Category Archives: Pediatric Gastroenterology Intestinal Disorder

Early Study Shows That Relamorelin Impoves Constipation and Transit Time

Posted on by

An early study shows that Relamorelin relieves constipation & accelerates colonic transit in a placebo-controlled, randomized trial.  Abstract follows.

Relamorelin Relieves Constipation and Accelerates Colonic Transit in a Phase 2, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Trial A Acosta et. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; December 2015Volume 13, Issue 13, Pages 2312–2319.e1. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2015.04.184

Abstract:

Background & Aims

Ghrelin receptors are located in the colon. Relamorelin is a pentapeptide selective agonist of ghrelin receptor 1a with gastric effects, but its effects in the colon are not known. We aimed to evaluate the effects of relamorelin on bowel movements (BMs) and gastrointestinal and colonic transit (CT) in patients with chronic constipation.

Methods

We performed a study of 48 female patients with chronic constipation who fulfilled the Rome III criteria and had 4 or fewer spontaneous BMs (SBMs)/wk. In a randomized (1:1), double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial, the effects of relamorelin (100 μg/d, given subcutaneously) were tested during 14 days after a 14-day baseline, single-blind phase in which patients were given placebo at 2 Mayo Clinic sites. The participants’ mean age was 40.6 ± 1.5 y, with a mean body mass index of 25.7 ± 0.6 kg/m2, with 1.7 ± 0.1 SBM/wk, and a mean stool consistency of 1.2 ± 0.1 on the Bristol scale during this baseline period. The effect of treatment on transit was measured in 24 participants with colonic transit of less than 2.4 (geometric center at 24 h) during the baseline period. Gastric emptying, small-bowel transit, and CT were measured during the last 2 days that patients received relamorelin or placebo. Bowel function was determined from daily diaries kept by patients from days 1 through 28. Study end points were time to first BM, SBMs/wk, complete SBMs/wk, stool form, and ease of stool passage. Effects of relamorelin were assessed by analysis of covariance.

Results

Compared with placebo, relamorelin accelerated gastric emptying half-time (P = .027), small-bowel transit (P = .051), and CT at 32 hours (P = .040) and 48 hours (P = .017). Relamorelin increased the number of SBMs (P < .001) and accelerated the time to first BM after the first dose was given (P = .004) compared with placebo, but did not affect stool form. Adverse events associated with relamorelin included increased appetite, fatigue, and headache.

Conclusions

Relamorelin acts in the colon to significantly reduce symptoms of constipation and accelerate CT in patients with chronic constipation, compared with placebo. ClinicalTrial.Gov registration number: NCT01781104.

Lights at Life University

Lights at Life University

Exome Sequencing in VEO-IBD: More Data

Posted on by

With more widespread use of whole-exome sequencing (WES), the ability to study the genetic basis for rare disorders like very early onset inflammatory bowel disease (VEO-IBD) has improved considerably. A recent study (JR Kelsen et al. Gastroenterol 2015; 149: 1415-24) analyzed 125 patients (3 weeks to 4 years of age) and compared with pediatric IBD patients (n=45), adult-onset Crohn’s (n=20), and healthy controls (n=145). Link to abstract and online material. (Link includes full-text as well).

The authors focused their study on 400 genes/regions associated with primary immunodeficiency.

Key finding:

  • “Our analysis showed novel and rare variants within these genes that could contribute to the development of VEO-IBD, including rare heterozygous missense variants in IL10RA and previously unidentified variants in MSH5 and CD19.”

In their discussion, the authors elaborate on these findings. In addition, in Table 3, the authors elaborate on potential immunologic studies for these children.

Take home message: The authors recommend “a more complete immunologic evaluation be performed in patients with VEO-IBD.”  Ultimately, understanding the complex genetics will lead to more individualized and successful treatments.

Related blog posts:

Lights at Life University

Lights at Life University

Zonulin –Possible Biomarker for Gluten Sensitivity?

Posted on by

A recent abstract indicated that there are high levels of zonulin in patients with gluten sensitivity as well as in patients with celiac disease.  These results are preliminary but could indicate a potential biomarker for this condition.  Here is a link to a review of these findings from NPR which includes commentary from Alessio Fasano: A Protein In The Gut May Explain Why Some Can’t Stomach Gluten

An excerpt:

Zonulin is an inflammatory protein first discovered by Fasano and his team in 2000. It helps regulate leakiness in the gut by opening and closing the spaces or “junctions” between cells in the lining of the digestive tract…

Giovanni Barbara and a team of researchers at the University of Bologna measured blood levels of zonulin in four groups of individuals: those with celiac disease, those with irritable bowel syndrome marked by diarrhea, those with self-diagnosed gluten sensitivity and healthy volunteers. Both celiacs and gluten sensitives turned up with remarkably high levels of zonulin in their blood. Those with IBS had elevated levels but less than half of celiacs or gluten sensitive individuals. Healthy volunteers had negligible blood levels of zonulin.

The results were presented in October as an abstract at the 23rd United European Gastroenterology Week in Barcelona, Spain.

Related blog posts:

NEJM: Functional Dyspepsia

Posted on by

A recent NEJM had a concise review of functional dyspepsia (Talley NJ, Ford AC. NEJM 2015; 373: 1853-63).

With regard to functional dyspepsia in adults, the authors note that using the Rome III criteria, the global prevalence is between 5% and 11%.

While symptoms do not reliably distinguish organic and functional dyspepsia, they note that “with a relatively low rate of identification of organic disease, it is neither desirable nor realistic to perform this test [upper gastrointestinal endoscopy] in all patients with dyspepsia.”

Their review suggests several criteria to consider to help determine who needs endoscopy including age >55 yrs, GI bleeding, dysphagia, persistent vomiting, unintentional weight loss, family history of gastric or esophageal cancer, and iron-deficiency anemia.

With regard to workup, they suggest testing for H pylori non invasively with either breath testing or stool antigen testing.  The review covers treatment approaches including acid suppression (“effect is modest”), antidepressants (“tricyclic antidepressants…should be preferred over selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors”), prokinetic agents, psychological treatments, and complementary approaches.  Figure 3 provides a helpful algorithm.

With regard to prognosis, “approximately 15 to 20% of people with functional dyspepsia have persistent symptoms and 50% have resolution of symptoms; in the remaining 30 to 35% of patients symptoms will fluctuate and meet the criteria for another functional gastrointestinal disorder.”

Briefly noted: “Acute Anxiety and Anxiety Disorders are Associated with Impaired Gastric Accommodation in Patients with Functional Dyspepsia” HG Ly et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13: 1584-91.

Related blog posts:

Sunrise in Sandy Springs

Sunrise in Sandy Springs

Why Does Enteral Nutrition Work for Crohn’s Disease? Is it due to the Microbiome?

Posted on by

A recent study (K Gerasimidis et al. Am J Gastroenterol advance online publication 3 November 2015; doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.357. Full Text: Extensive Modulation of the Fecal Metagenome in Children With Crohn’s Disease During Exclusive Enteral Nutrition) finds that treatment with Exclusive Enteral Nutrition further reduces microbiome diversity compared to healthy controls. This was an unexpected finding as the authors state: “we would expect EEN treatment to normalize the perceived ‘dysbiotic’ microbiota toward a healthier state.”

Reference from KT Park’s twitter feed. Here’s the abstract:

OBJECTIVES:

Exploring associations between the gut microbiota and colonic inflammation and assessing sequential changes during exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) may offer clues into the microbial origins of Crohn’s disease (CD).

METHODS:

Fecal samples (n=117) were collected from 23 CD and 21 healthy children. From CD children fecal samples were collected before, during EEN, and when patients returned to their habitual diets. Microbiota composition and functional capacity were characterized using sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene and shotgun metagenomics.

RESULTS:

Microbial diversity was lower in CD than controls before EEN (P=0.006); differences were observed in 36 genera, 141 operational taxonomic units (OTUs), and 44 oligotypes. During EEN, the microbial diversity of CD children further decreased, and the community structure became even more dissimilar than that of controls. Every 10 days on EEN, 0.6 genus diversity equivalents were lost; 34 genera decreased and one increased during EEN. Fecal calprotectin correlated with 35 OTUs, 14 of which accounted for 78% of its variation. OTUs that correlated positively or negatively with calprotectin decreased during EEN. The microbiota of CD patients had a broader functional capacity than healthy controls, but diversity decreased with EEN. Genes involved in membrane transport, sulfur reduction, and nutrient biosynthesis differed between patients and controls. The abundance of genes involved in biotin (P=0.005) and thiamine biosynthesis decreased (P=0.017), whereas those involved in spermidine/putrescine biosynthesis (P=0.031), or the shikimate pathway (P=0.058), increased during EEN.

CONCLUSIONS:

Disease improvement following treatment with EEN is associated with extensive modulation of the gut microbiome.

My take: We really don’t know why EEN works and we have a lot to learn about a ‘healthy’ microbiome.

Related blog posts:

“To biopsy or not to biopsy” –that is the question (for Celiac disease)

Posted on by

First off -thanks to Ben Gold for the following reference and the blog title as well.

  • CM Trovato et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110: 1485-89.

In this retrospective study (alluded to in a previous post:Celiac Update September 2015 | gutsandgrowth), the researchers examined whether “biopsy-sparing” protocols for symptomatic children with high titers of serum anti-transglutaminase (anti-TTG) antibody levels (>10 times upper limit of normal [ULN]) would be suitable for asymptomatic patients.

Background: In 2012, the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) published guidelines that it is possible to omit endoscopic biopsies for celiac disease if patients older than 2 years of age had high anti-TTG titers (>10 times ULN), positivity for EMA, compatible HLA DQ2 or HLA DQ8 and were symptomatic.

Findings:

  • Among 196 patients, the 40 who were asymptomatic had severe Marsh lesions (3a, 3b, or 3c) in 92% compared with 91% of 156 who were symptomatic. In both groups, the remaining patients had either Marsh 1 or 2 lesions.
  • 94.4% of patients had improved serology during followup along with symptomatic improvement (in those with symptoms)

Bottomline:  Whether symptomatic or not, those with high antiTTG titers who meet all of the other ESPGHAN criteria have a very high probability of celiac disease.

Briefly noted: K Marild et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110: 1475-84. This study, based on a large prospective Norwegian cohort (72,921 children) that frequent infections (>10) in the first 18 months of life increased the risk of celiac disease with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.32 (highest infection quartile compared to lowest infection quartile).  However, alternative explanations, including surveillance bias and reverse causation, cannot be excluded.

Related blog posts:

 

The Science Behind IBS Dietary Interventions

Posted on by

A succinct review (BE Lacy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13: 1899-1906) reviews the topic of dietary interventions for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).

Here are some of the points:

  • “True food allergies are present in 1% to 4% of the US population, but are not more prevalent in IBS patients.”
  • One study found that “more than 1 in 4 patients with self-reported NCGS [nonceliac gluten sensitivity] actually fulfill the diagnosis.”  In other words, most patients with self-reported NCGS do not have NCGS.
  • “The prevalence of lactase deficiency is similar, or slightly higher, in IBS patients compared with healthy subjects; however, the self-reporting of symptoms attributed to lactose intolerance is not reliable.”
  • Potential mechanisms of food triggering GI symptoms were discussed, including intestinal permeability, visceral hypersensitivity, small intestine bacterial overgrowth, and gut microbiome.

Another article which covers the same topic: PR Gibson et al. Gastroenterol 2015; 148: 1158-74.

 

The Story Behind a 30 Year Esophagitis Study

Posted on by

A recent retrospective study ( SS Baker et al. JPGN 2015; 61: 538-40) reported on changes in esophagitis over a 30 year period at one center.  While the authors focus on the fluctuating percentage of esophagitis noted during three periods, in my opinion, they miss the opportunity to discuss more relevant findings.

Specifically, the authors note the following:

  • From 1980-88 (n=186 over 8 years) that 26.9% had esophagitis and 4.8% had >15 eos/hpf.  Normal pathology in the esophagus was noted in 73.1%.
  • From 2000-2002 (n=321 over 2 years), 41.2% had esophagitis and 8.5% had >15 eos/hpf.  Normal pathology in the esophagus was noted in 58.8%.
  • In the most recent period, 2011, (n=675 over 1 year), 31%* had esophagitis and 12.7% had >15 eos/hpf.  Normal pathology in the esophagus was noted in 69%.     *erroneously reported as 33%

What is baffling to me are the following:

  • Why the authors assert that there has been a fluctuating prevalence.  In absolute terms, the increase in cases is marked, though one can argue that in earlier periods there may have been many undiagnosed cases.
  • Why the authors do not comment on the tremendous increase in the use of endoscopy in their discussion.  In the first period, they were averaging ~23/year, the second period ~95/year and in the most recent period, they performed 675 in one year.

My take: This study shows that esophageal eosinophilia has been present for a long time and that identification of cases has increased considerably over 32 years.  In addition, the use of endoscopy has increased markedly, yet the yield of abnormal findings remains similar.

Briefly noted: C Menard-Katcher et al. JPGN 2015; 61: 541-46.  This retrospective study of 22 children showed that 55% had esophageal strictures identified by esophagram but not endoscopy.

Related blog posts:

Bamboo

Eosinophilic Esophagitis Review -NEJM

Posted on by

Good review:  Glenn T. Furuta, M.D., and David A. Katzka, M.D. N Engl J Med 2015; 373:1640-1648

A couple pointers from this review:

  • Estimated prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) 0.4% in Western countries.  Symptoms are often underestimated due to patient ‘accommodation’ which includes eating slowly/carefully, drinking a lot of liquids and avoiding items more prone to become lodged (meats, pills, breads)
  • Pathogenesis: “Birth by cesarean section, premature delivery, antibiotic exposure during infancy, food allergy, lack of breast-feeding, and living in an area of lower population density have all been associated with eosinophilic esophagitis.”
  • Impaired barrier function and enhanced the activity play a role in pathogenesis
  • Food allergy is a non-IgE-mediated process.  Omalizumab, an anti-IgE biologic, is ineffective in EoE and EoE can develop in IgE-null mice
  • Male predominance (3:1) suggests that there is a genetic component.
Esophagus with ringed appearance, furrowing, and loss of vascular markings

Esophagus with ringed appearance, furrowing, and loss of vascular markings

Another useful reference on Eosinophilic Gastritis in Children: Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109; 1277-85.  This article provides data on clinical and histologic remission with eosinophilic gastritis (>70 eos/hpf), n=30 children.  “Response to dietary restriction was high” (82% clinical, 78% histologic response) Thanks to Seth Marcus for this reference.

Related blog posts:

Antibiotics and Growth in India

Posted on by

A recent study (Rogawski ET, et al. J Pediatr 2015; 167: 1096-102) examined a prospective observational cohort of 497 children in India (from “semi-urban slums”).  The authors found that early exposure to antibiotics were not associated with increased or decreased growth.

“There are several potential explanations for the lack of a growth-promoting effect.  Most of the previous studies showing increased weight gain or risk of obesity associated with antibiotics were conducted in high-income countries with Western diets.”

My take: This was a negative study on antibiotics and obesity.  This suggests that the effects of antibiotics with regard to weight gain may be limited and/or modified by diet.

Also noted: Wakamoto H, et al. J Pediatr 2015; 167: 1136-42.  This study showed that Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) which is abundant on type II alveolar pneumoctyes and respiratory epithelial cells is a fairly good serum biomarker for chronic aspiration in this study of children with severe motor and intellectual disabilities.  Figure 1 shows the distribution of KL-6 among the 37 with aspiration and the 29 without aspiration.  The median in the former was 344 vs 207 in the later, though there was overlapping results.

Related blog posts:

Sandy Springs

Sandy Springs