Tag Archives: irritable bowel syndrome

Acupuncture for irritable bowel syndrome

Posted on by

No medical therapy has been shown to alter the natural history of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).  A number of therapies have been used to improve the symptoms.  More data has been published on whether acupuncture is an effective therapy (Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 835-47)

A number of treatment approaches have shown that several medical treatments are more effective than placebo, including soluble fiber, some antispasmotics, peppermint oil, antidepressants, and agents that act on the 5-HT receptor.  In addition, cognitive-behavioral therapy and hypnotherapy seem to be more effective than placebo.  Dietary therapies (see blog links below) are helpful in some patients.  However, many patients have a poor response to all of these approaches.

To examine whether acupuncture may be effective for IBS, the authors of the current study reviewed 1421 citations and identified 17 eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with >1800 patients.  Only trials that used accepted traditional Chinese medicine methods of acupuncture were included.

Key findings:

  • Among the five sham-controlled trials, there was no significant difference detected between true acupuncture and sham acupuncture in terms of effects on symptoms or quality of life.  The standardized mean difference in post-treatment between the groups was -0.11 (difference between two groups) –confidence limits -0.35 to 0.13 for symptom severity and -0.03 for quality of life –confidence limits -0.27 to 0.22.
  • A selected summary on this article in Gastroenterology (2012; 143: 1683-84) notes that the largest RCT in the U.S. found that sham acupuncture and true acupuncture were both superior to a control arm (Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 1489-97).
  • When acupuncture was compared with medical therapies in 5 trials (4 with antispasmodic, 1 with sulfasalazine), acupuncture was more effective, RR=1.28 for symptom improvement.  These studies were non blinded and the overall effect was modest.
  • When acupuncture was added to traditional Chinese medicine in 4 RCTs, the addition of acupuncture improved the endpoints of IBS symptom severity (RR=1.17).

This study should reduce the stress of practitioners of acupuncture.  Whether they apply true acupuncture or sham acupuncture, the results may be equivalent.  In these studies, sham acupuncture did have a high “placebo effect.” At the same time, this study indicates that the comparison medical treatments (most in these RCTs are not used in Western medicine) were less effective than acupuncture.  So where does that leave us?

Related blog entries:

Mechanisms of irritable bowel syndrome

Posted on by

An excellent succinct review of the various peripheral mechanisms of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) has been published (NEJM 2012; 367: 1626-35).  Understanding these mechanisms is crucial in developing and targeting appropriate therapy.

Peripheral factors affecting IBS (Table 1 in review):

  1. Colonic motility –affects up to 45% of diarrhea-predominant IBS and 25% of constipation-predominant IBS.  Specific factors include enteroendocrine cell products (eg. 5-HT, granins), organic acids (eg. bile acids, short chain fatty acids [SCFAs]) impaired bile acid synthesis.
  2. Colonic motor and sensory response to food ingestion. Factors like fat content of meal can contribute to pain, urgency and diarrhea.
  3. Sensing responses in small bowel and colon.  Food stimulation of enteroendocrine cell products may trigger diarrhea, bloating and pain.
  4. Colonic mucosal permeability.  This may lead to malabsorption of carbohydrates or fats and subsequently increased levels of SCFAs.  Also, could trigger immune activation and altered feedback of bile acid synthesis.
  5. Mucosal immune activation.  Previous gastroenteritis along with mast cells, T lymphocytes, and circulating cytokines may be involved factors.
  6. Colonic microbiome.  There may be increased types of some bacteria (eg. firmicutes).  Antibiotics and probiotics could influence the microbiome. Fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs) are a group of foods that may trigger IBS symptoms, possibly due to a relationship with the colonic microbiome.

With regard to gluten intolerance, the author notes that the prevalence of celiac disease among IBS is similar to that among controls; however, a subgroup of individuals with diarrhea-predominant IBS respond to a gluten-free diet.

Some genetic factors have been identified which can contribute to IBS:

  • mutation in the guanylate cyclase C secretory pathway
  • mutations that increase the risk of postinfectious IBS
  • genetic variability in bile acid synthesis
  • variation in expression of neurotransmitters and cytokines

Towards the end of the review, the author notes that “IBS is no longer regarded as an idiopathic bowel dysfunction” due to stress.  The specific factors that have been identified will likely be further defined and likely lead to more specific individualized therapy.  Potential treatments:

  • diets -including gluten-free and FODMAPs
  • bile acid sequestrants and 5-HT3 antagonists
  • prokinetics or secretagogues in patients with constipation-predominant IBS
  • probiotics and non-absorbed antibiotics
  • antiinflammatory agents
  • tignt-junction modifiers
  • biofeedback

Previous related blog entries:

Additional references:
  • -J Pediatr 2009; 155: 416.  n=43 children & 56 control pts.  High incidence of abnormal lactulose (65%) breath test with IBS but not control pts (7%).  (lactulose 10g given in 20mL)
  • -Gastroenterol 2009; 137: 766.  Notes relatively weak data supporting use of antispasmotics, probiotics, and antidepressants for IBS.
  • -Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 859-865.  n=466 & 451 controls.  IBS pts with lower incidence of adenomas (7.7.% vs 26%).  9% had diverticulosis (lower).  Microscopic colitis present in 1.5%.
  • -Gastroenterol 2002; 123: 2105-07. & 2108-2131. AGA guidelines for IBS
  • -Gastroenterol 2007; 133: 799.  Natural hx of functional disorders: 20% persist w same Sx, 40% develop other Sx, 40% get better.  Large study from Olmstead county (n=1365)
    • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2005; 3: 397.  managing pts c severe IBS; advocates low dose tricyclics..
  • -Am J Gastro 2003; 98: 412-9.  use of neomycin for SBBO in IBS (43% response). 84% IBS pts c abnl lactulose vs 20% placebo
  • -Gastroenterol 2003; 124: S1152.  only 4 of 33 IBS pts had abnl jejunal samples
  • -J Musculoskel Pain 2001; 9:107-113.  78% of fibromyalgia pts c abnl BHT.

Increased bile acids in diarrhea-predominant IBS

Posted on by

The role for bile acids in causation of irritable bowel gets a closer look in a recent publication (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 1009-15).

This study randomly selected 52 participants (26 with diarrhea-predominant IBS, 26 with constipation predominant IBS) from a cohort of 700 IBS patients followed at the Mayo clinic along with 26 healthy volunteers.  The ages of the patients ranged from 29-51. Subsequently, these patients underwent additional testing following a 4-day high fat diet.  Of note, 5 of the IBS-D patients had a history of cholecystectomy compared with one patient in the other two groups.

In these patients, bile acid concentrations were measured in the stool and serum levels of 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4).In the IBS-D patients, serum levels of C4 were significantly higher than in the other two groups.  38% of the IBS-D group had elevated C4 levels; these elevated levels correlated with increased stool concentrations of bile acids.

The authors note that bile acid malabsorption has been identified frequently in patients with unexplained chronic diarrhea and that these patients often respond to bile acid sequestration (eg. cholestyramine or colesevelam).  Another interesting finding was that obesity was associated with elevated bile acid levels. Overall, the cohort with IBS-D had an average BMI of 29.5.

So, what conclusions can be drawn?

  • Serum C4 levels may be using in identifying patients with bile acid malabsorption
  • Bile acid sequestration agents may be worth a try in some cases of IBS-D and this study provides a rationale

Additional references:

-Alim Pharmacol Ther 2009; 30: 707-17.  Bile acid malabsorption in IBS-D.

Why didn’t patient with documented reflux get better with PPI?

Posted on by

There are numerous problems with pH studies; many of these problems have been alluded to in previous blog entries (see below).  Another problem is that these studies are not highly predictive of response to therapy (Gut 2012; 61: 501-506).

This French study from three centers examined 100 consecutive patients (58 females) with an average age of 50 years.  All patients had reflux symptoms, namely regurgitation and/or heartburn.  PPI dosage was not standardized and reflux symptoms were quantified with recall questionnaires.

The authors note that up to 40% of patients with reflux symptoms have inadequate symptom relief with a 4-week course of single dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy; the aim of their study was to investigate which factors on pH probe-impedance (pH-MII) would predict a response to therapy.

Definition: Nonresponders were patients who had more than 2 days of mild symptoms per week while receiving a standard or double dose of PPI treatment for 4 weeks

Results:

  • No reflux pattern on pH-MII was associated with a response to PPIs. Table 2 in the study looked at multiple factors including SI, SAP, time for acid exposure, and number of reflux events.
  • Lower BMI (≤ 25 kg/m-squared), non-erosive reflux, and normal pH study were associated with poor PPI response
  • Other factors associated with poor PPI response: female gender, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and functional dyspepsia.
  • Response rates: 58% of individuals with BMI >25, 71% with esophagitis, 23% with functional dyspepsia, 30% with IBS
  • Among responders, 77% were receiving a single dose PPI

Some of the poor response may be related to the study population.  Only 35% had abnormal acid exposure.  In total, 67% were determined to have abnormal pH studies, though this was due to a large fraction having a positive symptom-reflux association analysis.

However, this study population likely reflects a typical clinical group of patients diagnosed with GERD and demonstrates some of the shortcomings of pH-MII in clinical practice.  Even patients with abnormal pH-MII studies, the presence of functional dyspepsia and IBS were strongly associated with PPI failure.

Previous related blog entries:

HEROES trial

Impedance recommendations from PIG

Gastroesophageal Reflux: I know it when I see it

Treating reflux does not help asthma

Unexplained chest pain

Gluten sensitivity without celiac disease

Posted on by

Gluten free is big business.  In a range of conditions, eliminating gluten has been advocated to improve symptoms.  The most frequent problem in which a gluten-free diet (GFD) may be beneficial is irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).  A selected summary in Gastroenterology discusses this topic (Gastroenterology 2012; 142: 664-73).

This review highlights an article that showed improvement in a double-blind randomized trial (Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106: 508-14) & then reviews the topic more broadly.  The study is the first randomized controlled trial that suggests that nonceliac IBS patients may improve with a GFD.  The study looked at 34 patients with IBS who had improved with a GFD & had no evidence of celiac disease (either negative HLA-DQ2/DQ8 or duodenal biopsy).  Then 19 patients had 16g of gluten per day reintroduced; control patients were offered equivalent food that was gluten-free.  The gluten products in the study were free of fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides and polyols to avoid confounders (What to make of FODMAPs).  The patients who continued a GFD had less reported pain, bloating and tiredness.  The GFD group reported good control of symptoms the previous week in 68% vs. 40% in the study group.

The commentary notes that ‘gluten sensitivity’ is big business, accounting for 1.3 billion in 2011 expenditures.  Companies like General Mills, Betty Crocker, PF Chang’s, and Subway are offering gluten-free choices.  Since immune activation and low-grade inflammation may be important for IBS, it is possible that some foods trigger these processes.  At the same time, individuals with reported gluten sensitivity have not been shown to have increased intestinal permeability; this is in contrast to celiac disease (BMC Med 2011; 9; 23).

There may be more patients with IBS who will benefit from a GFD due to gluten sensitivity than patients with celiac disease.

Additional references:

  • -Nutr Clin Pract. 2011;26:294-299.  A gluten-free diet (GFD) is commonly recognized as the treatment for celiac disease. It also has been investigated as a treatment option for other medical conditions, including dermatitis herpetiformis, irritable bowel syndrome, neurologic disorders, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes mellitus, and HIV-associated enteropathy. The strength of the evidence for the use of a GFD in these nonceliac diseases varies.
  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2007; 5: 844. GFD in IBS pts (w/o celiac)
  • -Am J Gastro 2009; 104: 1587. Gluten sensitivity in IBS (w celiac)
  • -Gastroenterology 2011; 141: 1187. Prevalence of celiac similar in IBS as general population though higher number (7%) with celiac antibodies (esp gliadin).
  • -Am J Gastro 2008; 103: S472 (abstract P687) Serology for Celiac in IBS patients same as in controls. n=566. n=555 controls.
  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2007; 5: 844. d-IBS patients may respond to gluten-free diet, especially if positive HLA-DQ2 expression or positive celiac serology.
  • -Lancet 2001; 358: 1504-08. n=300 uninvestigated pts w IBS criteria & 300 controls. 66 w positive serology; 14 w biopsy-proven celiac dz, 43 w normal biopsies. Odds ratio of 7 to have celiac compared to control group (2 w biopsy-proven disease).

Rifaximin for Crohn’s disease?

Posted on by

Rifaximin (Xifaxan®) shows promise as a new treatment for Crohn’s disease (Gastroenterology 2012; 142: 473-81).  Rifaximin is an oral medication with minimal systemic absorption; it has a good track record in a number of GI indications, including bacterial gastroenteritis (traveler’s diarrhea), bacterial overgrowth in irritable bowel disease, and hepatic encephalopathy.  There are a few reasons why rifaximin would be considered a good candidate treatment for Crohn’s disease:

  • The pathophysiology of Crohn’s disease involves interaction of adherent bacteria to the intestinal mucosa and with the immune system
  • Other antimicrobials have shown benefit for Crohn’s disease
  • Animal models do not manifest Crohn’s disease when in a bacteria-free environment

In this study of 402 patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease, a multicenter randomized double-blind trial examined efficacy and safety of rifaximin at doses of 400mg, 800mg, and 1200mg twice daily.  The primary end point was remission based on Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (CDAI).

At the end of the 12-week treatment period, 62% of the 800mg group were in remission compared to 43% of the placebo group.  This difference was maintained 12 weeks afterwards with 45% maintaining remission compared with 43% of patients receiving placebo.  When looking at the other dosing regimens, at 12 weeks, 54% of the 400mg group and 47% of the 1200mg group were in remission based on CDAI.

Clinical response, but not remission, occurred in 56% of placebo patients compared with 63% for 400mg patients, 72% for 800mg patients, and 57% of 1200mg patients.  This trial may have been hampered by patient selection in that the placebo response was high.  This may be due to the fact that ~50% of patients had a low CRP value at baseline.

Safety was good in all patient groups.  However, one rifaximin-treated patient developed C difficile infection.

The fact that a clear dose response was not evident suggests the need for more studies.

Additional Rifaximin References:

  • -NEJM 2011; 364: 22 (pg 81-editorial).  About 10% improvement over placebo in pts with IBS-D.  (see abstract below).  Effects lasted up to 3 months.
  • -JPGN 2009; 49: 400-04. helped symptoms in 61% of IBD pts. n=23 (12 w Crohn). dose 10-30mg/kg/day.
  • -Aliment Pharm Ther 2005; 22: 31-35. Use in SBBO. n=90; 1200mg/day x 7 days. NL glucose breath test in 60% (vs 17% in low dose group); no side effects.
  • -Ann Intern Med 2006; 145: 557-563. double-blind, randomized controlled trial, n=87 for IBS. 400mg tid x 10days. Rx resulted in greater IBS improvement, ~40% improvement vs 20% w placebo during 10 week study
  • -IBD 2006; 12: 335. open-label use of rifaximim (400mg BID) for 30 pts c UC flare on ASA products resulted in clinical remission in 23 of 30.
  • -J Infect 2011; 62: 34-38. Rx may lead to resistant staphylococci.
  • -Hepatology 2010; 52: 1484. Review.

Additional Crohn’s Antibiotic/Probiotic References:

  • -IBD 2009; 15; 17. 40% response to Cipro in treatment of peranal fistulas. n=25. No response to metronidazole.
  • -IBD 2008; 14: 1597, 1585. No proven role for probiotics and IBD except pouchitis (after Abx)
  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2008; 6: 145. Pouch problems reviewed -excellent review.
  • -IBD 2006; 12: 335. open-label use of rifaximim (400mg BID) for 30 pts c UC flare on ASA products resulted in clinical remission in 23 of 30.
  • -Curr Med Res Opinion 2005; 8: 1165-70. Rx for traveler’s diarrhea.  May be useful for Crohn’s as well.
  • -Gastroenterology 2005; 128: 856. Use of ornidazole prophylaxis reduced recurrence p-op from 37.5% to 8%.
  • -IBD 2004; 10: 318-325. antibiotics & IBD review.
  • -Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 412-21. adherent-invasive E. coli associated with ileal mucosa in 22% of Crohn’s (n=63) ileal mucosa vs. 6% of controls (n=16); higher colonization noted in neo-terminal ileums (36%).

What to make of FODMAPs

Posted on by

Consumption of FODMAPs (fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols) may trigger irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms.  Some research indicates that a diet low on FODMAPs may be beneficial (J Hum Nutr Diet 2011; 24: 487-95).  This study tried to assess whether a low FODMAPs diet which had been reported from a single center in Australia would be effective for IBS.

In this study, consecutive patients with IBS were divided into two groups.  39 received standard dietary advice based on UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines.  43 patients were placed on a low FODMAP dietary advice.  Patients were selected into each group consecutively (not randomized). This study reported a 76% satisfactory symptom response in the FODMAP group vs a 54% response in the control group (p=0.038).  Overall, 86% of FODMAP group had improved composite score compared with 49% of standard treatment group. Specific improvements were noted in bloating, abdominal pain, and flatulence.  The average age of the study population was 38 and 71% were females.  60% had diarrhea-predominant IBS.

NICE guidelines for IBS:

  • Healthy eating principles: regular eating, taking time to eat
  • Limit high fat foods and fizzy drinks
  • Limit insoluble fiber for diarrhea and gradually increase for constipation
  • Limit sugar-free sweets and foods with sorbitol
  • Limit fruit to 3 portions/day
  • Avoiding ‘resistant’ starch may be useful (eg. sweetcorn, green bananas, part-baked and reheated bread)
  • Addition of oats and linseeds may be helpful

Low FODMAP diet

  • Reduce high fructan foods (eg wheat and onion)
  • Reduction in high galactooligosaccharide foods (eg chickpeas, lentils)
  • Reduce high polyol foods and polyol-sweetened sources.  Replace with suitable fruits and vegetables
  • In patients with lactose malabsorption, reduce high lactose foods (eg milk, yoghurt) to smaller volumes or substitute lactose-free products
  • In those with fructose malabsorption, decrease excess fructose

Of course, reading the author’s description of a low FODMAP diet is confusing.  Translation:

Include more bananas, blueberries, lettuce, potatoes, gluten-free breads or cereals, rice, oats, hard cheeses, lactose-free milk, sugar, molasses, and artificial sweeteners that do not end in “ol.”

Avoid/eliminate apples, pears, canned fruits in natural juices, high-fructose corn syrup, cows’ milk (due to lactose), soft cheese, broccoli, cabbage, pasta, bread, baked goods from wheat/rye, mushrooms, and sweeteners like sorbitol or others that end in “ol.”

Since this diet has attracted more widespread attention, basic familiarity is important for all physicians who treat IBS.  A useful resource to explain this diet is the Wall Street Journal:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204554204577023880581820726.html

This link has a good table illustrating the recommended dietary choices.

Whether FODMAPs will be superior to other dietary advice for IBS is still uncertain.  Though, given the limited number of effective treatments for IBS, this small study is a promising development.

Additional references:

  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2009; 7: 706. n=17. 13 responded to very low carb diet (<20g/day)
  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2008; 6: 765. Dietary triggers for IBS include fructose/fructans: honey, high fructose corn syrup, wheat, fruits.
  • -IBD 2006; 13: 91. Dietary guidelines for IBS.
  • -Clin Gastro Hepatol 2005; 10: 992-996. Obesity increases IBS symptoms; diet with low fat, high fruit/fiber have fewer symptoms
  • -Gut 2004; 53: 1459-1464. Food elimination based on IgG antibodies. Patients did better on diet with implicated foods than with control diet (diet was blinded/randomized).
  • -Am J Gastro 2011; 106: 508-514. randomized, double-blind trial showing efficacy of GFD for non-celiacs.  60% vs 32& placebo response.
  • -Nutr Clin Pract. 2011;26:294-299.  GFD for non-celiacs.
  • -Gastroenterology 2011; 141: 1941./Am J Gastro 2011; 106: 915.  Exercise improves IBS symptoms.