Category Archives: Gastroenterology

Comparing Infliximab, Adalimumab, and Vedolizumab in Adults and Children with Ulcerative Colitis

Posted on by

O Atia et al. Infammatory Bowel Diseases, 2025, 31, 617–624. Durability of the First Biologic in Children and Adults With Ulcerative Colitis: A Nationwide Study from the epi-IIRN

This was a nationwide Israeli study with 15,111 patients with UC, of whom 2322 (15%) received biologics, with a median follow-up of 7.0 years. The dataset includes ~98% of the Israeli population; “the accuracy of medication data is high, as the Israeli health care system provides medications almost free of charge through the HMOs, and the electronic dispensing of drugs contributes to reliable and precise data.”

Key findings:

  • After 5 years of treatment, 43% of the patients with UC sustained their first biologic
  • The durability rate was similar between pediatric-onset and adults after 1 and 5 years from initiation of treatment (72% and 43% vs 71% and 43%, respectively)
  • Durability of adalimumab vs infliximab after 1 or 5 years was similar, whether prescribed as monotherapy (65%/46% vs 63%/33%, respectively) or combotherapy (78%/56% vs 91%/58%, respectively)
  • Durability of infliximab at 1 yr and 5 yrs was higher as combotherapy (85%/50%) vs monotherapy (69%/42%; , P = .007), while it was similar for adalimumab (80%/52% vs 74%/52%)
  • The durability rate was similar for vedolizumab monotherapy at 1 yr and 5 yrs (77%/56%) compared with adalimumab monotherapy (69%/52%), and infliximab monotherapy (73%/55% vs 62%/44%). However, combotherapy of antitumor necrosis factors (TNFs) had longer durability than vedolizumab (85%/50% vs 75%/43%), respectively;

My take: When looking at the durability plots, the three main biologics in this study, infliximab, adalimumab and vedolizumab, performed similarly. Whether therapeutic drug monitoring would influence theses results is not clear. It is interesting that a recent study in the pediatric population found that combination therapy was important for adalimumab and not infliximab (see: Why Do Children Taking Adalimumab Benefit from Methotrexate Dual Therapy?)

Related blog posts:

Also, from AGA Today (3/20/25): FDA Approves Guselkumab To Treat Patients With Crohn’s Disease

HCPlive (3/20, Campbell) reports the FDA on Thursday announced the approval of “guselkumab (Tremfya) for the treatment of adults with moderately to severely active Crohn disease.” The announcement from Johnson and Johnson claims the “approval is based on data from multiple phase 3 trials, including the GALAXI trials, which found guselkumab outperformed ustekinumab (Stelara) for multiple endoscopic endpoints. The agent now boasts indications for moderately to severely active Crohn disease and moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC).” This is the fourth indication for guselkumab in the US

Related blog posts:

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Meta-Analysis: PPIs Did Not Increase Risk of Cardiovascular Events

Posted on by

Briefly noted -thanks to Ben Gold for this reference

AD Mosholder et al. The American Journal of Gastroenterology 2025; 120(2):p 362-369, Proton-Pump Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Adverse Events: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: “Protopathic bias may result from the use of PPIs for cardiac symptoms mistaken for gastrointestinal symptoms (e.g. heartburn), producing a spurious association between cardiac events and PPI use. In addition, some cardiovascular risk factors may be more prevalent among users of PPIs eg. smoking, obesity) but may not be well captured in observational data sets, resulting in confounding.”

Methods: This meta-analysis included randomized trials with at least 100 subjects, treatment duration >30 days, and a non-PPI comparator (active or placebo). In total, this study examined 164 trials including 52 trials with PPI (n=14,998) vs placebo (n=8,323), 61 trials with PPI (n=12,505) vs any active comparator (n=8,566), and 51 trials with PPI (n=9,430) vs H2 receptor antagonist (n=6,050).

Key finding:

  • Cardiovascular outcomes were infrequent in randomized trials of PPIs, and our primary analysis found no overall association (summary incident rate ratio, MACE+ events, PPI:placebo, 0.72)

My take: This study found no clear association of cardiovascular events with PPI treatment.

Related blog posts:

Andaman Sea, Thailand

Does a Less Restrictive Low FODMAP Diet Work?

Posted on by

In the movie There’s Something About Mary, there is a scene (YouTube: 7-minute abs) where the main character picks up a hitchhiker. The hitchhiker reveals his brilliant idea for the 7-minute ab workout to replace the 8-minute ab workout. Of course, he becomes upset when the lead character suggests that someone else could invent the 6-minute ab workout.

This is what I was thinking of when I read a recent article describing a simplified, less restrictive low FODMAP diet.

P Singh et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2025; 23: 362-364. Is a Simplified, Less Restrictive Low FODMAP Diet Possible? Results From a Double-Blind, Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

This pilot study with 35 subjects with IBS-D were randomized to a standard low FODMAP diet (LFD) or to a simplified FODMAP diet which eliminated solely fructans and galactooligosaccharides. The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects meeting the FDA responder definition for abdominal pain intensity (ie. a >/= 30% reduction in weekly average of daily abdominal pain scores for 2 of the 4-week treatment period).

Key findings:

  • There was a similar reduction in key symptoms (see below)
  • Fewer individuals in the simplified diet dropped out due to side effects or difficulty with adherence (12.5% vs 26.3%)
Blue columns indicate response to traditional low FODMAP diet (n=19)
and orange represents response to simplified low FODMAP diet (n=16)

My take: Larger trials are needed. This study suggests that a simplified version of a low FODMAP diet would improve symptoms in most patients with IBS-D.

Related blog posts:

HLA-DRB1*01:03: Biomarker for Severe Ulcerative Colitis

Posted on by

MV Vestergaard et al. . JAMA. Published online October 15, 2024. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.20429. HLA-DRB1*01:03 and Severe Ulcerative
Colitis

Background: This study aimed to identify biomarkers by conducting a Danish nationwide genome-wide association study (GWAS) on severe vs less severe ulcerative colitis.

Methods: Severe ulcerative colitis: Patients with severe ulcerative colitis were defined as having at least 1 major ulcerative colitis–related operation, at least 2 ulcerative colitis–related hospitalizations exceeding 2 days, and/or use of at least 5000 mg of systemic corticosteroids within 3 years of diagnosis

The authors utilized two source populations

  1. The Center for Molecular Prediction of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (PREDICT) neonatal blood spot cohort (NBS) includes individuals born in Denmark and diagnosed with ulcerative colitis from 1981 to 2022
  2. The North Denmark Biobank study is a population-based cohort of patients from Northern Denmark with inflammatory bowel disease from 1978 to 2020 (NorDIBD)

The combined cohort included 4491 patients (4153 from NBS and 338 from NorDIBD) with a mean (SD) age at diagnosis of 23.3 (8.4) years; 53% of patients were female and 27% had severe disease.

Key findings:

  • The association with HLA-DRB1*01:03 (Figure 1) had an OR of 6.38 for major operation, OR of 5.24 for at least 2 hospitalizations, and OR of 2.30 for use of at least 5000 mg
    of systemic corticosteroids in carriers vs noncarriers
  • Carriage of HLA-DRB1*01:03 allele was 2.8% in these cohorts
  • Limiation: Danish cohort -may not be applicable to other populations

My take: HLA-DRB1*01:03 is a low-frequency allele, carriers have a significantly higher risk of severe ulcerative colitis.

Related blog posts:

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Prevalence and Costs in the U.S.

Posted on by

HL Thel et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2025; 23: 272-280. Open Access! Prevalence and Costs of Eosinophilic Esophagitis in the United States

Methods: Using two  large administrative databases, MarketScan and Medicare, the authors estimated  annual prevalence of EoE, as well as age- and sex-stratified estimates, standardized to the U.S. population. Health care utilization, including medications and endoscopic procedures, was quantified, and annual EoE-associated costs were calculated.

Key findings:

  •  There was a 5-fold increase in prevalence in both databases since 2009.
  •  Standardized to the U.S. population, the prevalence of EoE was 142.5/100,000, extrapolating to 472,380 cases. This equates to ~1 in 700 persons.
  • Total EoE-associated annual health care costs were estimated to be $1.32 billion in 2024 dollars after accounting for inflation.
  • PPIs were used more commonly than steroids for treatment. For Marketscan in 2022, PPIs were used in 41% and steroids in 26%.
There has been a 5-fold prevalence increase since 2009
Prevalence by State. Overall, ~1 in 700 EoE Prevalence in U.S.

My take: There is likely a true increase in the number of affected individuals, though some changes in prevalence are due to an increased recognition/testing of eosinophilic esophagitis.

Related blog posts:

Vedolizumab’s Impact on Postoperative Crohn’s Disease Recurrence

Posted on by

G D’Haens et al. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2025; 10: 26-33. Vedolizumab to prevent postoperative recurrence of Crohn’s disease (REPREVIO): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial

In the REPREVIO study,  a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, 80 adults received either vedolizumab (300 mg IV) (n=43) or placebo (n=37) at weeks 0, 8, 16 and 24 following ileocolonic resection and had one or more risk factors for recurrence.

Key findings:

  • At week 26, the probability of a lower modified Rutgeerts score with vedolizumab versus placebo was 77·8% (95% CI 66·4 to 86·3; p<0·0001).
  • Severe endoscopic recurrence was observed in ten (23·3%) of 43 patients in the vedolizumab group versus 23 (62·2%) of 37 patients in the placebo group (difference –38·9% [95% CI –56·0 to –17·3]; p=0·0004). 
  • Adverse effects were noted in three patients who received vedolizumab (bilateral tubo-ovarian abscesses, thrombosed hemorrhoids, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma) and two patients who received placebo (intestinal perforation related to Crohn’s disease and severe abdominal pain)

My take: This study shows that vedolizumab is another biologic capable of reducing postoperative recurrence following ileocolonic resection in Crohn’s disease. Infliximab has been shown to reduce recurrence as well (shown in the PREVENT study).

Related blog posts:

Managing Drug-Induced Acne in IBD: A Guide for Gastroenterologists

Posted on by

MJ Temido et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2025;120:125–134. Drug-Induced Acne in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Practical Guide for the Gastroenterologist

“Corticosteroids and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) are commonly used for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and are known to aggravate a prior tendency to acne or trigger the development of new acneiform eruptions. Both randomized controlled trials and real-world studies have identified acne as one of the most common treatment-emergent adverse events in JAKi… This review examines the characteristics of drug-induced acne in IBD treatments, provides a practical guide for gastroenterologists to manage mild-to-moderate occurrences, and highlights when to seek specialist dermatology advice.”

My take: This is a helpful review of acne management in the setting of IBD.

Related blog posts:

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Understanding Alpha-Gal Syndrome: Key Symptoms and Findings

Posted on by

E Lesmana et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2025; 23: 69-78. Open Access! Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Alpha-Gal Syndrome

This was a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent serological testing for suspected Alpha-Gal Syndrome (AGS) between 2014 and 2023 at Mayo Clinic. Of 1260 patients who underwent testing,124 tested positive for AGS. –matched with 380 seronegative control subjects. 40 patients had long-term followup data available

Key findings:

  • AGS patients reported a higher frequency of tick bites (odds ratio [OR], 26.0)
  • AGS patients reported a higher prevalence of urticaria (56% vs 37%; P = .0008)
  •  A total of 47% experienced at least 1 GI symptom, such as diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, abdominal cramps, bloating, heartburn, and constipation, in descending order of frequency
  • 11% of AGS patients presented solely with GI symptoms
  • After institution of red meat restriction, 22 of 40 were asymptomatic at followup, 14 of 40 were improved, and 4 of 40 reported no improvement. 7 of the asymptomatic group were able to resume a diet without restrictions.

Discussion point:

  • “Symptom onset in AGS typically occurs more than 4 hours after allergen exposure, with studies emphasizing a tight association with delayed reactions within the 3- to 6-hour range.”

My take: This study provides some more granular data on Alpha-gal and highlights the importance of asking about tick bites and urticaria in patients with possible AGS.

Related blog posts:

Wat Arun (Temple of Dawn). Bangkok

Improving Laryngopharyngeal Symptoms with Laryngeal Recalibration

Posted on by

E Walsh et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2024; 119: 2198-2205. Laryngeal Recalibration Therapy Improves Laryngopharyngeal Symptoms in Patients With Suspected Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease (Thanks to Ben Gold for this reference)

For a lot of patients with rheumatologic complaints like joint pain, treatment often consists of sending patients to physical therapy rather than using pharmaceuticals. This type of approach is under-utilized in gastroenterology. A recent study, however, suggests that an analogous approach is likely beneficial in patients with chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms.

Background: Laryngopharyngeal symptoms such as cough, throat clearing, voice change, paradoxic vocal fold movement, or laryngospasm are hyper-responsive behaviors resulting from local irritation (e.g., refluxate) and heightened sympathetic tone. Laryngeal recalibration therapy (LRT) guided by a speech-language pathologist (SLP) provides mechanical desensitization and cognitive recalibration to suppress hyper-responsive laryngeal patterns.

Methods: Adults (n=65, mean age 55 years) with chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms referred for evaluation of GERD to a single center were prospectively followed. Inclusion criteria included ≥2 SLP-directed LRT sessions (60 minutes sessions). “Mechanical desensitization focuses on well-known laryngeal suppression techniques (i.e. pursed lip breathing to suppress throat clearing or cough) or changing voice production by means of acoustic and aerodynamic techniques…Cognitive recalibration uses relaxation and conceptualization of symptoms to rework thought patterns around chronic laryngeal behaviors.”

Key findings:

  • Overall, 55 participants (85%) met criteria for symptom response. 17 (26%) had complete resolution, 19 (29%) had near-complete resolution, and 19 (29%) had a moderate response
  • Specifically, symptom response was similar between those with isolated laryngopharyngeal symptoms (13/15, 87%) and concomitant laryngopharyngeal/esophageal symptoms (42/50, 84%)

My take: Historically, patients with laryngopharyngeal symptoms have been difficult to treat. Many do not respond to reflux therapies. This study highlights a different approach and shows that the benefit of working with highly-skilled SLPs.

Snow day in Atlanta (Jan 10, 2025)

Related blog posts:

Pivotal Study: Guselkumab Efficacy in Ulcerative Colitis (QUASAR study)

Posted on by

DT Rubin et al. Lancet 2024; 405: 33-49. Guselkumab in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (QUASAR): phase 3 double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled induction and maintenance studies

Background: “Guselkumab is a dual-acting, human IgG1, interleukin-23p19 subunit inhibitor that potently neutralises interleukin-23 and can bind to CD64.”

Methods:  “Two phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (QUASAR phase 3 induction and maintenance) included randomised and treated adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (induction baseline modified Mayo score from 5 to 9) with inadequate response or intolerance to conventional or advanced ulcerative colitis therapy.”

“The induction study primary population included 701 patients (guselkumab 200 mg given intravenously 60% [421 patients]; placebo 40% [280 patients]). The maintenance study primary population included 568 guselkumab induction responders randomly assigned to receive guselkumab 200 mg given subcutaneously every 4 weeks (190 [33%] patients) or 100 mg every 8 weeks (188 [33%] patients) or placebo (guselkumab withdrawal 190 [33%] patients).”

Key findings:

  • INDUCTION DATA AT 12 WEEKS:
At induction week 12
At induction week 12
Induction symptomatic endpoints -response noted in majority of guselkumab-treated patients by 4 weeks

MAINTENANCE DATA AT 44 WEEKS

Results and Discussion points:

  • “Symptomatic improvement was observed as early as induction week 1 (first assessed timepoint)”
  • “Greater reductions in C-reactive protein and faecal calprotectin concentrations with guselkumab induction compared with placebo were observed as early as induction week 4 (first assessed timepoint)”
  • “Guselkumab efficacy was shown in both biologic naive and JAK inhibitor-naive patients, and in patients with a history of inadequate response or intolerance to biologics or JAK inhibitors”
  • “Overall, 34% (129 of 378) of patients in the guselkumab groups achieved endoscopic
    remission     at maintenance week 44. Among the 180 patients in the guselkumab groups in clinical remission at maintenance week 44, 124 (69%) of 180 were in endoscopic remission”
  • “Symptomatic remission and deep symptomatic remission achieved with guselkumab induction was generally maintained to maintenance week 44 with guselkumab relative to placebo”
  • “The incidences of anti-guselkumab antibodies and NAbs were low in both the induction and maintenance studies…titres were low and did not affect serum concentration, efficacy, or safety”
  • “Head-to-head comparison data with other IL-23 antagonists are currently not available”
  • “Safety results were consistent with the known and favourable safety profile of guselkumab in its approved indications. Rates of adverse events, serious adverse events, and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation generally did not occur more frequently in patients treated with guselkumab versus placebo-treated patients”
  • Limitation: The primary analysis population for the maintenance study included only guselkumab induction responders following 12 weeks of intravenous treatment

My take: Overall, this is a pivotal study showing that guselkumab is an effective agent for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis in those with and without prior treatments. More head-to-head studies are needed to determine the optimal positioning of therapies for UC. Currently, AGA guidelines (AGA Living Guideline for Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis –The Good and The Bad) suggest that guselkumab should be considered in the top tier of medications used in patients naive to biologics/advanced therapies and in the second tier for those with prior biologic treatments.

Related blog posts: