Expert Guidance on Inflammatory Bowel Disease (Part 3)

A recent issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology focused solely on the clinical features and management of inflammatory bowel disease. Even for those with expertise in IBD, there is a lot of useful information and concise reviews of what is known.

Here are some of my notes from this issue (part 3):

RP Hirten et al. Clinical Gastroenterol Hepatol: 2020; 18: 1336-45. A User’s Guide to De-escalating Immunomodulator and Biologic Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

This article emphasizes the need for assessment of bowel disease activity before attempting de-escalation and provides a list of risk factors for flare-up off therapy.

Some of the Risk factors for Disease Flare with De-escalation:

  • Disease activity/abnormal biomarkers (CRP, WBC, Hemoglobin, Calprotectin)
  • Perianal disease
  • Penetrating disease
  • Extensive disease involvement
  • Abnormal bowel wall thickening on MRE
  • Young age at diagnosis
  • Short treatment duration
  • Prior surgeries

Key points:

  • In individuals on combination therapy, dropping immunomodulator therapy (but not biologic therapy) did NOT increase the short term risk of a flare up in a recent Cochrane review.  However, this did impact anti-TNF kinetics and lowers anti-TNF troughs.
  • With regard to stopping biologics, among patients in deep remission, the authors advise counseling patients (CD and UC) that stopping biologic agents results in a “40-50% relapse over the following 2 years that will further increase over time.”
  • Careful followup is recommended if a patient elects to stop biologic therapy. “CD and UC are progressive relapsing conditions…and approximately 80% of subjects” require re-initiation of biologic therapy with 7 years.”
  • “Repeat colonoscopy or imaging should be performed if a significant change in symptoms occurs or abnormal biomarkers are detected.”
  • In patients who resume infliximab, the authors advocate for an initial induction of 0, 4, and 8 weeks.  The presence of antidrug antibodies at week 2 “precludes drug administration and alternative agent should be started.”

Related blog posts:

M Kaur et al Clinical Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18: 1346-55. Inpatient Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Related Complications

This article reviews the approach to acute severe ulcerative colitis which has been discussed recently on this blog post and offers management recommendations for complications related to Crohn’s disease including abscesses, strictures/bowel obstruction.  With regard to abscess management, the authors note that medical therapy is more likely to be effective in those with a first-time abscess, spontaneous origin, right lower quadrant location, and smaller abscess size (<3 cm).  Stricture with upstream dilatation of bowel, multi-loculated abscesses and steroid use are features that make therapy less likely to be successful.

Related blog posts -ASUC:

Abscess-related blog posts:

EL Barnes et al Clinical Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18: 1356-66. Perioperative and Postoperative Management of Patients With Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis

This article reviews risk factors for disease recurrence after surgery, presurgical management (eg. minimize steroids, improve nutrition, do not delay surgery based on preoperative biologic exposure), postoperative strategies and management of pouchitis.

  • In those at high risk for postoperative disease recurrence, the authors advocate anti-TNF therapy plus an immunomodulator with colonoscopy at 6-12 months. In those at low risk, many are placed on no medications and have a colonoscopy at 6 months postoperatively.
  • The section on pouchitis lists alternatives to metronidazole and ciprofloxacin if these lose efficacy.  This includes amoxicillin-clavulanate, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, doxycycline and vancomycin.
  • Related blog post: What’s Going on With Pouchitis?

S Singh et al Clinical Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18: 1367-80. Management of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases in Special Populations: Obese, Old, or Obstetric

A Levine et al Clinical Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18: 1381-92. Dietary Guidance From the International Organization for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

  • The authors recommend more vegetables and fruits with CD (but low insoluble fiber if stricture present)
  • “Prudent to reduce intake of red and processed meat” with UC
  • “Prudent to increase dietary omega-3 fatty acids” from marine fish but not from dietary supplements with UC
  • ‘Prudent to use a low FODMAP diet for patients with persistent symptoms for CD and UC despite resolution of inflammation’

M Collins et al Clinical Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18: 1393-1403.Management of Patients With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Enterocolitis: A Systematic Review

This study reviews colitis induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors which are similar to young patients with inherent CTLA4b deficiency.

Related blog posts:

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Expert Guidance on Pediatric Postoperative Crohn’s Disease

A recent NASPGHAN clinical report (JB Splawski et al JPGN 2017; 65: 475-86) updates recommendations to lower the rate of postoperative recurrence in pediatric Crohn Disease (CD).  In this report, after review of a number of studies, the authors provide a management algorithm (Figure 1).  In addition, they review risk factors for surgery/postoperative recurrence in CD.

Key points:

  • “Endoscopic recurrence precedes clinical recurrence, and is a better predictor of the risk for future surgery.”
  • “Anti-TNF agents appear to be the most effective treatment in preventing postoperative recurrence.”  These agents “can be started as early as 4 weeks after surgery.”
  • “Prophylactic treatment to prevent recurrence rather than treating after the disease recurs, appears to be more effective in preventing further surgery.”
  • “Early postoperative surveillance for disease recurrence allows for a change in management to prevent complications that may lead to further surgery.” The authors note that fecal calprotectin (and lactoferrin) return to baseline around 2 months after surgery, and “monitoring disease activity postsurgery with these tests may help determine appropriate selection for more invasive testing such as endoscopy.”

My take: The authors emphasize that “whatever treatment is chosen, early surveillance for disease recurrence is clearly needed.”  In addition, anti-TNF agents are most likely to lower risk of further surgery.

Related blog posts:

Silver Bridge, Colorado River, Bright Angel Trail. Grand Canyon

 

NASPGHAN Postgraduate Course 2017 (Part 4): Therapeutic drug monitoring, Anti-TNF management, Postoperative Crohn’s disease

This blog entry has abbreviated/summarized these presentations. Though not intentional, some important material is likely to have been omitted; in addition, transcription errors are possible as well.

Here is a link to postgraduate course syllabus: NASPGHAN PG Syllabus – 2017

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

Andrew Grossman  Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia

The topic of therapeutic drug monitoring, both reactive and proactive, has been discussed numerous times on this blog.  This talk provided a good review of this topic.

Key points:

  • Greatest predictor of infliximab treatment failure was a low infliximab (<0.9 mcg/mL at anytime or <2.2 mcg/mL at 14 weeks) (Castelle et al Am J Gastro 2013; 108: 962-71)
  • Low level antibodies to infliximab may be transient in ~28% and may be overcome with escalation of therapy
  • Tissue levels of infliximab (and other agents) may be inadequate despite good serum levels

What if anti-TNF fails

Maria Oliva-Hemker   Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Key points:

  • Discussed prevalence of problem with anti-TNF failures and main options: vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and surgery
  • Vedolizumab can take a while to work, particularly for Crohn’s disease
  • Limited data in pediatrics for these newer agents
  • Ustekinumab has some preliminary data indicating benefit with anti-TNF induced psoriaform rashes
  • Newer agents also likely to need therapeutic drug monitoring
  • Overall, ustekinumab and vedolizumab have good safety profiles at this point

 

Prevention of postoperative Crohn’s disease

Miguel Regueiro   University of Pittsburgh

  • Rationale for postoperative preventative treatment: high rate of recurrent disease which can be silent for several years despite progressive damage to GI tract
  • Large study (PREVENT) to compare infliximab and placebo after surgery.  Primary endpoint was clinical recurrence (was endpoint demanded by FDA) even though clinical recurrence can be a late finding.  Endoscopic recurrence rate was a secondary endpoint.

Dr. Regueiro’s approach

  • Low risk patient –repeat scope at 6 months post-op, then every 1-3 yrs if no disease and Rx with anti-TNF or immunomodulator in those with endoscopic recurrence
  • Moderate risk patient -possible use of thiopurine or use the ‘low risk’ approach
  • High risk patient-combination therapy and if doing well for several years, consider monotherapy
  • In pediatrics, the postoperative management is unclear due to difficulty with risk stratification.  If postoperative treatment is not given, consider colonoscopy 3-4 months afterwards and treat if recurrence.  Then could use calprotectin every 3 months to monitor and when >50, likely will need to be treated

PREVENT Trial Data:

 

 

 

Two Viewpoints: Anti-TNF Therapy Shortly After Crohn’s Disease Surgery

A recent AGA perspectives issue provides two viewpoints on when to start/resume anti-TNF therapy after Crohn’s disease surgery:

Dr. Bressler states that he considers anti-TNF therapy for patients with ongoing immune dysfunction after surgery who are at high risk for recurrence.  Attributes of high risk disease include the following:

  • younger age (<30 years)
  • smoker
  • two or more surgeries for penetrating disease.

His commentary indicates that a “‘wait and see’ approach is appropriate for most patients. He frequently will measure a calprotectin three months postoperatively and every three months and perform a colonoscopy typically 6-9 months postoperatively. Those with endoscopic recurrence will be placed on anti-TNF therapy.

