Open Access! Low TTG-IgA associated with isolated bulb pathology in pediatric celiac disease: Implications in a no-biopsy approach era

Methods: There were 405 cases included in this retrospective study (mean age = 9.6 years). TTG-IgA values were considered negative if <4 U/mL, equivocal between 4 and 10 U/mL inclusively, and positive if >10 U/mL. At the authors’ institution, TTG‐IgA ≥10× ULN corresponds to ≥100 U/mL.

Key findings:

  • Bulb-restricted CD was present in 7.4% of cases
  • TTG-IgA was negative or equivocal in 60.0% of bulb-restricted CD, compared to 5.3% of distal duodenal CD (odds ratio [OR] = 26.6
  • No bulb-restricted CD cases attained TTG-IgA ≥10× ULN, compared to 48.5% of distal duodenal CD

My take: This study confirms and quantitates what most clinicians have experienced. Isolated duodenal bulb pathology is associated with lower celiac titer abnormalities.

Related blog posts:

Gorgeous stained glass by Margaret Vetter at Piedmont Arts Festival

Is it Helpful to Check Celiac Serology Titers After 3 Months of a Gluten Free Diet?

A recent prospective study (D Petroff et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 16: 1442-49) with 345 pediatric patients with biopsy-proven celiac disease (CD) examined serologic response to a gluten-free diet (GFD) between 2012-2015.

Key findings:

  • Mean TTG IgA concentration decreased 14-fold after 3 months of a GFD.  The study assay used kits from EUROIMMUN.
  • TTG IgA remained above 1-fold ULN in 83.8% and above 10-fold ULN in 26.6%.
  • Deamidated gliadin IgA (DGL IgA) decreased in the vast majority but did not distinguish response of GFD from random fluctuations.
  • The authors note that symptoms improved in most on GFD, but short-term response could reflect “regression to the mean…for a considerable share” as symptoms improved in the non-GFD group as well.

In their discussion, the authors reference a large study (n=487) which showed mean normalization of TTG IgA of ~400 days; longer times were noted in those with type 1 diabetes and higher baseline values.

My take: This study, while showing that TTG IgA levels improve after 3 months of a GFD, helps solidify my opinion that in those who are improving, followup serology could be obtained later.  My practice is to have followup serology after 6 months of a GFD in the majority of patients.

Related blog posts:

Lake Moraine, Banff