Category Archives: inflammatory bowel disease

More on Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Posted on by

In a population-based inception cohort study (S Yada et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14: 65-70) of 679 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) followed for a median of more than 19.8 years, it was determined that patients with IBD were ~9 times more likely to develop hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) compared with general population. 8 of 679 patients developed HS; only one had HS prior to IBD.

Other findings:

  • Most Crohn’s disease patients with HS had perianal disease.  Most ulcerative colitis patients developed HS after colectomy.
  • Female sex and obesity were risk factors for HS.

In a second retrospective study (N Kamal et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14: 71-9), the authors identified 15 patients with CD and HS.  10 patients had perianal disease.  In this population, “both diseases were characterized by their severity, requirement of systemic medical therapies including anti-TNF and high operative rate.” this article contained some very helpful pictures.

Unrelated article: F Wang, JL Kaplan, BD Gold et al. Cell Reports; 2016: 14: 945-55.  This highly technical study used two independent cohorts of patients with Crohn’s disease and non-IBD controls.  One cohort, RISK, had over 700 patients and ~30,000 mean number of reads per sample; the other cohort, PIBD-CC, and 87 patients and ~3000 mean number of reads per sample.  Overall, the study showed associations between Crohn’s disease and bacteria in the lumen and the study helps provide an information-based method to depict dysbiosis.

Related blog post: Add it to the list

San Juan

San Juan

High Risk of Relapse in Younger Patients after anti-TNF Therapy Withdrawal

Posted on by

From KT Park’s Twitter Feed:

Article first published online: 19 FEB 2016

NA Kennedy et al.  Aliment Pharm Ther; 2016. DOI: 10.1111/apt.13547

Abstract:

Background

Infliximab and adalimumab have established roles in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapy. UK regulators mandate reassessment after 12 months’ anti-TNF therapy for IBD, with consideration of treatment withdrawal. There is a need for more data to establish the relapse rates following treatment cessation.

Aim

To establish outcomes following anti-TNF withdrawal for sustained remission using new data from a large UK cohort, and assimilation of all available literature for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

A retrospective observational study was performed on 166 patients with IBD (146 with Crohn’s disease (CD) and 20 with ulcerative colitis [UC) and IBD unclassified (IBDU)] withdrawn from anti-TNF for sustained remission. Meta-analysis was undertaken of all published studies incorporating 11 further cohorts totalling 746 patients (624 CD, 122 UC).

Results

Relapse rates in the UK cohort were 36% by 1 year and 56% by 2 years for CD, and 42% by 1 year and 47% by 2 years for UC/IBDU. Increased relapse risk in CD was associated with age at diagnosis [hazard ratio (HR) 2.78 for age <22 years], white cell count (HR 3.22 for >5.25 × 109/L) and faecal calprotectin (HR 2.95 for >50 μg/g) at drug withdrawal. Neither continued immunomodulators nor endoscopic remission were predictors. In the meta-analysis, estimated 1-year relapse rates were 39% and 35% for CD and UC/IBDU respectively. Retreatment with anti-TNF was successful in 88% for CD and 76% UC/IBDU.

Conclusions

Assimilation of all available data reveals remarkable homogeneity. Approximately one-third of patients with IBD flare within 12 months of withdrawal of anti-TNF therapy for sustained remission.

Related blog posts:

El Junque, Puerto Rico

El Junque, Puerto Rico

Guts and Valentines?

Posted on by

I learned this week that the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation of America (CCFA) was founded in part  based on a love story:

From CCFA: Irwin M. Rosenthal, one of the visionary co–founders of CCFA, and Suzanne were due to be married in a few months time when suddenly Suzanne became very ill. Motivated by her struggle with Crohn’s disease, Irwin, along with William and Shelby Modell, and Dr. Henry D. Janowitz, established the Foundation for Research in Ileitis, now known as the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation of America.

To send an CCFA eValentine: CCFA Valentine E-card

Screen Shot 2016-02-12 at 4.19.04 PM

Value of Calprotectin

Posted on by

A large study (WJ Sandborn et al Gastroenterol 2016; 150: 96-102) focuses on the question of how well calprotectin values correlate with clinical outcomes.  As part of a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of 194 patients who received various doses of tofacitinib or placebo, the authors obtained data on fecal calprotectin (FCP).  Here were the key findings:

  • Week 8 FCP levels were significantly lower in those with a clinical response: 156 vs 725 mg/kg, in clinical remission: 64 vs 617 mg/kg, in endoscopic remission: 44 vs 489 mg/kg and in mucosal healing: 127 vs. 753 mg/kg.
  • On an individual level, FCP showed only moderate agreement for these measures.

For clinical remission, FCP concentration:

  • At 50 mg/kg, the specificity was 0.91, sensitivity was 0.43
  • At 150 mg/kg, the specificity was 0.79, sensitivity was 0.68

For endoscopic remission, FCP concentration:

  • At 50 mg/kg, the specificity was 0.88, sensitivity was 0.52
  • At 150 mg/kg, the specificity was 0.75, sensitivity was 0.79

For mucosal healing, FCP concentration:

  • At 50 mg/kg, the specificity was 0.92, sensitivity was 0.29
  • At 150 mg/kg, the specificity was 0.85, sensitivity was 0.54

The authors speculate that the only fair to good accuracy of FCP in classifying clinical and endoscopic outcomes of individual patients could be related to day-to-day variability in FCP levels and due to residual microscopic inflammation.

My take: While a single normal calprotectin value is not entirely reassuring, I would not be surprised if these values outperform the PGA (physician global assessment).  It is likely that serial calprotectin values will be helpful in tracking clinical progress.

In brief:

Agardh et al. JPGN 2016; 62: 43-46.  Authors show that fecal calprotectin levels were markedly elevated (median 844 mg/kg) in 11 of 12 patients with juvenile polyps and that these levels normalized after polypectomy.  These levels were similar to their cohort (n=129) of children with active IBD (median values of 962 mg/kg).

Heida et al. JPGN 2016; 62: 47-49.  The investigators retrospectively examined 80 children who had endoscopy due to suspected inflammatory bowel disease.  In all 10 of the children with calprotectin levels less than 50 (mcg/g), IBD was excluded.

Related blog posts:

Old Town, San Juan

Old Town, San Juan

Characteristics of Skin Lesions Associated with Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy

Posted on by

As noted in previous blog posts (see below), anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy has been associated with skin problems.  The following study/abstract elaborate on this issue further and indicate that while ~30% of patients with IBD may develop skin reactions, only 28 of 917 (3%) patients required anti-TNF therapy to be discontinued due to skin reactions.

I Cleynen et al. Ann Intern Med. Published online 8 December 2015 doi:10.7326/M15-0729  Characteristics of Skin Lesions Associated With Anti–Tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Cohort Study ONLINE FIRST

 Background: A subgroup of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with anti–tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antibodies develop skin lesions, but the lesions and their clinical course are not well-characterized.

Objective: To describe patients treated with anti-TNF antibodies who did and did not develop skin lesions.

Design: Retrospective cohort.

Setting: Single IBD tertiary referral center.

Patients: 917 consecutive patients with IBD who initiated anti-TNF therapy.

Measurements: Skin lesions, patient demographic characteristics, treatments, clinical course, and serologic and genetic markers.

Results: During a median follow-up of 3.5 years (interquartile range [IQR], 0.5 to 7.4 years), skin lesions associated with the use of anti-TNF therapy developed in 264 of 917 (29%) patients (psoriasiform eczema, 30.6%; eczema, 23.5%; xerosis cutis, 10.6%; palmoplantar pustulosis, 5.3%; psoriasis, 3.8%; other, 26.1%). Lesions typically developed at flexural regions, genitalia, and the scalp, especially the psoriasiform lesions. Thirty-one percent of women and 26% of men developed lesions. Median cumulative doses (2864 mg/y [IQR, 2203 to 3819 mg/y] and 2927 mg/y [IQR, 2377 to 3667 mg/y]) and trough levels (4.2 µg/mL [IQR, 2.6 to 5.8 µg/mL] and 4.0 µg/mL [IQR, 1.6 to 5.9 µg/mL]) of infliximab were similar in patients with and without lesions. All but 28 patients (11%) were successfully managed without needing to stop therapy because of lesions.

Limitation: Retrospective nature and no matched control group of patients not receiving anti-TNF therapy.

Conclusion: Skin lesions occur frequently in association with anti-TNF therapy but rarely require discontinuation of therapy. Close surveillance and early referral to a dedicated dermatologist are recommended.

Related blog posts:

“Good Job Making the Diagnosis”

Posted on by

Briefly noted: JA Leon et al. Gastroenterol 2015; 149: 1697-99.  Case report of Job syndrome (Autosomal-Dominant Hyper-IgE syndrome) mimicking Crohn’s disease in a 37 yo with perianal fistula, and weight loss. Clues to the diagnosis: “Recurrent skin abscesses and respiratory infections, eczema, marked elevation of serum IgE, eosinophilia, and mucocutaneous candidiasis are the hallmark of the infectious and immunologic features…Boils and furuncles almost always occur and characteristically lack of the usual inflammatory findings…”cold” abscesses…associated with markedly increase IgE or eosinophil levels, should always raise a suspicion for AD-HIES.”

Related blog post: Add it to the list | gutsandgrowth

Optimism for New Treatment in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: AJM300

Posted on by

Yesterday’s post on “Eternal Nutrition” had a link to podcasts on enteral nutrition as therapy for Crohn’s disease.  I listened to the podcasts and they were helpful (Enteral Therapy as Primary Therapy for Crohn’s Disease Podcast).  A few points that were made included the following:

  1. Try to have the right person teach/place the nasogastric feeding tube.  If the first experience is bad, this may make further attempts quite difficult.  At CHOP, their facility has an education center and they schedule 3-hour learning session for enteral feeds.  Teaching the teen to place the NG tube is preferred.
  2. Many pediatric gastroenterologists in U.S. are not informing their patients that enteral feedings are a treatment option.
  3. In most parts of the world, induction with enteral nutrition involves virtually 100% of diet as enteral nutrition for ~8-12 weeks.  CHOP modification involves 80-90% of calories delivered enterally, typically over an overnight drip.  If someone is not responding to enteral feeds, CHOP may increase calories delivered enterally.
  4. For maintenance with CHOP modification, gradually reduction from 7 days per week to 5 days per week is attempted.  At CHOP, they prefer hydrolysate for enteral tube feedings and think more rapid gastric emptying could be helpful.  However, the podcast state that specific formulas have not been shown to be superior in trials to date.  At CHOP, if formula is taken orally, then an intact protein formula is selected.
  5. If someone uses enteral formula for maintenance, then consideration of a gastrostomy tube (after 3 months) is reasonable.  They have not had local issues at sites due to Crohn’s disease.
  6. Resources include the Oley.org website and the Crohn’s Survival Guide.
  7. Enteral therapy seems to work in small bowel as well as colonic disease, despite early reports suggesting less efficacy with colonic disease.

———————

A recent phase II study (N Yoshimura et al. Gastroenterol 2015; 149: 1775-83) indicates that an oral antagonist of α4 integrin may be quite useful for ulcerative colitis.

This double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with 102 patients found the following:

  • A clinical response rate at 8 weeks of 62.7% in the treatment group and 25.5% for placebo)
  • Rates of remission were 23.5% in the treatment group  compared with 3.9% in the placebo group.
  • Mucosal healing were 58.8%% in the treatment group  compared with 29.4% in the placebo group.
  • No serious adverse events were noted.

In the commentary by  BG Levesque and S Ghosh (pg 1669-72), it is noted that subsequent oral integrins will be compared to vedolizumab and similar safety concerns exist; that is making sure that there are no cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) which has been associated with natalizumab therapy.  For vedolizumab, the RAMP safety monitoring program has NOT identified PML in 2884 IBD patients.

The commentary (in blue) discusses several integrins as potential therapeutic targets and outlines future therapies.

Nontargeted therapies:

  • A) Induction: corticosteroids, 5- aminosalicylates, cyclosporin, and tacrolimus
  • B) Maintenance: thiopurines, methotrexate, 5-aminosalicylates, and tacrolimus.

Targeted therapies (those in development phase in italics)

  • A) Monoclonal antibodies (induction and maintenance): tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, vedolizumab, other integrin/adhesion molecule inhibitors, interleukin-12/23 inhibitors, and interleukin-6 inhibitors.
  • B) Oral synthetic (induction and maintenance or stop and start): Jakinibs, integrin blockers, sphingosine-1-phosphate (s1P) regulators, and SMAD7 antisense oligonucleotide.

“The results of AJM300 demonstrate feasibility of such an approach, and we anticipate a proliferation of such approaches given the robust evidence supporting integrins as a target, especially if the drug can be targeted or delivered in a gut-specific manner.”

My take: There are a number of therapies being developed that are likely to transform the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease; future treatments will be more precise, more effective and have many more options.

Related blog posts:

Banning Mills

Banning Mills

 

Using Ustekinumab for Crohn’s Disease

Posted on by

From GI & Hepatology News: New targeted Crohn’s therapy performs well in phase III trial.

This study of Ustekinumab (aka Stelara) was different than previous studies (see previous gutsandgrowth blog from 2012: Ustekinumab for Crohn’s disease) in that this study targeted patients who were NOT ant-TNF failures; however, about 80% of patients had failed corticosteroids.

An excerpt:

Ustekinumab, a monoclonal antibody targeted against interleukins 12 and 23 (IL-12 and IL-23)…

 The trial, called UNITI-2, enrolled patients with moderate to severe Crohn’s disease who had failed traditional therapies but were naive to or at least had not failed a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor…

In UNITI-2, 628 patients were randomized to placebo, 130 mg of ustekinumab in a fixed subcutaneous dose of 130 mg, or a weight-based dose of 6 mg/kg of subcutaneous ustekinumab…The primary endpoint was a CDAI reduction of at least 100 points at 6 weeks. Clinical remission at 8 weeks, defined as CDAI less than 150, was a secondary endpoint.

The primary endpoint was reached by 28.7% randomized to placebo, 51.7% of those randomized to the fixed dose of ustekinumab, and 55.5% of those randomized to weight-based dosing. The advantage for the active treatment arms was statistically significant (both P less than .001). For the secondary endpoint of clinical remission at 8 weeks, the rates were 19.6% for placebo, 30.6% (P = .009 vs. placebo) for fixed-dose ustekinumab, and 40.2% (P less than .001 vs. placebo) for the weight-based dose…

Ustekinumab was well tolerated with similar rates and types of adverse events reported in the active treatment and placebo groups.

My take: This study indicates that ustekinumab is likely to be another treatment option for patients with Crohn’s disease.

IBD ‘Pearls’

Posted on by

A clinical pearl is “a short, straightforward piece of clinical advice.” Here are a few:

2015 DDW abstract –#536 DR Hoekman et al “Non-trough IFX concentrations reliably predict trough levels and accelerate dose-adjustment in Crohn’s disease.”  This abstract examined data from 20 CD patients.  The authors noted that infliximab concentrations of 15 mcg/mL or higher at week 4 and 7.5 mcg/mL or higher at week 6 appeared to predict trough concentrations of 3 mcg/mL or higher at week 8.

U Kopylov et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2015; 21: 1847-53.  This nested case control study identified 19,582 eligible patients.  Key findings:

  • Treatment with thiopurines for more than 5 years did not increase the risk of lymphoma, melanoma or colorectal cancer.
  • There was an association between thiopurine use and nonmelanoma skin cancer (OR 1.78).
  • No association was found between the risk of the evaluated malignancies and anti-TNFα medications

K Huth et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2015; 21: 1761-68. This prospective cohort study completed over 2 successive influenza seasons showed that offering education and access to vaccination improved rates of vaccination from 47% (2011-12) to 75% (2013-14).  The education module is available: www.cheo.on.ca/en/IBDflu

KH Katsanos et al. “Review article: non-malignant oral manifestations in inflammatory bowel disease” Aliment Pharmacol There 2015; 42: 40-60. (Thanks to Ben Gold for this reference). This review article provides extensive information about oral lesions in IBD, differential diagnosis, numerous pictures, and management recommendations.  Some oral lesions are directly related to IBD, others can be induced by vitamin deficiencies or by medications.

One of my pet peeves -I avoid using straws

One of my pet peeves -I avoid using straws.  I heard this statistic several years ago and also see too many littered straws.

Disclaimer: These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications/diets (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician/nutritionist.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Fecal Diversion for Perianal Crohn’s Disease

Posted on by

A recent study (S Singh et al. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics; 2015: 42: 783-92; article first published online: 11 AUG 2015. DOI: 10.1111/apt.13356) gives more specific data regarded the outcomes of fecal diversion for perianal Crohn’s disease.  While diversion can be helpful, the meta-analysis indicates that only one-sixth of patients were able to achieve successful bowel continuity/reconnection.  The authors did not note a significant improvement in successful bowel continuity restoration in the era of biologics compared with prebiologic era (17.6% vs13.7%).

An excerpt of a summary of this study from Gastroenterology & Hepatology (September 2015)

Screen Shot 2015-09-21 at 6.34.13 PM

Related blog posts:

Stranger than fiction?

Stranger than fiction?