Category Archives: Pediatric Gastroenterology Intestinal Disorder

Fundoplication effects on esophageal motility

Posted on by

Trying to decide whether a child should undergo a fundoplication is often quite difficult.  The best candidates with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) don’t need surgery because medical treatment is usually effective.  Typical patients who fail medical treatments may have numerous comorbidities that could cause a complicated postoperative course or failure of the procedure.

One aspect about the surgery that has been questioned has been whether surgery causes dysmotility of the esophagus.  A recent article describes a study, which enrolled only ten children who had surgery; however, these patients underwent extensive preoperative and postoperative evaluations to try to provide more information about the motility effects of fundoplication (J Pediatr 2013; 162: 566-73).

Patients were considered for surgery if they had failed medical therapy. Four of the ten patients were neurologically-impaired. Testing included automated impedance manometry, 24-hour pH-impedance, gastric emptying breath test, and GERD questionnaires (though the authors note that GERD questionnaires are not validated in children aged 1-12 years).  Median patient age was 6.4 years, with a range of 1-17 years.

Surgery: laparascopic anterior partial fundoplication

Results:

  • 4 patients developed postoperative dysphagia, two patients had redo fundoplications (one due to dysphagia and one due to persistent emesis).
  • Postsurgery, GER measures were reduced.  Total number of acid reflux episodes dropped from an average of 37 to an average of 10.  Total GER (acid and nonacid) episodes dropped from an average of 97 to an average of 66.  The percentage of time with pH<4 dropped as well from an average of 12.5% to an average of 3.1%.
  • Average gastric emptying time was unchanged: 64 minutes pre surgery and 63 minutes post surgery.
  • Conventional esophageal motility measures/peristaltic contractions were unaltered.  However, patients with postoperative dysphagia had longer gastric emptying times compared with those who did not develop postoperative dysphagia.

Related blog posts:

The Medical Pendulum and Gastroesophageal Reflux | gutsandgrowth

Gastroesophageal Reflux: I know it when I see it | gutsandgrowth

Related references:

  • -Gastroenterology 2011; 141: 1938 LOTUS study in JAMA summarized. JAMA 2011; 305: 1969. Medical rx outperformed surgery. 92% under control (remission) with long-term medical Rx vs 85% with surgery & fewer side effects of medical Rx.
  • -Clin Gastro & Hepatology 2009; 7: 1292, 1264 (editorial). 12 yr outcomes for surgery vs PPI. n=154 omeprazole, n=144 surgery. Similar long-term outcome ~50% with long-term remission.
  • -JPGN 2010; 50: 25. Reflux detected by impedance does NOT determine fundoplication outcome. n=34.
  • -JPGN 2006; 43: 185.  Effect of fundo: no change in  gastric motor activity & increased discomfort with distention
  • -Pediatrics 2006; 118: 2326. n=1142. Fundoplication decreased hospitalization rates for children <4yrs; in older children with developmental delay, there were increased hospitalization rates after fundoplication. (47% had no hospitalizations prior to fundoplication.)
  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2004; 2: 978-984. Gilger et al. n=198. 63% required p-op medical treatment for recurrent GERD -retrospective review 1996-99.
  • -J Pediatrics 2011; 159: 597. Hypoglycemia (likely due to dumping) was common post-op. n=285. 24% of screened children with low glucose (only 1.3%of those without formal screening). 2/3rds with hypoglycemia had preceding hyperglycemia. Only 53% had dumping symptoms.  Many in this cohort were NICU pts -~1/3rd of pts had mean age of 3months & another ~1/3rd with mean age of 6months.Rx often was continuous feeds.
  • -Pediatrics 2006; 118:1828. 48,665 antireflux surgeries done from 1996-2003 (~7000/yr) in US
  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2006; 4: 299. Frequent complications p-op and frequent need for GERD meds. dysphagia in 19%, dilation in 6%, repeat surgery in 2%, mortality in 0.8% (n=3145). 50% required GERD meds.
  • -Gastroenterology 2001; 121: 5-14 & 214.  Dysmotility with GER reflects severe disease & is present ~30%. According to this study, dysmotility does not affect postoperative outcome, is not corrected by fundoplication, may occur p-op, and requires no tailoring of surgical mgt.

