Breastfeeding: protection from asthma

Good news for breastfed babies –breastfeeding may reduce risk of wheezing and asthma for several years (J Pediatr 2012; 160: 991-6).

In this prospective birth cohort study of 1105 infants from New Zealand, detailed feeding information was obtained at 3, 6, and 15 months which allowed calculation of breastfeeding duration. This information was correlated with information about wheezing and asthma collected at 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 years.

Findings (after controlling for confounding variables):

  • Each month of exclusive breastfeeding was associated with significant reductions in asthma at all timepoints.  The effect was most prominent at younger ages.
  • The authors estimate that if every infant in the cohort had been exclusively breastfed for 6 months, that asthma would have been reduced by 50% at 2 years, 42% at 3 years, 30% at 4 years, 42% at 5 years, and 32% at 6 years.
  • In atopic children, the effects of exclusive breastfeeding are more pronounced.  In this study, exclusive breastfeeding for ≥3 months reduced asthma at ages 4, 5, and 6 by 62%, 55%, and 59% respectively.

The authors note that not all studies have found that breastfeeding improves asthma.  However, most of these studies reported outcomes in older children.

Related Posts:

Breastfed babies less likely to develop fatty liver

More evidence that breastfeeding improves cognitive development

Additional references:

  • -NEJM 2011; 364: 701, 769.  Living on a farm decreases risk of childhood asthma.
  • -Thorax 2009; 64: 604-9. Breastfeeding and asthma in children followed for 8 years.
  • -Br Med J 2007; 335: 815-20.  Longer time of breastfeeding does not reduce allergy/asthma. n=17,046 pairs of mother-infant (13,889 followed up at age 6.5yrs)

TODAY is worrisome for a lot of tomorrows

The TODAY study (NEJM 2012; 366: 2247-56 and editorial 2315-16) =Treatment Options for Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Youth.

While the study has a catchy acronym, the findings are disturbing.  Eligible patients (n=699) were 10 to 17 years old were followed on average over 3.86 years; they were divided into three groups:

  • Metformin 1000mg BID –48% achieved primary outcome (glycated hemoglobin <8% for at least 6 months).
  • Metformin with lifestyle changes –53% achieved primary outcome.  The lifestyle counseling that patients received in the study likely exceeded the typical counseling that most patients receive in clinical practice.
  • Metformin with rosiglitazone (4mg BID) –61% achieved primary outcome.  While this group had the best glycemic response, this group also had the greatest increase in BMI.

Other findings:

Comorbid conditions were common:

  • Hypertension: at baseline in 81 (11.6%) and new cases during study 155 (22.2%)
  • Dyslipidemia (LDL): at baseline in 23 (3.3%) and new cases during study 49 (7%)
  • Triglyceridemia: at baseline in 127 (18.2%) and new cases during study 70 (10%)
  • Microalbuminurina: at baseline in 44 (6.3%) and new cases during study 72 (10.3%)

Frequent adverse events noted with medications (Table 2 in study): gastrointestinal symptoms noted in about half of all study participants in each group, rash noted in about 40%, and elevated LFTs in about 40%.

Take home messages (borrowed from editorial):

“Most youth with type 2 diabetes will require multiple oral agents or insulin therapy within a few years after diagnosis”

“Fifty years ago, children did not avoid obesity by making healthy choices; they simply lived in an environment that provided fewer calories and included more physical activity.”

“Public-policy approaches–sufficient economic incentives to produce and purchase healthy foods and to build safe environments that require physical movement…will be necessary to stem the epidemic of type 2 diabetes and its associated morbidity.”

Related posts:

Treating diabetes with surgery

Cardiovascular disease for the entire family

Staggering cost of obesity

Lower leptin with physical activity

Reasons for refeeding syndrome

Refeeding syndrome (RFS) is defined as the potentially fatal shifts in fluid and electrolytes that may occur in malnourished patients who are abruptly refed either enterally or parenterally.  The biochemical hallmark is hypophosphatemia.  Other changes can include hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, and thiamin deficiency.  RFS can worsen the prognosis of children with celiac crisis as well (JPGN 2012; 54: 522-5).

A chart review from Lucknow, India from Jan-Dec 2010, identified 5 cases of RFS among 35 celiac patients.  All were severely malnourished.  All had anemia, hypoalbuminemia, hypophosphatemia, hypokalemia, and hypomagnesemia.  All improved with initial caloric restriction followed by gradual escalation of caloric intake along with electrolyte supplementation.

This article shows that a variety of causes of malnutrition can lead to refeeding syndrome. Considering refeeding syndrome in any severely malnourished child may help improve the prognosis by altering the nutritional management.

Additional references:

  • Nutr Clin Pract 2012; 27: 34-40. Reviewed refeeding syndrome publications since 2000.  Hypophosphatemia occurred in 96% of cases (26 of 27).
  • Crit Care Med 2010; 14: R172-R178.  Refeeding syndrome with anorexia.
  • Nutrition 2010; 26: 156-67. Review of refeeding syndrome treatment.
  • Nutr Clin Pract 2008; 23: 166-71.  Death due to refeeding syndrome.
  • JPEN 1990: 14.1; 90-97. Refeeding syndrome review.
  • Crit Care Med 1990; 18: 1030-1033. Review.

A cautionary vitamin D tale?

A recent case report indicates that pharmacologic doses of vitamin D can cause hypercalcemia and hypervitaminosis D (Pediatrics 2012; 129: e1060-63).  The three cases all document good reasons for instituting therapy: craniotabes, hypocalcemic seizures, and tibial bowing.  The total dose that the patients received over 7-12 weeks ranged from 112,000 IU to 168,000 IU.  The ages of the patients ranged from 2 weeks to 33 months.   The peak abnormal calcium for all three patients was 11 mg/dL and the peak 25-hydroxy vitamin D was 102 ng/dL.  There were no clinical symptoms in these three patients due to increased calcium.  A fourth oh-by-the-way patient was described as well.  This patient was receiving vitamin D for an “inappropriate indication” (failure to thrive) and had received 3.6 million IU without monitoring.  This led to the development of a multitude of symptoms associated with a calcium level of 17.4 mg/dL.

My take-home points:

  • If giving generous doses of vitamin D, obtain a followup calcium several weeks into therapy. However, pharmacologic doses of vitamin D for valid indications pose a very low risk.
  • Excessive doses of vitamin D can be detrimental. (This last statement may be akin to the warning “hot coffee might cause a burn.”)

Related blog entries:

Common to be “D-ficient”

Vitamin D, IBD, and Causality

Live longer -drink more coffee

In a previous post, I was impressed with some of the benefits of coffee (Drink Up!).  More good news for coffee drinkers: drinking coffee is associated with decreased mortality (NEJM 2012; 366: 1891-1904).  Full disclosure –I don’t even drink coffee & I am not being paid by industry!

This study examined a huge population, 5,148,760 person-years (1995-2008) among 229,119 men and 173,141 women in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study with participants aged 50-71 at baseline.  With age-adjusted models, if adjusted for smoking, an inverse association between coffee consumption and mortality was noted.  With 6 cups per day, the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.90 for men and 0.85 for women.  For 2-3 cups, the HRs were 0.94 and 0.95 respectively.

Declines in mortality were noted for heart disease, respiratory disease, stroke, injuries/accidents, diabetes and infections, but not for deaths from cancer.  However, while coffee is associated with improved mortality data, a causal role for coffee consumption in reducing mortality cannot be established with this study.

Related link:

http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/16/health/coffee-drinking-longer-life/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

Oley: Check it out

Recently, I received a post from Oley Foundation (Linda May) asking me whether I was going to its convention.  While I am not, I did want to share that link:

http://www.oley.org/annualconf.html
The conference is in lovely Redono Beach, CA, right on the beach. We have miles of running paths, beautiful beaches, on site tennis courts, and swimming pool . To quote other MDs, “the Oley Annual conference is the most important clinical conference I attend all year…”

Also, Oley website is a good link for patients with enteral tubes, ostomies, and central lines. http://oley.org/

Many questions and how-to advice available.  For example, look at this link if interested in advice about swimming with central line, or enteral tube: http://www.oley.org/Swimming.html

Treating diabetes with surgery

Two articles in the New England Journal of Medicine point to the role of bariatric surgery in  treating type 2 diabetes in obese patients (NEJM 2012; 366: 1567-76 & 1577-85).  Type 2 diabetes looms as one of “the most challenging contemporary threats to public health.”

The first study was a randomized nonblinded single-center trial with 150 patients; mean BMI 36 with 34% having a BMI less than 35.  Intensive medical therapy was compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy.  Mean patient age was 49 years. 42% of the gastric bypass group, 37% of the sleeve-gastrectomy group, and 12% of the medical treatment group achieved the primary end-point of a glycated hemoglobin level of ≤6% by the 12 month followup; the average starting glycated (HgbA1C) hemoglobin was 9.2%.  At the conclusion of the study, the average HgbA1C was 6.4, 6.6, and 7.5 respectively in the three groups.

The second study used a similar trial with 60 obese patients; all had BMI >35  At 2 years, diabetes remission occurred in 75% of their gastric bypass group, 95% of their biliopancreatic-diversion group and in no patients receiving intensive medical therapy patients. HgbA1C had similar rates of improvement as the 1st study: 6.3 in gastric-bypass, 4.9 in biliopancreatic-diversion group, and 7.7 in medical-therapy group.

While surgery has risks (see related material below), its benefits are likely to alter future treatment strategies with surgery being contemplated prior to exhausting all medical treatments.

Additional References:

  • -JAMA 2012; 307: 56-65.  Bariatric surgery and long-term cardiovascular events.
  • -JAMA 2011 [doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.817]). Large study failed to show that roux-en-Y gastric bypass prolonged life. n=850 VA pts to 41,244 controls. Same group showed no cost savings during initial 3 yrs: Med Care 2010; 48: 989-98.
  • -NEJM 2011; 365: 1365. Increased frequency of bariatric surgery in adolescents.
  • -NEJM 2009; 361: 445/520. perioperative safety.
  • -NEJM 2007; 357: 741, 753, 818. Bariatric surgery improves mortality rate.
  • NEJM 2007; 356: 2176. Review

Complications from surgery:

  • Early: bowel obstruction, DVT, GI bleed, leaks, pulmonary embolism, wound infection
  • After 30 days: anastomotic stricture, bowel obstruction, gallstones, dehiscence, fistula, Bleeding, Incisional hernia, nutrient deficiencies (iron, B12; calcium, Vit D (w RYGB), folate, B6/riboflavin).
  • Complications from gastric band: food impaction, erosion (now banned in Finland!), band slippage, gastric volvulus, band too tight, port infection
  • Roux-y gastric bypass:
    anastomotic leak 1.2%, anastomotic ulcers/stricture
  • Nutrient Monitoring–every 3months x 3, then yearly: Vitamin A, B12, Folate, Ceruloplasmin, Vit D-25OH, Iron studies, Zinc, thiamine, Selenium, Intact PTH, Mg, PT/PTT
  • Suggested supplements: Calcium c vitamin D 1200-2000mg, Iron at least 18-27mg/day, MVI with zinc/selenium
  • Also if duodenal switch, add Vitamin A 10,000 IU, and Vitamin D3 1200units daily or 50,000 units weeekly, Vitamin K 300 mcg,

Potential nutritional deficiencies:

  • B12, B6 (pyridoxine), Riboflavin (B2), B1 (Thiamine), Folate (B9)
  • Vitamins A,D,E, K
  • Calcium, Copper, Iron, Selenium, Zinc

Recommendations from NASPGHAN Post-Graduate Course 2011:

  • If post-op pain: epigastric –>do EGD & if neg do ‘RUQ w/u’, RUQ –> check U/S, LFTs possibly CT
  • If post-op vomiting –>do EGD
  • If post-op nausea –>Rx PPI and EGD if not improving
  • Anastomotic stricture in stomach –>dilate to 10-12mm in 1 session

Related blog posts (includes additional references)

Cardiovascular disease for the entire family

Staggering cost of obesity

A liver disease tsunami

Lower leptin with physical activity

Lower leptin with physical activity

Leptin is a cytokine expressed primarily by adipose tissue and helps regulate energy homeostasis in the body.  Higher leptin levels are found in obesity and associated with an increase risk of cardiovascular disease, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes.  In a recent study, physical activity, especially vigorous physical activity, has been shown to be negatively associated with leptin levels (J Pediatr 2012; 160: 598-603).

This study was conducted in school settings in 10 European cities from 9 countries (n=902) with ages 12-18 years.  Several fitness tests including handgrip, long jump, and shuttle runs were measured along with serum fasting leptin, insulin, and glucose.

Vigorous activity and fitness test results were associated with lower leptin levels; these findings were maintained when controlling for confounders.  It is not known the exact mechanisms whereby physical activity can lower leptin levels as this finding is independent of total body fat.  The authors note that previous studies have shown some contradictory results; the authors note that this could be related to drawbacks in how some studies measured physical activity.

This study’s information, when combined with previous studies (see below) on hormonal adaptations with weight loss, suggest a reason why exercise is important to maintain weight loss.  Losing weight without exercise could result in increased appetite and make it more difficult to achieve long-term results.  In contrast, physical activity may help maintain weight loss by improving hormonal adaptation.

Additional references:

  • -NEJM 2011; 365: 1597.  Persistence of hormonal adaptations with weight loss.  Due to persistent changes in hormones like leptin & peptide YY, hard to keep wt off -result is increased appetite.
  • -NEJM 2009; 360: 859.  Obesity-wt loss: composition of diet does not seem to be important.  Total calories important.
  • -NEJM 2007; 356: 237.  Leptin receptor deficiency present in 3% of 300 patients with early-onset obesity and hyperphagia.
  • -Pediatrics 2007; 120: suppl 4: S164-S287.
  • -NEJM 2007; 357: 370.  Obestiy spread in social network.
  • -Gastroenterology 2007; 132: 2085-2276.  Special issue on obesity issues.
  • -NEJM 2006; 355: 1593.  Case review on obesity c DDx and mgt.

Cardiovascular disease for the entire family

This month’s Journal of Pediatrics features an article for the entire family (J Pediatr 2012; 160: 590-7 [editorial pg 539]).  The authors demonstrate that children screened for cholesterol can serve as an index case for the entire family.  During a 26-year prospective followup of 852 pediatric patients (5-19 years old at enrollment) from Cincinnati, the authors assessed relationships of childhood risk factors with parental cardiovascular disease (CVD), type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and high blood pressure (HBP).

  • Pediatric HBP and low HDL cholesterol were predictive of parental CVD ≤age 50
  • Pediatric HBP and high triglycerides were predictive of parental CVD ≤age 60
  • Pediatric high triglycerides and high LDL cholesterol were predictive of parental CVD ≤age 66

The related editorial reviews large studies regarding lipid assessments, including the Bogalusa study with more than 3000 children and the Muscatine study with more than 14,000 children.  In addition, the editorial reviews the recommendations from an expert pediatric panel which suggested screening all children for dyslipidemia between 9 and 11 years. Interestingly, the editorial reviews the fact that screening for cholesterol has not been shown to harm children.  “The evidence is not sufficient to demonstrate any adverse affects.”

Although no harm has been proven, the expert recommendations do not have prospective data demonstrating benefit either.  While it is known that atherosclerotic lesions, including fatty streaks and calcifications, can develop in childhood, it is not known that current treatment strategies will improve long-term outcomes.  This study, however, provides an additional rationale for screening; namely, by identifying children with dyslipidemia, primary care providers can identify parents with cardiovascular disease who are more likely to benefit from urgent intervention.

Additional references:

  • http://hin.nhlbi.nih.gov/atpiii/calculator.asp?usertype=prof (cholesterol risk calculator)
  • Pediatrics 2011; 128 (suppl 5): S213-56.  Expert panel guidelines for cardiovascular health and risk reduction in children and adolescents.
  • -NEJM 2011; 365: 2078.  Use of statins to lower LDL to 60-70 range halted progression of coronary artery disease.
  • -Pediatrics 2007; 120: e189, e215.  US Preventive Services Task Force:  “the evidence is insufficient to recommend for or against routine screening for lipid disorders” up to age 20.  Consider pediatric drug Rx:
    1. After dietary failure
    2. LDL >190
    3. LDL >160 & FHx of CVD before age 55
    4. triglycerides >250-500 persistently
  • Pediatric Nutrition Handbook AAP Lipid types:type I -increased trig  (rare)
    type IIa -increased chol & LDL
    (most common)
       Homozygous: chol >500
         xanthomas before 10 yrs, vascular dz before age 20
       Heterozygotes with lower chol
    type IIb -elevated trig & chol/LDL
    (3rd most common)
    type III -abnormal LDL density (rare)
    type IV -elevated trig (2nd most common)
         may be increased with diabetes, obesity, inadequate fasting; may need to study parents to establish dx
    type V -increased trig/VLDL (rare)
         exclude nephrotic synd, hypothyroid, diabetes

Breastfed babies less likely to develop fatty liver

In a study presented at AASLD meeting (San Francisco, November 4, 2011), Ayonrinde et al followed 1170 children in Australia (www.rainstudy.org.au) from birth to age 17. Anthropometric measurements were followed regularly and a liver ultrasound was obtained at age 17.  Patients who reported consuming alcohol were excluded.

By age 17, 16% of girls and 10% of boys had developed nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Breastfeeding was highly protective.  Infants breastfed for more than 6 months were less than half as likely to develop NAFLD.

As noted in this blog recently (A liver disease tsunami), fatty liver disease is a huge problem.  While this study may not influence the choice to breastfeed in many cases, it highlights yet another advantage of breastfeeding. 

Previous post on breastfeeding:

More evidence that breastfeeding improves cognitive development