Dr. Requiero states:

  • The most effective way to prevent recurrence is to initiate an anti-TNF within four weeks of surgery. It has been my practice that patients at high risk for postoperative Crohn’s disease recurrence initiate anti-TNF shortly after they are discharged from the hospital.
  • If a patient had been on an anti-TNF prior to the surgery, I will usually resume the same anti-TNF after the surgery. In these patients, I do not give a re-induction course unless they had not received the anti-TNF for more than three months prior to surgery.
  • Concomitant therapy: “In the majority of patients, I treat with an anti-TNF, I will use a concomitant immunomodulator…One year after surgery, if there is no disease recurrence, I will decrease and often stop the immunomodulator. With the advent of therapeutic drug monitoring, I have a number of postoperative anti-TNF patients on monotherapy without an immunomodulator.
  • [In] patients at moderate risk for postoperative recurrence… I perform an ileocolonoscopy six months postoperatively and, if there is evidence of endoscopic recurrence, I add an anti-TNF agent. After finding a high rate of recurrence in these patients, I am beginning to shift my practice to initiating anti-TNFs in this moderate-risk group as well.

My take: I tend to favor Dr. Reguieiro’s approach in my patient population.

Related blog posts:

IBD Shorts and Postop Crohn’s Management

C Ma et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2017; 23: 833-9.  This retrospective study examined the ongoing response to ustekinumab in 104 patients with Crohn’s disease.  All patients had achieved a steroid-free ustekinumab induction.  92.3% had failed anti-TNFα therapy.Key findings:

  • 71.8% maintained a response at 52 weeks
  • 64.4% maintained an endoscopic or radiographic response

Related blog post: Closer Look at Ustekinumab Data

O Truffinet et al JPGN 2017; 64: 721-25. This small study with 8 children with Crohn’s disease examined the use of tacrolimus.  Six of eight showed a response to tacrolimus (target 8-15) with a clinical response at 2 months and 4 of 8 in clinical remission.  Adverse effects were common, occurring in 6 of 8.  These included renal dysfunction, diabetes, paresthesia and tremor.

J Adler et al.  JPGN 2017; 64: e117-e124. Using ImproveCareNow registry, the authors identified perianal disease (PD) in 1399 of 6679 cases (21%).  PD was more common in blacks than whites: 26% vs. 20%.  Overall, this study showed a higher rate of PD than previously recognized.

J Amil-Dias et al JPGN 2017; 64: 818-35.  This is an ESPGHAN IBD Porto Group guideline for surgical Crohn’s disease management in children.  There are 25 graded statements.  Here are a few:

  • #7 & #8. If needing surgery for CD pancolitis, the authors recommend subtotal colectomy and ileostomy.  Possible reanastomosis at later date if no significant rectal and/or perianal disease.  Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is NOT recommended.
  • #13. Monitor Vitamin B12 if >20 cm resection of terminal ileum
  • #16. Postoperative management “should be based on ileocolonoscopy.” Figure 1 details recommendations, including need for assessment postoperatively.
  • In patients with high-risk factors, anti-TNF therapy is recommended postoperatively.  In those without high-risk factors, the authors indicate that thiopurines are reasonable with and advancing to anti-TNF if Rutgeerts i2 or greater at followup assessment.  High-risk factors include growth failure, short duration from diagnosis to surgery, extensive resection (>40 cm), and penetrating disease.

Related blog post:

Musee d’Orsay

 

Short Takes on IBD Articles

Singh S, et al. Gastroenterol 2015; 148: 64-76.  In this study, the authors identified 21 trials with 2006 participants to examine the comparative efficacy of pharmacologic interventions to prevent relapse of Crohn’s disease (CD) after surgery.  Conclusion: “anti-TNF monotherapy appears to be the most effective strategy for postoperative prophylaxis for CD.” The relative risk of clinical relapse and endoscopic relapse with anti-TNF monotherapy was estimated to be between 0.02-0.20 and 0.005-0.04, respectively. Thus, those at highest risk for recurrence, including younger individuals, smokers, penetrating CD, perianal CD, and recurrent surgeries) are most likely to benefit.(Related blog post: More Lessons in TNF Therapy (Part 1) | gutsandgrowth)

Pariente B, et al. Gastroenterol 2015; 148: 52-63. The researchers in this cross-sectional study developed the Lémann Index which measures cumulative structural bowel damage in patients with CD.  My only complaint with this study was the associated editorial on pages 8-10, titled “The Holy Grail, or Only Half Way There?”  There are too many medical advances compared to ‘the holy grail’ and, in my opinion, this shouldn’t be one of them.

Zitomersky NL et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2015; 21: 307-14.  In this study the authors examine the relationship between the development of antibodies to infliximab (ATI) and the risk of surgery in a cross-sectional cohort of pediatric and young adult patients.  Not surprisingly, development of ATI, which was noted in 20% of cohort, correlated with reductions in infliximab levels and higher risk of surgery.  Interestingly, prior (but not current) immunomodulator therapy was associated with lower antibody levels (P=0.007).  Perhaps, “step-up” therapy may lower the risk of ATI. (This was a point noted by James Markowitz in a previous post: More NASPGHAN Meeting Notes: IBD Hot Topics | gutsandgrowth)

Rogler G, Vavricka S. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2015; 21: 400-08. This review article discusses the exposome in IBD.  Exposures include air pollution, diet, drugs, infections, water pollution, food additives, and smoking.  These exposures influence the gut microbiome and genetic susceptibility. “Only environmental influences…explain the rising incidence in IBD worldwide. The investigation of the exposome…is an enormous challenge…[but] of crucial importance.” (Related blog post: What do you know about the “exposome”? | gutsandgrowth)

Kalmon RS. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2015; 21: 428-35. Review article provides information when there is a prior personal or family history of malignancy (=avoid thiopurines).  Figure 2 is a suggested algorithm for those with IBD and a previous diagnosis of cancer.

  • In those in which the cancer is adequately controlled, the recommendations indicate that if it has been more than 2 years since completion of therapy to use a ‘step-up’ management and favor methotrexate over thiopurines
  • In those with less than 2 years since completion of cancer treatment and not responsive to 5-ASAs/antibiotics, then “consider monotherapy with biologic agents.”
  • In those still receiving chemotherapy, the authors suggest “hold immunosuppression and follow course of IBD.  If IBD not well controlled despite chemotherapy, 5-ASAs and antibiotics, treat flares with steroids, then consider biologic agents.”

More Lessons in TNF Therapy (Part 1)

More data has been published regarding postoperative therapy with infliximab (IFX) in Crohn’s disease (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 12: 1494-1502, editorial 1503-6).

In this prospective, open-label study with at least 5 years of followup, 24 patients who were previously randomly assigned to receive IFX or placebo for 1 year after ileocolonic resection were given the option of continuing IFX or stopping IFX (“watch and wait approach”).  This was a strange study and perhaps mirrors clinical experience in that consistent usage of IFX was not maintained in the majority; in addition, there was not a set pattern with regard to thiopurine usage.

Of 11 patients who received IFX during the first year after surgery, 8 elected to stop IFX and all 8 experienced endoscopic recurrences at a mean of 18.2 months, including 5 who needed surgery.  Of 13 patients who received placebo during the first year after resection, 12 elected to initiate IFX at 1-year entry point;  7 of those responded with endoscopic remission. Overall, the mean percentage of time that a patient received IFX was similar between those initially assigned to IFX or placebo (50.3% vs. 53%).

Key findings:

  • Among those originally assigned to the IFX group, there was a longer mean time to first endoscopic recurrence (1231 days vs. 460 days in placebo group).
  • Colonoscopy identified recurrent disease in 22.2% of patients receiving IFX compared with 93% off IFX.  That is, throughout the study there were 84 colonoscopies.  If one was receiving IFX at the time of the colonoscopy, the adjusted rate ratio for being in remission while on IFX was 13.47.
  • Among patients who received IFX for at least 60% of the full study period, they had fewer surgical recurrences: 20.0% compared with 64.3% (5 of 8).
  • Recurrence was similar for patients receiving IFX monotherapy or in combination (though small numbers preclude a definitive assessment).
  • None of the three patients who continued IFX from the beginning have required an operation in the past 8 years.

One can speculate that the main reason why so many placebo-treated patients (12 of 13) elected to start IFX was that there was evidence of recurrent disease; conversely, many of the patients who received IFX postoperatively were in remission and opted for a watch-and-wait approach subsequently.

Study limitations: small numbers, open-label design, changes in therapy at patient’s physician discretion, and no restrictions on use of concomitant medications.

The associated editorial recommends the use of IFX postoperatively in high-risk patients (perforating disease, smokers, >1 surgical resection) and notes that therapy should be started 2-4 weeks after surgery because IFX is “less effective in preventing medical recurrence if started after endoscopic recurrence.”  The editorial suggests that low-risk patients should undergo a 6- to 12-month endoscopic evaluation.  Though, “we urgently need data from large prospective studies such as the PREVENT trial” (NCT01190839) as well as the POCER study.

Bottomline: Infliximab, administered within 4 weeks of an ileocolonic resection, reduces postoperative recurrence of Crohn’s disease and helps prevent further surgeries.  Studies (like this one) with long followup are essential to determine the effectiveness of anti-TNF (tumor necrosis factor) therapies.  It remains unclear whether only “high-risk” patients should receive anti-TNF therapy or whether these agents should be used more broadly.

Related blog posts:

Only one chance to make first impression

Infliximab (IFX) came into clinical practice in 1998 after impressive results, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, demonstrated remarkable success in refractory Crohn’s disease  and even allowed resolution of fistulas.  Due to its expense and perceived risks, IFX has been typically reserved for treatment failures & significant perianal disease.  Although there have been discussions about ‘top-down’ therapy for many years, more and more it has become apparent that the best opportunity to influence the natural history of Crohn’s disease is early in the course; and perhaps in some cases of ulcerative colitis early IFX treatment may be worthwhile.  Clinical experience and treatment trials have shown that IFX response is significantly greater in Crohn’s disease than ulcerative colitis.  
Data on the postoperative course of Crohn’s disease has been informative on this approach as have large studies demonstrating that IFX is likely at least as safe as any other medication treatments for moderate-to-severe disease (eg. thiopurines, corticosteroids, methotrexate, tacrolimus).  With regard to postoperative Crohn’s disease, it has been shown that microscopic disease may develop within one week of intestinal resection.  More than 70% of postoperative patients develop significant mucosal recurrence within 12months (i2 or greater); yet, symptoms may not develop for a much longer time.  When significant mucosal disease is present, it may already be too late to achieve optimal response to IFX and similar agents due to remodeling of the intestinal submucosa.  Early in the course of Crohn’s disease, the vast majority of patients have an inflammatory phenotype (Cosnes J, et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2002; 8:244-25), whereas later in the course, stricturing and penetrating disease are increasingly common.  

Postoperative mucosal scoring system:

• i1 – 5 or fewer apthous lesions

• i2 – more than 5 apthous ulcers with normal mucosa between, or skip areas of larger lesions

• i3 – diffuse apthous ileitis with diffusely inflamed mucosa

• i4 – diffuse inflammation with large ulcers, nodules or narrowing

 Rutgeerts et al. Gastroenterology 1990;99:956-83

Top-down approach:

Benefits: higher efficacy, lower disease-related complications, decrease surgery, improvement in catchup growth/bone formation (both not shown in AZA trials)

Risks: higher costs (but probably cost-effective)

**IFX therapy early may save health care costs by reducing surgery/hospitalizations:  Jewell DP et al, Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005, Leombruno JP et al Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2011

Conventional approach with accelerated step-up:

Risks: lower efficacy, higher infection risk/mortality with repeated steroids

Benefits: possibly lower cost

Potential drawbacks with azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine (thiopurine class):

  • IBD 2011; 17: 2138. AZA can achieve remission in only ~30%.
  • Canc Research 2009; 69: 7004.  AZA is carcinogen– incorporated into DNA & changes sun absorption.  Skin cancer risk never drops when stopping med.
  • Gastro 2011; 141: 1621: CESAME (n=19,486)  thiopurines associated with NHL risk.  HR 5.28.
**Much of the information on this posting was influenced by presentations at “Advances in IBD 2011.”  Specific speakers that influenced this posting include Robert Baldassano, Marla Dubinsky, and Miguel Regueiro.

Additional References:

  • IBD 2009; 15: 1583. Postoperative mgt: low risk (1st surg, short stricture) –>no Rx; moderate risk (<10yrs of dz, long stricture, inflammatory dz)–>6MP; high risk (penetrating dz, >2 surg) –>IFX.  Post-op scope @6-12mo
  • JPGN 2009; 48 suppl 2: S72
  • Clin Gastro & Hep 2009; 7:183. Long term results with surgery for small bowel Crohn’s. n=865 surgeries. Risk for repeat surgeries: younger age, upper small bowel location, stricturing
  • Gastroenterology 2009; 136: 441. IFX prevents recurrent Crohn’s post-op. n=24. 1/11 w recurrence vs 11/13 control patients.
  • Am J Gastro 2008; 103: S412 (abstract 1054) IFX reduces post-op recurrence. clinical recurrence 0% at week 54 vs 39% of controls. n=23. 90% in IFX group with endoscopic remission vs 15% of placebo group.
  • Lancet 2008; 371: 660-667.   top-down strategy more likely to achieve endoscopic remicssion after 2yrs: 73% vs 30%. n=129.
  • NEJM 2010; 362: 1383. Sonic study. Combination AZA/IFX with greater efficacy. 56.8% remission in combo Rx vs IFX monotherapy.
  • Gut 2010; 59: 1363.   n=121.  Co-treatment helpd reduce complications & flares relative to monotherapy (& azathioprine appeared to be more effective than methotrexate).
  • JPGN 2009; 49: 183.  REACH pediatric trial showed good perianal dz response to infliximab.