Tag Archives: inflammatory bowel disease

Injection Flu Vaccine Safe for Patients with IBD

Posted on by

A recent article from Pediatrics, published online May 6, 2013
(doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3567), confirms that influenza vaccination (injection/inactivated vaccine) is safe in patients with inflammatory bowel disease:

“Safety and Utilization of Influenza Immunization in Children With Inflammatory Bowel Disease”  Eric I. Benchimol, Steven Hawken, Jeffrey C. Kwong, and Kumanan Wilson

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: Influenza immunization is recommended for children with IBD, however safety concerns may limit uptake. This study assessed whether immunization was associated with adverse events in IBD patients using a population-based database of children with IBD.

METHODS: All children <19 years diagnosed with IBD in Ontario, Canada between 1999–2009 were identified using health administrative data, and matched to non-IBD controls. Self-controlled case series (SCCS) analyses determined health services event rates (outpatient visits, hospitalizations and emergency visits) in any 2-week risk period to 180 days post-immunization compared to a no-risk control period. Relative incidence (RI) was calculated for overall and IBD-related events and rates were compared between IBD cases and controls using relative incidence ratios (RIR).

RESULTS: 4916 IBD patients were matched to 21,686 controls. IBD patients were more likely to have received immunization than controls (25.3% vs. 13.2%, P < .001). No increased event rates existed in IBD cases during risk periods (pooled RI 0.95, 95% CI 0.84–1.07), including hospitalizations and emergency visits. There was a slightly higher event rate in IBD cases versus controls for days 3–14 (RIR 1.60, 95% CI 1.05–2.44, P = .03). IBD-related visit rates were lower in risk periods compared to control period (pooled RI 0.81, 95% CI 0.68–0.96).

CONCLUSIONS: There was no increase in health services use in the post-vaccine risk period in IBD patients, and there was evidence for a protective effect of influenza immunization against IBD-related health services use. Influenza immunization is safe in children with IBD and should be encouraged to improve poor coverage rates.

Don’t forget HLH

Posted on by

A recent clinical challenge (Gastroenterol 2013; 145: 289, 489) regarding a a 78-year-old with a 12-year history of ulcerative colitis serves as a good reminder to remember hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) in inflammatory bowel disease patients with high fever, even in the presence of recognized viral infections like cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus which can trigger HLH.  Patients receiving immunosuppressive medications are at risk.

Other clinical points:

  • Consider HLH when cytopenias are present in addition to fever
  • Ferritin values >10,000 mcg/L serves as a good screen

Take-home point: HLH has a significant mortality rate.  Quick recognition can improve outcome.

Related blog post:

Diagnosing hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis … – gutsandgrowth

Treating Allergic Reactions to Infliximab

Posted on by

This week on the GI bulletin board there was a brief discussion about overcoming allergic/anaphylactic reactions to infliximab.  A reference and a thoughtful response by Athos Bousvaros (in italics) follows:

Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2001 Feb;7(1):34-7. Successful desensitization and therapeutic use of infliximab in adult and pediatric Crohn’s disease patients with prior anaphylactic reaction. Puchner TC, Kugathasan S, Kelly KJ, Binion DG.   

 IN summary:

1.  Premed with 4 days of steroids (1mg/kg up to 40mg), and hydrocortisone day of the infusion.

2.  Give two test doses (0.1 mg, 1 mg), each over 10 minutes,

3.  If no problems, run the infusion over 4 hours instead of two.

 

Getting antibodies to infliximab before the challenge may also be helpful.  If high levels of antibodies are present, the patient may be more likely to fail the challenge. WE can “rescue” about half our patients using this protocol, and keep them on infliximab. IMPORTANT that a physician is around during the challenge.

Given the potential for adverse reactions and the importance of not depleting useful treatments, it is definitely worthwhile to read the entire cited reference rather than the aforementioned summary.

Related blog entry:

Overcoming ATIs | gutsandgrowth

FMT -not quite the new Laser

Posted on by

I distinctly remember one of my high school teachers saying that if you asked someone if they were willing to have a serious operation like a brain lobe removal, that most would be unwilling unless there was no other choice.  However, if you told them that you were going to do it with a laser, people would want to get it done right away.  Such was the mesmerizing appeal of the word “laser.”

Fecal microbiota transfer (FMT) certainly does not sound as enticing as a laser treatment. Nevertheless, the authors of a recent report state that “we received interest from patients all over the world to participate.”  That being said, this recent report reintroduces the concept of FMT for ulcerative colitis (UC) (JPGN 2013; 56: 597-601).

In the introduction, the authors note that probiotics, in particular VSL#3, have shown usefulness in the treatment of UC and have noted previous sporadic reports of FMT for inflammatory bowel disease.  This led to their pilot study of 10 subjects (7 to 21 years); this was a single-center, uncontrolled study.  Due to financial constraints, there was no correlation with fecal microbial profiling, histologic/colonoscopic activity, or stool inflammatory markers.

The authors extensively describe their protocol of FMT (240 mL [in four aliquots] daily for five days) including donor exclusion criteria and donor screening.  Participants did not receive any bowel preparation prior to FMT.  The majority of participants had pancolitis;  only one patient had disease limited to proctitis. One of the ten patients could not retain FMT enemas.

Results:

  • Short-term improvement was noted with 7 of 9 (78%) achieving a clinical response within one week and 3 of 9 (33%) achieving a clinical remission.
  • The authors note that 6 of 9 (67%) maintained a clinical response at 1 month.  Although if one examines the study’s figure 2, this graphically demonstrates a fairly meager response in about half of these patients based on their PUCAI score.
  • The authors do not overstate their interpretation of their results.  “This unique biologic is potentially efficacious.”
  • Adverse effects appeared to be mild and self-limiting.

Ultimately if FMT proves efficacious for inflammatory bowel disease, feces with the right microbial mix would be quite valuable.  For now, this study indicates that further research is needed in this area.

Related blog entries:

Overcoming ATIs

Posted on by

Usually, when antibodies to infliximab (ATI) develop in combination with a loss of clinical response in an individual with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), this often indicates a need to switch treatments.  A recent study suggests that some patients can eliminate ATIs with the addition of immunomodulators (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 444-47).

In this small retrospective study, 5 patients (18-37 years of age) who developed ATIs were able to continue infliximab therapy after instituting immunomodulator treatment (3 with thiopurines, and 2 with methotrexate).  What makes this report interesting, was that these ATIs (prior to immunomodulator use) were identified multiple times and were associated with undetectable infliximab levels.  None of these patients had dose intensification of infliximab.  After instituting immunomodulator therapy, detectable infliximab was evident and the ATIs disappeared.  According to Figure 1, the timeframe for return of response was about 10 weeks in some of these patients.

The authors note that the addition of immunomodulators can gradually eliminate a preformed memory response to infliximab antigen.  They also note that ATIs can sometimes disappear spontaneously, though this had not been noted to occur previously when mulitple ATIs levels have been identified.

While these observations are important, a larger prospective study is needed to inform how frequently this strategy could be successful.

Related blog links:

Global increases in IBD incidence

Posted on by

Two more studies have shown increasing incidence of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease.

First in Victoria, Australia (mostly Melbourne) (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013; 19: 1-6).

Over a 60-year span (1950-2009), a retrospective review was undertaken of ulcerative colitis (UC) pediatric patients. In total, 342 children were diagnosed with UC. Key finding: The number of reported cases increased by 11-fold during the study period with a marked increase since 1990 (0.15 –>1.61/100,000).  In addition, recently diagnosed children have had more extensive disease.

Next in Spain (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013; 19: 73-80).

This retrospective study from hospitals’ databases looked at the incidence between 1996-2009 in the pediatric population (<18 years).  A total of 2107 patients were identified: 1165 with Crohn’s disease, 788 ulcerative colitis, and 154 IBD unclassified. Median age at diagnosis was 12.3 years.  Key finding: in the last 14 years, pediatric IBD incidence has almost tripled (0.9 –>2.8/100,000).

Both of these studies have limitations related to large retrospective reviews in terms of potential problems with capturing all of the patients and the potential for misdiagnosis.  However, the trend is clear.  In addition, these studies show incidence rates comparable to several other Western studies.  The increasing incidence of IBD ‘argue for a common environmental factor in their pathogenesis.’  While interest has focused on microbial factors, the basis for this increased incidence currently remains elusive.

Related blog posts:

A-OK for Accutane

Posted on by

Another article has reaffirmed that isotretinoin (Accutane) does not increase the risk of IBD (JAMA Dermatol 2013; 149: 216-20).  Thanks to Mike Hart for this reference. However, this data will not reverse the millions of dollars that have been lost in litigation (Isotretinoin – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia).

Using a large U.S. health claims database (68 million patients), the authors examined women ages 18-46 years who had received at least one oral contraceptive prescription between 2001-2009.  For each patient with IBD, 20 controls were identified in a nested case-control study design.

In total, 2159 IBD cases (1056 UC, 1103 CD) were matched with 43,180 controls.  Only 10 patients with IBD were exposed to isotretinoin compared with 191 controls.  The adjusted relative risk (RR) for IBD was 0.99; for ulcerative colitis the RR was 1.1 (confidence intervals 0.44-2.7) and for Crohn’s disease the RR was 0.91 (confidence interval 0.91).  For the meta-analysis which was a secondary part of this study, the RR for IBD with 5 studies was 0.94.

Conclusion: The study results do not suggest an increase risk of IBD with isotretinoin use.

Why did previous studies suggest a link between IBD and isotretinoin? The authors note that this is the first study to adjust for two main confounders, mainly a diagnosis of acne and use of oral tetracycline antibiotics.  Oral antibiotics, including tetracyclines, have been associated with IBD previously.  In addition, the design limits the confounding of contraceptive usage.

Limitations of this study:

  • Only women were studied; however, there are no known biologic factors that would make isotretinoin more problematic for males.
  • Other risk factors were not examined: smoking, ethnicity, diet, IBD family history

Additional references:

  • -Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 2774-78.  Population-based study in Winnipeg, <40yrs.  n=1960 cases and 19,419 controls.  No differences in the proportions of IBD cases taking isotretinoin vs controls.  1.2% of IBD cases received isotretinoin prior to IBD diagnosis (n=25) compared with 1.1% of controls (n=213).  Mean # of days prior to IBD dx was 1102.  Thus, isotretinoin unlikely to be causally-associated with idiopathic IBD.
  • -IBD 2009; 12: Supplement -abstract O -0002  Increased risk of UC after isotretinoin.  OR 4.36 for developing UC
  • -Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 2387-93.  7 country study found no causal association between isotretinoin & colitis.

FMT -fecal microbiota transplant

Posted on by

An excellent review of FMT, especially in regard to C difficile infection, has been published (Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108: 177-85)  Thanks to Ben Gold for sharing this reference.

FMT has been around for a long time.  It is first documented in the 4th century as a treatment for food poisoning or severe diarrhea.  Its current application has focused on C difficile infection (CDI), though its use in a number of other settings is being explored.  This includes irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease.

This articles makes several useful points.  In the ‘how to do it’ section, the author notes that at the NIH, donor screening includes screening for pathogens in the stool:

  • Bacteria: C difficile, Listeria monocytogenes, Vibrio cholera, Vibrio parahemoltyicus, H pylori
  • Parasites: Giardia, Cryptosporidium, Isospora (acid fast stain)
  • Viruses: Rotavirus
  • Blood: for Hepatitis A IgM, Hep B (HBsAg, anti-HBc ([gG & IgM]), HIV, Syphilis, HCV

However, the author notes that testing in the community tends to rely on screening only for enteric pathogens (stool tests only).  Donors should be excluded if they have received antibiotics in the preceding 3 months, if they participate in high-risk sexual behaviors, recent tattoo piercing, or recent incarceration.  Additional exclusions: history of IBD, IBS, immunocompromise, morbid obesity, metabolic syndrome, atopy, and chronic fatigue.

Related donors may provide a better long-term outcome.  In a recent review, FMT using a related donor yielded a 93% CDI resolution compared with 84% for unrelated donors.

Nuts and bolts:

  1. Donor is instructed to take a double dose of milk of magnesia at bedtime the night before procedure.
  2. Soft stool is passed into a clean plastic container; preference is for stool to be produced within 8 hour of FMT.  Stool does not need to be frozen or refrigerated (though can be refrigerated).
  3. Saline is added to the stool which is stirred and shaken (some use blenders, some use milk or water as suspending solutions).
  4. Typical amount of stool would be 50 g in 250 cc diluent.  For colonic administration, about 300 cc are administered in cecal region.  For duodenal administration, about 60 cc are administered.
  5. Prior to administration, it is best to filter the mixture through gauze pads to remove particulate matter that would interfere with administration.
  6. Though the author notes that there have been recommendations to prepare stool under a hood as stool is considered a level 2 biohazard, he states that this is not practical and in fact, the stool in this situation is the safest stool that gastroenterologists encounter.
  7. Recipients receive a colon lavage before the procedure regardless of route of FMT administration. If possible, all antibiotics are withheld 3 days prior.
  8. On the morning of administration, the author instructs recipient to take two lopermide tablets.

As positive experience gains in CDI, further efforts in a number of other diseases (>30 listed in Table 1 of article) with altered microbiome will be explored.  Thus far, FMT has been used in autism, fibromyalgia, metabolic syndrome, multiple sclerosis, obesity, and even parkinson’s disease.

Hippocrates stated “All disease begins in the gut.”  Given the diversity of diseases in which FMT is being examined, this sentiment may be close to the truth.

Related blog entries:

Bone health in pediatrics

Posted on by

Due to the survival of chronically ill children, exposure to skeletal toxic treatments, and wider availability of bone health measurement technology, osteoporosis in pediatrics has become a widespread problem.  A useful concise review is available (J Pediatr 2012; 161: 983-88).

One of the biggest problems is the limited pediatric evidence on which to base treatment decisions.

Specific points regarding osteoporosis and bone health:

  1. Bone accretion: most of one’s bone mass is reached by late adolescence or early adulthood
  2. Frequency of bone fractures: in the general population, 1/2 of boys and 1/3rd of girls have sustained a fracture by 16 years of age.  Thus, bone pathology should be suspected in those with unusual fractures.
  3. Pathological fractures: “meaningful” history of fracture history includes a lower extremity long bone fracture, 2 or more upper extremity long bone fractures and/or vertebral compression fracture.
  4. Testing: due to cost and precision, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) remains most widely used measurement tool. However, quantitative computed tomography (QCT) has some advantages.  It is less biased by bone size and directing generates a measurement of volumetric bone mineral density.
  5. Primary osteoporosis: osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), idiopathic juvenile osteoporosis (IJO), and osteoporosis-pseudoglioma syndrome (related to loss of function in low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 [LRP5]).
  6. Secondary osteoporosis: neuromuscular diseases, malabsorption syndromes, medication-induced (glucocorticoids, diuretics), chemotherapy, and radiation treatments.
  7. 1st line treatment: adequate nutrition –especially adequate calcium and vitamin D and exercise (especially weight-bearing exercise).  It is noted that with cystic fibrosis patients there has been a better response to vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) than D2 (ergocalciferol); as a consequence, the CF Foundation recommends all CF patients receive vitamin D3.  With regard to weight-bearing exercise, the data are conflicting regarding its efficacy.
  8. 2nd line treatment: treat underlying disorder.  For example, with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), treatment of chronic inflammation with infliximab has been shown to improve markers of bone formation.  Inflammation in IBD has been shown to play a more important role than glucocorticoid dosing in terms of predicting bone health.
  9. 3rd line treatment ??? a) “Currently, teriparatide is the only available treatment with anabolic actions on bone.” But, a black box warning has cautioned against its use in pediatric patients   b) bisphosphonates: pamidronate, aleondronate, and zoledronic acid. A review of the small pediatric studies, primarily in OI patients, have shown some improvement in fractures, skeletal pain, and mobility.  Optimal dose, frequency, and duration remain unknown.
  10. Safety of bisphosphonates: potential problems include ‘acute phase reaction,’ hypocalcemia, musculoskeletal pain, gastrointestinal side effects, and many other adverse reactions. Atypical fractures and jaw osteonecrosis have been reported in adults.

Related blog posts:

Vitamin D, IBD, and Causality

Posted on by

The importance of vitamin D has been noted in this blog previously (Common to be “D-ficient” ).  Now a study implicates vitamin D as a risk factor for developing inflammatory bowel disease, especially for Crohn’s disease (Gastroenterology 2012: 142: 482-89).  It is known that vitamin D influences innate immunity.  As such, it may play a role in the susceptibility to Crohn’s disease (CD) and Ulcerative colitis (UC).

This prospective study included 72,719 women (age 40-73) enrolled in the Nurses’ Health Study.  Research subjects completed an assessment of diet and lifestyle along with 25-hydroxy vitamin D [25(OH)D] levels.  The 25(OH)D levels were predicted; this prediction was based on a validated model which included vitamin D intake, sun exposure, race, and body mass index (J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98: 451-9).  This model was validated against directly measured 25(OH)D levels.

During nearly 1.5 million person-years of followup, 122 incident cases of CD and 123 cases of UC occurred.  The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for the highest quartile of 25(OH)D was 0.54 for CD and 0.65 for UC compared to the lowest quartile.  Compared with a level less than 20, the highest quartile HR was 0.38 for CD and 0.57 for UC.

In addition, the authors identified a significant inverse association between dietary supplemental vitamin D and UC; an insignificant reduction in CD risk was noted with dietary intake.  Although it is difficult to determine causality, these data convincingly show that ‘healthy’ levels of vitamin D are associated with a lower risk of IBD.