Tag Archives: celiac disease

Zonulin –Possible Biomarker for Gluten Sensitivity?

Posted on by

A recent abstract indicated that there are high levels of zonulin in patients with gluten sensitivity as well as in patients with celiac disease.  These results are preliminary but could indicate a potential biomarker for this condition.  Here is a link to a review of these findings from NPR which includes commentary from Alessio Fasano: A Protein In The Gut May Explain Why Some Can’t Stomach Gluten

An excerpt:

Zonulin is an inflammatory protein first discovered by Fasano and his team in 2000. It helps regulate leakiness in the gut by opening and closing the spaces or “junctions” between cells in the lining of the digestive tract…

Giovanni Barbara and a team of researchers at the University of Bologna measured blood levels of zonulin in four groups of individuals: those with celiac disease, those with irritable bowel syndrome marked by diarrhea, those with self-diagnosed gluten sensitivity and healthy volunteers. Both celiacs and gluten sensitives turned up with remarkably high levels of zonulin in their blood. Those with IBS had elevated levels but less than half of celiacs or gluten sensitive individuals. Healthy volunteers had negligible blood levels of zonulin.

The results were presented in October as an abstract at the 23rd United European Gastroenterology Week in Barcelona, Spain.

Related blog posts:

“To biopsy or not to biopsy” –that is the question (for Celiac disease)

Posted on by

First off -thanks to Ben Gold for the following reference and the blog title as well.

  • CM Trovato et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110: 1485-89.

In this retrospective study (alluded to in a previous post:Celiac Update September 2015 | gutsandgrowth), the researchers examined whether “biopsy-sparing” protocols for symptomatic children with high titers of serum anti-transglutaminase (anti-TTG) antibody levels (>10 times upper limit of normal [ULN]) would be suitable for asymptomatic patients.

Background: In 2012, the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) published guidelines that it is possible to omit endoscopic biopsies for celiac disease if patients older than 2 years of age had high anti-TTG titers (>10 times ULN), positivity for EMA, compatible HLA DQ2 or HLA DQ8 and were symptomatic.

Findings:

  • Among 196 patients, the 40 who were asymptomatic had severe Marsh lesions (3a, 3b, or 3c) in 92% compared with 91% of 156 who were symptomatic. In both groups, the remaining patients had either Marsh 1 or 2 lesions.
  • 94.4% of patients had improved serology during followup along with symptomatic improvement (in those with symptoms)

Bottomline:  Whether symptomatic or not, those with high antiTTG titers who meet all of the other ESPGHAN criteria have a very high probability of celiac disease.

Briefly noted: K Marild et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110: 1475-84. This study, based on a large prospective Norwegian cohort (72,921 children) that frequent infections (>10) in the first 18 months of life increased the risk of celiac disease with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.32 (highest infection quartile compared to lowest infection quartile).  However, alternative explanations, including surveillance bias and reverse causation, cannot be excluded.

Related blog posts:

 

Milder Celiac Disease Being Diagnosed Now

Posted on by

A study (Kivela L et al. J Pediatr 2015; 167: 1109-15) over a period of 48 years from Finland provides some hard data regarding the changing presentation of celiac disease.

Here are the key points;

  • Age at diagnosis has increased from a median of 4.3 years before 1980 to 7.6 years and 9.0 years in later periods.
  • Poor growth has decreased.  Among the 46 children diagnosed prior to 1980, poor growth occurred in 66% whereas 2010-2013: 23% had poor growth (had 14% were overweight or obese)
  • Severity of small-bowel mucosal damage was milder (Figure 1 D).  Among those with gastrointestinal presentation, total villous atrophy also declined from “61-62% to 18-22% (P=.001).”

Why is the presentation changing? There are increased “proportions of screen-detected and asymptomatic children…[this has] increased over 6-fold and simultaneously gastrointestinal symptoms …decreased.”  While there are improved diagnostic methods and increased knowledge, there has also been a “well-defined increase in the true prevalence of celiac disease.”

Related blog posts:

Nutrition Symposium Georgia AAP (Part 2)

Posted on by

Last week I summarized an excellent talk by Ronald Kleinman.  For me, I had never heard such a concise and definitive rebuttal of the claims of those fearful of food biotechnology.  There were three other lectures at the symposium.  These three lectures covered areas that are well-known to pediatric gastroenterologists but less familiar to general pediatricians.  The full set of slides are available at the Georgia AAP Symposium Website.

Jeff Lewis had an excellent lecture that tied together gluten and our microbiome: Gluten – Eat not, suffer not and Microbiome 101: Waste Not, Want Not

After reviewing celiac disease and other wheat-related disorders (eg. wheat intolerance syndrome, and wheat allergy), he summarized a great deal of information regarding the human microbiome and which factors influence this. In addition, he had the opportunity to briefly present data from his research on fecal microbiota transplantation (for C diff) and its influence on the microbiome over time. Here are a couple of slides from his talk:

 

Screen Shot 2015-11-13 at 5.51.40 PM

Screen Shot 2015-11-13 at 5.50.12 PM

Screen Shot 2015-11-13 at 5.49.18 PM

Key points:

  • “It is hard to communicate science to families. It is a huge challenge for us.”
  • Dermatitis herpetiformis (rare in kids), a rash associated with celiac disease, can be treated with Dapsone. This rash has caused such severe itching that there are cases of suicide that have been reported.
  • For celiac disease, Dr. Lewis recommends testing of 1st degree relatives but this needs to be after gluten exposure and before gluten-free diet.
  • Wheat allergy reviewed. Skin test positivity does not prove that you are allergic to food. IgG based testing is worthless –it means you have been exposed to a food, but is not an indication of food allergy.
  • Nonceliac gluten sensitivity (aka. wheat intolerance syndrome): need to test for celiac first. No tests/biomarker that can confirm this diagnostic. This appears to be a true disease; there is a small subset of patients who develop symptoms with a double-blind challenge.
  • Microbiome –more bacterial DNA in us than human DNA. New organisms –archaea kingdom.  Now a specimen of a person’s microbiome can be run for <$50.
  • Microbiome terms: Richness, Diversity, and Dysbiosis. Many diseases are associated with dysbiosis (obesity, IBD), but there is a ‘chicken and the egg’ problem. Is dysbiosis a causal factor or a secondary factor?
  • Xyloglucans (in lettuce) –not broken down by humans and affected by gut bacteria.
  • Mice given stool from fat mice or fat person become heavy.

Celiac Update September 2015

Posted on by

A useful review (CP Kelly et al. Gastroenterol 2015; 148: 1175-86) summarizes the ‘state of the art” information regarding celiac disease presentation and management. The review notes that some expert organization consensus state that intestinal biopsy is mandatory whereas some do not under certain conditions.

According to ESPGHAN, if anti-TTG >10-fold elevated, anti-EMA positive in separate sample, and +HLA typing, then a biopsy may not be required.  For the WGO (World Gastroenterologic Organization), the exception focuses on available local resources.

The article recommends the following for monitoring:

  • Clinical evaluation -annually or if recurrent symptoms
  • Serology & Nutritional evaluation -every 3-6 months until normal, then every 1-2 years.  Common nutrient deficiencies: iron, vitamin D, vitamin B12, folate, and zinc
  • Bone density -once within first 2 years.  (Some recommend checking after 1 year on gluten free diet)
  • Liver transaminase levels & Thyroid function tests -at diagnosis, then every 1-2 years.  Autoimmune thyroid disorders are “found in approximately 15-20% of adults with celiac disease”

A second retrospective indicates that ESPGHAN criteria for avoiding biopsy in children and adolescents with high titers for anti-TTG (>10-fold) along with positive EMA, and HLA-DQ2/DQ8.are reasonable.  Here’s the abstract:

Are ESPGHAN “Biopsy-Sparing” Guidelines for Celiac Disease also Suitable for Asymptomatic Patients?

CM Trovato, et al.The American Journal of Gastroenterology , (15 September 2015) | doi:10.1038/ajg.2015.285

OBJECTIVES:

In 2012, European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition published novel guidelines on celiac disease (CD) diagnosis. Symptomatic children with serum anti-transglutaminase (anti-tTG) antibody levels ≥10 times upper limit of normal (ULN) could avoid duodenal biopsies after positive HLA test and serum anti-endomysial antibodies (EMAs). So far, both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with anti-tTG titer <10 times ULN should undergo upper endoscopy with duodenal biopsies to confirm diagnosis. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of serological tests to diagnose CD in asymptomatic patients.

METHODS:

We retrospectively reviewed data of 286 patients (age range: 10 months to 17 years) with CD diagnosis based on elevated titer of anti-tTG, EMA positivity, and histology. All patients were distinguished between symptomatic and asymptomatic; histological lesions were graded according to the Marsh–Oberhuber (MO) criteria. Fisher exact test was applied to analyze both groups in terms of diagnostic reliability of serological markers.

RESULTS:

A total of 196 patients (68.53%) had anti-tTG titers ≥10 times ULN. Among them, a group of 156 patients (79.59%) also had symptoms suggestive of CD (“high-titer” symptomatic); of these, 142 patients (91.02%) showed severe lesion degree (3a, 3b, 3c MO). Conversely, 40 out of 196 patients (20.40%) were asymptomatic (“high-titer” asymptomatic) and 37 patients (92.5%) of them showed severe lesion degree (3a, 3b, 3c MO). No difference in histological damage was found between “high-titer” symptomatic and “high-titer” asymptomatic children (Fisher exact test, P=1.000).

CONCLUSIONS:

If confirmed in large multicenter prospective studies, the “biopsy-sparing” protocol seems to be applicable to both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with anti-tTG titer ≥10 times ULN, positive EMA, and HLA-DQ2/DQ8.

Related blog posts:

 

 

Celiac Disease: “Ten Things That Every Gastroenterologist Should Know”

Posted on by

Turns out that a recent review (AS Oxentenko, JA Murray. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13: 1396-1404) is a succinct summary on celiac disease with questions focused on diagnosis, endoscopy, genetics/HLA typing, at risk groups, management, adherence, non responsive celiac patient, and refractory patients.  Most of these topics have been addressed previously on this blog.

However, here are a few pointers:

  • “Histologic improvement is slow in adults…Mucosal recovery, defined by a villous:crypt ratio of 3:1, was present in 34% at 2 years and 66% at 5 years, with healing complete in 90% by 9 years.”
  • “Mucosal recovery is faster and more complete in children, with 95% recovery in 2 years and 100% recovery long-term in children following a GFD.”
  • With nonresponsive celiac disease, “defined as a lack of response to 6 months on a GFD or a recurrence of celiac-related features despite compliance,” the authors recommend reviewing serology and biopsies.  Other etiologies to consider include bacterial overgrowth, autoimmune enteropathy, tropical sprue, Crohn’s disease, combined variable immunodeficiency, collagenous sprue, and eosinophilic gastroenteritis.
  • For refractory celiac disease with ongoing villous atrophy, this “should prompt immunophenotyping and T-cell rearrangement studies” of duodenal biopsies.

Briefly noted: ET Jensen et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13: 1426-31.  The authors examined 88,517 patients who had undergone both esophageal and duodenal biopsies.  “Odds of EoE (eosinophilic esophagitis) were 26% higher in patients with celiac disease than in patients without celiac disease” (adjusted odds ratio 1.26).

Related blog posts:

From the High Line, NYC

From the High Line, NYC

Celiac Disease and Neuropathy

Posted on by

From GI & Hep News: Celiac Disease Associated with 2.5-fold Risk of Neuropathy

Here’s an excerpt:

The use of Swedish population registries enabled first author Dr. Sujata P. Thawani of Columbia University, New York, and her colleagues to find that the risk of neuropathy was increased both before and after a diagnosis of celiac disease (CD).

“We found an increased risk of neuropathy in patients with CD that persists after CD diagnosis. Although absolute risks for neuropathy are low, CD is a potentially treatable condition with a young age of onset. Our findings suggest that screening could be beneficial in patients with neuropathy,” they wrote (JAMA Neurol. 2015 May 11 [doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.0475]).Neuropathy has a known association with CD, an immune-mediated disorder characterized by sensitivity to gluten with an incidence of about 1% in Western Europe…

Dr. Thawani and her associates used Swedish pathology registers to identify individuals whose small intestine biopsies showed villous atrophy between 1969 and 2008 (Marsh stage 3, n = 28,232)…Each CD patient was matched with up to five age- and sex-matched controls (n = 139,473) from the Swedish Total Population Registry, all of whom were diagnosed in the same year and were from the same county as the matched CD patient. 

Although 41.7% of CD patients were diagnosed in childhood, the median age at diagnosis was 29 years…

Surveillance bias may account for some of the increased risk for neuropathy…Notably, though, patients with a prior neuropathy diagnosis also were more likely to be diagnosed with CD, showing a bidirectional relationship. 

Grand Tetons

Grand Tetons

New Therapy for Celiac Disease: Larazotide Acetate

Posted on by

A recent randomized controlled trial study (Gastroenterol 2015; 148: 1311-9) examined the effectiveness of larazotide acetate in 342 adults with Celiac disease (CD) who had ongoing symptoms despite the use of a gluten-free diet for at least 12 months.

Larazotide acetate is a locally acting, nonsystemic 8-amino acid oral peptide which is a tight junction (TJ) regulator.  “Larazotide acetate appears to prevent opening of intestinal TJs by promoting TJ assembly and actin filament rearrangement, which prevents gluten from reaching the intestinal submucosas and triggering an inflammatory response.”

Screen Shot 2015-06-01 at 8.35.51 PM

Patients received either placebo, 0.5 mg, 1 mg, 2 mg three times daily. The majority of patients had normalized serology at the start of the study.  Key findings:

  • “The 0.5 mg dose showed a 26% decrease in celiac disease patient-reported outcome symptomatic days (P =.017), a 31% increase in improved symptom days (P =.034), a 50% or more reduction from baseline of the weekly average abdominal pain score for 6 or more of 12 weeks of treatment (P =0.022), and a decrease in the nongastrointestinal symptoms of headache and tiredness (P =0.010).”
  • The 1- and 2-mg doses were no different from placebo for any end point.
  • Safety was comparable to placebo.

The authors state that is unclear why the higher doses were not effective “but may involve peptide aggregation … reducing activity in vivo.”

Bottomline: There would be a benefit for an adjunct to a gluten-free diet due to the difficulty in adherence and due to ongoing symptoms in some despite the use of a GFD; in some cases, symptoms may be induced by inadvertent deviation from GFD.  More data is needed to determine if larazotide acetate will be useful in this role.

Related blog post: Good Educational Two Minute Celiac Video | gutsandgrowth

Generation R Study: Insights into the Effects of Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody Positivity

Posted on by

In a study from Rotterdam (Jansen MAE, et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13: 913-20), the authors show that positivity for anti-tissue transglutaminase IgA antibodies (TTG) is associated with lower growth trajectories and bone mineral density.

This was a population-based prospective cohort study which examined children born from 2002-2006 (median age 6 years).  4249 children with TTG <7 U/mL were compared with 57 children with TTG >7 U/mL.  The authors specifically looked at those >70 U/mL as well. Children with a previous diagnosis of celiac disease were excluded.

Key findings:

  • Positive TTG serology was associated with reduced weight gain 0.05 standard deviation score (SDS) per year and less linear growth 0.02 SDS/year.
  • Children with positive TTG were shorter 0.29 SDS and weighed less 0.38 SDS.
  • Children with positive TTG had lower bone mineral density (BMD) 0.26 SDS less.
  • Children with positive TTG did not have increased gastrointestinal symptoms compared with control children.

The authors note that the majority of these effects (poor growth, shortness, lower BMD) were mostly present in children with TTG >10 times upper limit of normal.

Bottomline: Subclinical or potential celiac disease is associated with reduced growth and bone mineral density.

Briefly noted:  Emilsson L, et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13: 921-27.  Using a Norwegian cohort study with 95,200 women and 114,500 children (199-2008), the authors showed that development of celiac disease was associated with maternal celiac disease and type 1 diabetes.  There was no significant association noted with intrauterine growth, or mode of delivery.

Related blog posts:

Disclaimer: These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications/diets (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician/nutritionist.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Cumberland Island

Cumberland Island

 

PPIs and Associated Heart Risk

Posted on by

A NY Times review PPIs and Heart Attacks of PLos One study showing an association between PPI usage (eg. prilosec, prevacid, and nexium) and heart attacks -this study does not prove any causality, but is likely to spark some questions. Excerpt:

The widely used drugs known as proton pump inhibitors, or P.P.I.’s — gastric reflux preventives like Prilosec and Prevacid — may increase the risk for heart attack, according to analysis of data involving almost three million people.

A significant limitation of the study, in PLOS One, is that P.P.I. usage may be a marker of a sicker patient population, more subject to heart disease in any case.

Here’s NPR’s take on the same study: Data Dive -Possible Link Between PPIs and Heart Attacks

“The increase in risk is about 16 to 20 percent, depending on the particular drug involved”…

Someone with a low risk of heart attack doesn’t have much to worry about. “If your risk of a cardiovascular event or a heart attack is one in a million, now it is 1.2 in a million,” [Nigham] Shah [one of the authors] says.

“The problem is, it’s very easy to do studies of this sort that lead to conclusions that can be misleading,” says Dr. David Juurlink, a drug-safety researcher at the University of Toronto…

“Having a bad diet, drinking too much alcohol, smoking and all sorts of other things … might lead people to be on a PPI,” Juurlink says. One would expect those people to be at higher risk of heart attack, which leads Juurlink to think the medicine is likely not to blame.”

 

Also noted: