Category Archives: Nutrition

Micronutrient Monitoring in Intestinal Failure

Posted on by

J Pediatr 2013; 163: 1692-6.  This retrospective study of prospectively collected data from 178 children provides data with regard to micronutrient deficiency among intestinal failure patients transitioning to enteral feeds. Figures 1 and 2 along with Table 2 provide the prevalence of micronutrient deficiency while receiving supplemental parenteral nutrition (PN) and while on full enteral nutrition (FEN).  Iron deficiency was most common in both situations with prevalence of 84% and 61% respectively. With the exception of folate (0%), all of the vitamins and micronutrients had fairly high rates of deficiency.  While on FEN,  deficiencies were  the following:

  • Vitamin A        19%
  • Vitamin B12    6.5%
  • Vitamin D        30%
  • Vitamin E          6%
  • Copper            8%
  • Iron                61%
  • Selenium         4%
  • Zinc               23%

The study does not indicate that the deficiency values were adjusted based on CRP values.  Instead, “low serum levels were used to define deficiencies.”  This is likely to lead to numerous errors.  Nevertheless, it is clear that these deficiencies are common.  Another finding of the study was that normal anthropometrics did not reduce the frequency of these deficiencies.  In their patient population, 57 of 136 (42%) with sufficient height and weight data had a height-for-age z-scores of <-2 by the time of FEN; where as 52 of 139 patients (37%) had weight-for-age z-scores of <-2.

A recent post on The Pediatric Nutritionist blog provides a suggested approach to the monitoring of vitamins and micronutrients based on the need for parenteral nutrition and on the need to consider inflammatory markers in the interpretation of these lab values: The Importance of Nutrition Lab Monitoring Protocols Featuring …

Bottomline: Vitamin and micronutrient deficiencies are common among intestinal failure patients.  In addition, a large percentage of these kids are not large at all.

Related blog post:

What happens to micronutrient levels in the hospital setting …

Timing of Solid-Food Introduction

Posted on by

The “DAISY” (diabetes autoimmunity  study in the young) study indicates that the timing of solid-food introduction can influence the likelihood of developing type 1 diabetes (T1DM) (JAMA Pediatr 2013; 167: 808-15).

The participants were 1853 children at increased genetic risk for T1DM who were enrolled in a longitudinal observational cohort study in Denver. Early solid-food exposure was considered <4 months of age and late >6 months of age.

Results:

  • “Both early and late first exposure to any solid food predicted development of T1DM.”  For early exposure, the Hazard Ratio was 1.91 and for late HR was 3.02.
  • Breastfeeding at the time of introduction to wheat/barley conferred protection (HR 0.47)

The study has several limitations, particularly the relatively low numbers of children who developed T1DM (n=53).

A second study (Pediatrics 2013 [doi: 10.1542/peds2012-3692]) –thanks to Ben Gold for this reference –showed that “solid foods were introduced significantly earlier among the infants with allergies, with 35% of them receiving their first solids before and including 16 weeks, compared with 14% of control infants (P=.011).”   (Solid foods before 17 weeks linked to food allergy)

Bottomline: As with celiac disease (“Gluten–Related Disorders” (Part 1) | gutsandgrowth), current science suggests the introduction of solid foods between 4-6 months of age may diminish the risk of developing T1DM as well as food allergies.

 

Newest FODMAPs Study for IBS

Posted on by

From AGA twitter feed: http://t.co/vFwhS5YEF4 -Full text article.

From Abstract:

Methods

In a study of 30 patients with IBS and 8 healthy individuals (controls, matched for demographics and diet), we collected dietary data from subjects for 1 habitual week. Participants then randomly were assigned to groups that received 21 days of either a diet low in FODMAPs or a typical Australian diet, followed by a washout period of at least 21 days, before crossing over to the alternate diet. Daily symptoms were rated using a 0- to 100-mm visual analogue scale. Almost all food was provided during the interventional diet periods, with a goal of less than 0.5 g intake of FODMAPs per meal for the low-FODMAP diet. All stools were collected from days 17–21 and assessed for frequency, weight, water content, and King’s Stool Chart rating.

Results

Subjects with IBS had lower overall gastrointestinal symptom scores (22.8; 95% confidence interval, 16.7–28.8 mm) while on a diet low in FODMAPs, compared with the Australian diet (44.9; 95% confidence interval, 36.6–53.1 mm; P < .001) and the subjects’ habitual diet. Bloating, pain, and passage of wind also were reduced while IBS patients were on the low-FODMAP diet. Symptoms were minimal and unaltered by either diet among controls. Patients of all IBS subtypes had greater satisfaction with stool consistency while on the low-FODMAP diet, but diarrhea-predominant IBS was the only subtype with altered fecal frequency and King’s Stool Chart scores.

Conclusions

In a controlled, cross-over study of patients with IBS, a diet low in FODMAPs effectively reduced functional gastrointestinal symptoms. This high-quality evidence supports its use as a first-line therapy.

Related Blog Posts:

What helps kids poop?

Posted on by

While there are a number of answers to the above title, the answer that I’m looking for is physical activity (JPGN 2013; 57: 768-74).

With regard to the referenced study, a large prospective birth-cohort study (n=347 participants) in Rotterdam showed that preschool children with increased physical activity had about 1/3rd less frequency of functional constipation in the fourth year of life.  Activity measurements at the age of 2 years were accomplished by wearing ActiGraph accelerometers during 1 weekday and 1 weekend day.  Additionally, children who had physical activity of 60 min/day at age 4 had about 1/2 the likelihood of having functional constipation.  There are several limitations to the study; reduced activity and constipation could both be present in some individuals as a consequence of personality or psychologic attributes rather than physical activity having a causal relationship in causing constipation.

Bottomline: Another good reason to encourage physical activity –it might help with regular bowel habits.

Also, on a separate note, a recent blog post by Kipp Ellsworth is a useful reference for lab monitoring (micronutrients and vitamins) in children with short bowel syndrome:

Blog | The Pediatric Nutritionist | Covering the world of infant, child …

Related blog entries:

.

Could you recruit your patients to climb a mountain for research?

Posted on by

Amazingly, a group of investigators enrolled 25 healthy climbers to determine how hypoxia affects the expression of iron transporters in the duodenal mucosa (Hepatology 2013; 58: 2135-62).

Methods: In a nonblinded, prospective study, blood and duodenal samples were taken at three timepoints: baseline (446 meters) and at 4559 meters two days later after a rapid ascent and then at day four while remaining at high altitude. 14 subjects received dexamethasone on day 2 to avoid high-altitude sickness. The duodenal biopsies were obtained by unseated transnasal small-caliber duodenoscopy.  Numerous other assays were checked as well.

Key finding: Hypoxemia was associated with a 10-fold increase in duodenal expression of divalent metal-ion transporter 1 and ferroportin 1 which promote iron intake.  In addition, there was decreased serum hepcidin levels.

Take-home message: Hypoxic conditions such as high-altitude quickly lead to an activation of changes that lead to compensatory erythropoeisis.

Related blog post: Help with hepcidin | gutsandgrowth

Healthy Obesity?

Posted on by

From NY Times,  nyti.ms/1diH2d4 –an excerpt:

The idea that there are obese people who are nonetheless healthy may be a myth.

Although some overweight or obese people have normal cholesterol, glucose levels and blood pressure — elements of so-called metabolic health — a new study suggests that obesity by itself increases the risk for heart disease, stroke, diabetes and death.

Researchers analyzed 12 studies that had together followed more than 61,000 adults, most for at least 10 years. About 9 percent of the subjects were obese and metabolically healthy — that is, they had normal LDL, HDL and total cholesterol, along with healthy blood pressure and blood sugar levels. The report was published online last week in Annals of Internal Medicine.

Compared with metabolically healthy people of normal weight, the obese group had a 24 percent increased risk for fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events like heart attack and stroke, and for death by any cause.

Related blog posts:

Vitamins: often ‘throwing money down the drain’

Posted on by

From USA Today: Medical journal: ‘Case closed’ against vitamin pills

“it’s time for most consumers to stop wasting money on multivitamins and other supplements, because they have no proven benefits and some possible harms.”

That declaration comes in a strongly worded editorial that accompanies two new studies and an expert panel’s report published Monday in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

“The message is simple: Most supplements do not prevent chronic disease or death, their use is not justified, and they should be avoided,” says the editorial, signed by two researchers from Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, one British researcher and one of the journal’s senior editors…

The new results from that study will disappoint anyone who hoped a multivitamin might keep them sharp in old age. The study followed male physicians over age 65 for an average of 11 years and found multivitamins had no effect on cognitive decline…

A second, unrelated, new study in Annals found high-dose multivitamins had no effect on the progression of heart disease in heart attack survivors…

there are exceptions. For example, health officials strongly urge women of childbearing age to take folic acid, to prevent birth defects. Some ongoing studies of vitamin D, he says, are justified because some benefits…

most of the 53% of U.S. consumers who use supplements are wasting money, to the tune of $28 billion a year.

Same story from NY Times: http://t.co/kEwrk1mGyQ

Related blog entry:  Live longer -don’t take your vitamins? | gutsandgrowth

Don’t Go Nuts over Nuts

Posted on by

A recent study (NEJM 2013; 369: 2001-11) showed that nut consumption was associated with a lower mortality rate among more than 115,000 people in two large independent cohorts.  Nut consumption had significant inverse associations with deaths due to cancer, heart disease, and respiratory disease.  Those who ate nuts most frequently (7 or more times per week) had a 20% lower hazard ratio for death. However, the individuals who consumed nuts may have been more likely to have other healthy habits, though this was not identified in the study.

This study is explained more fully in the following video (less than 3 minutes):  nej.md/1aSbuY4 

Have you seen the Duodenal-Jejunal Bypass Liner?

Posted on by

A recent article (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 1517-20) reports on the effects of the duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) on improvement in parameters of nonalcoholic liver disease (NAFLD).  The study enrolled 17 patients who had obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The following link provides more details on this technique (from a 2009 study) and provides a picture (Figure 2) of the 60 cm sleeve that is placed endoscopically:

Radiographic appearance of endoscopic duodenal … – GI Dynamics

These studies indicate that less invasive approaches may develop as alternatives to bariatric surgery.

Related blog links: