Category Archives: inflammatory bowel disease

CCFA Conference Notes 2016 (part 3) -Malignancy and IBD

Posted on by

This blog entry has abbreviated/summarized this terrific presentation; most of the material has been covered in this blog in prior entries but still this was a useful review. Though not intentional, some important material is likely to have been omitted; in addition, transcription errors are possible as well.

3rd Lecture: Prevention and management of malignancy in IBD –Dr. Thomas Ullman

Malignancy risk (colorectal cancer [CRC]) is present with prolonged ulcerative colitis, though more recent studies have shown lower risk than in the past –not much higher than the general population.

Screen Shot 2016-04-17 at 12.02.04 PM

  • CRC surveillance–colonoscopy monitoring after 8-10 years. Typically colonoscopy every other year for most patients, every year in higher risk patients (eg. PSC).

Screen Shot 2016-04-17 at 12.01.37 PM

  • Unclear if chemoprevention is effective (5-ASA, thiopurines, others).
  • Chromoendoscopy “has not been consensus on its use in our field (yet).” It is time consuming and expensive and unclear if it will improve outcome.

Does medical therapy for IBD predispose to developing cancer?

  • Thiopurines increase the risk of malignancy. (Pasternak et al) though the risk returns to near baseline when stopped according to study below.

Screen Shot 2016-04-17 at 12.03.27 PM

  • No overall increased risk with anti-TNF agents with RCTs (may not follow patients long enough) but also not seen in Danish registry either (JAMA study)
With Anti-TNFs

No increased risk of malignancy in this study with Anti-TNFs

  • Lymphoma risks: age, immunodeficiency, EBV
  • EBV negative are at risk for HLH with thiopurines
  • HTSCL ~200, >90% men and >90% <35 years. NOT EBV-related. Has not been identified in anti-TNF monotherapy.

Screen Shot 2016-04-17 at 12.02.55 PM

  • Skin cancer –main concern is in non-melanoma skin cancer (possibly melanoma too). Skin cancer increase has not been noted with methotrexate. Prevention: Skin care, and annual dermatology visits.
  • Cervical cancer—likely increased risk in IBD, probably due to thiopurine exposure and reduced immune surveillance. Prevention: HPV vaccination, Pap testing.
  • Urinary Tract cancers –especially in those >65 years with thiopurine exposure

 

CCFA Conference Notes (Part 1): Preemptive Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Not That Helpful

Posted on by

This blog entry has abbreviated/summarized this terrific presentation; most of the material has been covered in this blog in prior entries but still this was a useful review. Though not intentional, some important material is likely to have been omitted; in addition, transcription errors are possible as well.

Optimizing Therapeutic Drug Monitoring –Dr. Hans Herfarth

  • Trough levels have been recognized to correlate with remission rates. Good data from SONIC (2010) for infliximab. Ultra2 trial (2013) showed similar data for adalimumab.

Screen Shot 2016-04-17 at 11.19.23 AM

  • Low albumin predicts higher rates of failure, possibly due to loss of infliximab in stool.

Screen Shot 2016-04-17 at 11.20.14 AM

 

  • Reviewed algorithm for loss of response to infliximab based on trough levels. If low infliximab and no antibodies, increase dosing of infliximab has high likelihood of clinical response.
  • If high infliximab and not responding, evaluate for other reasons including irritable bowel, and strictures.

Scenarios that create confusion with therapeutic drug monitoring:

  • If clinically-well patient has antibodies and adequate drug level, could observe or possibly add immunosuppressive agent. ~3% of patients have simultaneous ATI and IFX detection.
  • If clinically-well with low infliximab level, could increase dose or observe.

Screen Shot 2016-04-17 at 11.23.19 AM

Screen Shot 2016-04-17 at 11.24.10 AM

  • In TAXIT study, however, lowering dose (panel B above) to get in target range was associated with a lower rate of response. No clear difference between clinically-based changes compared with proactive monitoring. Proactive adaption of trough levels may help prevent relapse in ~10% but not shown to alter long-term outcomes

Screen Shot 2016-04-17 at 11.25.43 AM

  • TAILORIX study looked at tailoring dose at week 14. ‘Week 14 adaption did not make a significant difference at 1 year.’  Limitation: 122 patients.

Screen Shot 2016-04-17 at 11.26.29 AM

Hard to see Group C (clinically-based group) in this slide

Hard to see Group C (clinically-based group) in this slide

Drug monitoring has become popular but its importance as a preemptive measure is unclear.  Dr. Herfarth’s practice is to monitor when loss of response but not to monitor if doing well. His view: if someone is doing well, therapeutic drug monitoring can be confusing. It is not proven that optimizing drug levels will improve long-term outcomes. (In children, especially due to growth, drug monitoring may be more important.)

Screen Shot 2016-04-17 at 11.30.13 AM

Screen Shot 2016-04-17 at 11.39.09 AM

One other recommendation from Dr. Herfarth: he recommends combination therapy in his patients are started on a 2nd anti-TNFs.

Anti-TNF therapy and Pregnancy -More Data

Posted on by

G Broms et al (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14: 234-41) provide more data on the ‘low risk of birth defects for infants whose mothers are treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor agents during pregnancy.”

From a Danish/Swedish cohort of 1,272,424 live births (2004-2012), the authors found the following (in comparison to healthy infants):

  • Birth defects were increased in chronic inflammatory bowel disease: 4.8% vs. 4.2%
  • 43 (6.3%) of the infants born to women with IBD who received anti-TNF therapy (683) had birth defects.  The OR for any defect was 1.32 (CI 0.93-1.82).  The types of defects were generally similar, including VSD, ASD, hypospadias, and hydronephrosis

Limitations:

  • In infants of mothers with chronic diseases, it is possible that more careful screening identified some less apparent defects.
  • Study did not examine rates of stillborn or abortions

My take: Overall there is a slightly but not significantly increased risk in birth defects based on the use of anti-TNF therapy.  Stopping anti-TNF therapy is likely to be more detrimental.

Briefly noted: P Wils et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14: 242-50.  This retrospective study of 122 patients showed that 65% had a clinical benefit within 3 months of receiving ustekinumab for Crohn’s disease refractory to anti-TNF therapy.  Concomitant immunosuppressant therapy was associated with an increased likelihood of benefit (OR 5.43)

Related blog posts:

More on Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Posted on by

In a population-based inception cohort study (S Yada et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14: 65-70) of 679 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) followed for a median of more than 19.8 years, it was determined that patients with IBD were ~9 times more likely to develop hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) compared with general population. 8 of 679 patients developed HS; only one had HS prior to IBD.

Other findings:

  • Most Crohn’s disease patients with HS had perianal disease.  Most ulcerative colitis patients developed HS after colectomy.
  • Female sex and obesity were risk factors for HS.

In a second retrospective study (N Kamal et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14: 71-9), the authors identified 15 patients with CD and HS.  10 patients had perianal disease.  In this population, “both diseases were characterized by their severity, requirement of systemic medical therapies including anti-TNF and high operative rate.” this article contained some very helpful pictures.

Unrelated article: F Wang, JL Kaplan, BD Gold et al. Cell Reports; 2016: 14: 945-55.  This highly technical study used two independent cohorts of patients with Crohn’s disease and non-IBD controls.  One cohort, RISK, had over 700 patients and ~30,000 mean number of reads per sample; the other cohort, PIBD-CC, and 87 patients and ~3000 mean number of reads per sample.  Overall, the study showed associations between Crohn’s disease and bacteria in the lumen and the study helps provide an information-based method to depict dysbiosis.

Related blog post: Add it to the list

San Juan

San Juan

High Risk of Relapse in Younger Patients after anti-TNF Therapy Withdrawal

Posted on by

From KT Park’s Twitter Feed:

Article first published online: 19 FEB 2016

NA Kennedy et al.  Aliment Pharm Ther; 2016. DOI: 10.1111/apt.13547

Abstract:

Background

Infliximab and adalimumab have established roles in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapy. UK regulators mandate reassessment after 12 months’ anti-TNF therapy for IBD, with consideration of treatment withdrawal. There is a need for more data to establish the relapse rates following treatment cessation.

Aim

To establish outcomes following anti-TNF withdrawal for sustained remission using new data from a large UK cohort, and assimilation of all available literature for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

A retrospective observational study was performed on 166 patients with IBD (146 with Crohn’s disease (CD) and 20 with ulcerative colitis [UC) and IBD unclassified (IBDU)] withdrawn from anti-TNF for sustained remission. Meta-analysis was undertaken of all published studies incorporating 11 further cohorts totalling 746 patients (624 CD, 122 UC).

Results

Relapse rates in the UK cohort were 36% by 1 year and 56% by 2 years for CD, and 42% by 1 year and 47% by 2 years for UC/IBDU. Increased relapse risk in CD was associated with age at diagnosis [hazard ratio (HR) 2.78 for age <22 years], white cell count (HR 3.22 for >5.25 × 109/L) and faecal calprotectin (HR 2.95 for >50 μg/g) at drug withdrawal. Neither continued immunomodulators nor endoscopic remission were predictors. In the meta-analysis, estimated 1-year relapse rates were 39% and 35% for CD and UC/IBDU respectively. Retreatment with anti-TNF was successful in 88% for CD and 76% UC/IBDU.

Conclusions

Assimilation of all available data reveals remarkable homogeneity. Approximately one-third of patients with IBD flare within 12 months of withdrawal of anti-TNF therapy for sustained remission.

Related blog posts:

El Junque, Puerto Rico

El Junque, Puerto Rico

Guts and Valentines?

Posted on by

I learned this week that the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation of America (CCFA) was founded in part  based on a love story:

From CCFA: Irwin M. Rosenthal, one of the visionary co–founders of CCFA, and Suzanne were due to be married in a few months time when suddenly Suzanne became very ill. Motivated by her struggle with Crohn’s disease, Irwin, along with William and Shelby Modell, and Dr. Henry D. Janowitz, established the Foundation for Research in Ileitis, now known as the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation of America.

To send an CCFA eValentine: CCFA Valentine E-card

Screen Shot 2016-02-12 at 4.19.04 PM

Value of Calprotectin

Posted on by

A large study (WJ Sandborn et al Gastroenterol 2016; 150: 96-102) focuses on the question of how well calprotectin values correlate with clinical outcomes.  As part of a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of 194 patients who received various doses of tofacitinib or placebo, the authors obtained data on fecal calprotectin (FCP).  Here were the key findings:

  • Week 8 FCP levels were significantly lower in those with a clinical response: 156 vs 725 mg/kg, in clinical remission: 64 vs 617 mg/kg, in endoscopic remission: 44 vs 489 mg/kg and in mucosal healing: 127 vs. 753 mg/kg.
  • On an individual level, FCP showed only moderate agreement for these measures.

For clinical remission, FCP concentration:

  • At 50 mg/kg, the specificity was 0.91, sensitivity was 0.43
  • At 150 mg/kg, the specificity was 0.79, sensitivity was 0.68

For endoscopic remission, FCP concentration:

  • At 50 mg/kg, the specificity was 0.88, sensitivity was 0.52
  • At 150 mg/kg, the specificity was 0.75, sensitivity was 0.79

For mucosal healing, FCP concentration:

  • At 50 mg/kg, the specificity was 0.92, sensitivity was 0.29
  • At 150 mg/kg, the specificity was 0.85, sensitivity was 0.54

The authors speculate that the only fair to good accuracy of FCP in classifying clinical and endoscopic outcomes of individual patients could be related to day-to-day variability in FCP levels and due to residual microscopic inflammation.

My take: While a single normal calprotectin value is not entirely reassuring, I would not be surprised if these values outperform the PGA (physician global assessment).  It is likely that serial calprotectin values will be helpful in tracking clinical progress.

In brief:

Agardh et al. JPGN 2016; 62: 43-46.  Authors show that fecal calprotectin levels were markedly elevated (median 844 mg/kg) in 11 of 12 patients with juvenile polyps and that these levels normalized after polypectomy.  These levels were similar to their cohort (n=129) of children with active IBD (median values of 962 mg/kg).

Heida et al. JPGN 2016; 62: 47-49.  The investigators retrospectively examined 80 children who had endoscopy due to suspected inflammatory bowel disease.  In all 10 of the children with calprotectin levels less than 50 (mcg/g), IBD was excluded.

Related blog posts:

Old Town, San Juan

Old Town, San Juan

Characteristics of Skin Lesions Associated with Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy

Posted on by

As noted in previous blog posts (see below), anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy has been associated with skin problems.  The following study/abstract elaborate on this issue further and indicate that while ~30% of patients with IBD may develop skin reactions, only 28 of 917 (3%) patients required anti-TNF therapy to be discontinued due to skin reactions.

I Cleynen et al. Ann Intern Med. Published online 8 December 2015 doi:10.7326/M15-0729  Characteristics of Skin Lesions Associated With Anti–Tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Cohort Study ONLINE FIRST

 Background: A subgroup of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with anti–tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antibodies develop skin lesions, but the lesions and their clinical course are not well-characterized.

Objective: To describe patients treated with anti-TNF antibodies who did and did not develop skin lesions.

Design: Retrospective cohort.

Setting: Single IBD tertiary referral center.

Patients: 917 consecutive patients with IBD who initiated anti-TNF therapy.

Measurements: Skin lesions, patient demographic characteristics, treatments, clinical course, and serologic and genetic markers.

Results: During a median follow-up of 3.5 years (interquartile range [IQR], 0.5 to 7.4 years), skin lesions associated with the use of anti-TNF therapy developed in 264 of 917 (29%) patients (psoriasiform eczema, 30.6%; eczema, 23.5%; xerosis cutis, 10.6%; palmoplantar pustulosis, 5.3%; psoriasis, 3.8%; other, 26.1%). Lesions typically developed at flexural regions, genitalia, and the scalp, especially the psoriasiform lesions. Thirty-one percent of women and 26% of men developed lesions. Median cumulative doses (2864 mg/y [IQR, 2203 to 3819 mg/y] and 2927 mg/y [IQR, 2377 to 3667 mg/y]) and trough levels (4.2 µg/mL [IQR, 2.6 to 5.8 µg/mL] and 4.0 µg/mL [IQR, 1.6 to 5.9 µg/mL]) of infliximab were similar in patients with and without lesions. All but 28 patients (11%) were successfully managed without needing to stop therapy because of lesions.

Limitation: Retrospective nature and no matched control group of patients not receiving anti-TNF therapy.

Conclusion: Skin lesions occur frequently in association with anti-TNF therapy but rarely require discontinuation of therapy. Close surveillance and early referral to a dedicated dermatologist are recommended.

Related blog posts:

“Good Job Making the Diagnosis”

Posted on by

Briefly noted: JA Leon et al. Gastroenterol 2015; 149: 1697-99.  Case report of Job syndrome (Autosomal-Dominant Hyper-IgE syndrome) mimicking Crohn’s disease in a 37 yo with perianal fistula, and weight loss. Clues to the diagnosis: “Recurrent skin abscesses and respiratory infections, eczema, marked elevation of serum IgE, eosinophilia, and mucocutaneous candidiasis are the hallmark of the infectious and immunologic features…Boils and furuncles almost always occur and characteristically lack of the usual inflammatory findings…”cold” abscesses…associated with markedly increase IgE or eosinophil levels, should always raise a suspicion for AD-HIES.”

Related blog post: Add it to the list | gutsandgrowth

Optimism for New Treatment in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: AJM300

Posted on by

Yesterday’s post on “Eternal Nutrition” had a link to podcasts on enteral nutrition as therapy for Crohn’s disease.  I listened to the podcasts and they were helpful (Enteral Therapy as Primary Therapy for Crohn’s Disease Podcast).  A few points that were made included the following:

  1. Try to have the right person teach/place the nasogastric feeding tube.  If the first experience is bad, this may make further attempts quite difficult.  At CHOP, their facility has an education center and they schedule 3-hour learning session for enteral feeds.  Teaching the teen to place the NG tube is preferred.
  2. Many pediatric gastroenterologists in U.S. are not informing their patients that enteral feedings are a treatment option.
  3. In most parts of the world, induction with enteral nutrition involves virtually 100% of diet as enteral nutrition for ~8-12 weeks.  CHOP modification involves 80-90% of calories delivered enterally, typically over an overnight drip.  If someone is not responding to enteral feeds, CHOP may increase calories delivered enterally.
  4. For maintenance with CHOP modification, gradually reduction from 7 days per week to 5 days per week is attempted.  At CHOP, they prefer hydrolysate for enteral tube feedings and think more rapid gastric emptying could be helpful.  However, the podcast state that specific formulas have not been shown to be superior in trials to date.  At CHOP, if formula is taken orally, then an intact protein formula is selected.
  5. If someone uses enteral formula for maintenance, then consideration of a gastrostomy tube (after 3 months) is reasonable.  They have not had local issues at sites due to Crohn’s disease.
  6. Resources include the Oley.org website and the Crohn’s Survival Guide.
  7. Enteral therapy seems to work in small bowel as well as colonic disease, despite early reports suggesting less efficacy with colonic disease.

———————

A recent phase II study (N Yoshimura et al. Gastroenterol 2015; 149: 1775-83) indicates that an oral antagonist of α4 integrin may be quite useful for ulcerative colitis.

This double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with 102 patients found the following:

  • A clinical response rate at 8 weeks of 62.7% in the treatment group and 25.5% for placebo)
  • Rates of remission were 23.5% in the treatment group  compared with 3.9% in the placebo group.
  • Mucosal healing were 58.8%% in the treatment group  compared with 29.4% in the placebo group.
  • No serious adverse events were noted.

In the commentary by  BG Levesque and S Ghosh (pg 1669-72), it is noted that subsequent oral integrins will be compared to vedolizumab and similar safety concerns exist; that is making sure that there are no cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) which has been associated with natalizumab therapy.  For vedolizumab, the RAMP safety monitoring program has NOT identified PML in 2884 IBD patients.

The commentary (in blue) discusses several integrins as potential therapeutic targets and outlines future therapies.

Nontargeted therapies:

  • A) Induction: corticosteroids, 5- aminosalicylates, cyclosporin, and tacrolimus
  • B) Maintenance: thiopurines, methotrexate, 5-aminosalicylates, and tacrolimus.

Targeted therapies (those in development phase in italics)

  • A) Monoclonal antibodies (induction and maintenance): tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, vedolizumab, other integrin/adhesion molecule inhibitors, interleukin-12/23 inhibitors, and interleukin-6 inhibitors.
  • B) Oral synthetic (induction and maintenance or stop and start): Jakinibs, integrin blockers, sphingosine-1-phosphate (s1P) regulators, and SMAD7 antisense oligonucleotide.

“The results of AJM300 demonstrate feasibility of such an approach, and we anticipate a proliferation of such approaches given the robust evidence supporting integrins as a target, especially if the drug can be targeted or delivered in a gut-specific manner.”

My take: There are a number of therapies being developed that are likely to transform the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease; future treatments will be more precise, more effective and have many more options.

Related blog posts:

Banning Mills

Banning Mills