Neurological Complications Associated with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Though I have not seen much in the way of neurological complications in our pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) population, nevertheless I worry about them.  A recent article provides some insight into the incidence, the pathophysiology and approach to these complications (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013; 19: 864-72).

Types of neurologic complications: The most common neurologic complication is peripheral neuropathy.  The frequency is quite variable based on data collection method.  In large administrative healthcare data, the prevalence has been reported around 2% whereas in cohort studies the range has been 8-15%. Other complications include meylopathy, cerbrovascular disease, cranial nerve palsy (eg. Melkersson-Rosenthal syndrome), seizures, and demyelinating diseases.

With regard to demyelinating diseases, this has gained additional attention in the setting of biologic agents which have been associated with this complication.  However, the authors note that a pre-biologic treatment study from Olmstead County, observed a prevalence of multiple sclerosis of 1% which was 3.7 times higher than expected.  In addition, similar studies have confirmed this finding.

Potential mechanisms vary greatly depending on the neurologic complication. With regard to cerebrovascular disorders, “venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been shown to occur 3 times more frequently in patients with IBD (the risk increases to 8-10-fold in patients with active colitis) than the general population.”  Hence, VTE prophylaxis is recommended by the authors in hospitalized IBD patients, especially if they are experiencing a disease exacerbation.

In addition to the underlying disease, vitamin deficiencies (eg. Vitamin B12) and medications can trigger neurologic complications.

  • Natalizumab: progress multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML)
  • Metronidazole: peripheral neuropathy (typically reversible with drug discontinuation)
  • Anti-TNF-α agents (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab): demyelination, rarely seizures, and rarely PML
  • Cyclosporine: various neurotoxicity in ~25%

Related blog entries:

Tacrolimus for Refractory Crohn’s Disease

While tacrolimus has been considered a potential option for refractory Crohn’s, data on its usage are sparse, mostly small retrospective studies.  Another small retrospective study from the Mayo clinic provides data from their experience with 24 adult patients who were treated with tacrolimus for a median of 4 months (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013; 19: 1107-11).

17 (71%) of study participants were female and their median age was 38 years.  18 (75%) had ileocolonic disease.  All patients were either intolerant or unresponsive to at least one anti-TNFα agent.  Most patients received concurrent therapy: thiopurines (58%), methotrexate (8%) and antibiotics (46%).

Results:

  • 67% responded to tacrolimus and 21% achieved a steroid-free remission.
  • Patients with trough levels of 10 to 15 ng/mL had the highest response (86%) and remission (57%).
  • Adverse events were common (75% of patients); 8 (33%) required dose reduction and 6 (25%) led to treatment discontinuation.  Frequent adverse events included acute kidney injury (29%), paresthesia (29%), headache (17%), and tremor (17%).
  • 54% of patients in this series required surgery within a median of 10 months after starting tacrolimus.
  • Of the patients who achieved remission (n=5), 2 were transitioned to immunomodulator therapy to minimize long-term toxicity. 1 patient did well after stopping all therapy during a 6 month followup.  1 patient stopped treatment due to paresthesias and 1 patient continued therapy for 2.5 years.

The study does not describe the use of antibiotics for the prevention of Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia.

Take-home message: Tacrolimus doesn’t look too promising for refractory disease.

Related blog post:

Additional references:

  • -IBD 2008; 14: 7-12. Tacrolimus of minimal efficacy for UC and Crohn’s. Some achieve response (22/32 in UC and 7/15 in Crohn’s) only 3/32 UC with remission and 1/15 Crohn’s with remission
  • -Gut 2006; 55: 1255-1262. Use of prograf in refractory UC. Troughs 10-15, then 5-10 after remission; partial response in 68% at week 2 & 58% at week 10 (n=19)
  • -Gastroenterol 2003; 125: 380. Tacrolimus helped but did not cure fistulizing disease
  • -J Pediatr 2000; 137: 794-799. n=14.
  • -Am J Gastro 1997; 92: 876. Use in fistualizing Crohn’s.
  • -Am J Gastro 1998; 93: 18. Use in IBD.
  • -IBD 1999; 5: 239. Combined c azathioprine for perianal fistulae. response: initial 2.4weeks, 12.2weeks complete. 7/11 c complete response.
  • -IBD 2009; 15: 193. topical tacrolimus for proctitis. 10/12 w proctitis responded to 2 mg or 4 mg enema in 100 mL of sterile water.
  • -IBD 2007; 13: 245. Use for perianal disease.
  • -Gut 2000; 47: 436-440. Topical tacrolimus may be effective in the treatment of oral and perineal Crohn’s disease.

Overcoming ATIs

Usually, when antibodies to infliximab (ATI) develop in combination with a loss of clinical response in an individual with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), this often indicates a need to switch treatments.  A recent study suggests that some patients can eliminate ATIs with the addition of immunomodulators (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 444-47).

In this small retrospective study, 5 patients (18-37 years of age) who developed ATIs were able to continue infliximab therapy after instituting immunomodulator treatment (3 with thiopurines, and 2 with methotrexate).  What makes this report interesting, was that these ATIs (prior to immunomodulator use) were identified multiple times and were associated with undetectable infliximab levels.  None of these patients had dose intensification of infliximab.  After instituting immunomodulator therapy, detectable infliximab was evident and the ATIs disappeared.  According to Figure 1, the timeframe for return of response was about 10 weeks in some of these patients.

The authors note that the addition of immunomodulators can gradually eliminate a preformed memory response to infliximab antigen.  They also note that ATIs can sometimes disappear spontaneously, though this had not been noted to occur previously when mulitple ATIs levels have been identified.

While these observations are important, a larger prospective study is needed to inform how frequently this strategy could be successful.

Related blog links:

Global increases in IBD incidence

Two more studies have shown increasing incidence of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease.

First in Victoria, Australia (mostly Melbourne) (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013; 19: 1-6).

Over a 60-year span (1950-2009), a retrospective review was undertaken of ulcerative colitis (UC) pediatric patients. In total, 342 children were diagnosed with UC. Key finding: The number of reported cases increased by 11-fold during the study period with a marked increase since 1990 (0.15 –>1.61/100,000).  In addition, recently diagnosed children have had more extensive disease.

Next in Spain (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013; 19: 73-80).

This retrospective study from hospitals’ databases looked at the incidence between 1996-2009 in the pediatric population (<18 years).  A total of 2107 patients were identified: 1165 with Crohn’s disease, 788 ulcerative colitis, and 154 IBD unclassified. Median age at diagnosis was 12.3 years.  Key finding: in the last 14 years, pediatric IBD incidence has almost tripled (0.9 –>2.8/100,000).

Both of these studies have limitations related to large retrospective reviews in terms of potential problems with capturing all of the patients and the potential for misdiagnosis.  However, the trend is clear.  In addition, these studies show incidence rates comparable to several other Western studies.  The increasing incidence of IBD ‘argue for a common environmental factor in their pathogenesis.’  While interest has focused on microbial factors, the basis for this increased incidence currently remains elusive.

Related blog posts:

True red flags in recurrent abdominal pain

For pediatricians and pediatric gastroenterologists alike, identifying which children need additional workup for recurrent abdominal pain (RAP) is facilitated by recognizing “red flags.”  “Red flags” are clinical features that indicate a higher likelihood of a nonfunctional disorder.  A recent study notes that reports of waking from sleep and joint pains do not distinguish functional from nonfunctional causes of RAP (J Pediatr 2013; 162: 783-7).

This study, performed between 2005 to 2008, had patients presenting to an outpatient pediatric gastroenterology clinic for RAP prospectively complete a detailed questionnaire. Data, though, was extracted retrospectively. In this population (n=606), 85% were Caucasian.  After their evaluation, patients with functional GI diseases (FGID, n=478) were compared with patients confirmed with Crohn’s disease (CD, n=128).  All FGIDs underwent biochemical testing, 41% had upper endoscopy, and 32% underwent colonoscopy.

Additional key findings:

  • Using a tree analysis, the cumulative sensitivity for Crohn’s disease was 54% with the presence of anemia, 78% when blood in stool was added to anemia, and 94% when weight loss was added as well.
  • FGID patients were more likely to report stress and headaches, more likely to have family history of FGID, and less likely to have anemia, hematochezia, or growth issues.
  • FGID patients were more likely to experience vomiting.

The sensitivity and specificity of these symptoms/signs will vary based on the population.  For a general pediatric clinic, it is likely that the sensitivity of these red flags would remain high; the specificity would likely be lower than in a pediatric gastroenterology office due to the increased prevalence of functional diseases in the general pediatric setting.

Related blog posts:

Paris Classification of Pediatric Crohn’s Disease

A recent study described the phenotypic results of a prospective, web-based registry of new-onset pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in 17 European countries and Israel (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013; 19: 378-85).

The EUROKIDS Registry included 582 pediatric Crohn’s Disease (CD) patients classified according to Paris classification:

  • 16% with L1 involvement of the terminal ileum only
  • 27% with L2 colonic involvement only (more common in younger children)
  • 53% with L3 involvement of the ileum and colon
  • 4% with L4 isolated upper GI disease.  Upper tract disease can be further subdivided into L4A esophagogastric disease and L4B jejunal/proximal ileal disease.
  • *Upper GI disease can coexist with L1, L2 or L3.  In this study, 34 (6%) had esophageal involvement, 102 (18%) had gastric involvement, and 100 (17%) had duodenal involvement.
  • In this study, 165 of the 507 patients did not undergo small bowel imaging. Of those who did, 64% had small bowel follow-through, 38% had MRI, 6% CT, and 5% video capsule.

Other findings:

  • Perianal disease (e.g.. fistula or abscess) noted in 9% at diagnosis.
  • Granulomas were found in 43% of patients who had biopsies from at least 10 segments of the GI tract
  • 82% of CD patients had nonstricturing, nonpenetrating disease (B1), 12% had stricturing disease (B2) and 5% had penetrating disease (B3).  2% had both stricturing and penetrating disease.
  • Extraintestinal manifestations were seen in 20% of the study population.
  • The authors estimated that the diagnostic yield of upper endoscopy  in the workup for pediatric IBD was  7.5% and for intubation of the ileum/ileoscopy 13%.

Study limitations included a selection bias of centers and pediatric gastroenterologists with a special interest in IBD.  Also, in this registry, older adolescents are underrepresented. In about one-third of the centers, patients older than 15 years are seen primarily by adult gastroenterologists.

Don’t Fix What’s Not Broken

A recent study provides information about elective switching from infliximab (IFX) to adalimumab (ADA) in stable Crohn’s disease (CD) (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013; 19: 761-66).  As a practical matter, patients and families inquire about switching therapy due to potential convenience and flexibility.  Thus far, there is little data to guide clinicians.  As such, the authors explored this question by designing an open-label study which would allow enrollment of any patients who had stable disease for >6 months (Harvey-Bradshaw Index ≤ 8) on IFX therapy.

In total, 29 patients with CD were enrolled with an average age of 39.  Twelve had previous resections.

Key results:

  • 21 patients (72%) were able to remain on ADA at 54 weeks.  8 patients discontinued ADA due to disease activity (n=3), side effects (n=4), or other symptoms (n=1).
  • 4 patients were restarted on IFX therapy; 1 required dose intensification.
  • At 54 weeks, 13 patients indicated a preference for IFX due to efficacy (n=9) or safety profile (n=4).  12 patients indicated a preference for ADA.  4 patients had no preference.

The authors state that a recommendation to avoid elective switching.  In their study, 28% were not able to be maintained on ADA therapy, more patients preferred IFX after experiencing both therapies, and switching back to IFX has been associated (in some) with reduced efficacy.  The main concern with an elective switch is the potential loss of response with very limited therapeutic alternatives.

The authors note that their study showed better results with an elective change than a previous study (the SWITCH trial, n=73).  In the SWITCH trial, “elective switch from IFX to ADA in patients with stable CD led to 47% of patients requiring dose intensification or interruption of treatment” in the ADA arm compared with 16% of patients who continued IFX therapy.  (Adalimumab in Crohn’s Disease Controlled by Infliximab)

The better outcomes in the current trial may have been due to selection of patients with milder disease and the more frequent use of concomitant immunosuppression.  In the current trial, 52% had concomitant immunosuppression (48% thiopurine, 4% methotrexate); in contrast, only 17% received concomitant immunosuppression in the SWITCH trial.  Another important difference was that the patients in the current trial received 160-80 loading doses rather than 80-40 induction.  Also, the trial designs were different.  The current trial enrolled patients without randomization; in contrast, the SWITCH trial randomized some patients to continue IFX and others to change to ADA therapy.

Related reference:

  • -Gut 2012; 61: 229-34. SWITCH trial.

Related blog references:

Clostridium difficile in IBD

A useful review of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in the inflammatory bowel disease population has been published and makes several useful points (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013; 19: 194-204). (Thanks to Ben Gold for suggesting this reference.)

Key points:

  • The incidence of CDI in IBD patients is increasing (faster than general population).  The prevalence of CDI in IBD was nearly eight times greater than non-iBD gastrointestinal patients in a recent population-based study (37.3 cases vs. 4.8 cases per 1000 discharges).
  • Though there is some conflicting data, CDI appears to worsen both short- and long-term outcomes in IBD patients.
  • Carriage (asymptomatic) rates in outpatient IBD patients is higher than the general population (8.2% vs. 1%) according to a recent study.
  • Endoscopic appearance of CDI is rarely classic in the setting of IBD.  Only 13% of hospitalized IBD patients with CDI had pseudomembranes (J Crohns Colitis 2010; 4: 194-98).  Thus, endoscopy has little utility in helping to distinguish IBD flare from superimposed infection.
  • Unique IBD risk factors for CDI: colonic disease and steroid use.
  • The review has a thorough discussion of the available testing and recommends testing only patients with unformed stools unless an ileus is present.
  • For recurrent disease, the authors suggest prolonged tapered vancomycin in adults: 125 mg QID for 10-14 days, then 125 mg BID x 1 week, then 125 mg QD x 1 week, then 125 mg QOD for 2-8 weeks.  Alternative approaches could included fidaxomicin, IVIG/antibody therapy, and fecal transplantation.

Related blog posts:

Data on Allopurinol

Given the limited number of therapeutic options for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), it is important to optimize each individual treatment.  Allopurinol can increase the effectiveness of thiopurines and if used properly can be safe (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013; 19: 363-69).

The referenced study took place between 2004-2011 and examined 77 patients who failed monotherapy with a thiopurine due to “skewed” metabolism.  The average age of study participant was 38 years (28-45).  23% had previous surgery. Cotreatment with an anti-TNF occurred in 7 patients and with an 5-ASA i 17 patients.

Results:

  • Median 6-thioguanine (6-TGN) levels increased from 145 to 271 pmol/8 x10-to-the-8th. 6-methyl mercaptopurine (6-MMP) concentrations decreased from 10,110 to 265 pmol/8 x10-to-the-8th.
  • Leukopenia occurred in 16%, necessitating dose reductions.
  • Liver tests normalized in 81% with the addition of allopurinol
  • The median azathioprine dose while on combination therapy was 0.64 mg/kg/day and the median 6-mercaptopurine dose was 0.39 mg/kg/day.  While on mono therapy, median values were 2.05 mg/kg/day and 1.23 mg/kg/day respectively.
  • 21% had to discontinue combination therapy.
  • Combination therapy was continued at 6, 12, 24, and 60 months in 87%, 85%, 76%, and 65%.

Take-home Message:

Allopurinol can salvage failed thiopurine monotherapy, but only in a minority of these patients.  Allopurinol should be considered for patients unable to achieve therapeutic 6-TGN levels who have liver toxicity/elevated 6-MMP levels.  Careful attention to dose reduction of the thiopurine is essential to avoid life-threatening bone marrow suppression.

Related blog entry:

Thiopurine Metabolite Testing -NASPGHAN … – gutsandgrowth

Additional references:

  • -Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 31: 640-47. use of allopurinol.
  • -Gastro & Hep 2008; 4: 505. use of allopurinol. Consider if pts unable to enter steroid-free remission AND on adequate AZA/6MP dose. ONLY in those who preferentially metabolize towards 6-MMP (~15% of population); thus subtherapeutic 6-TG levels and increased 6-MMP (>5700). Need adequate WBC >4.5 at start since this will decrease. Check labs every week x 4 at start, then qoweek x 4, then per routine.
  • -IBD 2008; 14: 1678. Experience with allopurinol in children -dose 100mg of allopurinol if >30kg and 50mg if < 30kg. AZA dose decreased to 25% of previous dose. n=13.
  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2007; 5: 170 (editorial) & 209.  Use of allopurinol (100mg/day) in 20 adults.  Dose of 6-MP reduced 25-50% concomitantly.  Improved disease control w/o hepatotoxicity.  Important to follow counts closely for first 2 months.

A-OK for Accutane

Another article has reaffirmed that isotretinoin (Accutane) does not increase the risk of IBD (JAMA Dermatol 2013; 149: 216-20).  Thanks to Mike Hart for this reference. However, this data will not reverse the millions of dollars that have been lost in litigation (Isotretinoin – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia).

Using a large U.S. health claims database (68 million patients), the authors examined women ages 18-46 years who had received at least one oral contraceptive prescription between 2001-2009.  For each patient with IBD, 20 controls were identified in a nested case-control study design.

In total, 2159 IBD cases (1056 UC, 1103 CD) were matched with 43,180 controls.  Only 10 patients with IBD were exposed to isotretinoin compared with 191 controls.  The adjusted relative risk (RR) for IBD was 0.99; for ulcerative colitis the RR was 1.1 (confidence intervals 0.44-2.7) and for Crohn’s disease the RR was 0.91 (confidence interval 0.91).  For the meta-analysis which was a secondary part of this study, the RR for IBD with 5 studies was 0.94.

Conclusion: The study results do not suggest an increase risk of IBD with isotretinoin use.

Why did previous studies suggest a link between IBD and isotretinoin? The authors note that this is the first study to adjust for two main confounders, mainly a diagnosis of acne and use of oral tetracycline antibiotics.  Oral antibiotics, including tetracyclines, have been associated with IBD previously.  In addition, the design limits the confounding of contraceptive usage.

Limitations of this study:

  • Only women were studied; however, there are no known biologic factors that would make isotretinoin more problematic for males.
  • Other risk factors were not examined: smoking, ethnicity, diet, IBD family history

Additional references:

  • -Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 2774-78.  Population-based study in Winnipeg, <40yrs.  n=1960 cases and 19,419 controls.  No differences in the proportions of IBD cases taking isotretinoin vs controls.  1.2% of IBD cases received isotretinoin prior to IBD diagnosis (n=25) compared with 1.1% of controls (n=213).  Mean # of days prior to IBD dx was 1102.  Thus, isotretinoin unlikely to be causally-associated with idiopathic IBD.
  • -IBD 2009; 12: Supplement -abstract O -0002  Increased risk of UC after isotretinoin.  OR 4.36 for developing UC
  • -Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 2387-93.  7 country study found no causal association between isotretinoin & colitis.