Category Archives: General Health

Reason for Optimism

Posted on by

While yesterday’s post (No exaggeration: too many children are dying in U.S.) highlighted the numerous unnecessary childhood deaths in this country and previous posts have discussed the drop in life expectancy in this country, there are still reasons for optimism.

It has been said that newspapers/news programs never report on the thousands of airplanes that don’t crash everyday.  Similarly, it is easy to think that with so many challenges that we face everyday that the world is falling apart.  A recent NY Times commentary by Nicholas Kristof points out that 2018 was in fact the best year ever.

Why 2018 Was the Best Year in Human History!

An excerpt:

[In 2018] Each day on average, about another 295,000 people around the world gained access to electricity for the first time, according to Max Roser of Oxford University and his Our World in Data website. Every day, another 305,000 were able to access clean drinking water for the first time. And each day an additional 620,000 people were able to get online for the first time.

Never before has such a large portion of humanity been literate, enjoyed a middle-class cushion, lived such long lives, had access to family planning or been confident that their children would survive…

Child deaths are becoming far less common. Only about 4 percent of children worldwide now die by the age of 5. That’s still horrifying, but it’s down from 19 percent in 1960 and 7 percent in 2003…

Until about the 1950s, a majority of humans had always lived in “extreme poverty,” defined as less than about $2 a person per day. When I was a university student in the early 1980s, 44 percent of the world’s population lived in extreme poverty. Now, fewer than 10 percent of the world’s population lives in extreme poverty, as adjusted for inflation.

My take: This commentary points out that worldwide people are living longer and living better.

From Golden Gulch Trail, Death Valley

No Exaggeration: Too Many Children Are Dying in the U.S.

Posted on by

A recent report (RM Cunningham et al. NEJM 2018; 379: 2468-75; editorial 2466-7) highlights the poor outcomes for children in the U.S. based mainly on the CDC WONDER (Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research) database.

Key findings:

  • “The sad fact is that a child or adolescent in the United States is 57% more likely to die by the age of 19 years than those in other wealthy nations.”
  • Motor vehicle accidents (MVA) are the number one cause of deaths in children/adolescents, accounting for 20% of such deaths.  The U.S. rate of death from MVAs is “triple that in other developed countries.”  Overall, MVA deaths had dropped in half from 1999-2013 but have increased in last few years; this increase is thought to be related to distracted driving/walking due to cellphones.
  • Firearm-related deaths accounted for 15% of deaths in children/adolescents in U.S.  In U.S., children/adolescents are “36 times as likely to be killed by gunshots.”  Unlike adults in U.S., the majority of these gunshots are homicides (59%) rather than suicides (35%); unintentional firearm deaths accounted for 4% (2% undetermined firearm-related death).  Among U.S. adults, 62% of deaths from firearms were from suicide.
  • Malignant neoplasms were the third leading mortality cause in children/adolescents, 9%. This rate is similar to other countries.

The figures in the study are very helpful:

  • Figure 2: Deaths from MVAs for the U.S. pediatric population are more similar to low-to-middle income countries (Figure 2A) whereas firearm-related deaths are much greater than all of the countries shown in Figure 2B (including Sweden, England, Hungary, Australia, Austria, Thailand, Tajikistan, Romania, Mongolia).
  • Figure 3. Deaths in U.S. rural areas are roughly double from MVAs than from the average of urban/suburban areas.  Deaths from firearms are similar in all three areas.  There are several factors which could explain the high rate of fatal MVAs in rural areas: longer time to get medical attention, faster speeds in less populous areas, less seat belts, lower enforcement of traffic laws, and impaired driving.

My take: The increased risk of death from MVAs and firearms identified in this study should not be considered “accidents” but failures.  Is it too much to expect that a child born in the U.S. could have the same chance to reach adulthood as a child in Canada or a child in Europe?

Related blog posts:

 

Late-Night Pages –Are they a Conspiracy?

Posted on by

A few thoughts while I’m still in a post-call daze:

One of my biggest gripes is that there must be a hidden camera in my bedroom.  Someone must monitor this camera whenever I am on call.  Because everytime, every single time it seems, someone calls me 15-20 minutes after I get in bed.  As soon as I get nice and cozy and start to doze off, it is a guarantee that I will get a page.  In addition, it is usually something that could have been called hours earlier.  Last night, at 11:22 pm, a nurse from the hospital called me to say that a 12 year old girl (who was well-nourished) had not been eating all evening and wanted to know if we should put in an NG tube.

