Category Archives: Pediatric Gastroenterology Intestinal Disorder

Value of Calprotectin

Posted on by

A large study (WJ Sandborn et al Gastroenterol 2016; 150: 96-102) focuses on the question of how well calprotectin values correlate with clinical outcomes.  As part of a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of 194 patients who received various doses of tofacitinib or placebo, the authors obtained data on fecal calprotectin (FCP).  Here were the key findings:

  • Week 8 FCP levels were significantly lower in those with a clinical response: 156 vs 725 mg/kg, in clinical remission: 64 vs 617 mg/kg, in endoscopic remission: 44 vs 489 mg/kg and in mucosal healing: 127 vs. 753 mg/kg.
  • On an individual level, FCP showed only moderate agreement for these measures.

For clinical remission, FCP concentration:

  • At 50 mg/kg, the specificity was 0.91, sensitivity was 0.43
  • At 150 mg/kg, the specificity was 0.79, sensitivity was 0.68

For endoscopic remission, FCP concentration:

  • At 50 mg/kg, the specificity was 0.88, sensitivity was 0.52
  • At 150 mg/kg, the specificity was 0.75, sensitivity was 0.79

For mucosal healing, FCP concentration:

  • At 50 mg/kg, the specificity was 0.92, sensitivity was 0.29
  • At 150 mg/kg, the specificity was 0.85, sensitivity was 0.54

The authors speculate that the only fair to good accuracy of FCP in classifying clinical and endoscopic outcomes of individual patients could be related to day-to-day variability in FCP levels and due to residual microscopic inflammation.

My take: While a single normal calprotectin value is not entirely reassuring, I would not be surprised if these values outperform the PGA (physician global assessment).  It is likely that serial calprotectin values will be helpful in tracking clinical progress.

In brief:

Agardh et al. JPGN 2016; 62: 43-46.  Authors show that fecal calprotectin levels were markedly elevated (median 844 mg/kg) in 11 of 12 patients with juvenile polyps and that these levels normalized after polypectomy.  These levels were similar to their cohort (n=129) of children with active IBD (median values of 962 mg/kg).

Heida et al. JPGN 2016; 62: 47-49.  The investigators retrospectively examined 80 children who had endoscopy due to suspected inflammatory bowel disease.  In all 10 of the children with calprotectin levels less than 50 (mcg/g), IBD was excluded.

Related blog posts:

Old Town, San Juan

Old Town, San Juan

Eluxadoline for Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea

Posted on by

A recent study (AJ Lembo et al. NEJM 2016; 374: 242-53) found that eluxadoline, an oral agent with mixed opioid effects was helpful in some with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D).

Study methods: 2427 adults with IBS-D received either 75 mg, 100 mg of study medication or placebo twice daily for 26 weeks.  The primary endpoint was a composite response of decreased abdominal pain and stool consistency.

Eluxadoline in IBS

Eluxadoline in IBS.  Primary efficacy end point was defined as the proportion of patients who recorded a reduction of 30% or more from baseline in the daily average score for their worst abdominal pain for at least 50% of days assessed and, on the same days, a daily stool consistency score of less than 5.  Panel A: weeks 1-12.  Panel B for weeks 1-26.

While the absolute difference in response compared to placebo appears modest (see Figure above), the authors note that the treatment effects “were similar to those reported with alosetron and rifaximin.” Adverse effects included nausea (7.5% in 100 mg group compared with 5.1% in placebo), constipation (8.6%% in 100 mg group compared with 2.5% in placebo), and abdominal pain (7.2% in 100 mg group compared with 4.1% in placebo).  Pancreatitis developed in 5 patients in the treatment group (0.3%).

My take: While Eluxadoline helped some with IBS-D, better, more effective treatments are needed.

Related blog post:

“Medical Taylorism” & Zika Link

Posted on by

An interesting commentary (P Hartzband, J Groopman. NEJM 2016; 374: 106-8) explains the history of trying to achieve better efficiencies in medicine and some of the problems with this.

Frederick Taylor has been described as the “father of scientific management” and the original “efficiency expert.”  He supported the notion that there is one best way to do every task.  This was initially applied to car production but there have been attempts to adopt this idea into medicine.  The authors make several key points:

  • “The standardization integral to Taylorism and the Toyota manufacturing process cannot be applied to many vital aspects of medicine”
  • “There is a certain hypocrisy among some of the most impassioned advocates for efficiency and standardization…they all want a different kind of health care for themselves and their families than they profess for everyone else.  What they want is what every patient wants: unpressured time from their doctor or nurse and individualized care rather than generic protocols for testing and treating.”
  • “Medical Taylorism began with good intentions — to improve patient safety and care. But it has gone too far…we must reject its blanket application…Good medical care takes time, and there is no one best way to treat many disorders.”

Zika NEJM Link (full text): Zika Virus in the Americas Anthony Fauci/David Morens

Related blog posts:

Isla Verde, San Juan

Isla Verde, San Juan

Characteristics of Skin Lesions Associated with Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy

Posted on by

As noted in previous blog posts (see below), anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy has been associated with skin problems.  The following study/abstract elaborate on this issue further and indicate that while ~30% of patients with IBD may develop skin reactions, only 28 of 917 (3%) patients required anti-TNF therapy to be discontinued due to skin reactions.

I Cleynen et al. Ann Intern Med. Published online 8 December 2015 doi:10.7326/M15-0729  Characteristics of Skin Lesions Associated With Anti–Tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Cohort Study ONLINE FIRST

 Background: A subgroup of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with anti–tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antibodies develop skin lesions, but the lesions and their clinical course are not well-characterized.

Objective: To describe patients treated with anti-TNF antibodies who did and did not develop skin lesions.

Design: Retrospective cohort.

Setting: Single IBD tertiary referral center.

Patients: 917 consecutive patients with IBD who initiated anti-TNF therapy.

Measurements: Skin lesions, patient demographic characteristics, treatments, clinical course, and serologic and genetic markers.

Results: During a median follow-up of 3.5 years (interquartile range [IQR], 0.5 to 7.4 years), skin lesions associated with the use of anti-TNF therapy developed in 264 of 917 (29%) patients (psoriasiform eczema, 30.6%; eczema, 23.5%; xerosis cutis, 10.6%; palmoplantar pustulosis, 5.3%; psoriasis, 3.8%; other, 26.1%). Lesions typically developed at flexural regions, genitalia, and the scalp, especially the psoriasiform lesions. Thirty-one percent of women and 26% of men developed lesions. Median cumulative doses (2864 mg/y [IQR, 2203 to 3819 mg/y] and 2927 mg/y [IQR, 2377 to 3667 mg/y]) and trough levels (4.2 µg/mL [IQR, 2.6 to 5.8 µg/mL] and 4.0 µg/mL [IQR, 1.6 to 5.9 µg/mL]) of infliximab were similar in patients with and without lesions. All but 28 patients (11%) were successfully managed without needing to stop therapy because of lesions.

Limitation: Retrospective nature and no matched control group of patients not receiving anti-TNF therapy.

Conclusion: Skin lesions occur frequently in association with anti-TNF therapy but rarely require discontinuation of therapy. Close surveillance and early referral to a dedicated dermatologist are recommended.

Related blog posts:

Proton Pump Inhibitors Webinar

Posted on by

For those who missed the live NASPGHAN webinar, it is also available on demand: Link: Proton Pump Inhibitors Webinar. CME credit is available too.

Overall, this is a terrific review and intended for a high level audience. Here are a couple of key points from the talk:

  • Dr. Jennifer Lightdale introduced the webinar.  She noted that there has been a tremendous rise in the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in children over the past 15 years, including in infants.
  • Preponderance of evidence does not support use of PPIs for reducing GER symptoms or crying in infants.
  • PPIs are extremely effective at acid suppression.
  • Excellent discussion by Dr. Rachel Rosen on Nonerosive Reflux Disease (NERD) and distinguishing this entity from erosive reflux disease, hypersensitive esophagus, and functional heartburn.
  • On a microscopic level, NERD is similar to erosive reflux with microscopic inflammation and dilated intracellular spaces.
  • With regard to testing, it is recommended that for impedance studies, that acid suppression be stopped prior due to improved sensitivity/accuracy.
  • For those at odds with their pulmonologists and ENT colleagues, Dr. Ben Gold reviewed the literature on asthma, cough, and laryngeal-pharyngeal pathology related to reflux. The sensitivity of laryngoscopic findings to identify reflux is poor.  “There is insufficient evidence to recommend for OR against the use of acid suppression therapy.”
  • Dr. Jose Garza reviewed the indications for PPI use which include eosinophilic esophagitis/PPI-REE, erosive esophagitis, NSAID prophylaxis, Upper GI bleeding, and H pylori therapy.
  • Dr. Carlo DiLorenzo provided an in-depth discussion of the potential risks of PPI therapy and explained some of the context as well as absolute risks.  He noted that besides the risk of infection, particularly C difficile, other risks demonstrated in adults have not yet been confirmed in children.
  • “Prolonged acid suppression should be used only when indicated.”  Thus, management should include strategies for treatment discontinuation in the majority of those receiving PPI therapy.

Related blog posts:

Isla Verde, San Juan

Isla Verde, San Juan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nummular Eczema due to Infliximab

Posted on by

An image report (YM Dawkins et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatolo 2016; 14: xxxv-xxxvi) describes a 30-year-old with ulcerative colitis who developed nummular eczema two years after the start of infliximab.  He was treated with topical agents and a course of systemic corticosteroids.  The authors note that in a few patients, withdrawal of anti-TNF therapy is needed, but this was not needed in their patient.

SkinRxnNumEczemaIFX

Related blog posts:

Increasing Rates of Abdominal Wall Birth Defect (Gastroschisis)

Posted on by

From NY Times summary of recent study, “Rate of Birth Defect of Abdominal Wall Increasing, CDC Says“:

The prevalence of gastroschisis has increased by about 30 percent, to 4.9 births out of 10,000 during the period from 2006 to 2012, from 3.6 per 10,000 live births from 1995 to 2005, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

My take: This epidemiology is definitely concerning.  Though most children with gastroschisis do well over time, some have serious problems and many require prolonged hospitalizations after birth.

 

Living Liver Donors: 97% Would Do It Again

Posted on by

A recent study (VR Humphreville et al. Liver Transpl 2016; 22: 53-62) indicates that living liver donors report a high satisfaction following donation.

The authors examined a cohort of 127 living liver donors from the University of Minnesota; donation had occurred between 2 years and 16 years previously.  In addition to a donor-specific survey (DSS) completed by 107, the participants completed the short-form 36 health survey to assess health-related quality of life.

Key findings:

  • Almost all donors reported that they would donate again (97.2%)
  • Satisfaction rate correlated with the outcome of the liver transplant recipient along with pain after donation and vitality after donation. 91.6% rated their satisfaction with the donation process as >8 on a 10 -point scale, with 10 being “extremely satisfied”
  • Health-related quality of life was higher among donors than the general population (though they likely had higher scores than the general population at baseline)

The study elaborates on the potential complications with the most frequent  being incisional discomfort in 34%.

My Take: this information on high satisfaction will be useful for transplant programs and those considering living liver donation.

 

Good Press for PPIs

Posted on by

A lot of medical publications focus on infrequent complications of medications.  This is problematic for many who have trouble understanding absolute risks and relative risks.  If a medication increases the relative risk of a rare problem, the absolute risk to the individual remains quite low.

For proton pump inhibitors, there has been a fair amount of focus on potential complications.  In my view, some of this is due to the fact that there are many taking these medications who may not be receiving much benefit.   Many of the adverse effects for most patients would result in a low absolute risk. In fact, stopping PPIs in those who have indications for their usage could result in significantly greater harm.

For those who’ve been thinking that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been getting a ‘bum rap,’ here are a few publications have highlighted their success in problems other than ulcers and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

  • AJ Lucendo et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14: 13-22.
  • RMM van Aerts et al.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14: 147-52.

The first study, a systemic review and meta-analysis of PPIs in inducing remission for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).  In all 33 studies (11 prospective) of adults and children were included with 619 patients. Key findings:

  • Clinical response was noted in 60.8%
  • Histologic remission (<15 Eos/hpf in this study) in 50.5%
  • In prospective studies, once-daily therapy had similar effectiveness to twice daily (55.9% vs. 49.7%)
  • pH monitoring did not predict response to PPI therapy

My take: While the conclusion from this study (by the authors) is that PPIs should be considered a first-line therapy for EoE, they also indicate that the findings need to interpreted cautiously due to poor-quality evidence, heterogeneity of the studies, and publication bias.  Despite these limitations, most experts agree that PPI therapy should be undertaken prior to use of other treatments like diets or topical steroids for EoE.

The second study showed that patients with hereditary hemochromatosis needed less phlebotomy if they were taking PPIs.  The study was a retrospective study which divided patients into 3 groups, including a paired group of 12 patients who had ferritin levels and number of phlebotomies compared for 3 years prior and 3 years after the start of PPI therapy.  In this group, phlebotomies were needed 3.16 times per year prior to PPI and only 0.5 per year subsequently (to keep ferritin less than 100 mcg/L).  The authors note that studies have shown that PPIs reduced postprandial iron absorption.  PPIs effect on iron metabolism “acts at cellular level in the endosomes and in the stomach, and it seems to have no influence on the hepcidin regulation.”  For PPI fans, the editorial (pgs 153-55) comments that “an attractive aspect of this strategy is the safety of PPIs, which has been shown even with long-term use.’ [Aliment Phamacol Ther 2015; 41: 1162-74]

My take: While this study is not recommending that patients with hereditary hemochromatosis start PPI therapy, those who are taking PPI therapy may need less frequent phlebotomy.

So, in addition to patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and peptic ulcer disease, patients with eosinophilic esophagitis and those with hereditary hemochromatosis often benefit from PPI therapy.

Related blog posts:

Half Dome, Yosemite

Half Dome, Yosemite

Expect More on Microbiome Modulation with Enteral Nutrition

Posted on by

Similar to a study reviewed on this blog (Why Does Enteral Nutrition Work for Crohn’s Disease? Is it due to the Microbiome?), another publication has shown decreased microbiome diversity associated with exclusive enteral nutrition (C Quince et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2-15; 110: 1718-29 -thanks to Ben Gold for this reference). The overall findings suggest that enteral nutrition makes the gut microbiome more ‘dysbiotic’ (more dissimilar to healthy controls) than prior to enteral nutrition.  This study examined 23 children with Crohn’s disease and 21 healthy children.

My take: Due to the increased ease and fascination of studying our stools, a lot more of this research is going to be published.  At some point, hopefully, these observational studies will transition to hypothesis-driven studies regarding which microbial species need to be modulated to improve inflammatory bowel disease.

Screen Shot 2016-01-13 at 8.02.25 PM