Will I Have This Stomach Pain Forever? (Part 1)

More data (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 12: 2026-32) helps answer the question about the persistence of functional abdominal pain from childhood into young adulthood.

Using a longitudinal study design, consecutive new pediatric patients (8-16 years) with functional abdominal pain from a subspecialty clinic were contacted on average 9.2 years (n=392) after their initial evaluation.

Key findings:

  • 41% continue to meet criteria for a functional GI disorder, most commonly irritable bowel syndrome (110 of 169 patients).
  • Severity of pain was not a predictive factor of persistence
  • Extraintestinal somatic complaints and depressive symptoms increased the risk of having persistent functional abdominal pain.

The associated editorial (pages 2033-36) comments on the strengths of the study and the potential opportunity of intervening to prevent persistence of abdominal pain.  It notes that anxiety and hypervigilance can lower the brain’s perception threshold and lead to increased pain.  “From this perspective, centrally targeted treatments such as psychological treatment or psychopharmacological treatments will likely have therapeutic value.”

Take-home message: 59% of patients resolve their symptoms with time.

Related blog posts:

Amplified Pain Syndromes in Children

A recent review (Curr Opin Rheumatol 2014; 23: 1-12 -thanks to our pain team for sending reference) makes a number of important points regarding the pathogenesis and management of amplified pain syndromes (APS).

Table 1 lists the diagnosis and pain presentations.  These include complex regional pain syndromes, juvenile fibromyalgia, diffuse idiopathic pain, concomitant conditions (including irritable bowel syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome, interstitial cystitis, chronic headache, functional abdominal pain, and conversion symptoms/disorder).

Key points:

  • Pediatric APS are widespread and under-recognized
  • Pathophysiology is complex with numerous contributors “including central sensitization, abnormal cytokine production, sympathetic-sensory disorders, autoimmune responses, altered blood flow, genetic predisposition, and psychosocial factors.”
  • The clinical effectiveness of medication management in pediatric APS remains unclear and controversial.”  It is noted that preoperative gabapentin and pregabalin may reduce the incidence of chronic post surgical pain (in adults); this has not been documented in a pediatric population.
  • Exercise-based and cognitive-based treatments remain the cornerstone of therapy.” Intensive multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation “restores functioning rapidly, reduces pain in the long run, improves comorbid psychological distress, and reduces medical utilization.”
  • Potential elements of treatment noted in Table 2 (geared more towards rheumatology), including exercise, desensitization, self-regulation (eg. diaphragmatic breathing, guided imagery), and stress management/counseling.

Bottomline: For children with severe pain symptoms, multidisciplinary pain teams can be very helpful.  However, there is not a simple pill that will fix everything.

Related blog posts:

 

Change the Name: “Functional” is Lousy

A recent commentary explains why “functional” pain is such a lousy term (JAMA Pediatr. Published online June 02, 2014. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.530 –thanks to Ben Gold for this reference).  In pediatric GI practice, functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) constitute a large part of clinical work.

The author, Neil Schechter from the Chronic Pain Program in Boston, makes several important observations:

  • “There is general dissatisfaction with the terminology.”  This stems from the fact that “in common parlance today, functional disorders are typically assumed to be a product of psychological distress.” Yet, parents/patients are “not ready to accept a strictly psychological explanation.”
  • The idea that functional pain is solely a psychological disturbance is inaccurate.  Though, anxiety and depression are common associated problems which often contribute to symptoms.  He states that “hyperexcitability” of the nervous system is “the core biological link and final common pathway for the creation of functional pain disorders.”
  • This category should be labeled dysfunctional pain.  “In effect, calling pain ‘functional’ is like calling disease, ‘ease.'”
  • These disorders frequently respond to centrally acting therapies including antidepressants, anticonvulsants, exercise, cognitive behavioral therapy, and acupuncture.
  • “The search for an appropriate term for these pain problems is far more than semantic…[a patient’s] understanding of their illness is clearly linked to their compliance with medical advice…it may stem their desire for additional costly investigation.”
  • Dr. Schechter proposes the term “primary pain disorder.”  “Unlike Shakespeare’s rose, functional pain would benefit from a new name.”

Take-home message: I wish I had written this commentary.  Explaining “functional” pain and “irritable bowel syndrome” are Sisyphean tasks.  Better nomenclature could ease the burden.  Join me in abandoning the use of the word “functional.”

In the same issue, an editorial on the “Role of Celiac Disease Screening for Children with Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders” (JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(6):514-515. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.5418) comments on a study (JAMA Pediatr. 2014; 168(6):555-60) in the same issue which reports a 4-fold higher prevalence of celiac disease among children who meet clinical criteria for irritable bowel syndrome.  The study reports the results from a cohort of 992 children identified with recurrent abdominal pain in a primary care setting.  In the editorial, the authors note:  “When grouped together, the prevalence rate of celiac disease among all children with FGIDs (IBS included) approaches 2%.  Celiac disease screening in this population would result in a positive tTG-IgA test result in 4%…However, 53% of all positive test results would be falsely elevated.”  As such the editorial advocates in favor of screening for celiac disease in children with IBS but not all FGIDs.

Related blog posts:

What NOT to say with functional pain

A recent article crossed my desk (from the “G-force”) which I hadn’t seen (or at least remembered).  So, although it is not new, it is a useful reference (Pain 2006; 122: 43-52).

In brief, the authors divided 223 children (n-104 with recurrent pain, n=119 healthy children) between ages 8-16 into 3 groups: attention, distraction, and no instruction.  After the children consumed water until they felt “completely full,” they were observed with their parents.  Parents in the attention and distraction groups had received video and written instructions; whereas the no instruction parents watched a video about the university.

Questions/statements that were typical in the attention group:

  • “I know it hurts now, but you’ll be OK later”
  • “What doe it feel like?”
  • “I can imagine it must feel really uncomfortable”

Questions/statements that were typical in the distraction group:

  • “Let’s talk about something else to get your mind off of it.  Tell me about ____”
  • “What would you like to do this evening?”

Key findings:

  1. Complaints nearly doubled under conditions of parent attention and were reduced by half under conditions of distraction (in comparison to the no instruction group).
  2. Female patients in this study had greater increase in pain complaints in the attention group than male patients.
  3. After water loading, children with a history of pain had significantly more complaints in the attention group than healthy children.
  4. “Unlike parents of well children, no parent of a pain patient rated attention as having any potential for negative impact on their child.”

Take home message (from Oscar Wilde -quoted in article): “While sympathy with joy intensifies the sum of joy in the world, sympathy with pain does not really diminish the amount of pain.”

Related blog post:

Anxiety and Functional Abdominal Pain | gutsandgrowth

Frequency of Functional Pain Overlap in Pediatric Crohn’s Disease

If a patient with Crohn’s disease has pain, it may signal a flare-up of the inflammatory process.  Other causes like secondary infections, strictures, and functional pain need to be considered as well.  Functional pain can be particularly challenging.  A recent study reports on the prevalence of functional pain overlap in this setting (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013; 19: 826-31).

This study prospectively enrolled 307 patients from two centers; it was a substudy to a cognitive behavioral therapy trial.

Patients in remission were defined by the following:

  • all normal laboratory findings:erythrocyte sedimentation rate <10, albumin >3.5, C-reactive protein <1 mg/dL
  • absence of clinical signs/symptoms of inflammatory bowel disease: 3 or less stools per day, no bloody stools, no nocturnal stools, no strictures, no concurrent steroid therapy
  • no escalation in medical therapy or clinical relapse in previous 6 months

Results: 139 of 307 patients had abdominal pain.  Among those with pain, 18 (13%) patients had functional abdominal pain (FAP). 10 of the 18 had either a colonoscopy or MRI in the previous year.  In these patients, the median PCDAI was 10.

This study noted a higher rate of depression in patients with both FAP and Crohn’s: 56%. This is compared with 29% of Crohn’s patients in remission without pain and 45% of Crohn’s patients with pain due to active disease.

Key points:

  • Pain with or without active disease can lead to an overestimation of disease activity based on PCDAI.
  • Depression is common in patients with pain, regardless of etiology
  • Current diagnostic criteria for FAP are flawed.  In fact, the Rome III criteria for FAP which specify absence of organic disease.
  • Biomarkers and imaging modalities are the best tools to exclude active disease.

Related blog links:

Anxiety and Functional Abdominal Pain

A recent review highlights the importance of anxiety and functional abdominal pain (FAP) (JPGN 2013; 56: 469-74).

“Preliminary evidence suggests that anxiety frequently co-occurs with FAP.  This is not to suggest that FAP is a manifestation of a psychological disorder, but rather that anxiety and FAP may frequently co-occur because of potentially shared etiological factors (eg. heightened physiological arousal) or as a consequence of coping with recurrent pain.”

“Anxiety disorders are estimated to affect 42-85% of youth with FAP.”

