Three-fer on Steatotic Liver Disease

  1. JJ Wattacheril, MF Abdelmalek et al. Gastroenterol 2023; 165: 1080-1088. Open Access! AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Role of Noninvasive Biomarkers in the Evaluation and Management of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Expert Review

This article offers best practice advice -here are two of them:

#2: A Fibrosis 4 Index score <1.3 is associated with strong negative predictive value for advanced hepatic fibrosis and may be useful for exclusion of advanced hepatic fibrosis in patients with NAFLD.

#8 Patients with NAFLD and NITs (noninvasive tests) results suggestive of advanced fibrosis (F3) or cirrhosis (F4) should be considered for surveillance of liver complications (eg, hepatocellular carcinoma screening and variceal screening per Baveno criteria). Patients with NAFLD and NITs suggestive of advanced hepatic fibrosis (F3) or (F4), should be monitored with serial liver stiffness measurement; vibration controlled transient elastography; or magnetic resonance elastography, given its correlation with clinically significant portal hypertension and clinical decompensation.

2. AJ Sanyal et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21: 2889-2900. Validation of a Clinical Risk-based Classification System in a Large Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Real-world Cohort

In this study from U.S., patients (n=2523) were divided into three categories based on FIB-4 scores: (A) Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) <1.3 and/or liver-stiffness measurement (LSM) measured by Fibroscan <8 kp, (B) FIB-4 1.31‒2.6 and/or LSM 8.1-12.5 kp, and (C) FIB-4 >2.6 and/or LSM >12.5 kp. However, those in class A with aspartate transaminase:alanine transaminase ratio >1 or platelets <150,000/mm3, or class B with aspartate transaminase:alanine transaminase ratio >1 or platelets <150,000/mm3 were upstaged by one class. The data were reviewed retrospectively from a prospective longitudinal cohort (TARGET-NASH)

Key findings: All adverse outcomes including liver and cardiovascular (see below) were correlated with FIB-4 staging.

S Man et al. Gastroenterol 2023; 165: 1025-1040. Open Access! Prevalence of Liver Steatosis and Fibrosis in the General Population and Various High-Risk Populations: A Nationwide Study With 5.7 Million Adults in China

Key findings: The prevalence of steatosis, severe steatosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis was 44.39%, 10.57%, 2.85%, and 0.87%, respectively in Chinese adults

Limitation: This data was derived from a health checkup cohort which could give different results than a random population sampling. Patients at health checkups may be more health conscious and/or be aware of underlying health concerns.

Prevalence of different grades of liver fibrosis in different age groups.

My take: Steatotic liver disease is a huge worldwide problem. The growing prevalence is going to result in extensive health issues.

—————

This year’s pumpkin 910/31/23):

It does not look like I will become a professional pumpkin artist anytime soon!

Pilot Study of Elafibranor in Children with NASH (MASH)

NP Goyal et al. JPGN 2023; 77: 160-165. An Open Label, Randomized, Multicenter Study of Elafibranor in Children With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

Ten males [mean 15.1 years, standard deviation (SD) 2.2] with NASH were randomized to once daily treatment with Elafibranor: 80 mg (n = 5) or 120 mg (n = 5). Elafibranor, a dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α/δ agonist, has been proposed as a treatment for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH, aka Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH)). Key findings:

  • End of treatment mean ALT was 52 U/L (SD 20) for the 120 mg group, with a relative mean ALT change from baseline of −37.4% (SD 23.8%) at 12 weeks.
  • Elafibranor was rapidly absorbed and well tolerated.

My take: I think we are on the verge of identifying medications which will be able to improve outcomes for those with steatotic liver disease.

Related blog posts:

Rock Jumping -from Cap D;Ail Trail (near Eze, France)

You No Longer Have Fatty Liver Disease-You Have Steatotic Liver Disease!

A total of 236 panelists from 56 countries participated in four online surveys and two hybrid meetings.

Key points:

  • Steatotic liver disease (SLD) was chosen as an overarching term to encompass the various “aetiologies” of steatosis.
  • The name chosen to replace NAFLD was metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). There was consensus to change the definition to include the presence of at least one of five cardiometabolic risk factors (see 2nd figure).
  • The term steatohepatitis was felt to be an important pathophysiological concept that should be retained. Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is the replacement term for NASH.
  • Those with no metabolic parameters and no known cause were deemed to have cryptogenic SLD.
  • A new category, outside pure MASLD, termed MetALD was selected to describe those with MASLD who consume greater amounts of alcohol per week (140 to 350 g/week and 210 to 420 g/week for females and males respectively). 

AASLD News Digest: “MASLD, formerly known as NAFLD, is the most common chronic liver disease around the world, affecting more than 30% of global population. This was why it was vital that the global liver community coalesce around an affirmative, non-stigmatizing name and diagnosis. Ultimately, the global members of the Nomenclature Development Initiative were focused on ensuring the global community had better nomenclature that could be used around the world so that the research and funding could be better directed to save more people’s lives.”

My take: NAFLD is now MASLD –time to update patient handouts (hopefully someone at GIKids.org is on top of this). Aslo, if you have really bad disease, should it be called the ‘monster MASH’ ?