Category Archives: Pediatric Gastroenterology Liver Disease

PRO and CON: All Pediatric Transplant Centers Should Have Living Donor Liver Transplant Option

Posted on by

S Zielsdorf et al. Liver Transplantation 2025; 31: 832-835. PRO: All pediatric transplant centers should have LDLT as an option

Zielsdorf et make a compelling argument that all liver transplant patients should have access to LDLT. By improving access to transplantation, transplant recipients are in better health at the time of LDLT and have better outcomes. This also results in fewer deaths on the waiting list, even for patients who do not receive a LDLT.

The authors note that “whether LDLT is a superior option in and of itself or is instead a proxy for higher volume and more experienced centers, with associated better outcomes, may not be entirely feasible to tease out from the data.”

N Galvan et al. Liver Transplantation 2025; 31: 836-839. CON: LDLT should not be a requirement for pediatric transplant programs

Galvan et al counter with their good statistics from their large-volume center in Houston. In their center, 91% of the liver transplants performed over a decade were size-matched, whole organ allografts. They attribute some of their success to their central U.S. location allowing them to access more donors without compromising warm ischemia time. Other factors that make LDLT less viable at their center include lack of Medicaid reimbursement for living donor operations (51% of their patients rely on public insurance) and concern that the donor is oftentimes a primary caregiver.

They note that most programs in U.S. “are low-volume centers, that is, <5 pediatric liver transplants/year, making up 75% of the pediatric centers in the country that account for 38.5% of the pediatric cases…Experience is garnered by volume, and so the question,…is whether it is worth consolidating small-volume programs.”

My take: LDLT is an important tool to improve outcomes. The ability to access LDLT and technical variant grafts could be life-saving for a patient. Thus, from a public policy standpoint, it would make more sense to have fewer high-volume liver transplant centers that offer these options. Centers, like Houston, which have improved organ availability/acceptance and main high-volume, are the exception and not the rule with regard to outcomes.

Related blog posts:

Dr. William Balistreri: Whatever Happened to Neonatal Hepatitis (Part 2)

Posted on by

Recently Dr. Balistreri gave our group an excellent lecture. I have taken some notes and shared some slides. There may be inadvertent omissions and mistakes in my notes.

Key Points:

  • Producing enough bile acids and recycling bile acids in enterohepatic circulation is crucial for bile acid flow. In addition, there are ‘good’ bile acids like cholic acid that have trophic properties and ‘bad’ bile acids like lithocholic acid that cause liver toxicity
  • In addition to defects in the metabolic pathway of bile acids, discoveries identified defects in the membrane transporters (eg. FIC1, BSEP, MDR3), trafficking proteins (eg. MYO5B, VPS33B), nuclear control receptors (eg. FXR), and tight junction proteins (eg. TJP2). Tight junction protein defects are associated with bile leakage from bile canaliculus
  • Alagille syndrome, a disorder of embryogenesis, related to JAG1-NOTCH2 signaling pathways affects organs throughout the body
  • Many of these genetic mutations are now being identified in adults with unexplained liver diseases (eg. intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and cryptogenic cirrhosis)
  • Cholestasis panels and whole exome sequencing are important tools
  • Ileal bile acid transporter (IBAT) inhibitors have emerged as important therapies for conditions like Alagille which were previously treated with biliary diversion

Cholestasis Evaluation:

See blog post: Identifying Biliary Atresia in Infants: New Guidelines

Baby with Carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase 1 (CPS1) deficiency (urea cycle defect)

My take: This lecture really shows how the field of pediatric liver disease has been a puzzle. Now one can see how almost all of the pieces of the puzzle work together.

Related blog posts:

Increased Mortality in Pediatric Steatotic Liver Disease Plus One

Posted on by

From UCSD 4/28/25: Children with Liver Disease Face Dramatically Higher Risk of Early Death (via Jeff Schwimmer’s X feed)

The findings, published April 22, 2025 in Hepatology, the scientific journal of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, come from the Longitudinal InVestigation Evaluating Results of Steatosis (LIVERS) study, which followed 1,096 children over an average of 8.5 years. Nearly half of all deaths in the cohort were liver-related, and the overall mortality rate was 40 times higher than that of similar peers in the general U.S. population...

The retrospective cohort study used medical records and National Death Index data to follow children ages 2 to 18 who were diagnosed with MASLD between 2000 and 2017. Over an average of 8.5 years of follow-up, 3.4% of children had died…

In addition to the risk of early death, many children in the study developed serious health problems while still in their teens or twenties. These included high blood pressure (14%), obstructive sleep apnea (9.5%) and type 2 diabetes (7.3%). Problems with blood fats, such as high triglycerides or low HDL, were even more common — making dyslipidemia, the presence of abnormal levels of fats (lipids) in the blood, the most frequent complication overall.

Link to study: JB Scwimmer et al Hepatology ():10.1097/HEP.0000000000001357. Long-term mortality and extrahepatic outcomes in 1,096 children with MASLD: A retrospective cohort study

My take: Since this was a retrospective single center study, the severity of the findings may be different with a more-representative national cohort. Nevertheless, this study shows that MASLD has serious consequences including premature death and numerous comorbidities.

Related article: J Panganiban et al. Obesity Pillars 2025: 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obpill.2025.100164. Open Access! Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in children with obesity: An Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) and expert joint perspective 2025. This Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) Expert Joint Perspective is a comprehensive review (~28 pages) of steatotic liver disease (SLD), metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) in children with obesity.

Related blog posts:

Triple Therapy for Cystic Fibrosis May Improve Liver Damage

Posted on by

S Diemer et al. JPGN 2025; DOI: 10.1002/jpn3.70050. Open Access! The effect of elexacaftor–tezacaftor–ivacaftor on liver stiffness in children with cystic fibrosis

In this retrospective study, 12 of 21 patients had cystic fibrosis hepato-biliary involvement (CFHBI). The authors examined the liver stiffness after administration of the new and highly potent CF transmembrane conductance regulator modulator therapy, elexacaftor–tezacaftor–ivacaftor (ETI). All of the patients in this cohort had normal liver enzymes.

Key findings:

  • Analyzing liver stiffness in CwCF with CFHBI showed a decline to 5.7 kPa median (IQR: 3.9–7.1) during ETI treatment, and this decline was statistically significant (W = −60, n = 12, p = 0.0161) (Figure 3B) (after at least 3 months of ETI treatment)
Liver stiffness over time in patients with CFHBI

Discussion Points:

“Our findings of a clear improvement of liver stiffness in CwCF and CFHBI during ETI treatment is in line with the recently published study by Terlizzi et al.28  Calvo et al. prospectively investigated liver stiffness and liver enzyme development in a single-centre cohort with a starting point before ETI and a follow-up at 1, 3 and 6 months on ETI…A significant overall reduction in mean liver stiffness was found at 6 months, and already after 1 month of ETI, a decline in liver stiffness was observed in those with values ≥5 kPa.29“

My take: Liver stiffness is a biomarker for chronic liver damage. Longer term studies will be needed to determine how important triple therapy is for liver health in persons with cystic fibrosis. Thus far, there has not been improvement in the number of patients with CF needing a liver transplant; however, there has been a marked improvement in the need for lung transplantation.

Related blog posts:

Advancements in Pediatric Cholestatic Liver Disease Management

Posted on by

KR Mysore et al. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2025;80:549–558. Recent advances in the management of pediatric cholestatic liver diseases

This is a useful review summarizing advances in the management of cholestatic diseases.

Treatment with IBAT inhibitors:

“Improvement in both pruritus and serum BAs/bilirubin levels has been associated with improved event‐free survival and 6‐year transplant‐free survival in ALGS patients treated with maralixibat. Additionally, this class of medication improved overall growth of the patient by improving mean height and weight Z scores that may be related to reduced impact of high serum bile acid levels on the growth axis although further studies are needed to better define the mechanism responsible for this out-come. This finding suggests these parameters could be used as surrogate end‐points for disease severity in diseases like ALGS or PFIC, where the time course to develop the need for LT commonly occurs over many years.”

Related blog posts:

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Essential Learning Objectives in Pediatric Gastroenterology (and All Subspecialties) for Pediatricians and in Pediatric Residency Training

Posted on by

T Aye et al. J Pediatr 2025; 277, 114380. (Open Access!) Subspecialty Perspectives on the Education Needs for Pediatrics Residency Training

Background: The Council of Pediatric Subspecialties (CoPS) created a list of 3 to 5 learning objectives that each subspecialty believes are the most important practical skills for the general pediatrician and recommends be included in general pediatrics, medicine-pediatrics, and other combined residency program curricula… The Subspecialty Perspectives on (pediatrics) Training (SPoT) action team within CoPS asked each subspecialty representative, most of whom were fellowship program directors at the time, in collaboration with their subspecialty colleagues, to provide a list of 3 to 5 practical learning objectives that should be expected of graduating pediatric residents and practicing general pediatricians in the evaluation and management of conditions related to their subspecialty.

Recommendations for Pediatric Gastroenterology:

My take: This article identifies four of the most important areas in pediatric gastroenterology. If I were to add a fifth, given the wide variety of problems in our field, it would be to know how to quickly reach out to a pediatric gastroenterologist when you need advice.

This article is worth a quick look to see if you have the essential knowledge in all pediatric subspecialty fields (Table 1). One of the most important that relates to pediatric gastroenterology is in the allergy section: “Identify the importance of avoiding indiscriminate testing for food allergy without an appropriate clinical history concerning for IgE mediated food allergy.”

Key Insights on MASLD from Dr. Marialena Mouzaki

Posted on by

Dr. Marialena Mouzaki recently gave an excellent ground rounds at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta. My notes below may contain errors in transcription and in omission. Along with my notes, I have included many of her slides (with permission).

Key points:

  • Epidemiology: Metabolic associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is very common and increasing in prevalence
  • There is new terminology and new diagnostic thresholds
  • Treatment cornerstone relies on lifestyle changes including diet modifications and exercise. Small weight reductions (10 lbs in adults)/improvement in BMI (z reduction of >0.25) can be beneficial
  • Diet: No specific diet has proven more effective than others (eg. low carb, Mediterranean). Avoiding simple sugars is helpful
  • Exercise: US children do not get enough physical activity (goal 1 hour daily). Exercise has not been studied well for pediatric MASLD but it has been proven to reduce cardiovascular disease and premature death
  • Medications: Medications are not part of routine care for pediatric MASLD in 2025 When they are available, use without lifestyle changes could be detrimental (eg. sarcopenia, worse cardiometabolic profile, nutritional deficiencies)
  • Multiple GLP-1 RA-containing agents appear promising (Semaglutide, tirzepatide, survodutide). Resmetirom is FDA approved for the treatment of MASLD with stage 2-3 fibrosis in adults.
  • Treat comorbidities like diabetes, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), dyslipidemia and hypertension. Treatment of OSA may help MASLD
  • The leading cause of mortality in adults with MASLD is due to cardiovascular disease

Related blog posts:

AASLD Guidelines: Challenges of Liver Fibrosis Testing in Pediatrics

Posted on by

This guideline reviews and recommends blood-based tests as a tool to help determine the likelihood/severity of liver fibrosis in the presence of chronic liver disease. Most of the guideline focuses on adult liver disease. For pediatrics, the guideline makes the following recommendation:

In the pediatric patients with chronic liver disease, AASLD suggests the use of simple, cost-effective, and readily available blood-based NILDA [Non-invasive Liver Disease Assessment], such as APRI or FIB-4, for the detection of advanced fibrosis (F3-4) (ungraded statement).

Technical Remarks:

  • Some blood-based NILDA in children have good accuracy in detecting advanced fibrosis but have difficulty discriminating earlier stages of fibrosis.
  • FIB-4 does not perform as well in children as it does in adults, particularly very young children, due to the inclusion of age in the index.
  • Rapid growth in children and attendant fluctuations in alkaline phosphatase can confound interpretation of blood or collagen-based NILDA tests in pediatric liver disease.
  • There are insufficient biopsy validated data to recommend biomarkers for evaluating fibrosis in pediatric NASH and α1AT at this time.
  • In the pediatric population with CLD, there is growing but insufficient evidence to recommend blood-based NILDA as endpoints to monitor changes in fibrosis over time.

Despite the guidance recommendation, reading the text makes one leery about relying on these tests:

  • For example with biliary atresia: “The utility of APRI to assess or predict liver fibrosis in BA is mixed in the current literature.”
  • “In conclusion, blood-based NILDA tests in children vary widely in their accuracy, even in detecting F3-4 fibrosis, and have difficulty discriminating earlier stages of fibrosis. These tests also have different disease-specific thresholds that correlate with histopathologic fibrosis and differ from adults. APRI and FIB-4 have been the most studied NILDA tests in children, but there is still insufficient evidence to recommend blood biomarkers as endpoints to monitor changes in fibrosis over time. Any blood-based NILDA that includes age (Table 5) should be used cautiously in children.“

My take: This practice guideline, while recommending use of blood-based tests for fibrosis even in the pediatric age group, makes a fairly compelling argument that they are unreliable in children. Elastrography is likely to be more useful, though also imperfect, in the pediatric population.

Algorithm Recommended for Adults:

Related blog posts:

Impact of CFTR Modulators on the Need for Liver and Lung Transplantation in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis

Posted on by

M Mendizabal et al. Liver Transplantation 2025; 31: 412-416. Have CFTR modulators changed the need for liver and lung transplantation among patients with cystic fibrosis? An analysis of the UNOS database

This article notes that there have been 146,851 waitlistings and 95,254 liver transplants in the U.S. between 2012 and 2023. This includes 194 waitlistings and 138 transplants in patients with cystic fibrosis.

Key finding:

My take: This is great news for patients with cystic fibrosis. The drop in lung transplants is surely the tip of the iceberg. Think about your next breath! For patients with cystic fibrosis, these new medications make every single breath better. Longer followup is needed to determine if the long-term use of these agents may lower the rate of end-stage liver disease as well.

Related blog posts:

Current Practices and Wide Variation in Autoimmune Hepatitis Treatment Across Europe

Posted on by

M Cananzi et al. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2025;80:260–270. Current practice in the management of paediatric autoimmune liver disease in Europe

Methods: Thirty-six centers from 22 European countries responded to the survey that was sent to European Reference Network for Rare Liver Disorders (ERN RARE-LIVER) and members of the Hepatology Interest Group (HIG) of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN)

Key findings:

  • All centers use predniso(lo)ne as first-line therapy, alone (15/36) or with azathioprine (21/36)
  • Azathioprine and mycophenolate are the preferred second-line options in centres using first-line steroid monotherapy (11/15) or combined steroid-azathioprine (19/21)
  • Tacrolimus is used as third-line agent in 15/36 centers
  • Proactive measurement of drug metabolites and target levels vary widely among centers. About 27/36 centers have thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) genotyping available, of which 21 (58%) routinely perform this test before prescribing AZA. Among the 12 centres that reported target metabolite levels, 10 aim for levels between 200 and 300 pmol/8 × 108 red blood cells (RBC).
  • About 24/36 centers routinely incorporate PPIs into steroid treatment protocols, seven prescribe PPIs solely when there are risk factors for peptic ulcer disease, and the remainder refrain from using PPIs unless gastrointestinal symptoms occur.

My take: There is a great deal of variation in the management of autoimmune hepatitis indicating the need for more collaborative efforts to advance evidence-based therapeutic strategies.

Related blog posts:

White Temple, Chiang Rai, Thailand