Why Changing to Denmark’s Vaccine Schedule is a Bad Idea and Other Ways RFK Jr is Working to Undermine Our Health

Last week, the following article explained why the newest changes, announced yesterday (see link below), to the vaccine schedule recommendations are not a good idea:

J Interlandi. NY Times 12/30/25: This Is the Damage Kennedy Has Done in Less Than a Year

An excerpt:

Proponents of the push to align U.S. recommendations with those of so-called peer nations such as Denmark, Japan and Germany — all of which recommend fewer shots than the United States — have billed it as a common-sense corrective. But, as innumerable doctors and scientists have explained, when it comes to public health, countries with fewer shots on their must-have list are not actually our peers.

In Denmark, to take the administration’s favorite example, prenatal care is free and universal. More than 95 percent of pregnant women are screened for hepatitis B, and those who test positive are promptly treated and duly monitored…

None of this is true in the United States.

Here, nearly a quarter of pregnant women lack adequate prenatal care, and those who face the highest risk of contracting and spreading vaccine-preventable diseases are often the least likely to have access to doctors or pharmacies. When U.S. health officials tried to stamp out hepatitis B through vaccination programs aimed at high-risk groups, they failed miserably. It was not until they carried out a universal, at-birth vaccination policy in 1991 that hepatitis B infections finally plummeted — by about 99 percent.

In fact, if the U.S. public health system has one thing going for it relative to other nations, it’s probably vaccines. As the C.D.C.’s own data indicates, routine childhood vaccination has prevented hundreds of millions of illnesses and tens of millions of hospitalizations here. It has also saved half a trillion dollars in medical costs, a figure that jumps into the multitrillions once you factor in indirect, societal costs like lost productivity and lost wages.

The United States tends to have higher rates of measles vaccination than Europe, and fewer measles cases as a result. Compared with Denmark, we also tend to have lower hospitalization rates for rotavirus (which causes diarrhea and can be fatal in infants and children) and respiratory syncytial virus, or R.S.V. (which is a leading cause of hospitalization among children). The reason for those disparities is not in dispute: We vaccinate routinely against both viruses. Denmark does not…

In the meantime, the Food and Drug Administration is angling to make an even bigger and more enduring impact on Americans’ access to vaccines…top officials at the agency have proposed a roster of new requirements for the shots, including several that critics say would be logistically impossible and could leave us with no F.D.A.-approved Covid or flu vaccines…

We don’t have to wonder what that future will look like. We can glimpse it already in communities across the country where measles and whooping cough are resurgent and where infants and young children have already died from both. We can also see it foretold in the current flu season: This year’s flu vaccine has proved an imperfect match to the currently circulating strains. New shots, based on mRNA technology, would have one day enabled us to avoid this kind of misfire. But the nation’s leaders have imperiled that future with the decisions they made this year…

Mr. Kennedy has brought us to this precipice by aggressively subverting nearly every process and protocol that previously governed our public health institutions. He has granted political appointees enormous sway over agency scientists. He has excluded people with meaningful expertise from his planning and deliberations. And he has fired dissenters all the way up to the C.D.C. director and replaced them with lackeys, sycophants and wellness grifters.”

My take: RFK Jr and this administration has already done great damage to our health care and the toll will be evident for a long time. But, they are not done yet.

Link to yesterday’s announcement: NY Times 1/05/25: Kennedy Scales Back the Number of Vaccines Recommended for Children“Public health experts expressed outrage at the sweeping revisions, saying federal officials did not present evidence to support the changes or incorporate input from vaccine experts…and will endanger the health of children in the United States…The C.D.C.’s new schedule continues to recommend vaccines against some diseases, including measles, polio and whooping cough, for all children. Immunization against six other illnesses — hepatitis A, hepatitis B, meningococcal disease, rotavirus, influenza and respiratory syncytial virus, the leading cause of hospitalization in American infants — will be recommended for only some high-risk groups or after consultation with a health care provider.”

Related blog posts:

Cochran Shoals, Atlanta

Operating Room Privacy: What Patients May Record and Hear

J Goldstein, NY Times, 12/1/25: The Transgender Cancer Patient and What She Heard on Tape

This article focuses on the experience of a transgender patient who recorded unfavorable remarks while under anesthesia.

An excerpt:

On the recording, the health care workers express a variety of opinions about transgender identity more generally….And in the middle of the conversation, one person suggests updating Ms. Capasso’s medical file. “Yeah, it needs to say ‘male,’” the person says.Ms. Capasso said it appeared that hospital staff had in fact changed her electronic medical records, all while she was unconscious…

Ms. Capasso insists that she was not trying to catch the medical staff speaking disrespectfully about her. She said she was motivated by curiosity and a desire to know exactly what the surgeons discovered. It may not be such an unusual impulse.

Dr. Alexander Langerman, a surgeon at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, led a medical conference in 2021 on surgical recordings.

There is often “a really strong desire by patients to know what happened to them in the operating room,” Dr. Langerman said. “And, I think, a valid right to know what happened.”

Surgery was once a relatively public event — operating rooms were called “theaters” for a reason. But infection control and malpractice litigation pulled the operating room out of public view.

“Operating rooms and surgery have become one of the most secretive environments in modern society,” said Dr. Teodor Grantcharov, a Stanford University professor who started a company that uses operating room recordings to improve patient safety and hospital efficiency.

My take: While a patient is under anesthesia, it is best to treat them in the same manner as if they were awake.

“The true test of a man’s character is what he does when no one is watching.”

― John Wooden

Sandy Springs, GA

Effects of NIH Funding Cuts on Clinical Trials

PBS News 11/17/25: NIH cuts affected over 74,000 patients enrolled in experiments, report finds

An excerpt:

Between the end of February and mid-August, funding ceased for 383 studies that were testing treatments for conditions including cancer, heart disease and brain disease. The cuts disproportionately impacted efforts to tackle infectious diseases like the flu, pneumonia and COVID-19, researchers found…

More broadly, the lost research harms patients who could have benefited from a possible new treatment, researchers said in the report published Monday in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine…

“The whole purpose of these clinical trials is to generate evidence on what works and doesn’t work in medicine,” said study co-author Anupam B. Jena with Harvard Medical School. Researchers counted 11,008 NIH-funded studies during the study period. Of those, 1 in 30 lost funding.

Related blog posts:

New Trend: Oral Medicines Replacing Injections

  • R Bissonnette et al. NEJM 2025; 393: 1784-1795. Oral Icotrokinra for Plaque Psoriasis
  • RS Stern. NEJM 2025; 303: 1854-1855. Oral Psoriasis Therapy — For Whom and at What Cost and Risk?
  • S Wharton et al. NEJM 2025; 303: 1796-1806. Orforglipron, an Oral Small-Molecule GLP-1 Receptor Agonist for Obesity Treatment

In the ICONIC-LEAD study (Bissonnette et al), 684 adolescents and adults participated in a DBPC trial with an oral peptide, icotrokinra, which binds the IL-23 receptor. This medication is of interest as there are ongoing trials with it for inflammatory bowel disease. Other injectable medications targeting IL-23 are already approved for IBD.

Key Findings:

The associated editorial notes that this new therapy is likely to cost ~$70,000 per year. The cost of psoriasis care has increased more than 2000% since 1997. “Because of these high prices, rebates and discounts to pharmacy benefit managers that often guide formulary preferences are likely to govern clinician’s selection of immune-based oral and parenteral therapies for psoriasis.”

In the ATTAIN-1 Trial (Wharton et al), the authors share the results of an oral GLP-1 Receptor Agonist, Orforglipron, monotherapy for obesity.

Key findings:

My take: There are similar injectable alternatives to each of these medications for psoriasis, obesity and diabetes. The availability of oral medications could reduce one barrier to treatment. Cost barriers may preclude their use in many patients when they become available. In addition, long-term outcome data are still needed.

Related blog posts:

Microplastics Impact on Gastrointestinal Health

DA Johnson et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2025; DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003417. Plastics: Here, There, and Everywhere: Implications for Gastrointestinal Health and Disease

This article reviews the growing health concerns regarding microplastics and nanoplastics (MNPs) specifically regarding the GI tract.

Key points:

  • “As these [plastic] products degrade, they break down into smaller particles, forming microplastics (< 5 microm) and nanoplastics (<1 microm), collectively referred to as
    MNPs”
  • “Although many plastic products are deemed recyclable, in the United States, less than 10% are actually recycled…annual global production projected to reach 1.1 billion tons by 2025. Simultaneously, over 12 billion tons of plastic wastes are expected to accumulate in landfills”
  • “The average American ingests approximately 5g of plastic per week, equivalent to 1 credit card, and 39,000–50,000 particles annually”
  • Potential association of MNPs with metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease, liver and pancreatic cancer and inflammatory bowel disease. “Studies have reported
    significantly higher levels of MNPs in patients with IBD compared with healthy controls.”

In a related article in Gastroenterology and Endoscopy News (October 2025), Dr. Johnson noted that “reduction of plastic intake from bottled water to tap water in one study reduced microplastic intake, the number of particles within human tissues, from 90,000 to 4,000…Avoid heating food in plastics…the effect of microwave increased the evidence of microplastics by over 4.2 million and the nanoplastics, 2 billion, just in three minutes in the microwave.”

My take: Something that almost everyone could agree on – they would like less plastic in their food and environment. How to achieve this is much more difficult.

Related blog posts:

“You Still Going to be Doing This?”

EJ Shapiro. NEJM 2025; 393: 1360-1361. “You Still Going to be Doing This?”

This commentary mirrored a lot of my recent experience. The author is startled at how patients are asking if he will still be taking care of patients in a few years and how he has enjoyed being a clinician.

Here is an excerpt:

At first, I was startled — I’d never seriously considered the timeline of my own career…Whether it was thanks to luck, sound reasoning, some resolution of my cognitive dissonance, or (least likely) an easy disposition, I mostly enjoyed the ride. Medical school flew by…every rotation opening a new world…As a resident, then a fellow, I learned the delicate balance between personal responsibility and teamwork required in caring for patients facing the range of problems…

Then…I …realized that my opinion — no discussion with the team, no attending cosignature, just mine alone — would guide this patient’s care… So many lives shared, some with laughter, less often with tears. Many of them I helped, and some I probably didn’t…

I realize the time has come to try to figure out the answer to, “Are you still going to be doing this?” But the decision doesn’t come easily. On a day-to-day basis, I love what I do, mostly because of the connections with those patients, and the nurses, techs, secretaries, medical assistants, and my partners (some of whom are now in my children’s age group). Also because medicine always changes and always fascinates.

Of course, prior authorizations, electronic medical record snafus, obtuse hospital administrators, and sometimes the clinical demands can feel oppressive… But… when I go into the exam room, close the door, greet the patient, and begin our visit, none of those structural irritants matter. We explore their situation and try to figure out how to move forward. The challenge and respect of that task never really pale…

Still, all the other passions, affections and hobbies, grandchildren, books, and mountains call out…And… I’d rather go when the reaction from the people left behind will be regret rather than relief…

I still have some things to consider before I put that full stop on my medical career, but maybe at some point the choice will become clear — like the one that long ago began it. Everything has its season.

My take: Though I am not ready to retire, I am getting the question from families about when I might and have started to think about the next season.

Related blog posts:

“Self-Portrait with Straw Hat” at the Metropolitan Museum of Art

CDC Website Changed to Include False Claims About Autism and Vaccines

11/20/25 AAP: AAP: ‘Stop wasting government resources to amplify false claims’ about vaccines, autism

An excerpt:


The AAP and more than 40 other medical, health and patient advocacy groups also issued a joint statement condemning the change and called on the CDC to “return to its long history of promoting evidence-based information.”

Potential links between vaccines and autism have been studied for decades. More than 40 high-quality studies in seven countries involving over 5.6 million people have found no connection.

“The conclusion is clear and unambiguous: There’s no link between vaccines and autism,” Dr. Kressly said. “Anyone repeating this harmful myth is misinformed or intentionally trying to mislead parents.”

Scientists believe there is no single root cause of autism. Interactions between genetic changes and environmental influences likely play a role, according to an AAP Fact Checked article. Improved awareness and screening and updated diagnostic criteria have contributed to increases in autism prevalence.

“At this point, it’s not about doing more studies. It’s about being willing to accept what the existing studies clearly show,” said Alison Singer, M.B.A., co-founder and president of the Autism Science Foundation.

She said spending more money on settled science takes funding away from research on genetics and services for autistic people. False claims further stigmatize autistic people and their families…

Sean T. O’Leary, M.D., M.P.H., FAAP, chair of the AAP Committee on Infectious Diseases, called the latest move to put misinformation on the trusted CDC website “madness” and “a tragic moment for this country” and said he does not blame the career CDC scientists.

“For many decades, we (could) rely on CDC to provide the American public with the best available science,” Dr. O’Leary said. “Now our government is using it as an apparatus to spread falsehoods and lies.”

Here is a screenshot on media coverage of this story:

Related blog posts:

Dr. Jennifer Lee: AI for Peds GI

Recently, Dr. Jennifer Lee gave our group an excellent update on artificial intelligence (AI) for pediatric gastroenterology.  My notes below may contain errors in transcription and in omission.

  • AI is ubiquitous -it helps you login into your phone, helps with traffic apps, filters spam from email, and even edits Bowel Sounds (gets rid of the ‘umms’)
  • AI can help and AI can harm
  • Dr. Lee thinks that AI is not going to replace doctors and may help doctors in their clinical work
  • AI is teaching computers to think and predict problems. This can include analyzing radiology images, endoscopic findings (eg. polyps), interpreting EKGs, help with voice recognition, and scribe office visits (still in early stages)
  • For EoE, it was hypothesized that PPI-REE was different than EoE. However, it turned out that no significant differences were found. Thus, diagnosis of EoE no longer requires exclusion of EoE. (Related blog posts: Do We Still Need PPI-REE?, Updated Consensus Guidelines for Eosinophilic Esophagitis)
  • For colonoscopy, AI may aid polyp detection but whether this is clinically meaningful is unclear
  • With more complex analysis, AI is less transparent
  • AI algorithms can increase bias
  • Reliance on AI could lead to skill deterioration. MIT did a study showing less brain activity when using ChatGPT
  • Generative AI can create a summary of a patient chart. EHRs are partnering with AI
  • Agentic AI is when AI is set up to act autonomously like reminding patients to get vaccines, reminding to make appointments, or helping schedule appointments
  • AI in the clinic and hospital may help reduce documentation burden, improve satisfaction and improve safety for patients
  • AI does have a problem of hallucination (‘making stuff up’) (my comment: so can people). Case report of man admitted to the hospital after following ChatGPT advice in substituting sodium bromide to reduce salt intake (Eichenberger et al. Annal Internal Medicine, 2025. A Case of Bromism Influenced by Use of Artificial Intelligence)
  • AI tools are still in early stages; however, ChatGPT uptake has been much quicker than previous internet tools

Related blog posts:


Related article: A Soroush et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2025; 23: 1472-1476. Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Gastroenterology Workforce and Practice

Medical Imaging of Children/Adolescents and Risk of Cancer (2025)

R Smith-Bindman et al. NEJM 2025; 393: 1269-1278. Medical Imaging and Pediatric and
Adolescent Hematologic Cancer Risk

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort of 3,724,623 children born between 1996 and
2016 in six U.S. health care systems and Ontario, Canada, until the earliest of cancer
or benign-tumor diagnosis, death, end of health care coverage, an age of 21 years, or December 31, 2017.

Key findings:

  • During 35,715,325 person-years of follow-up (mean, 10.1 years per person), 2961 hematologic cancers were diagnosed, primarily lymphoid cancers (2349 [79.3%]), myeloid cancers or acute leukemia (460 [15.5%]), and histiocytic- or dendritic-cell cancers
    (129 [4.4%]).
  • The excess cumulative incidence of hematologic cancers by 21 years of age among children exposed to at least 30 mGy (mean, 57 mGy) was 25.6 per 10,000
  • The authors estimated that 10.1% of hematologic cancers may have been attributable to radiation exposure from medical imaging, with higher risks from the higher-dose medical-imaging tests such as CT
Cumulative Incidence of Hematologic Cancer According to Attained Age and
Radiation Dose to Bone Marrow among Children without Down’s Syndrome

Discussion Points:

  • “A 15-to-30-mGy exposure equivalent to one to two CT scans of the head was associated with an increased risk by a factor of 1.8”
  • “Although CT and other radiation-based imaging techniques may be lifesaving, our
    findings underscore the importance of carefully considering and minimizing radiation exposure during pediatric imaging to protect children’s long-term health”
  • “Research on Japanese atomic-bombing survivors showed that leukemia rates peaked 6 to 8 years after exposure, with excess risk lasting for more than five decades, particularly for acute myeloid leukemia”
  • This study tried to avoid concerns about reverse causation — in which imaging is performed because of existing cancer symptoms –by lagged exposures by 6 and 24 months
  • “The increasing use of low-value imaging in children and excessive radiation doses in CT are well documented…In many cases, reducing the imaging dose or substituting magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasonography may be more feasible than avoiding imaging altogether”

While the risks in aggregate appear quite substantial, the editorial (L Morton. NEJM 2025; 393; 1337-1339.Studying Cancer Risks Associated with Diagnostic Procedures –Interpret Wisely) makes the point that the risks for the individual are very small. “Fewer than 1% of youths in this study accumulated doses of 30 mGy or more from medical imaging and even at this exposure level, the excess cumulative incidence of hematologic cancers was low (25.6 per 10,000)…we need to ensure that all involved in medical imaging…wisely interpret the results…to understand the balance of the very small risks and the notable benefits of necessary imaging examinations to provide optimal patient care.”

My take: This study is a reminder to carefully evaluate the benefits, risks and alternatives when using ionizing radiation studies.

Related blog posts:

In the News: Fewer Peanut Allergies, Possibly Improving Obesity Rates in U.S., Best Fruit for Constipation

10/20/25 NY Times: Peanut Allergies Have Plummeted in Children, Study Shows “The new study, published Monday in the journal Pediatrics, found that food allergy rates in children under 3 fell after those guidelines were put into place — dropping to 0.93 percent between 2017 and 2020, from 1.46 percent between 2012 and 2015. That’s a 36 percent reduction in all food allergies, driven largely by a 43 percent drop in peanut allergies.”

Referenced article (Open Access!): S Gabryszeweki et al. Pediatrics e2024070516. Guidelines for Early Food Introduction and Patterns of Food Allergy

Related blog posts:

10/16/25 ABC News: Obesity remains high in the US., but more states showing progress, a new report finds “For the first time in more than a decade, the number of states with rates of obesity of 35% or more dropped, an encouraging sign that America’s epidemic of excess weight might be improving.  But cuts to federal staff and programs that address chronic disease could endanger that progress, according to a new report released Thursday. Nineteen states had obesity rates of 35% or higher in 2024, down from 23 states the year before, according to an analysis of the latest data collected by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention”

M Warren et al. Trust for America’s Health. Open Access! The State of Obesity 2025 Report (140 pages)

Related blog post: Worldwide Trends in Underweight and Obesity (2024)

10/13/25 NBC News: What to eat to ease chronic constipation, according to new guidelines This article revies the new dietary guidelines from the British Dietetic Association.

Related blog posts: