Tag Archives: short bowel syndrome

Dr. Valeria Cohran: Short Bowel Syndrome/Intestinal Failure in Pediatrics 2026

Posted on by
Reply

Recently, Dr. Valeria Cohran gave our group a terrific update on Short Bowel Syndrome (SBS)/Intestinal Failure (IF). My notes below may contain errors in transcription and in omission. Along with my notes, I have included many of her slides. Dr. Cohran has been a leader in intestinal rehabilitation. Among many accomplishments, she was the 2025 recipient of the 2025 Margaret Stallings NASPGHAN Distinguished Service Award.

Key points:

  • Most children with SBS/IF are able to taper off parenteral nutrition (PN). Even ~30% of those with extreme SBS (<10% of expected bowel length) are able to achieve enteral autonomy.
  • SBS/IF due to NEC has a generally more favorable outcome than other etiologies
  • Stoma takedown is associated with better outcomes (eg. more likely to taper off PN). (Raghu et al. JPEN. 2023;47:1047-55). Taking down stoma may be beneficial if unable to taper PN and in those developing liver disease
  • SBS/IF caretakers spend a median of 29 hrs/week managing PN, enteral nutrition, medications, and other tasks
  • In the nursery, one study reported that NICU patients with IF spent a median of 150 days and cost more than $500K
  • Overall, advances in SBS/IF management have been associated with lower death rates and lower intestinal transplant rates (~30 ITx last year), yet similar rates of achieving enteral autonomy
Overall, Group 1 SBS is least likely to achieve enteral autonomy
Intestinal length with maximal increase in first year of life
•N=362 children in over 26 centers world-wide, started 2018 (enrolled if PN >2 months)
Multi-organ effects of SBS
  • Fish oil based lipid emulsions do not always work; cirrhosis can still develop even with minimal biochemical marker alterations
  • IFALD mortality is associated with degree of conjugated hyperbilirubinemia, though we are not seeing this complication much with current management
  • GLP-2 can reduce PN requirements by more than 20% in the majority of those with SBS/IF and may help achieve enteral autonomy in about 20%. However, their use requires close monitoring for fluid overload and electrolyte disturbances
  • Lots of disparities noted along socioeconomic variables. For outpatient management, home nursing care is not available in some neighborhoods

Related blog posts:

Data Insufficient to Recommend Immobilized Lipase Cartridge Use in Children with Short Bowel Syndrome

Posted on by
Reply

E Khenner et al. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2026;82:1488–1494. Open Access! Retrospective chart review of immobilized lipase cartridge use in children with short bowel syndrome

***Three of the authors of this study are/were employed or receive research support from Alcresta Therapeutics, Inc.

This small retrospective single-center study reports the use of in-line immobilized lipase cartridges (ILC) in 14 patients; 10 were PN-dependent, and four had enteral autonomy (Table 1). The mean age at the start of ILC use was 6 years (range 2–15 years). Mean estimated residual small bowel length was 66 cm (range 11–190 cm; n = 13). Eight patients received peptide-based EN and 6 elemental EN, typically delivered over 12–24 h.

Key findings:

  • In 9 PN-dependent patients (with Type II or III SBS), mean PN use at baseline was 45.3 kcal/kg/day (59% of supplemental nutrition). At final follow-up, mean PN use decreased by 10.6 kcal/kg/day (15.5%) and mean EN use increased by 6.0 kcal/kg/day (39.9%) after 3.8 to 23.9 months of ILC use.
  • In 4 patients with enteral autonomy (all Type III SBS), mean weight z-score improved by 0.60 and mean EN use decreased by 6.9% after 2.7 to 5.3 months of ILC use. The decrease from baseline in mean EN use at final follow-up was driven by data from one patient (#12) who had poor compliance with tube feeding.
  • None of these changes are statistically significant.

Discussion:

  • “There are limitations to ILC use in children with SBS: not all SBS patients receive EN, bolus feeding with ILC is limited to flow rates ≤400 mL/h, and ILC is not compatible with high fiber enteral formulas.6“
  • “Blenderized tube feeding is becoming the preferred method of enteral feeding in pediatrics.17 Although the use of blenderized tube feeds in children with SBS is associated with improved GI symptoms as well as a reduction in PN dependence, some patients experience intolerance or lack of weight gain.18, 19“
  • The authors conclusions: “ILC offers a low-risk option to potentially advance enteral autonomy or weight gain in some children with SBS.”

My take: I am not convinced that ILC is worthwhile for pediatric patients with SBS. I have received questions about this from our neonatal colleagues. When I have questioned leaders of several intestinal rehab centers, they have stated there is no solid data supporting its use. When I have asked the manufacturer to provide data in children with SBS less than two years of age, I have heard no response. The cost (without insurance) likely exceeds $9,000/month if using two ILCs per day. The use of this expensive product needs to be carefully evaluated in a prospective randomized trial.

Related blog posts:

BAPS Shri Swaminarayan Mandir, Atlanta (Hindu Temple)

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician. Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure. This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition

Dr. Danielle Wendel: Management of Short Bowel Syndrome

Posted on by

Two years ago, Dr. Wendel gave our group a great lecture on short bowel syndrome (SVS). One of the neonatologists in attendance invited her back to provide a state of the art update. While this 2026 lecture covered some of the same issues, there were important updates and insights.

My notes below may contain errors in transcription and in omission. In addition, the information provided is based on what is done in Seattle. However, there is not a lot of evidence for much of what is done in intestinal rehabilitation. Thus, there is variation in practice at different centers and what works for one patient might not work for another. Following my notes, I have included many of her slides.

Diet:

  • Enteral feedings promote intestinal adaptation. Pediatric patients with SBS require much higher calories with enteral nutrition and may have hyperphagia as a compensatory mechanism
  • Breastmilk and/or Standard formula likely help promote intestinal adaptation better than hydrolysates and elemental formulas. In addition, it may help reduce the development of food allergies which are increased in children with SBS
  • Oral feedings have many advantages over NG or GT feedings when feasible. The ability to consume solid foods is quite helpful in reducing diarrhea. Also, encouraging oral feedings may help reduce feeding aversions. As such, GT placement is avoided if possible in Seattle
  • Key diet advice: avoid sweet tasting food/drink, especially in the first few years of life while they are developing their palate/food preferences
  • Feed osmolarity/caloric density: Most children with SBS tolerate lower caloric density (15-20 cal/oz) and more volume orally rather than higher caloric density/lower volume feeds

Parenteral Nutrition:

  • Lipid emulsions: SMOFlipid at 2 gm/day can help prevent essential fatty acid deficiency (EFA). Omegaven may need to be dosed at 1.5 gm/day to prevent EFA. If used for short-term and low dose, standard intralipid can be useful
  • HAL (aka TPN): Typically weaning calories is done before weaning volume. Cycling HAL (delivering over fewer hours) can be started prior to discharge. Watch for tolerance of the glucose infusion rate (JH: I prefer the terms HAL = hyperalimentation or PN=parenteral nutrition. TPN =total parenteral nutrition. Most patients are receiving parenteral nutrition but not total parenteral nutrition.)

Ostomy/Stool Output:

  • Output goals: Most pediatric patients can tolerate output of 50 mL/kg/day of ostomy output  (if being supported by PN), though less than 30 mL/kg/day is more physiologic
  • Iron: Parenteral iron is typically needed. Seattle team prefers ferric carboxymaltose as it may deliver enough iron for 6-12 months in one infusion
  • Acid suppression: While acid suppression can sometimes be beneficial by lowering gastric output, if possible avoid long-term use as it may increase risk of bacterial overgrowth along with other infections
  • Excessive stool output (via stoma or per rectum) is when it is more than the patient’s baseline. This should prompt investigation for potential causes including diet/osmotic agent, bacterial overgrowth and infections
  • Pancreatic enzymes: It is unclear if pancreatic enzymes (PERT, Relizorb) will improve stool output due to lack of data
  • Teduglutide can reduce the need for HAL. It is a hormone (like insulin) and sustained effects are generally not seen when it is stopped. However, especially in patients close to coming off HAL, it may be beneficial

Monitoring:

  • Nutrient deficiencies: Close monitoring for nutrient deficiencies is needed and often even more important when no longer receiving HAL
  • Urine sodium more than 30 is a goal. Sodium depletion interferes with growth and can contribute to other electrolye disturbances (eg. hypokalemia)

CLABSI:

  • Antibiotics: Treatment starts with a broad-spectrum antibiotic and wait to add specific gram-positive coverage unless ill-appearing or gram-positive organism starts growing. Vancomycin is not used frequently in Seattle due to concerns of renal toxicity. In patients with gram-positive infection, linezolid is often used
  • Minimum of 48 Hours For All Fevers: Everyone with SBS and with fever (greater than or equal to 100.4) stays for at least 48 hrs on broad spectrum IV antibiotics
  • Locks: Sodium bicarb locks help prevent CLABSI and appear to have similar infection prevention as ethanol locks. Ethanol locks have been difficult to get coverage.

SIBO:

  • Medications: Metronidazole is generally 1st line agent and gentamicin (IV formulation given enterally) is a 2nd line agent in Seattle. Rifaximin would be potentially their 1st line agent if it were easier to get covered

Related blog posts:

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Post-Endoscopic Fever in Pediatric Intestinal Failure & Short Bowel Syndrome Patients

Posted on by

J Hilberath et al. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2025;81:736–742. Open Access! Post‐endoscopic fever and infection in paediatricpatients with intestinal failure

Methods: This was a retrospective single-center observational study which included children with IF and CVC who underwent GI endoscopy between 2019 and 2024. Intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis was used in 71.2% of the procedures.

Key findings:

  • The overall post-endoscopic fever (PEF) rate was 6%, with no significant difference between the group that received prophylactic antibiotics and the group that did not. Specifically, there were 10 with PEF that had received prophylactic antibiotics and 4 that had PEF with no prophylaxis
  • No infections, including central line-associated bloodstream infections, were observed
  • 5/14 of the cases with PEF had an interventional procedure. The remainder had a diagnostic EGD, colonoscopy or both.

Interventional Cases:

Discussion Points:

  • “PEF in children with IF was 6%, which is approximately 10 times higher than the recently published 0.55% in pediatric patients following endoscopic procedures by Boster et al.” (see: Must-Read: How to Handle Post-Procedure Fevers)
  • A strength of this study was that the comparison of children with IV antibiotics versus those without was due to an institutional policy change in 2022. This helps eliminate selection bias in the determination that IV antibiotics were not beneficial in preventing PEF

My take: The high rate (6%) of PEF should be discussed with families prior to endoscopic procedures. The rate was increased (36%) in those with interventional procedures. It is reassuring that no definitive infections were identified despite the fevers.

Related blog post: Must-Read: How to Handle Post-Procedure Fevers

Long-Acting GLP-2 Analogue Glepaglutide Reduces Parenteral Support

Posted on by

PB Jeppesen et al. Gastroenterol 2025; 168: 701-713. Open Access! Glepaglutide, a Long-Acting Glucagon-like Peptide-2 Analogue, Reduces Parenteral Support in Patients With Short Bowel Syndrome: A Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: “GLP-2 is a specific, endogenous, intestinal, pro-adaptive factor that plays a key role in enhancing intestinal mucosal morphology, function, and integrity under normal and pathophysiological conditions. The introduction of GLP-2 analogue treatment has been a paradigm shift in the treatment of SBS, targeting the pathophysiology of SBS by aiming to reinforce the structural and functional integrity of the remaining intestine. Exogenous GLP-2 induces significant hyperplasia of the small intestinal mucosal epithelium via stimulation of stem cell proliferation in the crypts and via inhibition of apoptosis in the villi…

The short half-life of 5–7 minutes for circulating native GLP-232 is a significant practical limitation for its use in a therapeutic setting. This is improved for the currently marketed GLP-2 analogue teduglutide, which has a half-life in circulation of approximately 2 hours.33 However, treatment is time-consuming due to the requirement for daily drug product reconstitution and dosing…

Glepaglutide is a novel, long-acting GLP-2 analogue in a stable, aqueous formulation for subcutaneous administration to treat patients with SBS. The stability in aqueous solution allows for dosing of glepaglutide as a ready-to-use liquid formulation. The mean effective half-life is 88 hours,34 which enables extension of the dosing interval beyond daily dosing.”

Methods: In this placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, phase 3 trial, adult patients (n=106) with SBS with intestinal failure requiring PS ≥3 d/wk were randomized 1:1:1 to 24 weeks of glepaglutide 10 mg twice weekly or once weekly or placebo

Key findings:

  • Glepaglutide twice weekly significantly reduced weekly PS volumes from baseline to week 24 vs placebo (mean change, −5.13 vs −2.85 L/wk; P = .0039; primary end point).
  • The improvement with glepaglutide was more prominent in those without a colon in continuity.
  • Mean concentrations of citrulline (a biomarker for enterocyte mass) increase 47% and 19% from baseline in the TW and OW treatment groups vs 5% in the placebo group
  • Serious adverse events were more common in both glepaglutide groups (28.6% and 11.4% for TW and OW respectively) compared to 5.6% for placebo. Specific risks of the active treatment included injection site reactions (common). Stoma complications (swelling of stoma nipple) along with GI events (nausea, vomiting and pain) were reported in more than 10% of patients. One patient developed cholecystitis and one developed a generalized rash in the active treatment group.
  • 61 of 70 patients (87%) treated with glepaglutide developed anti-drug antibodies. However, the authors found no apparent association with glepaglutide pharmacokinetics.
The improvement in parenteral support was more notable in those without the colon in continuity
Difference compared to placebo: 14.1% more of patients receiving twice weekly dosing and 11.2% more of patients receiving once weekly dosing of glepaglutide achieved enteral autonomy.

My take: This study shows that glepaglutide, like its GLP-2 analogue predecessor teduglutide, reduces the volume of parenteral support for patients with SBS. Due to its longer half-life, less frequent dosing is an added benefit compared to teduglutide.

Drawbacks for this group of medications include the potential for long-term adverse effects, endoscopic monitoring (possibly both upper endoscopy and colonoscopy), substantial costs, and reversion of intestinal failure severity when the medications are stopped.

Related blog posts:

Inpatient Admission to Achieve Enteral Autonomy in Children with Intestinal Failure

Posted on by

Happy New Year!

——-

A Fialdowski et al. J Pediatr 2024; 275: 114226. Achieving Enteral Autonomy in Children with Intestinal Failure Following Inpatient Admission: A Case Series

This retrospective review identified 6 patients (out of 153) who were weaned off parenteral nutrition (PN) as part of an inpatient admission.

Key findings:

  • Except for one admission of 8 days, all of these patients required a prolonged admission 1-5 months.
  • Two of the patients were receiving PN primarily due to abdominal pain in the absence of a recognizable motility disorder.
  • Two of the patients had a suspected factitious disorder imposed on a medical disorder; one received this diagnosis.
  • All patients had chronic feeding intolerance despite favorable prognostic factors including underlying necrotizing enterocolitis (n=1), preserved ileocecal valve (n=5), longer bowel length (n=5), and retention of entire colon (n=5).
  • Post-pyloric feeds aided conversion to EN in 5 patients.

My take: In order to achieve enteral autonomy, hospital admission may be needed for patients who require long-term PN despite favorable prognostic factors.

  • Be prepared for a lengthy stay
  • Anticipate the need for an interdisciplinary team (eg. nutrition, social work, and others).

Related blog posts:

From the Lake by Georgia O’Keefe (1924). High Museum, Atlanta.

Short Bowel Syndrome and Risk of Eosinophilic Disease

Posted on by

N Du, C Torres. JPGN 2024;78:1149–1154. Prevalence of eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases in children with short bowel syndrome: A single center study

Methods: EoEdefined as ≥15 eosinophils per high powered field (HPF), eosinophilic gastritis (EoG) as ≥30 eosinophils per HPF, eosinophilic enteritis (EoGN) as >50 eosinophils per HPF, and eosinophilic colitis (EoC) as>80–100 eosinophils per HPF.

Key findings in this retrospective study (n=82):

  • The prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis in our SBS cohort was10%, eosinophilic gastritis was 4.9%, and eosinophilic enteritis was 4.9%
  • SBS patients with history of allergy or atopy were more likely to have esophageal and intestinal eosinophilia on biopsy than patients without allergy
  • One patient had EoC

In their discussion, the authors speculate on the potential role for dysbiosis, possibly related to parenteral nutrition. They note that “rare SBS patients were on amino acid‐based formulas alone and almost all were exposed to food allergens around the same age as the general population.” I did not see any information about PPI use in this cohort.

My take: This report reinforces the fact that eosinophilic disorders are more frequent in SBS (see related post below). The exact role of altered diet/use of amino acid based formulas and the role of medications like PPIs in regards to the development of EGIDs remains unclear.

Related blog posts:

Practical Intestinal Rehabilitation (Part 2)

Posted on by

We had an brilliant lecture given to our group by Danielle Wendel who leads Seattle Children’s Intestinal Rehabilitation team. My notes below may contain errors in transcription and in omission. In addition, the information provided is based on what is done in Seattle. However, there is not a lot of evidence for much of what is done in intestinal rehabilitation. Thus, there is variation in practice at different centers and what works for one patient might not work for another. Following my notes, I have included many of her slides (same slides as yesterday’s post).

CLABSI Pointers:

  • -At Seattle, with suspected CLABSI, usually central blood culture obtained without peripheral blood culture. (Peripheral blood cultures have not helped their team improve management)
  • -Everyone with SBS and with fever (greater than or equal to 100.4) stays for at least 48 hrs on broad spectrum IV antibiotics (choice based on local sensitivities) through the central line until it is conclusively determined if they have a CLABSI (which still carry a significant mortality risk)
  • -Sodium bicarbonate lock experience has been good (8.4% solution, 1.5 mL lock for the entire time off PN in all tunneled CVL flushed in at the end of the dwell). It has become a good substitute for ethanol locks.  Their experience will be published soon.  Since sodium bicarbonate lock does not need to be withdrawn, it has been associated with less line breakage.  Several lock solutions (KiteLock and Taurolidine) are not currently available in the U.S.  KiteLock is about to be studied in Seattle.
  • -At Seattle, all CLABSI are treated  through the line and every effort is made to salvage and/or repair lines.  Line replacement increases risk of losing central IV access.
  • -Line is removed for fungal infections
  • -The Seattle team prefers tunneled CVC

SIBO Pointers:

  • -Testing is problematic.  Breath tests are not reliable in kids with SBS.  Duodenal aspirates are often not helpful and have a number of technical difficulties; also, it is unclear whether a duodenal aspirate is representative of the bacteria in the more distal bowel.
  • -Metronidazole is their first line choice.  Gentamicin (IV formulation given enterally) is their 2nd choice.  Rifaximin is their 3rd line.  Rifaximin would possibly be used earlier in treatment except for difficulty getting covered.  When used, they crush up pills rather than have it compounded to avoid sweeteners.

Teduglutide

  • -Best to start if a patient is is > 1yo and on stable TPN (not able to wean)
  • -Make sure patient is using a tiny needle (not adult needle in package)
  • -Anticipate long-term treatment (?indefinite)

GI Bleeding Pointers:

  • This is being seen frequently. 
  • Etiologies include anastomotic ulcers and IBD-like lesions.   If a patient is not improving with standard approaches and possibly resection, could need an anti-TNF type agent.
  •  At Seattle, they are very selective about patients appropriate for a STEP procedure as this may be associated with more frequent bleeding over time due to the many staples used. Hand-sewn tapering may be a better option for many patients.
  • With the challenging decisions required for these bleeding patients, discussion with an experienced intestinal rehab center may be helpful.

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Practical Intestinal Rehabilitation (Part 1)

Posted on by

We had an brilliant lecture given to our group by Danielle Wendel who leads Seattle Children’s Intestinal Rehabilitation team. My notes below may contain errors in transcription and in omission. In addition, the information provided is based on what is done in Seattle. However, there is not a lot of evidence for much of what is done in intestinal rehabilitation. Thus, there is variation in practice at different centers and what works for one patient might not work for another. Following my notes, I have included many of her slides.

Key points:

  • Enteral nutrition is key for adaptation.  At Seattle, oral feeds rather than GT feeds are preferred.
  • Time is the thing that helps the most.  Unclear which additives help.
  • Though prediction models often look at >50 cm, it is important to counsel families, even with more bowel length, that the care is going to be quite challenging.
  • Acid suppression can be helpful in the early phase after resection especially if problematic high stoma output.
  • Iron: if given enterally, typically given everyday or every other day.  Iron dextran can be given in TPN (cannot be given with lipids).  Ferric carboxymaltose is a good choice for parenteral administration.  Due to the need for few infusions (~1-2 per year), it is safer (less line entry) and cost-effective compared to iron sucrose.
  • Seattle shares an “Emergency Care Letter” with their patients (template available in EPIC)
  • Yearly doppler ultrasound is recommended to assess vascular access.
  • If a patient has more than one thrombosis, the Seattle team recommends long term prophylaxis, though it might take treatment levels to prevent further thrombosis.
  • SMOFlipid is the most frequently used lipid at Seattle. It can be given in higher doses than Omegaven which is important nutritionally; omegaven is generally given at only 1 to 1.5 mg/kg/day and used for treatment of IFALD.
  • Long term outcomes are just as good with chronic TPN as with intestinal transplantation. So, referral generally needed based on complications like losing central access (3 of 4 upper central sites) or progressive liver disease.

Diet Pointers:

  • -In infancy, standard formula and breastmilk are preferred and thought to help with adaptation.  Some infants need elemental diets but it is not routinely given across the board  (some other institutions feel strongly about using elemental diets, but there is limited data)
  • -Kids with short bowel syndrome may tolerate volume better than concentration
  • -The Seattle program strictly restricts sweet tasting food/drink for first 3-4 years of life to help educate the child’s palate and recommends limiting these food/drink for IF patients in general.
  • -Addition of solid foods usually helps with stoma output

Nutrient Monitoring Pointers:

  • Usually best to batch them all lab tests for micronutrients [many micronutrients are affected by inflammation and this may affect timing of lab testing]
  •  At Seattle, aluminum and manganese are not routinely checked as they are contaminants in PN that cannot be removed
  • Serum thyroid testing is a marker for iodine deficiency in patients receiving most of their calories from PN (>70) which may be more frequent now that betadine is not used for dressing changes.  Their goal for urine iodine is >100 (can be treated with ultra-diluted potassium iodide which needs to be compounded by the pharmacy)
  • When testing for EFA (essential fatty acid) deficiency, lipids should be off for 4 hrs (or more).  Urinalysis is checked to monitor for chronic kidney disease. Urine sodium goal is >30 and is checked quarterly in patients with high ostomy output or excessive rectal stool output with poor growth.
  • Hypokalemia may be a sign of total body sodium depletion due to the kidneys dumping potassium to conserve sodium

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Income and Health Outcomes in Pediatric Short Bowel Syndrome

Posted on by

Clarification: Yesterday’s post on the safe use of polyethylene glycol (Long Term Use of Polyethylene Glycol (PEG 3350)) noted the labeling indicates “‘to not use these medications for more than 7 days.” However, Ben Enav pointed out that the label also states the following in bold: “do not take more than directed unless advised by your doctor.” The actual label is shown below.

———

SA Gutierrez et al. J Pediatr 2024; 265: 113819. Neighborhood Income Is Associated with Health Care Use in Pediatric Short Bowel Syndrome

Methods: The authors used the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database to evaluate associations between neighborhood income and hospitalization data for children with short bowel syndrome (SBS). This included 4289 children with 16,347 hospitalizations from 43 institutions.

Key findings:

  • 2153 of the 4289 (50%) patients were readmitted during the study period (2006-2015)
  • Children living in low-income neighborhoods were more likely to be Black, Hispanic, have public health insurance, and live in the Southern U.S.
  • Children from low-income neighborhoods had a 38% increased risk for all-cause hospitalizations (rate ratio [RR] 1.38), an 83% increased risk for CLABSI hospitalizations (RR 1.83) and increased hospital length of stay.
  • 2.4% of patients in this cohort experienced 10 or more CLABSI hospitalizations

One of the study’s limitations is that ‘there is no singular ICD-9 code for SBS.’

My take: It is speculation about the reasons why children in low income neighborhoods have higher rates of hospitalizations and CLABSI hospitalizations. It could be that more parents in these households have less time and resources to manage a child with SBS. It is possible that these households have more chaotic environments. Regardless of the reason, it takes a lot of work and meticulous care to prevent CLABSI hospitalizations in children with SBS.

Related blog posts:

A lot of Turk’s Cap Cacti along the Ram Head Trail, St John