Data on Allopurinol

Posted on by

Given the limited number of therapeutic options for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), it is important to optimize each individual treatment.  Allopurinol can increase the effectiveness of thiopurines and if used properly can be safe (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013; 19: 363-69).

The referenced study took place between 2004-2011 and examined 77 patients who failed monotherapy with a thiopurine due to “skewed” metabolism.  The average age of study participant was 38 years (28-45).  23% had previous surgery. Cotreatment with an anti-TNF occurred in 7 patients and with an 5-ASA i 17 patients.

Results:

  • Median 6-thioguanine (6-TGN) levels increased from 145 to 271 pmol/8 x10-to-the-8th. 6-methyl mercaptopurine (6-MMP) concentrations decreased from 10,110 to 265 pmol/8 x10-to-the-8th.
  • Leukopenia occurred in 16%, necessitating dose reductions.
  • Liver tests normalized in 81% with the addition of allopurinol
  • The median azathioprine dose while on combination therapy was 0.64 mg/kg/day and the median 6-mercaptopurine dose was 0.39 mg/kg/day.  While on mono therapy, median values were 2.05 mg/kg/day and 1.23 mg/kg/day respectively.
  • 21% had to discontinue combination therapy.
  • Combination therapy was continued at 6, 12, 24, and 60 months in 87%, 85%, 76%, and 65%.

Take-home Message:

Allopurinol can salvage failed thiopurine monotherapy, but only in a minority of these patients.  Allopurinol should be considered for patients unable to achieve therapeutic 6-TGN levels who have liver toxicity/elevated 6-MMP levels.  Careful attention to dose reduction of the thiopurine is essential to avoid life-threatening bone marrow suppression.

Related blog entry:

Thiopurine Metabolite Testing -NASPGHAN … – gutsandgrowth

Additional references:

  • -Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 31: 640-47. use of allopurinol.
  • -Gastro & Hep 2008; 4: 505. use of allopurinol. Consider if pts unable to enter steroid-free remission AND on adequate AZA/6MP dose. ONLY in those who preferentially metabolize towards 6-MMP (~15% of population); thus subtherapeutic 6-TG levels and increased 6-MMP (>5700). Need adequate WBC >4.5 at start since this will decrease. Check labs every week x 4 at start, then qoweek x 4, then per routine.
  • -IBD 2008; 14: 1678. Experience with allopurinol in children -dose 100mg of allopurinol if >30kg and 50mg if < 30kg. AZA dose decreased to 25% of previous dose. n=13.
  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2007; 5: 170 (editorial) & 209.  Use of allopurinol (100mg/day) in 20 adults.  Dose of 6-MP reduced 25-50% concomitantly.  Improved disease control w/o hepatotoxicity.  Important to follow counts closely for first 2 months.

Malnutrition Redefined

Posted on by

Defining malnutrition accurately is the focus of a new report (JPEN 2013; DOI: 10.1177/0148507113479972). Thanks to Kipp Ellsworth for this article.

The Pediatric Malnutrition Definitions Workgroup was formed in April 2010 and makes numerous relevant contributions to precisely defining malnutrition.  The reasons for this workgroup and report are to promote the following:

  • early identification of those at risk for malnutrition
  • allow better comparison of malnutrition prevalence & collect meaningful data
  • develop uniform screening tools
  • develop thresholds for intervention
  • improve assessment of outcomes

“Pediatric malnutrition (undernutrition) is defined as an imbalance between nutrient requirement and intake, resulting in cumulative deficits of energy, protein, or micronutrients that may negatively affect growth, development, or other relevant outcomes.”

First, malnutrition is subdivided into two categories: illness-related malnutrition and non-illness-related malnutrition.  Illness-related malnutrition refers to malnutrition caused by chronic conditions, burns, and surgery.  It is the predominant cause in developed countries.  Non-illness-related malnutrition refers to malnutrition caused by environmental or behavioral factors (including food aversions or anorexia).

Illness-related malnutrition occurs due to nutrient loss, increased energy expenditure, decreased nutrient intake, or altered nutrient utilization.

In brief, patients need to be assessed in five domains: anthropometrics, growth charts, chronicity, etiology/pathogenesis, and functional status.

Summary of recommendations:

  1. Record anthropometric variables on admission and serially.  These measurements include weight, height, BMI, mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) and consider triceps skin fold (TSF) and mid-arm muscle circumference.  Obtain head circumference if younger than 2 years.
  2. In infants/children <2 years, measure length with recumbent board. In older patients unable to stand, consider alternative measurement like tibia length or knee height for a height proxy.
  3. Use the 2006 World Health Organization growth charts in patients younger than 2 years and the CBC 2000 growth charts for children 2-20 years. In addition, use corrected age (number of weeks/months premature + chronological age) for preterm infants until they are 3 years old.
  4. Use a decline in z score for individual anthropometric measurements as the indication of faltering growth.
  5. Use 3 months as a cutoff to classify as acute or chronic.
  6. Include description of predominant mechanism of malnutrition: decreased intake, increased requirements, excessive losses, or failure to assimilate/malabsorption.
  7. Recognize the role of inflammation on nutrition status.
  8. Assess impact of malnutrition: consider developmental assessment, lean body mass measurements, and measures of muscle strength.

By having a better established uniform definition of malnutrition, impact on outcomes will be easier to assess. In addition to the potential outcomes noted above (#8), others that will need to be examined in relation to malnutrition include length of hospital stay, wound healing, frequency of infections, behavioral problems, and disease-specific resource utilization.

This article also reviews previous definitions and potential problems with their usage.  For example, Waterlow criteria rely on percentiles and standard deviations and are used widely.  In hospitalized children, accurate serial weights and heights can be challenging due to fluid retention and poor mobility.

The authors note that malnutrition is likely underdiagnosed and inadequately treated.  Some recent estimates indicate that malnutrition is present “in 40% of patients with neurologic conditions, 34.5% in those with infectious diseases, 33.3% of those with cystic fibrosis, 28.6% in those with cardiovascular disease, 27.3% in oncology patients, and 23.6% in those with GI diseases. Patients with multiple diagnoses are most likely to be malnourished (43.8%).”

Bottomline: A lot of patients are malnourished.  Recognition of malnutrition (defining what is malnutrition) should improve outcomes.

Related blog posts:

How effective are aminosalicylates for pediatric UC?

Posted on by

In a prospective, multicenter, inception cohort study (JPGN 2013; 56: 12-18) with 213 newly diagnosed ulcerative colitis (UC) patients, oral aminosalicylate (5-ASA) therapy was effective in 86 (40%).  That is, 40% were considered to be in corticosteroid-free remission at 1 year using 5-ASA as primary maintenance therapy.

This study took place between 2002-2010.  Of 1669 children enrolled in the registry from 32 sites, 440 (26%) were diagnosed with UC.  Of this group, 353 had followup >1 year and 213 met inclusion/exclusion criteria; all patients had to be treated with only 5-ASA or corticosteroids in the initial 30 days following diagnosis.  Most of those excluded had other therapies.  Among those with primary oral 5-ASA treatment, only 98 started treatment without a steroid induction.

Some interesting aspects of the study group:

  • 82% had pancolitis
  • 62% had moderate/severe disease at diagnosis based on physician global assessment
  • No laboratory or clinical features were associated with a higher likelihood of response
  • Mean daily dosage of 5-ASA was 52 mg/kg/day; 23% had a dose >60 mg/kg/day

The authors note that improved patient adherence and possibly higher 5-ASA dosing schedules may improve response to 5-ASA treatment.

Related blog entry:

Once daily Mesalamine | gutsandgrowth

Expert review: Celiac disease

Posted on by

A recent article gives a concise expert update on Celiac disease (NEJM 2012; 367: 2419-26).

As this is an area that has been covered several times by this blog and is familiar to most of the followers, I will comment on a few issues that were particularly interesting to me.  Though, the review is thorough and a helpful reference on most aspects of celiac disease..

What is the gluten threshold?  In patients with celiac disease, a minimal degree of gluten contamination is difficult to avoid.  “The lowest amount of daily gluten that causes damage to the celiac intestinal mucosa over (the gluten threshold) is 10 to 50 mg per day (a 25-g slice of bread contains approximately 1.6 g of gluten).”  New regulations propose that foods which are labeled as gluten free have less than 20 ppm of gluten contamination.

When are intraepithelial lymphocytes increased in the duodenum?  The abnormal threshold is considered >25 per 100 enterocytes.

What proportion of celiac disease patients have been diagnosed?  According to a recent European study, only a small proportion (21%) of celiac patients are clinically recognized.

Best screening test currently? Anti-tissue transglutaminase (TTG) IgA antibody –both sensitivity and specificity are >95%.  Consider TTG IgG in patients with IgA deficieny or possibly deamidated gliadin IgG.

Potential complications of untreated celiac disease? Osteoporosis, impaired splenic function, neurologic disorders, infertility or recurrent abortion, ulcerative jejunoileitis, and cancer.

Biopsy needed? Usually, “although recent guidelines suggest that biopsy may not be necessary in selected children with strong clinical and serologic evidence of celiac disease.”

Population-based screening or case-finding?  At this time, population-based screening is not recommended.  Case-finding based on symptoms and screening of at-risk groups is recommended though this is likely to miss >50% of cases.

Related blog posts:

A-OK for Accutane

Posted on by

Another article has reaffirmed that isotretinoin (Accutane) does not increase the risk of IBD (JAMA Dermatol 2013; 149: 216-20).  Thanks to Mike Hart for this reference. However, this data will not reverse the millions of dollars that have been lost in litigation (Isotretinoin – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia).

Using a large U.S. health claims database (68 million patients), the authors examined women ages 18-46 years who had received at least one oral contraceptive prescription between 2001-2009.  For each patient with IBD, 20 controls were identified in a nested case-control study design.

In total, 2159 IBD cases (1056 UC, 1103 CD) were matched with 43,180 controls.  Only 10 patients with IBD were exposed to isotretinoin compared with 191 controls.  The adjusted relative risk (RR) for IBD was 0.99; for ulcerative colitis the RR was 1.1 (confidence intervals 0.44-2.7) and for Crohn’s disease the RR was 0.91 (confidence interval 0.91).  For the meta-analysis which was a secondary part of this study, the RR for IBD with 5 studies was 0.94.

Conclusion: The study results do not suggest an increase risk of IBD with isotretinoin use.

Why did previous studies suggest a link between IBD and isotretinoin? The authors note that this is the first study to adjust for two main confounders, mainly a diagnosis of acne and use of oral tetracycline antibiotics.  Oral antibiotics, including tetracyclines, have been associated with IBD previously.  In addition, the design limits the confounding of contraceptive usage.

Limitations of this study:

  • Only women were studied; however, there are no known biologic factors that would make isotretinoin more problematic for males.
  • Other risk factors were not examined: smoking, ethnicity, diet, IBD family history

Additional references:

  • -Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 2774-78.  Population-based study in Winnipeg, <40yrs.  n=1960 cases and 19,419 controls.  No differences in the proportions of IBD cases taking isotretinoin vs controls.  1.2% of IBD cases received isotretinoin prior to IBD diagnosis (n=25) compared with 1.1% of controls (n=213).  Mean # of days prior to IBD dx was 1102.  Thus, isotretinoin unlikely to be causally-associated with idiopathic IBD.
  • -IBD 2009; 12: Supplement -abstract O -0002  Increased risk of UC after isotretinoin.  OR 4.36 for developing UC
  • -Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 2387-93.  7 country study found no causal association between isotretinoin & colitis.

CCFA IBD Update -Conference Notes (part 2)

Posted on by

As noted in previous blog post, I wanted to share some notes from recent Atlanta CCFA talk.

The fourth lecture by Jeffry Katz discussed optimizing biologic therapy.  Overall this was an excellent review.  He discussed his general preference for combination therapy since the publication of the SONIC study. Also, he highlighted a smaller study that showed better efficacy with combination therapy in ulcerative colitis as well (DDW 2011, Abstract #835).

With regard to withdrawal of therapy when doing well on combination treatment, he indicated that he sometimes reduces (or stops) dosage of immunomodulator after 1 year but tries to avoid stopping anti-TNF agents.  Relapse rates after stopping infliximab in Crohn’s disease are approximately 50% at 1 year and 75% at 5 years.

His talk reviewed antibodies to infliximab and low therapeutic levels. This has been discussed on this blog previously:

He reviewed risks of the IBD medications.  With regard to psoriasis reactions, he stated that developing skin lesions occur in about 5% and this necessitates drug withdrawal in 1%.  As these skin reactions are often a ‘class effect,’ use of an alternative may be needed.  He stated that he had used ustekinumab in this setting (“but this entails a fight with the insurance company”).

The 5th talk by Doug Wolf reviewed pregnancy in IBD.  Much of the information has also been discussed in this blog recently: Anti-TNFs and Pregnancy | gutsandgrowth

His key points:

  • Probably stop infliximab at gestational week 32
  • Likely give adalimumab up until week 34-36
  • If patient in remission, consider stopping stopping drugs earlier
  • In PIANO registry (n=1000), use of anti-TNFs and immunomodulators was not associated with any complication, including prematurity, spontaneous abortion, intrauterine growth retardation or specific birth defects.  However, there was a significant increase in infant infections up to 12 months of life in the combination therapy group.
  • No live virus vaccines (eg. rotavirus) for first 6 months for infants exposed to infliximab

The last talk that I attended was a pediatric case presentation from Cary Sauer. He presented a teenage boy who had mild disease based on bloodwork and endoscopy who had more severe and extensive disease on magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) (More imaging needed? | gutsandgrowth) and video capsule endoscopy.  He argued that small bowel assessment is worthwhile in every patient at the time of diagnosis as more severe findings could influence the choice to start with top-down therapy.

The final aspect worth mentioning were some of the patient-related information:

1. A pediatric, adolescent, and parent support group will have its first meeting April 23rd 6-7:30 pm at Scottish Rite Children’s Hospital (Main auditorium).  Followup meetings are scheduled for August 27, and October 22. All meetings are free.  Contact CCFA mball@ccfa.org or 646-623-4869 (cell) for more information.

2. CCFA also has “Power of Two.”  This contacts patients/parents with peer mentors.  Interested patients can contact mball@ccfa.org or 404-982-0616.

CCFA IBD Update -Conference Notes (part 1)

Posted on by

I wanted to share some notes from the Atlanta CCFA “Update in Inflammatory Bowel Disease” conference which was held March 23, 2013.

The first talk by Gil Melmed reviewed immunization issues in IBD.  One of the best quotes of the conference was on his first slide:  “The single most important thing a [rheumatologist] can do to optimize care for a [lupus] patient is to act as their internist, yet that is the last thing most [rheumatologists] wish to or feel qualified to do.” (Wallace DJ. Lupus 2008 (17) 91-2.

While trying to manage all aspects of the health care of our patients with chronic disease is an ideal, he also noted that 20-30% of adult IBD doctors do not understand the importance of avoiding live-virus vaccines (a list of these are noted in previous blog: Protecting the most vulnerable | gutsandgrowth).

One of the take-home points from this talk for me was to avoid use of rotavirus vaccine in newborn patients if their mother is receiving Infliximab or Adalimumab.  Another useful point would be to remind family members of immunosuppressed IBD patients to receive the influenza vaccine rather than the live-virus vaccine (flumist).

The second talk by Wallace Crandall focused on improving health care delivery.  The best quote of the day was from his first slide: “Every system is perfectly designed to achieve exactly the results it gets.”  (Donald Berwick).  One of his slides that I found intriguing showed 2007 data on immunomodulator use within the first 3 months of diagnosis from 10 different centers.  The rate varied from 30% to 98%.  He didn’t try to answer how frequent immunomodulator use in this time period should occur but there was no valid reason for this degree of variation.

In Columbus (Ohio), he stated that they are working to transform chronic care from 15-30 minute visits every 3-6 months to a more continuous process.  “Patients receive only 60% of recommended care.” With a better health care delivery system, this could be improved and potentially improve outcomes.

Another obstacle is the lack of evidence to guide decisions.  Recent “ECCO” guidelines for pediatric ulcerative colitis had 48% of recommendations based on level D evidence.

The third talk by Douglas Drossman was probably the most helpful.  He discussed pain management in IBD.  He reviewed a lot of recent data on irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and discussed similarities between post-infectious IBS and many patients with treated IBD.

He also discussed central pain aspects and alluded to changes in the brain that happen with chronic treatment (Pain changes brain | gutsandgrowth).  He noted that antidepressants have the potential to reverse brain changes due to chronic pain but that regrowth of neurons can take a long time.  As such, he noted that agents like imipramine are needed for at least one year. Use of imipramine, he noted, has been shown to improve cognitive function in mice with traumatic brain injury (J Neurotrauma 2011; 28: 995).

With regard to IBD, Dr. Drossman noted a wide variability in pain response among patients.  Some who have very significant mucosal disease do not experience significant pain, likely due to downregulation of some central pathways.  He outlined his treatment model for pain in IBD.

  1. Effective communication improves clinical outcomes
  2. Just as there is a “treatment pyramid” for IBD, with IBS the treatment pyramid ncludes the following: motility agents, antispasmodics, antidepressants, psychological intervention, and central augmentation.
  3. With regard to antidepressants, he highlighted the differences between tricyclics, SSRIs, and SNRIs. He noted that SSRIs like citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline are not effective at reducing pain but can help anxiety/depression.
  4. Tricyclic antidepressants are effective at reducing pain and are inexpensive.  Side effects can include sedation, dry mouth, dizziness, and constipation.  Desipramine and nortriptyline have fewer side effects.
  5. SNRIs including duloxetine, venlafaxine, desvenlafaxine, and minacipran are effective at reducing pain and fewer side effects.  However, they are considerably more expensive.  Nausea, though, is not infrequent.
  6. Psychologic treatments: cognitive behavioral, psychotherapy, hypnosis, and relaxation training.  When to refer? moderate-severe symptoms, maladaptive coping (eg. “catastrophizing”), and motivated patient.
  7. What is central augmentation? If an antidepressant is not effective, augmentation is adding an agent that may target a different brain receptor.  Potential augmenters include pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic approaches.  Pharmacologics could include added gabapentin, added atypical antipsychotic (e.g.. quetiapine [Ability]), added clonidine, added buspirone, or added mirtazepine (e.g. remeron).  Most practitioners will need the help of a psychiatrist to manage these medications.

Thiopurine Metabolite Testing -NASPGHAN Consensus Recommendations

Posted on by

The inflammatory bowel disease committee of NASPGHAN has published a review and recommendations for the use of thiopurine metabolite testing (JPGN 2013; 56: 333-40).

The effectiveness of thiopurines is reviewed with a few key points:

  • Cochrane reviews have shown that azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine are effective in inducing remission in Crohn’s disease.  For active disease the overall response rate has been reported as 54% compared with 33% for placebo.
  • For ulcerative colitis, a Cochrane analysis deemed the methodologic quality of 4 of the 6 studies as unsatisfactory and that all studies were small.  “The reviewers concluded that azathioprine may be effective treatment for patients with ulcerative colitis.”

The review covers the potential adverse effects of the thiopurines: myelosuppression, pancreatitis, elevated transaminases, susceptibility to infection, and malignancy.  The review suggests that the risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma is probably increased up to 4-fold. Though, it is difficult to determine how much of the risk is truly due to the usage of thiopurines or other confounding factors.  The studies about the risk of non-melenoma skin cancer are not discussed.

Other covered topics: advantages of thiopurine metabolite testing (6-thioguanine [6-TGN] and 6-methylmercaptopurine[ 6-MMP]), potential disadvantages of metabolite testing (e.g.. cost), use of genotype versus phenotype (phenotypic testing is generally preferred), thiopurine metabolism, devising target levels, use of allopurinol, and misinterpretation of metabolite testing.

Specific Consensus Recommendations:

  • Obtain thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) testing prior to initiation of thiopurines.
  • Avoid use of thiopurines in individuals with extremely low TPMT activity or who are homozygous recessive for TPMT activity
  • TPMT testing does not predict all cases of leukopenia.  All individuals receiving thiopurines should have routine monitoring with CBCs.  “Most adverse effects from thiopurines are not directly related to 6-TGN or 6-MMP levels.”
  • Metabolite testing can help determine adherence to therapy
  • Metabolite testing may be helpful in guiding dose adjustment and/or adding allopurinol treatment
  • Routine and repetitive testing of metabolites is not recommended in patients who are doing well on an acceptable thiopurine dosage.

Related blog posts:

Anti-TNFs and Pregnancy

Posted on by

While pregnancy does not occur commonly while patients are in a pediatric gastroenterology practice, the possibility of becoming pregnant certainly influences our choice of medications.  With inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), I rarely recommend methotrexate in young women due to its teratogenicity.  With regard to the anti-TNF agents, there is less data available.   Two recent studies add some insight into this issue.

The first study ((Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 318-21) followed 31 pregnancies in 28 women with IBD (2006-2011).  18 patients received infliximab (IFX) and 13 adalimumab (ADA).  Most were receiving lower doses; only one IFX patient was receiving 10 mg/kg/dose and only two ADA patients were receiving weekly dosing.  Levels of anti-TNF agents were measured from cord blood from 18 newborns (12  IFX, 6 ADA).

Results:

  • 28 live births.  3 miscarriages (1 IFX, 2 ADA).  No congenital malformations were noted.
  • Mean cord IFX level was 6.4 mcg/mL.  A level of 2.8 mcg/mL was noted in the early discontinuation group –stopping 10 weeks prior to delivery .
  • Mean ADA level was 1.7 mcg/mL in five infants.  One infant had an undetectable level. All mothers had stopped ADA at gestational week 22.

In the second study (Clin Gastroenterol Hepat 2013; 11: 286-92) there were 31 pregnant patients. Anti-TNF treatment: Certolizumab (CZP) (n=10), IFX (n=11), ADA (n=10).  Serum levels were measured at birth in the mother, infant, and in cord blood. Then, levels were followed monthly until undetectable.  Among women receiving IFX, two were receiving 10 mg/kg/dose.  Women were identified through the Crohn’s Colitis Foundation of America Pregnancy IBD and Neonatal Outcomes (PIANO) Registry.

Results:

  • IFX was detectable for 2-7 months postpartum (median interval prior to delivery and last dose was 35 days).  Median IFX level in the cord was 160% that of the mother.
  • ADA was detectable for at least 11 weeks in infant’s circulation (median interval prior to delivery and last dose was 5.5 weeks). Median ADA in the cord was 153% of the mother.
  • Median CZP in the cord was 3.9% that of the mother.
  • No congenital anomalies or complications were reported in any of the infants.

Bottomline from these studies:

Stopping these drugs after the second trimester lowers the level of these medications in the infant.  This likely results in a lower likelihood of the infant developing an opportunistic infection but also results in a low risk for the mother of an IBD flareup.  Certolizumab pegol has very low levels of placenta transfer.

Related references:

  • -J Am Acad Dermatol 2011; 65: 870.  Death noted in infant whose mother took IFX after BCG vaccination.
  • -J Crohns Colitis 2011; 5: 555-8.  Low levels of IFX detected in infants from nursing mothers with IBD  (1/200th of the maternal level in serum 2 to 3 days after infusion).
  • -Clin Gastroenterol & Hep 2010; 8: 509. n=2377. Crohn dz assoc w prematurity but not birth defects.
  • -Gastroenterol 2003;124: 9-17. Safety of 6-MP in pregnancy. n=155, at least 1 pregnancy. No adverse effect noted.
  • -Clin Gastroenterol & Hepatology; 2006: 4: 1255.  Infliximab crosses placenta but was not detected breastmilk.