Despite my antipathy for late-night calls, particularly some pointless ones, I try to always project a pleasant demeanor on the phone.  I might grumble after a call but not during.  There have been so many times when I have received timely information from nurses which have made important changes in a patient’s care.

Unwanted phone calls remind me of an anecdote that I heard in fellowship.  My mentor said he had received a pointless call from a family at 4 am about their young son.  So, he decided to set his alarm clock for 4 am the next morning and asked the parents how the son had been doing.  Later that morning, the family called the GI division to report the phone call.  They said, ‘When he called us at 4 am, we realized that he could not sleep because he was so worried about our child.  He is an amazing doctor.’

On another topic, can someone explain to me why it seems that whenever I am retrieving a foreign body that the forceps always line up parallel to the object rather than in the optimal perpendicular?

I sometimes tell colleagues that when I am post-call that I don’t realize how it has affected me.  Sometimes I am ‘punch-drunk’ and think everything is funny.  Sometimes I am irritable –but in my view –always justified.  The next day is sometimes like the difference portrayed in the snickers bar commercial where Betty White is transformed into a young adult.

Related blog post:

 

 

How Parents Feel After Tracheostomy Decision

Posted on by

A recent study (S Nageswaran et al. J Pediatr 2018; 203; 354-60) examined parents’ perceptions about their decision to proceed with a tracheostomy.  As a GI doctor, I am not directly involved in the discussions about tracheostomy; however, we interact closely with many complex patients whose families have reached this decision.  Many times I have wondered whether families regret this decision and whether a more palliative approach may have been appropriate in some children.

In this study with interviews from 56 caregivers of 41 children, their was very high satisfaction with the decision to proceed with a tracheostomy.  All children in this study had a tracheostomy for 5 years or less.

The parents reported the following reasons:

  • Extending the life of their children.  In fact, many parents reported there were no other options available to ensure their children’s survival; thus, many caregivers felt they did not have a choice other than a tracheostomy.
  • Being able to provide care at home
  • Improvement in respiratory symptoms
  • Improved quality of life
  • Physical and developmental health

Key finding: Among 38 interviews, 38 out of 41 explicitly expressed satisfaction with their decision to pursue a tracheostomy.  In none of the interviews did any caregiver express clear regrets about their decision.

At the same time, the parents acknowledged difficulties like mucus plugs, accidental decannulation, and difficulty of home care with a tracheostomy..

Suicide Rate Up 33% in Last 20 Years & Can We Stop It?

Posted on by

A recent article in USAToday highlights the increasing problem of suicides in U.S.:Suicide rate up 33% in less than 20 years, yet funding lags behind other top killers

Also, at the bottom of this post is more information on the topic of whether we can stop suicide from happening.

An excerpt from USAToday:

“More than 47,000 Americans killed themselves in 2017, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention … contributing to an overall decline in U.S. life expectancy. Since 1999, the suicide rate has climbed 33 percent. 

Americans are more than twice as likely to die by their own hands, of their own will, than by someone else’s. But while homicides spark vigils and protests, entering into headlines, presidential speeches and police budgets, suicides don’t. Still shrouded in stigma, many suicides go unacknowledged save for the celebrities – Robin Williams, Kate Spade, Anthony Bourdain – punctuating the unrelenting rise in suicide deaths with a brief public outcry. 

And research suggests our ways of living may be partly to blame, in ways that don’t bode well for the future.

Alcohol and substance abuse are risk factors, and both are increasing. Isolation raises the risk, and nearly half of Americans say they sometimes or always feel alone. Increasing smartphone use has been linked to suicidal thoughts in teens. Even climate change has been found to have roughly the same effect on increasing suicides as an economic recession.”

A related commentary from the NY Times: Can We Stop Suicides? details the reasons for suicides and discusses the potential of ketamine as a treatment for depression/suicidality.

 

Interesting Study -Detrimental Dose-Response of Screen Time

Posted on by

In 1995, there was a Batman movie, “Batman Forever,” in which one of the central villains, the Riddler, places these brainwave devices over the TVs to gain control of Gotham.  The sad part, according to a recent study (J Zhao et al. J Pediatr 2018; 202; 157-62) is there is no need to add a brainwave device to a TV set.  Excessive screen time alone is quite detrimental.

In this cross-sectional survey in Shanghai with more than 20,000 children, the authors found the following:

  • Mean screen time for preschool children was 2.8 hrs per day.  78.6% exceeded 1 hour per day and 53% exceeded 2 hrs per day.
  • Every additional hour of screen time was associated with increased risk for poor psychosocial well-being; this effect on well-being had a number of mediators including reducing parent-child interaction as well as increased body mass index and reduced sleep duration.

My take: This study reinforces the consequences of excessive screen time  –now, the hard part — how to translate these findings into reduction in screen time.

Related blog posts:

 

 

Adverse Childhood Experiences

Posted on by

Recently, I attended the 17th Annual Donald Schaffner lecture.  This lecture honors the legacy of an outstanding surgeon who I had the opportunity to work with many years ago.  One of my partners, Dr. Jeff Lewis, has been instrumental in arranging these annual lectures.

This terrific lecture by Emory physician, Dr. Stan Sonu, focused on Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs).  While this has been a pervasive long-standing problem, there has been heightened interest in this topic following the shameful policy of promoting childhood separations at the U.S.-Mexico border.

This lecture explained how widespread the problem of ACEs is among children born in the U.S., even among the affluent.  Much of the lecture focused on the ACEs study which included a cohort of 17,000 –all of whom were insured and 75% were white and 75% were college educated.

Here are pictures of some of the slides -which explain the scope the problem and the consequences of ACEs:

The above slide provides the three take home points.

The slide above shows associations between ACEs and smoking drinking, and IV drug use. The slides below shows associations between ACEs and negative mental health outcomes,  chronic diseases, and poor work performance.

The slide above demonstrates that adverse health effects are increased even among 18-34 year olds. The slide below showed that learning problems are associated with ACEs as well; thus, the effects of ACEs start in childhood.

The slide above coincided with discussions (&other slides) of how toxic stress can result in physical changes to the brain.

The slide above (which is difficult to see)  indicates that while we see the health effects, we often are not seeing ACEs directly.

Dr. Sonu stated the single most protective factor was having a stable relationship with caregiver.

 

 

Are Patients (but not Doctors) Better Off with EMRs?

Posted on by

A terrific piece by Atul Gawande explores the issues related to adoption of EMRs (electronic medical records): Why Doctors Hate Their Computers

He reviews in-depth many of the reasons why doctors face difficulties with their EMRs:

  • Spending twice as long in front of computer screen instead of with patients
  • Longer days
  • Endless problem lists
  • Inability to delegate some tasks (that previously were done by staff) and needing to provide more information on orders

“Gregg Meyer … the chief clinical officer at Partners HealthCare, Meyer supervised the software upgrade.

‘We think of this as a system for us and it’s not,’ he said. ‘It is for the patients.’

While some sixty thousand staff members use the system, almost ten times as many patients log into it to look up their lab results, remind themselves of the medications they are supposed to take, read the office notes that their doctor wrote in order to better understand what they’ve been told. Today, patients are the fastest-growing user group for electronic medical records.”

Hospital systems can use EMRs in various ways:

Other topics:

  • the emergence of scribes, including scribes in places like India where doctors transcribe recorded patient visits.
  • physician burnout
  • alarm/signal fatigue
  • ” the inevitability of conflict between our network connections and our human connections.”

My take: This is a terrific article and shows why physicians are struggling with EMRs; this article explains the problem in a way that is easy for non-physicians to grasp.  It shows that other professions face similar challenges.

Related blog posts on EMRs:

 

More on the Flu -5 Reasons for the Flu Shot

Posted on by

Last year’s deadly flu was likely due in part due to a low rate of vaccination.

From NPR: 5 Reasons Why You Need the Flu Shot

Last year “more than 80,000 people died from flu-related illnesses in the U.S. — the highest death toll in more than 40 years.” So 5 reasons to get your shot:

1. You are vulnerable.

People 65 and older are at higher risk of flu-related complications, but the flu can knock young, healthy people off their feet, too. It does every year.

2. Getting a flu shot is your civic duty.

“Nobody wants to be the dreaded spreader,” says Schaffner. But everybody gets the flu from somebody else.

3. You can still get the flu, but you won’t be as sick.

After last winter’s severe season, some people are skeptical. They say: “I got the flu shot, but I still caught the flu.”

4. Pregnant women who get the flu shot protect their babies from flu.

Women who are pregnant should be vaccinated to protect themselves. The vaccine also offers protection after babies are born

5. You cannot get flu from the flu vaccine.

It’s still a common misperception: the idea that you can get the flu from the flu shot.

Related blog posts: