Tag Archives: Eosinophilic esophagitis

Dr. Sana Syed: AI Advancements in Pediatric Gastroenterology

Posted on by

Recently, Dr. Sana Syed gave Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta Grand Rounds. She provided an excellent update on the development of artificial intelligence (AI) to select targeted therapies for pediatric gastroenterology diseases.  My notes below may contain errors in transcription and in omission. Along with my notes, I have included many of her slides.

Key points:

  • One of the goals of using AI is to identify the right therapy at the time of diagnosis. Currently, diseases like eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and Crohn’s disease have multiple treatment options. However, many patients do not respond to first-line treatments; many develop complications due to not responding to treatment.
  • Currently we are lacking adequate biomarkers for individualized therapy. AI has the potential to sort through massive amounts of data (histologic, genetic, pharmacokinetics, transcriptome, metabolomics, etc) to allow for precision therapy.
  • For EoE, machine-learning has already identified three subtypes that may affect clinical management. EoE1 is associated with a normal-appearing esophagus. EoE2 is associated with being steroid refractory. EoE3, when compared to the other two endotypes, is associated with adult-onset and narrow-caliber esophagus or stricturing.
  • For Crohn’s disease, research has shown that younger age has been associated with an increased risk of not responding to anti-TNF therapy
This is a quote from President Obama when his administration announced massive funding
toward precision medicine in January of 2015, that the promise of precision medicine is
”delivering the right treatments at the right time, every time to the right person.” This figure illustrates some of the kinds of data that Dr. Syed had access to as faculty at UVA, including
genomics, epigenome, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, etc.
Shoda and colleagues, used a combination of histology data, endoscopic features, histologic and endoscopic scoring indices, and transcripts that make up the eosinophilic esophagitis diagnostic
panel, a quantitative PCR assay with 96 EoE representative genes. The key message from all of those visualizations is that they found that EoE can be divided into three distinct endotypes after analyzing transcriptomics changes via partition-around-medoid clustering, a machine-learning method.
In this project, the researcher intend to curate a novel metabolic network specific to the ileum,
which is relevant to Crohn’s disease, link metabolic processes with Crohn’s disease phenotypes
using in silico metabolic network modeling and ‘omics and characterize and target metabolic
pathways in an organoid model generated from patient-derived Crohn’s disease tissue.
In CoMPAS, the researchers aim to leverage artificial intelligence methods (AI) methods to build predictive
models for CD using histology slides and single-cell RNA sequencing, allowing for risk
stratification of B1 patients who will respond to anti-TNF therapy
The goal of our project is to create a multi-omics reference dataset with scRNA-seq data
coupled with contextual data on tissue morphology, ancestry, social determinants of health, and
the environment. The cohort for this study is enrolling patients who have clinical indications for endoscopy like foreign body removal, reflux, abdominal pain

My take: This work is necessary to identify the right treatments for each patient and will lead to better outcomes. We are already seeing the early stages of machine-learning’s impact on clinical care. In many other fields, AI work is much further along (especially in oncology). A recent study in Nature identified JAK inhibitors as potential life-saving therapy with toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN).

Reference: Nordmann, T.M., Anderton, H., Hasegawa, A. et al. Spatial proteomics identifies JAKi as treatment for a lethal skin disease. Nature (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08061-0

Summary from Eric Topol (Ground Truths) focusing on spatial omics: Thierry Nordmann, Matthias Mann and their international consortium, used deep visual proteomics from 3μm PPFE sections of skin biopsies in patients affected by TEN…

More than 5,000 proteins were quantified from single cells—keratinocyte and immune cells—using mass spec, for the 4 different skin conditions (proteome cluster in Figure below, left panel). This led to the finding that the TEN patients had marked increased in Type 1 and 2 interferon signaling and activation of phosphorylated STAT1, which invoked the janus kinase (JAK/STAT) pathway. Subsequent steps were to test JAK inhibitors in cell culture (with live cell imaging) and in two different mouse models, all showing highly potent, dose-dependent impact on inhibition of the intense inflammatory process and disease severity…

They went on to treat seven patients at Fuian Medical University, the course of one patient shown below, treated with a JAKi on day 4 after diagnosis, and manifesting a marked response starting within 48 hours. All 7 patients fully resolved, with no side effects…

For spatial medicine, there are multiple analytical challenges that invoke the need for machine learning and A.I., including segmentation of cell types, automated capture of cells of microdissection, extracting useful information from the >5,000 proteins quantified per cell, and ultimately, as we’ll see more in the future, A.I. powering the construction of high-resolution 3D maps.

Related blog posts:

ESPGHAN Eosinophilic Esophagitis Guidelines

Posted on by

Yesterday was “National Dog Day.” Here’s our pooch:

J Amil-Dias et al. JPGN;79:394–437. Open Access! Diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis in children: An update from the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN)

This report makes 52 statements and 44 recommendations. Overall this is a helpful report but there are many statements and recommendations that have NO value for pediatric gastroenterologists (except for those trapped in a cave for the last 10 years). Here are a couple examples of that:

  • “ESPGHAN EGID WG recommends that pediatricians should be aware of the higher incidence of EoE in relatives.”
  • “ESPGHAN EGID WG recommends that a high index of suspicion for EoE must be maintained in children with concomitant atopic disease.”
  • “ESPGHAN EGID WG recommends the peak value of 15 eos/HPF as the cut‐off value in esophageal biopsy specimens, for the histological diagnosis of EoE in an appropriate clinical context”

Some helpful recommendations:

  • “ESPGHAN EGID WG recommends against using available allergy tests to predict dietary triggers of EoE.” This is not new information but helpful to have clearly stated in guidelines.”
  • “ESPGHAN EGID WG recommends maintenance therapy to all patients after achieving histological remission” Commentary: “There are no prospective data on the best duration of maintenance therapy in pediatric EoE…[In a large study of adults} sustained untreated combined remission was seen in only 1.3% of patients who discontinued treatment.”
  • “ESPGHAN EGID WG suggests endoscopic and histological re‐evaluation after 1‐3 years during the maintenance phase in cases of stable clinical remission”
  • “ESPGHAN EGID WG recommends that dupilumab can be used in selected cases of children over1 year old weighing >15 kg with EoE refractory to conventional treatment and in those with concomitant atopic burden with approved indications for biologics”
  • “ESPGHAN EGID WG suggests that a short course of systemic steroids be considered as an alternative to dilation in the presence of moderate to severe esophageal strictures with severe symptoms.” “Treatment with short term systemic steroids can significantly reduce the need for mechanical esophageal dilation in moderate to severe strictures associated with pediatric EoE”
  • Suggested drug dosing is noted in Table 3 (see below)

Related blog posts:

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

How Closely Related Are Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders To Isolated Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Posted on by

H Sato et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 22: 1531-1534. (Research Letter) Eosinophil Involvement Outside the Esophagus in Eosinophilic Esophagitis

The authors retrospectively studied a cohort of children (n=782) with eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGID) including 592 with isolated eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), 190 with EGID which included esophageal involvement (“EI”) and 35 EGD without esophageal involvement (“Non-EI”).

Key findings:

  • Abdominal pain was more frequent in EI than isolated EoE: 61% vs 45%, p=.002)
  • EI patients had more dense esophageal eosinophil infiltrate (peak) than isolated EoE: 115 vs 92; P=.036) and higher peripheral blood eosinophil level (0.44 vs 0.38; p=0.027)
  • 94-Gene expression profiles from esophageal biopsies from a 168 subgroup showed that EoE and EI were not significantly different. The heat map for upregulated and downregulated gene expression was different based on disease activity but not significantly different between EoE or EI in either state.

My take (borrowed from authors): The similar molecular transcriptome between EI and EoE are indicative of a shared pathogenesis.

Related blog posts:

Colorado River near Moab

Dupilumab (Dupixent) for Young Children with Eosinophilic Esophagitis (Published Data)

Posted on by

M Chehade et al. NEJM 2024;390:2239-2251 Dupilumab for Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Patients 1 to 11 Years of Age

This study provides published data that has been referenced previously at time of FDA approval and prior meetings (see posts: Dupixent Approved in Younger Children (15 kg+), Dupixent for Eosinophilic Esophagitis (1-11 yrs) and Clinical Diagnosis of Rumination from DDW Tweets).

Methods:

  • Part A -In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 2:2:1:1 ratio, patients 1 to 11 years of age (n=102) with active eosinophilic esophagitis who had had no response to proton-pump inhibitors to 16 weeks of a higher-exposure or lower-exposure subcutaneous dupilumab regimen or to placebo (two groups)
  • Part B- At the end of Part A, eligible patients in each dupilumab group continued the same regimen and those in the placebo groups were assigned to higher-exposure or lower-exposure dupilumab for 36 weeks  

Key findings:

  • In Part A, histologic remission occurred in 25 of the 37 patients (68%) in the higher-exposure group, in 18 of the 31 patients (58%) in the lower-exposure group, and in 1 of the 34 patients (3%) in the placebo group
  • The higher-exposure dupilumab regimen led to significant improvements in histologic, endoscopic, and transcriptomic measures as compared with placebo
  • The improvements in histologic, endoscopic, and transcriptomic measures between baseline and week 52 in all the patients were generally similar to the improvements between baseline and week 16 in the patients who received dupilumab in Part A
  • Similar adverse effects were noted across all groups. There was an increased rate (at least 10%) of COVID infections in participants receiving dupilumab whereas the incidence of vomiting was at least 10 percentage points lower among patients who received dupilumab (either group) than among those who received placebo 

My take: Dupilumab is an effective option for eosinophilic esophagitis.

Related blog posts:

Manometry for Persistent Dysphagia in Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Posted on by

D Yogev et al. JPGN Reports; 2024 https://doi.org/10.1002/jpr3.12083. Open Access! Manometric findings in children with eosinophilic esophagitis and persistent post-remission dysphagia

In this 10-year retrospective review (2013-2023), the authors reviewed children with EoE referred for high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) due to persistent dysphagia despite histologic healing (i.e., <15 Eos/hpf).

Key findings:

  • Among a cohort of ~1500 children, only 4 patients met inclusion criteria:  histologic remission (<15 eos/hpf) and absence of fibrostenotic features on endoscopic evaluation
  • Thus, the estimated prevalence of post-remission dysphagia in this cohort was exceedingly rare (<0.05%).
  • On HRIM, all four patients had a hypomotile esophagus and abnormal bolus clearance. Lower esophageal sphincter integrated relaxation pressure values were normal in three patients and elevated in one. Two patients were diagnosed with ineffective esophageal motility, one with aperistalsis and one with achalasia type 1.
Manometry findings from 12 yo diagnosed with Achalasia Type 1

Discussion:

  • “Endoscopic evaluation of fibrosis is somewhat limited as less than 50% of biopsies contain an adequate sample of the lamina propria for evaluation..[Also, these] patients did not undergo endoluminal functional lumen imaging (Endoflip) which has been recently shown to correlate with fibrotic changes of the esophagus in pediatric patients…Nonetheless, this case series highlights the fact that esophageal dysmotility can persist, even in the absence of endoscopic or histologic findings”
  • The authors “did not study all EoE patients treated in our facility who had persistent dysphagia despite histologic remission of EoE, but rather explored just those who were referred for manometry. This methodology creates a risk of referral bias.”

My take: Though there is a referral bias due to the methodology, this study suggests that persistent dysphagia is rare in children who achieve EoE histologic remission. In addition, in those with significant dysphagia despite improvement in EoE, manometry is worthwhile.

A related study suggests that achalasia may be more common in patients with Klinefelter syndrome, though still quite rare: L Miller et al. JPGN Reports 2024: https://doi.org/10.1002/jpr3.12084 Open Access! Achalasia in Klinefelter syndrome: A suspected pediatric case as well as prevalence analysis suggesting increased risk in this population

Related blog posts:

Long Duration of Eosinophilic Esophagitis Associated with a Stiff Esophagus

Posted on by

IK Araujo et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 22: 513-522. The Severity of Reduced Esophageal Distensibility Parallels Eosinophilic Esophagitis Disease Duration

This study of 171 adult patients (mean age 38 years) who had FLIP at time of an EGD determined the degree of esophageal distensibility and its association with eosinophilic esophagitis disease duration.

Key findings:

  • The median symptom duration was 8 (interquartile range, 3–15) years and diagnostic delay was 4 (interquartile range, 1–12) years
  • Symptom duration and diagnostic delay were negatively correlated with distensibility plateau (DP) (rho = –0.326 and –0.309; P values < .001)
  • Abnormal esophageal distensibility (DP ≤17 mm) was more prevalent with increased duration of symptoms (P < .004): 23% at <5 years to 64% at ≥25 years
  • Patients with ≥15 eos/hpf had significantly lower DP with greater symptom duration (P = .004), while there was not a significant difference among patients with <15 eos/hpf (P = .060).

My take: Longer duration of disease increases the risk of esophageal fibrosis and lack of distensibility. We need better tools to predict who is at most risk for developing fibrosis.

Related blog posts:

I-SEE (Index of Severity for Eosinophilic Esophagitis) Works in Kids Too

Posted on by

A Dickerson et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 22: 732-740. The Index of Severity for Eosinophilic Esophagitis (I-SEE) Reflects Longitudinal Clinicopathologic Changes in Children

This was a retrospective analysis on a prospectively enrolled cohort of children at a single center who were treated as part of routine clinical care. I-SEE was calculated at the diagnostic and follow-up endoscopies over a mean of 6.6 years.

Key findings:

  • Of 67 children who met study criteria of at least 3 endoscopies over at least 2 years of follow-up time, 43%, 36%, and 21% had mild, moderate, and severe I-SEE scores at baseline, respectively.
  • By the last instance, the overall I-SEE score dropped to 3.9 (P < .001). Body mass index <5% and poor feeding were more common in the children with severe I-SEE scores at baseline, and both improved by the last instance.

The discussion notes that I-SEE metric was developed to determine EoE severity and for tracking purposes to gauge effectiveness of therapy. They note that most patients improved but a score of 0, indicating deep remission, was difficult to achieve at the population level. They also anticipate further modifications to I-SEE “such as age or an assessment of symptoms that reflects inflammatory or fibrotic disease.”

My take: I-SEE provides a way to objectively assess and follow EoE severity at all ages.

Related blog posts:

Link: I-SEE Tool Scoring Table

AGA has an I-SEE App available: AGA I-SEE App

AGA: High Quality Upper Endoscopy

Posted on by

S Nagula et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2023.10.034. Open Access! AGA Clinical Practice Update on High-Quality Upper Endoscopy: Expert Review

The summary with nine “best practice advice” statements is not very helpful. However, Figure 2 and Table 1 are very useful.

From Figure 2 -not shown below (but in article) are Prague classification for Barrett’s and EREFS for eosinophilic esophagitis. The remaining parts of this figure include the Los Angeles classification for erosive esophagitis, the Hill classification of the gastroesophageal flap, and the Forrest classification of peptic ulcers:

From Table 1:

Table 1 also gives guidance for biopsies with peptic ulcer disease, Barrett’s esophagus, gastric preneoplasia, and for gastric polyps.

My take: When suspicious of underlying disease, this article recommends taking more biopsies and in more jars.

Related blog posts:

“Real-World” Dupilumab for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Posted on by

CJ Lee, DS Dellon. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 22: 252-258. Open Access! Real-World Efficacy of Dupilumab in Severe, Treatment-Refractory, and Fibrostenotic Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Rationale for the retrospective study: ” Although it is the first Food and Drug Administration–approved treatment for EoE, eligibility criteria for the clinical trial program excluded several characteristics of the most severe EoE patients seen in clinical practice…Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the real-world efficacy of dupilumab in patients with severe, treatment-refractory, and fibrostenotic EoE.”

This cohort of 46 patients with severe disease including 39 (85%) who had prior esophageal dilatation (mean of 9). Patients had a mean age of 39 and had had symptoms for a mean of 13 years. Patients were considered treatment-refractory as all had received PPIs and topical steroids; in addition, most (87%) had tried elimination diets.

Key findings:

  • The peak eosinophil counts decreased markedly, and postdupilumab histologic response rates were 80% and 57% for fewer than 15 eosinophils per high-power field and 6 or fewer eosinophils per high-power field, respectively. Mean eosinophil count dropped from 70 to 9 following dupilumab treatment.
  • The Endoscopic Reference Score (EREFS) decreased from 4.62 to 1.89 with improvement in all categories: exudates, rings, edema, furrows and strictures.
  • Global symptom improvement was reported in 91% (P < .001).

My take: Many clinical studies are not representative of typical patients with various ailments, often excluding those with the most severe manifestations. This study indicates that dupilumab is an effective agent for patients with severe fibrostenotic eosinophilic esophagitis.

Related blog posts:

Where I Want to Be Right Now (Honeymoon Beach, St Johns)

Practical Tips for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Posted on by

We recently had Glenn Furuta, MD give our group a terrific lecture on eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).

Some of the key points:

  • The burden of EoE continues to increase.
  • There are clearly several phenotypes of EoE. Some patients may never develop stricturing/fibrostenotic disease  but natural history data continues to evolve.
  • After treatment response, many patients can continue with symptoms. In adults and adolescents, this has been termed ‘esophageal hypervigilance.’ Feeding therapy may be helpful in this circumstance.
  • Adrenal insufficiency: Currently their group tries to screen for this after 4 months of topical corticosteroids and then yearly. It is unusual for them identify adrenal insufficiency if the patient is receiving only a single steroid agent; patients receiving steroids for other conditions like asthma are at higher risk.
  • An esophagram with a barium coated pill can be a useful adjunct to determine if there is esophageal narrowing (this can be missed on endoscopy).
  • For select patients, endoFLIP can characterize distensibility/esophageal function
  • Esophageal strictures: Their group uses Bougie dilators and has had a good experience. No perforations. ~15% with chest pain afterwards.
  • Corticosteroids (topical) can reduce the risk of food impactions in adults.
  • Reviewed use of Dupilimab and its recent approval in EoE for children as young as 1 yr of age (>15 kg)

Some selected slides:

Related blog posts: