Tag Archives: esophageal atresia

How Long Should Be PPIs Be Used in Patients with Esophageal Atresia?

Posted on by

A recent study (FR Grunder et al. JPGN 2019; 69: 45-51) examines the use of proton pump inhibitor use after surgical repair of esophageal atresia; this involved a longitudinal cohort (n=73) with prospectively collected data over 11 years.

Background: While PPIs have been used for long-term treatment due to the high frequency of reflux and concerns regarding anastomotic strictures, the authors note that data on long-term outcomes/natural history and benefits/risks of this approach are lacking.

Key findings:

  • 48% of patients had PPIs discontinued at followup.
  • Among the 43 with PPI discontinuation, 40 had endoscopy results available.  Histologic abnormalities were noted in 8 (19%) which was lower than in the group receiving ongoing PPI use (n=19, 63%).. These 8 patients had PPI restarted.
  • Among patients unable to discontinue PPI therapy, there was a higher rate of prior anti-reflux surgical procedure, 27% compared to 5% who had anti-reflux procedure among group who were able to discontinue PPI therapy.
  • Patients more likely to remain on PPIs more frequently had a prior anastomotic leak and/or moderate to severe tracheomalacia.
  • The authors state that among patients receiving PPIs, there was more frequent recurrent pneumonia as well as more frequent use of inhaled beta-adrenergic agonists and steroids. However, this was not shown to be a causal association.  It is unclear whether these patients had more severe esophageal dysfunction or whether PPI use contributed to this outcome.

In their discussion, the authors note that PPIs have not been shown to reduce the rate of anastomotic strictures.  They argue that “PPI could be used more selectively in the following: in children with long-gap EA or anastomotic tension or anastomotic leak; after a first dilatation for anastomotic stricture rather than systematically, given the lack of preventive effect of PPI; and in children whose esophagoscopy demonstrates peptic esophagitis, eosinophilic esophagitis, or gastric metaplasia.”

My take: The authors are probably right that a large fraction of EA patients may not need long-term PPI use.  Selecting which patients will benefit will remain a challenge. Published guidelines recommend monitoring for GERD complications in EA, especially after stopping PPIs.

Related blog posts:

University of Virginia

 

Increased Risk of Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Esophageal Atresia Patients

Posted on by

Briefly noted: U Krishnan et al. Analysis of eosinophilic esophagitis in children with repaired congenital esophageal atresia. JACI 2018. Published online Oct 24, 2018.

This retrospective, single-center study examined 4 eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) study cohorts and identified EoE in 20 of 110 patients (18%) who had surgically-repaired esophageal atresia.

This association has been seen previously: . 2014 Dec 21; 20(47): 18038–18043.  This case study stated ” We are suggesting that EoE is a frequent concomitant problem in patients with history of congenital esophageal deformities, and for this reason any of these patients with refractory reflux symptoms or dysphagia (with or without anastomotic stricture) may benefit from an endoscopic evaluation with biopsies to rule out EoE.”

Related blog posts:

Pain in Children with Severe Neurologic Impairment

Posted on by

A recent commentary (JM Hauer JAMA Pediatrics; 2018. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1531) addresses a common misconception regarding children with severe neurologic impairment (SNI):

“we don’t think she experiences pain”

She notes that literature since 2002 has challenged this assumption and that this is addressed in a new AAP clinical report as well (Hauer J, Houtrow AJ. Pediatrics 2017; 139: e20171002).

Key points:

  • Children with SNI may have moaning, grimacing, changes in tone/body position in reaction to pain and treatment can make them comfortable.
  • “We can never prove that such a child does not feel pain…When parents of children with hydranencephaly were asked whether their child felt pain, 96% indicated yes.”
  • Pain can trigger changes in catecholamines, cortisol and stress hormones.  “These considerations suggest that untreated chronic pain is more harmful to the well-being of children with SNI than is treatment used for pain.”
  • Sometimes no source for pain is identified.  This may be related to a CNS etiology (alteration of CNS) and may benefit from treatment.
  • “It is time to do away with the question of whether these children feel pain and focus on how we as individuals” identify/consider pain

My take: Reframing this issue is important; pain can occur in children with SNI.  At the same time, we have to be careful that some “palliative” measures could paradoxically prolong suffering in some children.

Related blog post: Suffering

 

Declining Role of Fundoplication in Esophageal Atresia, Too

Posted on by

A recent study (SA Pellegrino et al. J Pediatr 2018; 198: 60-6) examines the likelihood of redo fundoplication for esophageal atresia (EA) in comparison to redo fundoplication for other indications.

Key findings:

  • Among all EA cases, n=344 (1994-2013), 85 underwent fundoplication (single-center study from Melbourne)
  • Rates of fundoplication were declining over study period: there was a 37% drop from 2010-2013 compared to 1994-97.
  • Overall, 767 patients had a fundoplication (n=682 without EA).  The rates of redo fundoplication were similar 11/85 compared with 53/682, despite the fact that EA patients had earlier surgery with median ages of 7.2 months versus 23 months, respectively.

Factors leading to fewer fundoplications:

  • Improving medical therapies, including proton pump inhibitors and use of jejunal feedings
  • Awareness that fundoplication may not be curative and is associated with significant morbidity

Anecdotally, I have had some EA patients whose lives were transformed positively by fundoplication, though many are difficult operations due to anatomic factors like small gastric volumes and pulmonary issues.  Careful selection and surgical expertise are essential to good outcomes.

My take: The authors note that “this study challenges the assertion that fundoplicaiton is less successful in patients with EA.”

Related blog posts:

Gibbs Gardens

Esophageal Atresia and Barrett’s Esophagus

Posted on by

Briefly noted: FWT Vergouwe et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 16: 513-21.

In this prospective study of adult patients with esophageal atresia (EA) with 151 participants, 6.6% had Barrett’s Esophagus (BE); squamous cell cancer (SCC) was identified in 0.7% (youngest at 42 years).  The authors note that the prevalence of BE and SCC were ~4-fold and ~100-fold higher, respectively, compared to the general population.

Related blog posts:

Creek near Chattahoochee River

Guideline Links: Infant Cholestasis and Esophageal Atresia-Tracheoesophageal fistula

Posted on by

One way that I use this blog is to use the search function for previous posts with useful links.  For example, I know if I search “foreign” that I will come across a post that has a summary as well as a link to the NASPGHAN recommendations on Foreign Bodies (Foreign Bodies in Children -Expert Guidance).

This post has two links :

Related blog posts:

oneboatcostamaya

 

Guidelines for Esophageal Atresia-Tracheoesophageal Fistula

Posted on by

From a NASPGHAN-ESPGHAN working group of surgeons and pediatric gastroenterologists. a recent guideline (U Krishan et al JPGN 2016; 63: 550-70) regarding esophageal atresia (EA) and tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) has made 36 specific statements and graded the evidence for these recommendations.

On GERD:

  • Low level evidence: The authors recommended starting PPIs in the neonatal period and continuing them “up to the first year of life or longer, depending on persistence of GERD.”
  • High level evidence: pH monitoring is useful in evaluating the severity of acid reflux in patients with EA.  Low level evidence: pH-impedance monitoring is useful to evaluate and correlate non-acid reflux in selected patients.
  • High level evidence: “Endoscopy with biopsies is mandatory for routine monitoring of GERD in patients with EA.” The authors recommend evaluation (pH, impedance, and/or endoscopy) at time of stopping anti-acid treatment and during long-term follow-up. Specifically,  with low level of evidence, the authors advocate for one endoscopy after stopping PPI therapy, one before age 10 years, and one at transition to adulthood.”
  • High level evidence: Fundoplication has accepted role, despite dysmotility, in patients with recurrent anastomotic strictures and poorly controlled GERD despite maximal PPI therapy. Full evaluation prior to fundoplication is recommended.

Other Statements:

  • Low level evidence: the authors recommend regular multidisciplinary evaluation, the authors note that symptoms of aspiration during swallowing may be identical to GERD symptoms, and evaluation of dysphagia with EGD/UGI.
  • High level evidence: ENT evaluation may disclose other anatomic abnormalities
  • Low level evidence: The authors recommend that anastomotic strictures be excluded in symptomatic children and that there is no “evidence that routine screening and dilatation” is necessary in asymptomatic patients.
  • Low level evidence: Management of EA patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) should follow the treatment of EoE in non-EA patients.
  • High level evidence: Incidence of Barrett’s esophagus is increased in adults with EA.
  • No level evidence: Potential treatments for recurrent strictures: steroids, mitomycin C, stents, and endoscopic knife.

While some these recommendations noted above are based on low level evidence, it is worthwhile for experts to provide their opinions.  At the same time, there are some completely useless statements included in the guidelines, like those that suggest tailoring the treatment to the underlying problem.  For example: “Statement 19: We recommend tailoring management of post-fundoplication dysphagia to the underlying mechanism(s).”  Another useless statement: “Statement 21: No data are available on the most efficacious methods of avoiding feeding disorders in children with EA. However, the committee recommends a multidisciplinary approach to prevent and treat feeding difficulties.” (very low level evidence).  In my view, shortening the number of recommendations, mainly by eliminating the useless ones, would have been helpful.

My take: Despite my view that about 20% of the recommendations are useless (Statements 17, 19, 21, 25, 26A & 26B, 31, and 34), the overall guideline is helpful and it is still worthwhile for experts to provide their recommendations.

Related blog posts:

Rockland Harbor Lighthouse

Rockland Harbor Lighthouse

Endoscopic Surveillance after Esophageal Atresia: Low Yield In Pediatrics

Posted on by

A recent study of patients who had undergone repair of esophageal atresia (Koivusalo et al. JPGN 2016; 62: 562-66) confirms that “routine endoscopic surveillance had limited benefit and seems unnecessary” before 15 years of age.

A retrospective review of pediatric patients with esophageal atresia (EA) from 1980-2014) identified 209 patients with 616 biopsies.  60 patients had undergone antireflux surgery. Key findings:

  • Gr I esophagitis was noted in 37%, Gr II or III in 16%.
  • Gastric metaplasia was found in 17% and reached a prevalence of 15% by age 15 years.
  • Only 9% of patients with gastric metaplasia and 32% of patients with gr II esophagitis were symptomatic.
  • No cases of dysplasia or cancer were identified.

My take: Conditions, including esophageal atresia, that predisposed to chronic reflux esophagitis increase the risk of esophageal malignancy; however, this risk remains very low in childhood.  Therefore, surveillance for asymptomatic children is not needed prior to age 15 years.

Related blog post: Never quite right | gutsandgrowth

Vik Muniz recreation of Mary Cassatt painting

Vik Muniz recreation of Mary Cassatt painting

Up close, one sees this painting is actually a collage of images

Up close, one sees this painting is actually a collage of images

Disclaimer: These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications/diets (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician/nutritionist.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Reclassifying Biliary Atresia -Three Subtypes

Posted on by

Using a large prospective multicenter cohort (ChiLREN study group), a recent study examined 289 infants and identified three subtypes of biliary atresia (BA) enrolled in PROBE (Hepatology 2013; 58: 1724-31).

Previously, BA has been considered to have two presentations:

  • Acquired/nonsyndromic ~90%
  • Embryonic/syndromic ~10%

However, this study suggests the following:

  • Group 1 -nonsyndromic, isolated BA. n=242 (84%)
  • Group 2 -BA with major malformation but without laterality defect. n=17 (6%)
  • Group 3 -syndromic, with laterality defect. n=30 (10%)

Group 3 BA defects included splenic abnormalities (eg. asplenia, polysplenia, right-sided spleen), cardiovascular anomalies (eg. dextrocardia, TAPVR, interrupted IVC) and gastrointestinal anomalies (eg. “abdominal heterotaxy,” malrotation, annular pancreas).

In contrast, Group 2 BA had frequent genitourinary problems (cystic kidney and hydronephrosis) along with different cardiovascular anomalies and gastrointestinal anomalies which included esophageal/duodenal/jejunal atresia and imperforate anus.

Other points:

  • The frequency of cardiac problems is particularly important to recognize as this could make differentiation from Alagille syndrome more difficult.
  • One other interesting finding was the high incidence of autoimmunity in first-degree relatives of all BA groups (~44%).

Bottomline: there are at least 3 subtypes of BA.

Related posts:

NASPGHAN Preview

Posted on by

I had a few free minutes so I decided to take a look at a bunch of upcoming lectures from the 2013 NASPGHAN upcoming meeting.  With electronic media, it is easy to take a quick glance.  Here’s the master link to all of the following talks:

Annual Meeting page.

Some of the power point lectures that I’ve seen so far:

  • Is my PPI dangerous for me? Eric Hassall MBChB, University of British Columbia One point in his slides that I had not seen much about was a hypothesis that PPI use may predispose to the development of eosinophilic esophagitis by allowing food proteins to be more intact ( attributed to Merwat, Spechler. Am J Gastro ’09).  He explains that “acid reflux” is a clever marketing term and has a slide with Madmen actors.  If there is “acid,” one must need acid suppression.
  • My child doesn’t go to school Lynne Walker MD, Vanderbilt University.  Lynne shows an interesting fax from a parent that asks if the problem is physical, how will she help? And, if it is psychological, how can this be remedied?  She outlines a lot of pain theory and indicates that parents need to become health coaches, avoid catastrophizing (?spelling), and encourages mental health evaluation.  Use the parents words ‘I’m going to refer xxx for relaxation and stress management.’
  • My child’s H. pylori will not go away – (the resistant bug) Benjamin Gold MD, Children’s Center for Digestive Healthcare. Ben manages to stuff so much information into his talk.  His talk is like one of those clown cars where more and more people keep coming out.  He has slides with worldwide resistance maps, slides with treatment regimens and algorithms, and the reasons for treatment failure. Perhaps I can convince him to give a live preview.
  • Administrative/executive functioning Richard Colletti MD, Fletcher Allen Healthcare. Offers personal and pragmatic advice for career advancement.  His slides indicate that he started his GI fellowship at age 40.  One of his quotes, “80% of success is showing up” (Woody Allen) is definitely true.  It’s pretty much akin to what I learned about success in medical school.  You need the three As: availability, affability, and ability.  My mentor said the first was what people needed most.
  • The changing face of intestinal transplantation
    Simon Horslen MD, Seattle Children’s Hospital.  Lecture notes that number of intestinal transplants have decreased dramatically, particularly in children. In 2012, only about 100 intestinal transplants were performed whereas it had peaked at nearly 200.  Much of the credit is due to intestinal rehabilitation work and adjustments in parenteral nutrition (eg. lipid minimization, line care).  Two most common reasons for intestinal transplantation at this time are gastroschisis and volvulus.
  •  Gluten sensitivity: Fact or fiction Alessio Fasano MD, MassGeneral Hospital for Children. This blog has covered a lot of the same material, but Alessio’s slides are pretty impressive.  Also, I was not aware that Lady Gaga consumes a gluten-free diet
  • Controversies in parenteral nutrition Christopher Duggan MD, Boston Children’s Hospital.  This lecture provides a timely update on nutrient deficiencies due to component shortages and discusses lipid minimization compared with fish oil-based lipid emulsions.
  • Vitamin D and immunity James Heubi MD, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital and Medical Center.  In the beginning of the slides, Jim provides a very user-friendly definition of an expert and a suitable picture.  He indicates that in 2011 there were 3746 vitamin D publications but inexplicably only chooses to review a tiny fraction.

At the time of this posting, I haven’t had a chance to look through these talks: