Tag Archives: calprotectin

Transmural Disease, Biomarkers, and Correlation between MRI and Endoscopy

Posted on by

A recent study (I Weinstein-Nakar et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 16: 1089-97, editorial 1037-39)) provide data from 151 children who underwent multiple modalities to assess their Crohn’s disease (CD) (ImageKids Study group).

Key findings:

  • MRE and ileocolonoscopy had concordance in 69% of cases.  55% had neither transmural nor mucosal healing, 14% had both transmural and mucosal healing.
  • MRE did not show features of active disease in 25% that was identified on ileocolonoscopy.  This is an expected finding given the ability of endoscopy (& capsule endoscopy) to identify milder mucosal lesions more precisely.
  • MRE did show evidence of disease in 6% who had unremarkable ileocolonoscopy (mucosal healing)
  • Calprotectin at a cut-off of 100 mcg/mL had 71% sensitivity and 92% specificity for diagnosing mucosal and transmural healing whereas a level of 300 mcg/mL had a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 81%.

My take: This study confirms the complementary nature of cross-sectional imaging with endoscopy to determine healing.  In addition, in children with CD, calprotectin levels of more than 100 mcg/mL could indicate the need for further assessment (if this would affect management).

This is in agreement with another recent post: IBD Reviews: Antibiotics and Biomarkers:  “a calprotectin has a high level of excluding active inflammation/IBD. In populations with IBD, levels more than 250 mcg/g indicate a high likelihood of active inflammation whereas levels between 100-250 are indeterminate.”

Related blog posts:

Sunshine Meadows, Banff Nat’l Parke

Active Colitis More Likely in Children in Clinical Remission Who Have PSC and IBD

Posted on by

A recent study (A Ricciuto et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 16: 1098-1105) provides more data regarding the lack of symptom correlation and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) activity in children with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC).

In a prospective study of children with colonic IBD with and without PSC, the authors followed clinical features (eg. PUCAI), fecal calprotectin and endoscopy severity.

Key findings:

  • Patients with PSC-IBD (n=37) in clinical remission had higher endoscopic scores and greater odd of active endoscopic disease than IBD-only controls (n=50) (odds ratio 5.9, with CI 1.6-21.5)
  • Fecal calprotectin level <93 mcg/g were identified mucosal healing with 100% sensitivity and 92% specificity when compared with UC Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS)

Overall, this study is in agreement with a prior adult study showing higher levels of active disease in those with PSC-IBD compared to those with IBD alone, despite clinical remission (Why does PSC increase the risk of colorectal cancer in UC?).

My take: Particularly in individuals with the combination of IBD-PSC, objective biomarkers (eg. Calprotectin) are needed to identify the accuracy of clinical remission; though, even in patients with IBD without PSC, objective biomarkers are needed as well due to the limitations of clinical symptom indices.

Related blog posts:

Moraine Lake, Banff

IBD Reviews: Role of Antibiotics and Data on Biomarkers

Posted on by

A clinical review, “Antibiotics in IBD: Still a Role in the Biological Era?” (O Ledder, D Turner, Inflamm Bowel Dis 2018; 24: 1676-88).  While this article provides a detailed review of the use of antibiotics for Crohn’s (including perianal disease), Ulcerative colitis and the effects on the microbiome, the potential use for very early onset (VEO) IBD caught my attention:

“We have recently begun considering oral vancomycin and gentamicin as sole firstline therapy in the rare form of infantile (ie <2 years of age) mild to moderate IBD, with promising success…this is merely investigational” at this time.  (Ref: Lev-Tzion R et al. Digestion 2017; 95: 310-13).

My take: Antibiotics can be a helpful adjunct therapy in both Crohn’s disease and Ulcerative colitis. It is unclear what role antibiotics will have for VEO-IBD.

A recent commentary (R Khanna et al, Inflamm Bowel Dis 2018; 24: 1619-23) examines the role of biomarkers.  While much of this topic has been reviewed extensively, I found the part about calprotectin helpful.  One of the topics with discrepant data has been the negative predictive value of calprotectin for detecting inflammatory bowel disease.  The data in this review:

  • From a meta-analysis in patients with symptomatic ulcerative colitis, calprotectin had a sensitivity of 0.88 and specificity of 0.79 compared to endoscopic inflammation.  For Crohn’s disease, the respective values were 0.87 and 0.67.
  • For histologic remission in ulcerative colitis, a study found that with a threshold of 155 mcg/g, calprotectin had a sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 71%.
  • Another study suggested that values <100 mcg/g indicate quiescent disease, values 100-250 suggest possible active inflammation, and values >250 mcg/g suggest active inflammation.
  • A cross-sectional study indicated that calprotectin ≥57  mcg/g had a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 90% to identify endoscopically-active disease (Gastroenterol 2016; 150: 96-102)

My take: Sensitivity/specificity vary greatly based on the likelihood of disease; in populations at lower risk for IBD, a calprotectin has a high level of excluding active inflammation/IBD. In populations with IBD, levels more than 250 mcg/g indicate a high likelihood of active inflammation whereas levels between 100-250 are indeterminate.

Related blog posts:

 

 

CALM Study: Tight Control Improves Outcomes in Crohn’s Disease

Posted on by

A recent study (JF Colombel et al. Lancet 2017; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32641-7 ) shows that “tight control” improves outcomes in Crohn’s disease.  This study was alluded to in a previous post: CCFA 2017 Updates (part 2)

Background: The CALM study was an open-label, randomized study.  122 adult patients were randomized to typical clinical management and 122 patients received “tight control” in which treatment was modified by fecal calprotectin (≥250 mcg/g) and CRP (≥ 0.5 mg/dL) values in addition to clinical symptoms.

Treatment was escalated in both groups in a stepwise manner.  Initial treatment was with adalimumab induction and then every other week. If patient did not meet treatment objectives, which differed in the groups, then adalimumab would be given every week, and then, if still needed, azathioprine would be added. Interestingly, both groups had ~25% of participants who were smokers which is known to worsen outcomes.

Key Findings:

  • Mucosal healing (CDEIS <4) was significantly improved in tight control group at week 48: 46% vs. 30%.
  • Similarly, steroid-free remission based on CDAI <150 was better in tight control group compared with standard treatment at week 48: 59.8% vs. 39.3%.  Endoscopic response was 50.8% compared with 40.2% respectively.

My take (1st part borrowed from authors): “Tight control of inflammation in patients with Crohn’s disease, with objective markers of disease activity  and clinical symptoms to drive treatment decisions, achieved better endoscopic and clinical outcomes than conventional care based on symptoms alone.” Yet, there are a large number who do not respond adequately and better treatments in these patients are needed.

As an aside, these response rates based on objective markers are far lower than the remission rates claimed by ImproveCareNow; thus, while ImproveCareNow is forward-thinking and helping improve outcomes with inflammatory bowel disease, we need to be careful about citing remission rate trends that are not directly linked to objective markers.

#NASPGHAN17 IBD Treat to Target and Tight Control

Posted on by

More information from this year’s annual NASPGHAN meeting.

This blog entry has abbreviated/summarized these presentations. Though not intentional, some important material is likely to have been omitted; in addition, transcription errors are possible as well.

IBD Treat to Target: Treat the Patient or Treat the Disease

Robert Baldassano  Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia

I missed the first few minutes of this presentation, even though I had highlighted this as one of my top priorities.  So, if anyone reading this post has some additional comments, they are certainly welcome.

Key points:

  • Do not rely on symptoms alone to assess patient improvement.
  • Best surrogate marker: calprotectin.  Frequent calprotectin levels can help determine objective improvement; it is much more helpful than CRP as ~25% of patients do not elevate their CRP levels
  • Therapeutic drug monitoring is important in improving outcomes. Dose optimization improves response rate and durability of infliximab response.
  • Evolving targets in ulcerative colitis.  Even histologic activity, in the absence of endoscopic activity, is associated with relapsing disease
  • Dr. Baldassano indicated that he no longer is starting patients on thiopurine therapy. There are “36 phase 3 trials underway.” Thus, many promising options for those who may burn through current treatments
  • This lecture reviewed data from the RISK study showing that early (1st 90 days w/in diagnosis) TNF therapy helps prevent penetrating disease (related post: CCFA Update 2017/RISK study)

Another presentation by Philip Minar et al (Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center) shows that CD64 suppression is an early biomarker of response to infliximab therapy.

CCFA: Updates in Inflammatory Bowel Disease 2017 (Part 4)

Posted on by

Our local CCFA chapter provided a useful physician CME meeting.  The following are my notes. My notes may include some errors in transcription and errors of omission.

Ashish Patel  -Updates in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treatments

Key points:

  • Top-down or step-up models are outdated –use appropriate agent for each patient
  • Discussed therapeutic drug monitoring.  In pediatrics, checking infliximab (IFX) level after 14 weeks is recommended by ICN per Dr. Patel.
  • Veolizumab -no pediatric FDA indication yet..  Alpha4Beta7 integrin blocker –blocks recruitment of WBC
  • Stelara -off label in pediatrics.  Seems to be helpful for patients who have psoriasis on TNF agents.
  • Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) like medical therapies are therapies and not cures.  It has to be maintained to be effective.

Disclaimer: These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) and changes in diet should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

CCFA: Updates in Inflammatory Bowel Disease 2017 (part 2)

Posted on by

Douglas Wolf -New Treatments and New Strategies

  • More proactive approach is recommended; this leads to less surgery, less hospitalization, and less antibodies to infliximab
  • Risk assessment should guide treatment; higher risk indicates a need for more aggressive therapy
  • Higher doses of anti-TNFs appropriate in some cases (eg weekly Humira)
  • For distal colitis/proctitis, budesonide foam is an alternative to cortifoam
  • Azathioprine monotherapy has a low response rate
  • Combination therapy may not be needed if good IFX levels obtained.  Though, it is possible that development of antibodies precludes achieving good levels; thus, combination therapy may increase likelihood of good levels by reducing antibody formation, particularly earlier in course
  • Vedolizumab can be shortened to q4weeks if not improving.
  • CALM study: symptom based management compared to management based treat-to-target relying on CRP, and calprotectin. Improved outcomes with treatment based on CRP, calprotectin in addition to symptoms.
  • Tofacitinib –will be available in 2018 for ulcerative colitis

Chiristina Ha -Treatment Strategies in the Elderly

Dr. Ha referenced Dr. Sandborn who recently stated that combination therapy should be first-line therapy in moderate-to-severe disease –though this may be different in elderly patients.

  • Older age –increases mortality risk
  • Immunosenescence -relative immunodeficiency state associated with aging
  • Pharmokinetic changes with aging
  • Increased susceptibility to drug toxicity (eg. Renal, hepatic)
  • Older patients usually excluded from therapeutic trials
  • Polypharmacy is more common

Treatment:

  • Frequent strategy in elderly has been using 5-ASAs and steroids, even in moderate-to-severe disease. This has been due to increased fear of adverse events with IMM and anti-TNFs.  However, using data from rheumatoid arthritis, older patients’ biggest risk is steroids.
  • Thiopurines have unfavorable risk profile in the elderly.
  • Anti-TNFs are not as effective in the elderly
  • Preliminary data on vedolizumab -very limited data, may work better in older patients
  • Most common infections by be reduced considerably by immunizations. (eg.  ,bacterial pneumonia, herpes zoster)
  • Correct anemia, nutritional deficiencies

Disclaimer: These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) and changes in diet should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Fecal Calprotectin Monitoring Helpful at Identifying Relapse in IBD

Posted on by

Thanks to Ben Gold for this reference: Y. Zhulina et al. Aliment Pharm Ther 2016; 44: 495-504.

Methods: 

  • Patients aged 18 years or older, with a known diagnosis of IBD in clinical remission, were prospectively studied. Patients provided faecal samples every third month and were prospectively followed until the first clinical relapse or the end of the 2-year follow-up period.  
  • Relapse was defined as increasing symptoms necessitating intensified medical therapy or surgery.

Key finding:

  • Among 104 patients, Crohn’s disease (n = 49) and ulcerative colitis (n = 55), 37 had a relapse. A doubling of faecal calprotectin level between two consecutively collected samples was associated with a 101% increased risk of relapse (HR: 2.01; 95% CI: 1.53–2.65; P < 0.001).

My take: Another study showing that stool calprotectin is quite useful. How long will it be until I will not need to write letters to insurance companies to get this test covered?

Also noted in the same issue: 
“The safety of autologous and metabolically fit bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells in medically refractory Crohn’s disease – a phase 1 trial with three doses” (pages 471–481) T. Dhere, I. Copland, M. Garcia, K. Y. Chiang, R. Chinnadurai, M. Prasad, J. Galipeau and S. Kugathasan. Aliment Pharm Ther 2016; 44: 471-81. This study examined the use of mesenchymal stromal cells in 12 patients.

In conclusion, a single infusion of fresh autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells propagated ex vivo using a non xenogeneic human platelet lysate growth supplement at doses ranging 2–10 million cell/kg BW was well tolerated in patients with medically refractory moderate to severe Crohn’s disease in this preliminary study. Our data neither addressed long-term safety nor sustained efficacy. However, this study informs that a future phase 2 study 

A previous study of mesenchymal stromal cells was briefly discussed in a previous blog: Sanjay Gupta is Wrong…about Stem Cell Therapy

Related blog posts:

Hidden Lake at Glacier National Park

Hidden Lake at Glacier National Park

Best Fecal Marker for Crohn’s Disease: Calprotectin

Posted on by

A recent study (EK Wright et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2016; 22: 1086-94) collected data from 135 participants in a prospective, randomized, controlled trial aimed at preventing postoperative Crohn’s disease (CD) recurrence.  As part of this study, serial stool collections enabled comparison of fecal markers: calprotectin (FC), lactoferrin (FL) and S100A12 (FS).

FC was the optimal marker and was superior to CRP and CDAI. Table 4 provides a list of sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for each of the fecal markers at various cutoffs.

For FC, using the optimal cutoff of 135 mcg/g, the sensitivity was 0.87, specificity was 0.66, PPV was 56%, and NPV 91%.  A lower cutoff (50 mcg/g) improved sensitivity to 0.96 and NPV to 94%; whereas a higher cutoff (200 mcg/g) lowered the sensitivity to 71% but improved the specificity to 0.74 along with raising the PPV% to 59%.

My take: While the yield of a test changes based on the population examined, this report indicates that it is likely that calprotectin would outperform the other fecal inflammatory markers in most settings.

Related blog posts:

Briefly noted: G Gale et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2016; 22: 1071-77.  This report describes more extensive disease when there is concomitant orofacial granulomatosis with Crohn’s disease.

Paris from Postcards

Paris from Postcards, Vik Muniz

ParisCaption