Proposed guidelines for assessment and treatment of youth with FAP and anxiety:

Initial evaluation: build rapport between family and medical provider, assess for red flags, perform standard testing, anticipate and predict normal testing results, validate the pain experience is real, educate regarding pain sensation via brain-gut axis, administer anxiety screener (see below)

Management: reassure family that FAP is not a failure to identify an organic condition, avoid extensive testing, consider a low-dose antidepressant when appropriate

Psychosocial: if elevated levels of anxiety, refer for assessment by a psychologist, educate families about cognitive-behavioral treatment

With regard to screening, the authors propose the Screen for Child Anxiety and Related Disorders (SCARED) tool.  From the University of Pittsburgh website,

http://www.psychiatry.pitt.edu/sites/default/files/Documents/assessments/SCARED%20Child.pdf:

  • Target Population: Children ages 8-18 years
  • Intended Users: Clinicians and psychiatrists
  • Time to Administer: 10 minutes
  • Completed By: Children and parents
  • Modalities Available: Handwritten
  • Scoring Information: Severity of symptoms for the past three months is rated using a 0 to 2-point rating scale with 0 meaning not true or hardly ever true, 1 meaning sometimes true, and 2 meaning true or often true.

Many other subspecialists joke about the need for a psychiatry degree to be an effective pediatric gastroenterologist; this review suggests that they are not far off the mark.

Take-home message: the review covers important aspects of this ubiquitous problem.  Trying to get patients (and their parents) to address anxiety will likely improve outcomes of children with FAP.

Related blog links:

Additional references:

  • -JPGN 2011; 53: 200. n=98. 79% of FAP responded to low dose tricyclics
  • -Gastroenterol 2009; 137: 1261, 1207– Editorial. Amitriptyline helped in 66% vs 58% w placebo. n=90. dose 10mg <35kg, 20mg >35kg. 89% had failed Rx prior to study. ‘inability to use placebo.. in practice may justify amitriptyline Rx. Consider hypnotherapy/CBT first.’
  • Distraction/ignoring important: Pain 2006; 122: 43-52. (Walker LS et al), J Pain 2006; 7: 319-26.
  • -J Peds 2009; 154: 313 (editorial), 322. Prospective school study. n=237. Weekly prevalence of abd pain was 38%. 18% with persistence for >12 weeks. FAP persists into adulthood in 1/3 to 1/2 of cases (Clin Gastro Hepatol 2008; 6: 329-32).
  • -Acta Paediatr 2007; 96: 697-701. Maternal anxiety is most consistent predictor of outcome.

Is functional pain more common in children with Celiac disease?

A recent study adds information to the title question but does not resolve it (J Pediatr 2013; 162: 505-09).

The authors note that they expected to find a higher prevalence of abdominal pain and abdominal pain/functional gastrointestinal disorders among children with diagnosis of celiac disease.  They note that functional disorders have been more common after acute gastroenteritis and cow’s milk hypersensitivity of infancy presumably due to preceding inflammation.  Persistent low-grade intestinal inflammation and immune activation have been proposed as precipitating susceptibility to functional abdominal pain.

In this small retrospective study, a statistically significant difference in functional GI disorders was not observed.  Enrolled families were contacted by telephone at least 6 months after the diagnosis of Celiac disease.  They completed a telephone questionnaire and a separate Rome III questionnaire.

Celiac cases (n=49):  abdominal pain (24.5%), functional abdominal pain (4.8%), IBS (6.1%), dyspepsia (4.8%), abdominal migraine (4.8%), nonspecific abdominal pain (6.1%)

Control cases (n=48): abdominal pain (14.6%), functional abdominal pain (6.3%), IBS (2.1%), nonspecific abdominal pain (6.1%)

Given the question that the authors were trying to answer, this study was unlikely to be helpful.  Problems with the study:

  • The biggest problem is the small number of patients.
  • Cross-sectional design
  • Reliance of recall symptoms
  • Lack of information on dietary adherence
  • Collection of information from only parents contributed

Bottomline: While screening for celiac disease is common in patients with possible functional abdominal pain, treatment with a gluten-free diet may not resolve these symptoms. Functional abdominal pain is at least as common in children with celiac disease as in the general population.

Related blog post:

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Childhood Abdominal Pain

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) can be effective for children with functional abdominal pain (JAMA Pediatr 2013; 167: 178-84).  Thanks to Ben Gold for this reference.

This prospective, randomized study recruited 200 children and their parents.  One group of child-parent dyads received ‘social learning and cognitive behavioral therapy’ (SLCBT) and the other group ‘education and support’ (ES).  Over the course of a year, children in the SLCBT group reported greater baseline decreases in gastrointestinal symptom severity and better pain-coping responses.  Parents in the SLCBT group reported greater decreases in ‘solicitous responses’ to their child’s symptoms along with decrease in maladaptive beliefs regarding their child’s pain.

The intervention in the SLCBT group was three 1-hour sessions approximately 1 week apart in which parents were taught social learning strategies 1) to reduce ‘solicitous responses’ to illness behavior, and 2) to model /reinforce healthier ways to respond to gastrointestinal discomfort.  Then, assessments were made at 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.

This study shows that CBT can be effective for functional abdominal pain, if you can find skilled therapist and families willing to participate.

Related blog entries:

Unexplained chest pain

Not surprisingly -unexplained pediatric chest pain has a high association with anxiety/psychiatric disorders (J Pediatr 2012; 160: 320).  In this study, the authors compared patients (8-17 years) with chest pain (n=100) to a cohort referred with innocent heart murmur (n=80).  In addition to cardiology evaluation, patients had a structured interview and a child health questionnaire to assess for psychiatric disorders; also, the investigators interviewed the parent(s).

Based on DSM-IV criteria, 70% of chest pain patients had an anxiety disorder and 9% had depression.  In contrast, 33% of heart murmur patients had an anxiety disorder and none were depressed.  Among the chest pain subjects, 26% had abdominal pain and 26% had headaches -both higher than the control group, 9% and 10% respectively.  Also, 90% of patients with chest pain had psychiatric disorders which preceded the chest pain.

For pediatric gastroenterologists, a take home message from this article is that chest pain is quite similar to abdominal pain (see references below); it might be interesting to discuss with cardiologists.

  • Do cardiologists experience the same reluctance from families to seek help from mental health?
  • How much testing is required before a functional diagnosis is accepted?
  • Do they follow patients with functional chest pain or send back promptly to primary care physician?

This article does not examine parental mental health issues.  This would be interesting.  In functional abdominal pain, maternal anxiety has been ascribed as the most consistent predictor of outcome (Acta Paediatr 2007; 96: 697-701).  Another factor that would be of interest would be level of activity; exercise helps reduce symptoms of irritable bowel/abdominal pain.

At the same time, the issue of reflux is not addressed by this article and not infrequently the issue of whether reflux is causing chest pain needs to be considered.  An article (Gut 2011; 60: 1473-78) regarding chest pain in adults indicates that patients with pH-probe (or endoscopic) proven GERD often respond partially (>50% reduction in symptoms) to PPI use.  This study reviewed RCTs involving chest pain and PPIs -six met inclusion criteria.  The RR of therapeutic gain for PPI usage was 4.3 for those with proven reflux and 0.4 for those with pH-probe (or endoscopic) negative chest pain.  Interestingly, in this study, heartburn was not predictive of whether chest pain was due to GERD on pH study.

Additional references:

  • -Pediatr Emerg Care 2010; 26: 830-6.  Psychopathology among children presenting to ER with unexplained chest pain.
  • -Clin Gastro 2008; 6: 329-32.  Depressive symptoms common in RAP -45%
  • -Pediatrics 2004; 113: 817.  Anxiety & depression commonly associated with RAP.  anxiety in ~79%, depression ~43%; anxiety often precedes RAP.
  • -JPGN 2011; 53: 200. n=98. 79% of FAP responded to low dose tricyclics
  • -Gastroenterology 2009; 137: 1261, 1207– Editorial.  Amitriptyline helped in 66% vs 58% with placebo. n=90. dose 10mg <35kg, 20mg >35kg. 89% had failed Rx prior to study. ‘Inability to use placebo.. in practice may justify amitriptyline’ Rx. Consider hypnotherapy/CBT first.
  • -Gut 2011; 60: 1473-78. PPI use in unexplained chest pain.
  • -Pain 2006; 122: 43-52. (Walker LS et al), J Pain 2006; 7: 319-26.  Distraction/ignoring important.
  • -J Pediatr 2009; 154: 313 (editorial), 322. Prospective school study. n=237. Weekly prevalence of abd pain was 38%. 18% with persistence for >12 weeks.
  • -Clin Gastro Hepatol 2008; 6: 329-32.  FAP persists into adulthood in 1/3 to 1/2 of cases.
  • -Gastroenterol 2006; 130: 1459-1465.  Functional esophageal d/o.
  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2006; 4: 558. Review.
  • -Ann Heart J 2000; 40: 367-372.  Sertraline decreased chest pain independent of mood alteration/psychological scores.