Tag Archives: adalimumab

Liver Injury from Anti-TNF Agents

Posted on by

While anti-TNF agents have been associated with drug-induced liver injury (DILI), it has been difficult to get a handle on how much importance to place on this.  A recent study provides more data and some reassurance (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 558-64).

The authors searched the U.S. DILI Network database from 2003 to 2011 and describe 6 cases of anti-TNF DILI; in addition, they searched PubMed for articles related to anti-TNF agent associated hepatotoxicity and identified an additional 28 cases. Other causes of liver disease were excluded in these patients, including reactivation of hepatitis B, and acute viral hepatitis (eg. hepatitis C, hepatitis E).

Results of anti-TNF hepatotoxicity:

  • 26 cases due to infliximab, 4 cases due to etanercept, and 4 due to adalimumab.
  • Based on scoring system, the anti-TNF agent was considered a definite cause of DILI in 1 (3%), very likely in 21 (62%) and probable in 12 (35%).
  • Median latency (duration of therapy before onset of DILI) was 13 weeks with a range of 2-104 weeks.
  • 22 (67%) had positive anti-nuclear and/or smooth muscle antibodies.  15 of 17 of these patients had liver biopsy features consistent with autoimmunity.
  • Among those 22 with autoimmune features, there was a higher peak alanine aminotransferase compared with the 12 without these features (784 vs 528 U/L)
  • Favorable outcome: all but one patient improved after discontinuation of the implicated drug; 12 received corticosteroids. One patient with underlying cirrhosis underwent liver transplantation after infliximab-induced liver injury.

While the authors note the potential for a class effect of anti-TNF agents, in studies from patients with psoriasis, there was a lack of cross-toxicity between etanercept and infliximab.

Take-home messages:

The risk of hepatocellular injury from anti-TNF agents is very low.  DILI due to anti-TNFs often have autoimmune features. The prognosis is favorable, and alternative anti-TNFs can be given after resolution.

Related blog links:

Don’t Fix What’s Not Broken

Posted on by

A recent study provides information about elective switching from infliximab (IFX) to adalimumab (ADA) in stable Crohn’s disease (CD) (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013; 19: 761-66).  As a practical matter, patients and families inquire about switching therapy due to potential convenience and flexibility.  Thus far, there is little data to guide clinicians.  As such, the authors explored this question by designing an open-label study which would allow enrollment of any patients who had stable disease for >6 months (Harvey-Bradshaw Index ≤ 8) on IFX therapy.

In total, 29 patients with CD were enrolled with an average age of 39.  Twelve had previous resections.

Key results:

  • 21 patients (72%) were able to remain on ADA at 54 weeks.  8 patients discontinued ADA due to disease activity (n=3), side effects (n=4), or other symptoms (n=1).
  • 4 patients were restarted on IFX therapy; 1 required dose intensification.
  • At 54 weeks, 13 patients indicated a preference for IFX due to efficacy (n=9) or safety profile (n=4).  12 patients indicated a preference for ADA.  4 patients had no preference.

The authors state that a recommendation to avoid elective switching.  In their study, 28% were not able to be maintained on ADA therapy, more patients preferred IFX after experiencing both therapies, and switching back to IFX has been associated (in some) with reduced efficacy.  The main concern with an elective switch is the potential loss of response with very limited therapeutic alternatives.

The authors note that their study showed better results with an elective change than a previous study (the SWITCH trial, n=73).  In the SWITCH trial, “elective switch from IFX to ADA in patients with stable CD led to 47% of patients requiring dose intensification or interruption of treatment” in the ADA arm compared with 16% of patients who continued IFX therapy.  (Adalimumab in Crohn’s Disease Controlled by Infliximab)

The better outcomes in the current trial may have been due to selection of patients with milder disease and the more frequent use of concomitant immunosuppression.  In the current trial, 52% had concomitant immunosuppression (48% thiopurine, 4% methotrexate); in contrast, only 17% received concomitant immunosuppression in the SWITCH trial.  Another important difference was that the patients in the current trial received 160-80 loading doses rather than 80-40 induction.  Also, the trial designs were different.  The current trial enrolled patients without randomization; in contrast, the SWITCH trial randomized some patients to continue IFX and others to change to ADA therapy.

Related reference:

  • -Gut 2012; 61: 229-34. SWITCH trial.

Related blog references:

CCFA IBD Update -Conference Notes (part 2)

Posted on by

As noted in previous blog post, I wanted to share some notes from recent Atlanta CCFA talk.

The fourth lecture by Jeffry Katz discussed optimizing biologic therapy.  Overall this was an excellent review.  He discussed his general preference for combination therapy since the publication of the SONIC study. Also, he highlighted a smaller study that showed better efficacy with combination therapy in ulcerative colitis as well (DDW 2011, Abstract #835).

With regard to withdrawal of therapy when doing well on combination treatment, he indicated that he sometimes reduces (or stops) dosage of immunomodulator after 1 year but tries to avoid stopping anti-TNF agents.  Relapse rates after stopping infliximab in Crohn’s disease are approximately 50% at 1 year and 75% at 5 years.

His talk reviewed antibodies to infliximab and low therapeutic levels. This has been discussed on this blog previously:

He reviewed risks of the IBD medications.  With regard to psoriasis reactions, he stated that developing skin lesions occur in about 5% and this necessitates drug withdrawal in 1%.  As these skin reactions are often a ‘class effect,’ use of an alternative may be needed.  He stated that he had used ustekinumab in this setting (“but this entails a fight with the insurance company”).

The 5th talk by Doug Wolf reviewed pregnancy in IBD.  Much of the information has also been discussed in this blog recently: Anti-TNFs and Pregnancy | gutsandgrowth

His key points:

  • Probably stop infliximab at gestational week 32
  • Likely give adalimumab up until week 34-36
  • If patient in remission, consider stopping stopping drugs earlier
  • In PIANO registry (n=1000), use of anti-TNFs and immunomodulators was not associated with any complication, including prematurity, spontaneous abortion, intrauterine growth retardation or specific birth defects.  However, there was a significant increase in infant infections up to 12 months of life in the combination therapy group.
  • No live virus vaccines (eg. rotavirus) for first 6 months for infants exposed to infliximab

The last talk that I attended was a pediatric case presentation from Cary Sauer. He presented a teenage boy who had mild disease based on bloodwork and endoscopy who had more severe and extensive disease on magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) (More imaging needed? | gutsandgrowth) and video capsule endoscopy.  He argued that small bowel assessment is worthwhile in every patient at the time of diagnosis as more severe findings could influence the choice to start with top-down therapy.

The final aspect worth mentioning were some of the patient-related information:

1. A pediatric, adolescent, and parent support group will have its first meeting April 23rd 6-7:30 pm at Scottish Rite Children’s Hospital (Main auditorium).  Followup meetings are scheduled for August 27, and October 22. All meetings are free.  Contact CCFA mball@ccfa.org or 646-623-4869 (cell) for more information.

2. CCFA also has “Power of Two.”  This contacts patients/parents with peer mentors.  Interested patients can contact mball@ccfa.org or 404-982-0616.

Anti-TNFs and Pregnancy

Posted on by

While pregnancy does not occur commonly while patients are in a pediatric gastroenterology practice, the possibility of becoming pregnant certainly influences our choice of medications.  With inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), I rarely recommend methotrexate in young women due to its teratogenicity.  With regard to the anti-TNF agents, there is less data available.   Two recent studies add some insight into this issue.

The first study ((Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 318-21) followed 31 pregnancies in 28 women with IBD (2006-2011).  18 patients received infliximab (IFX) and 13 adalimumab (ADA).  Most were receiving lower doses; only one IFX patient was receiving 10 mg/kg/dose and only two ADA patients were receiving weekly dosing.  Levels of anti-TNF agents were measured from cord blood from 18 newborns (12  IFX, 6 ADA).

Results:

  • 28 live births.  3 miscarriages (1 IFX, 2 ADA).  No congenital malformations were noted.
  • Mean cord IFX level was 6.4 mcg/mL.  A level of 2.8 mcg/mL was noted in the early discontinuation group –stopping 10 weeks prior to delivery .
  • Mean ADA level was 1.7 mcg/mL in five infants.  One infant had an undetectable level. All mothers had stopped ADA at gestational week 22.

In the second study (Clin Gastroenterol Hepat 2013; 11: 286-92) there were 31 pregnant patients. Anti-TNF treatment: Certolizumab (CZP) (n=10), IFX (n=11), ADA (n=10).  Serum levels were measured at birth in the mother, infant, and in cord blood. Then, levels were followed monthly until undetectable.  Among women receiving IFX, two were receiving 10 mg/kg/dose.  Women were identified through the Crohn’s Colitis Foundation of America Pregnancy IBD and Neonatal Outcomes (PIANO) Registry.

Results:

  • IFX was detectable for 2-7 months postpartum (median interval prior to delivery and last dose was 35 days).  Median IFX level in the cord was 160% that of the mother.
  • ADA was detectable for at least 11 weeks in infant’s circulation (median interval prior to delivery and last dose was 5.5 weeks). Median ADA in the cord was 153% of the mother.
  • Median CZP in the cord was 3.9% that of the mother.
  • No congenital anomalies or complications were reported in any of the infants.

Bottomline from these studies:

Stopping these drugs after the second trimester lowers the level of these medications in the infant.  This likely results in a lower likelihood of the infant developing an opportunistic infection but also results in a low risk for the mother of an IBD flareup.  Certolizumab pegol has very low levels of placenta transfer.

Related references:

  • -J Am Acad Dermatol 2011; 65: 870.  Death noted in infant whose mother took IFX after BCG vaccination.
  • -J Crohns Colitis 2011; 5: 555-8.  Low levels of IFX detected in infants from nursing mothers with IBD  (1/200th of the maternal level in serum 2 to 3 days after infusion).
  • -Clin Gastroenterol & Hep 2010; 8: 509. n=2377. Crohn dz assoc w prematurity but not birth defects.
  • -Gastroenterol 2003;124: 9-17. Safety of 6-MP in pregnancy. n=155, at least 1 pregnancy. No adverse effect noted.
  • -Clin Gastroenterol & Hepatology; 2006: 4: 1255.  Infliximab crosses placenta but was not detected breastmilk.

Monitoring TNF antagonists in inflammatory bowel disease

Posted on by

Previously, this blog has discussed the use of drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease (Drug levels for inflammatory bowel disease | gutsandgrowth).  A good review of this topic has been published recently (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 1079-87).

Some of the useful pointers:

  • Factors that influence clearance of TNF antagonists are reviewed:
  1. Antidrug antibodies (ADA) increase clearance and worsen outcomes
  2. Use of concomitant immunosuppressives reduces the likelihood of ADA formation and increase drug concentration.   In the SONIC trial, use of azathioprine was associated with trough infliximab (IFX) levels of 3.5 μg/mL compared with 1.6 μg/mL with monotherapy.  Also, ADA was reduce: 0.9% compared with 14.6% in the monotherapy group. [Other studies though have found variable effects of cotherapy.]
  3. Low serum albumin and high CRP are associated with increased drug clearance
  4. Individuals with high body size and males are more likely to have increased drug clearance.
  • Better assays for measurement of IFX and adalimumab (ADL) are now available.
  • Currently a trial evaluating trough levels is underway: Trough Level Adapted Infliximab Treatment (TAXIT).  With this study, the accepted target range for trough levels is 3-7 μg/mL.  Levels >7 μg/mL are considered supratherapeutic and allows for a prolongation of dosing interval.  Preliminary data confirm that trough levels inversely correlate with CRP.
  • Proposed algorithm in individuals with loss of response & positive ADA.  If ADAs present at high titer, then switch to different TNF antagonist.  If low  titer, could either switch or attempt drug escalation.
  • With IFX, when antibodies to infliximab (ATIs) are present, the likelihood of responding to increased dose is less than 20% whereas changing to different TNF antagonist has about an 90% response (in patients who were previous responders).
  • Proposed algorithm in individuals with loss of response & negative ADA.  If subtherapeutic trough levels (IFX ❤ μg/mL, ADL <8 μg/mL, or certolizumab <27.5 μg/mL), then dose escalation is worthwhile.  If drug levels are therapeutic, then dose escalation will not be effective.
  • With IFX, more than 85% of patients will respond to drug escalation when the trough level is subtherapeutic. This is much more favorable than switching agents.
  • One other issue with ADAs is that they may be transient is some patients.  Perhaps one-fourth of ATIs may be transient which may explain why some individuals with ATIs may still respond to dose escalation.

These points give several reasons why drug monitoring is useful in individuals with loss of response and may help determine whether patients responding to therapy may be able to prolong dose intervals.  At the same time, when an individual is not responding to therapy, it is also important to determine if in fact active inflammation is present with objective markers and to consider alternative explanations for GI symptoms (eg. Clostridium difficile infection, irritable bowel, bacterial overgrowth, etc.).

Related blog entries:

Only one chance to make first impression | gutsandgrowth

When nothing else is working | gutsandgrowth

Infliximab for children with Ulcerative Colitis | gutsandgrowth

Adalimumab for children with Crohn’s disease | gutsandgrowth

CHOOSE TNF TRIAL | gutsandgrowth

Adalimumab for children with Crohn’s disease

Posted on by

While adalimumab has been used in children with refractory Crohn’s disease, there has not been a lot of available data.  However, this situation has improved with the publication of the “IMAgINE 1” study (Hyams JS et al, Gastroenterology 2012; 143: 365-74).

This study enrolled 192 pediatric (6-17 yr-old) patients with moderate to severe Crohn’s disease; patients had PCDAI >30 and had failed conventional therapy with the exception of infliximab.  Approximately 45% in both groups had received prior treatment with infliximab.  The study started as an open-label induction followed by double-blind randomization into either a high-dose or low-dose maintenance phase.

Dosing:  For open label, patients >40 kg received 160 mg at week 0 and 80 mg at week 2.; patients <40 kg, received 80 mg at week 0 and 40 mg at week 2.

For maintenance, high dose was considered 40 mg every other week (eow) if >40 kg, and 20 mg eow if <40 kg.  Low dose was 20 mg and 10 mg respectively based on weight.

Results: 152 of 188 patients completed 26 week study period; 4 patients did not complete induction period.  At week 26, 63 patients (33.5%) were in clinical remission.  The high-dose remission response was 38.7% which was not statistically different from the 28.4% response in the low-dose group.

At week 52, there was a statistically improved response rate in the high-dose group 41.9% compared with low-dose group 28.4%; at the week 52 point, the remission rates were 33.3% compared with 23.2% respectively (p=0.1).  Among patients who were at least 13, it is noted that the overall CDAI clinical remission rate was 51% (week 26) and 36% (week 52) which are comparable to adult data from CHARM study.

Based on previous infliximab: Patients who had prior infliximab did not respond as favorably as infliximab-naive patients.  In the high dose group, the clinical remission at week 26 was 56.9% for infliximab-naive group compared to 16.7% for infliximab-experienced.  Similarly, the infliximab-naive response was higher, 68.6% compared with 47.6% for the infliximab-experienced.

Safety: “No new safety signals were detected.” Yet, 101 of 192 patients had adverse events during open label period, including 2 serious infections (which resolved & patients completed study).  Eight serious infections were noted during double-blind period.  Other safety problems included hepatic-related events in 9 of 188 patients, injection site reactions in 19 patients, hematologic adverse events in 8 patients, and 8 allergic reactions.  There were no reports of malignancy, congestive heart failure, lupus-like syndrome or demyelinating disease.

In both the high-dose and low-dose group, switching to weekly therapy instead of eow was allowed and commonly occurred: 48/95 in low-dose & 35/93 in high-dose.

Reasons for discontinuation: In both groups, drug discontinuation was frequent.  In the low-dose group, 37 patients stopped therapy.  In 18, this was due to lack of efficacy.  The other reasons included adverse effects in 10, protocol violation in 4, withdrew consent in 4, and lost to followup in 1.  In the high-dose group, 27  stopped therapy.  In 11, this was due to lack of efficacy; 12 had adverse effects, 2 withdrew consent, and 1 had protocol violation.

Another recent article (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012; 18: 685-90) indicates that the annual risk of loss of response to adalimumab was 18% per year of followup.  This study involved 380 CD patients with an average age of 38 years.  This study also showed that there was a significant difference between patients naive to anti-TNF therapy and those who had prior anti-TNF therapy:  8% loss of response per year of followup compared with 22% respectively.

Related blog entries:

TNF-α antagonists and infections

CHOOSE TNF TRIAL

Disease modifying treatment in IBD

Only one chance to make first impression

TNF antagonists and UC

Adalimumab references:

  • -Gut 2011:  Gut doi:10.1136/gut.2010.221127. Use in induction of remission in UC. Reinisch W, et al. Adalimumab for induction of clinical remission in … – Gut – BMJ
  • -Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 32: 1228-39. CHOICE trial. adalimumab effective in pts failing prior IFX.
  • -Gastroenterol 2009; 137: 1628. n=168.  71% & 67% of pts responded by weeks 4 & 12.  61% demonstrated sustained benefit. (in IFX failure pts). Of 156 pts, 65% needed to step up to 40mg weekly and 60 eventually stopped adalimumab due to loss of response.  Lower trough levels associated with loss of effectiveness & often with antibodies to adalimumab (present in 9.2% of pts).
  • -IBD 2011; 17: 2512.  n=50.  62% of pts develop skin reactions: eczema, acne-like dermatitis, psoriasis-like (6 of 50).  Adalimumab d/c’d in 22%.  Message -see dermatologist
  • -Lofberg et al. Am J Gastro 2008; 103: S418 (abstract 1069) Care study. -n=945. Humira at week 20 -remissions in 52% of pts naive to biologics, in 46% who prev responded to IFX & became intolerant, in 40% who prev responded to IFX and lost response, and 36% of pts with primary non-response to IFX.
  • -IBD 2008; 14: S1 Abrstarct 0002. Humira in TNF-naive patients with Crohn’s disease. Decreases hospitalizations. (12 month: 12.7% vs 20.3% in placebo group) Adult dosing: Induction 160mg, then 80mg in 2 weeks, then 40mg every 2 weeks.
  • -IBD 2008; 14: 1683. Response to adalimumab in 10 children.
  • -Gastro 2008; 135: 1493. n=778. mod-to severe Crohn had less hospitalizations (decreased ~60%) and surgery if Rx’d w Humira. 40mg eo week or qweek post 80/40 induction
  • -NEJM 2008; 359: 810. Use in pediatric JRA -helpful.
  • -JPGN 2008; 47: 19. n=15 pediatric patients. Complete or partial response in 64%.
  • -Gastro 2007; 132: 52. CHARM Trial. n=778. 40mg weekly c 47% response at week 26 (17% placebo) & 41% @ week 52 (12% placebo); works nearly as well in pts c prev inliximab as naive pts. Rapid onset ~c/in 2 weeks
  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2006; 4: 1199-1213. Excellent review. Suggested dosing: 20mg every other week if 20-25kg, 25mg every other week if 25-30kg, 30mg every other week if 30-40kg, 35mg every other week if 40-55kg,  40mg every other week if >55kg, and increase to weekly dosing if needed
  • -JPGN 2008; 46: 1208, 226. pediatric case report and review of CHARM
  • -Gastro 2006; 130: 323-333. CLASSIC-I Trial, n=299. 36% 4-week response to 160mg/80mg week 0/subsequent week 2 (vs. 12% of placebo) All pts naive to anti-TNF Rx.

Adalimumab Injection Pain

  • –Suggestions from GI bulletin board. 1)you let the Humira Pen sit out for about 30 minutes prior to administering the medication, so that it appears clear and not foggy, that it greatly reduces pain at the site. 2) the pain disappeared after adding bicarbonate to the Humira. By trial and error, our nurse found that 0.15cc of bicarbonate is the minimum amount that yields a good effect.
  • -Lidocaine with adalimumab. Abstract reference: AF Ayala, Rosanne S.Groh, Brandt P.Robbins, Lisa M.Scalzi, Lizabeth Bingham, C. April TI The addition of injectable lidocaine to adalimumab results in decreased injection site pain and increased acceptance of therapy. 72nd Annual Scientific Meeting of the American-College-of-Rheumatology/43rd Annual Scientific Meeting of the Association-of-Rheumatology-Health-Professionals. CY OCT 24-29, 2008 CL San Francisco, CA. They used 0.2 ml 1% lidocaine into prefilled adalimumab syringe. We’ve tried this with a few patients and it seems to work well.
  • -Pt developed a “shot blocker” that is a bristle brush with a central hole for the syringe. The brush diffuses the pain from the Humira injection. Click the link below for a youtube video he created.
  • -http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfL95YRlTjY

CHOOSE TNF TRIAL

Posted on by

While most physicians consider drug efficacy as the most important factor in choosing therapy, this is not always the determinant factor in patient choice.

The “CHOOSE TNF TRIAL” (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012; 18: 1523-30) was a prospective survey of 100 adult patients with Crohn’s disease who were naive to anti-TNF therapy (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab).

Most important to patients:

  • Ease of use 69%
  • Time for therapy 34%
  • Time between applications 31%
  • Evidence for efficacy 19%
  • Fear of syringes 10%

Patient choice: Adalimumab preferred in 36%, certolizumab in 28%, and infliximab in 25%

While patient concerns need to be considered, others have shown that physician opinion is an important factor for patient decisions (J Rhemumatol 2008; 35: 618-24).  The discussion notes that “three anti-TNF drugs used in inflammatory bowel disease treatment have not been compared side-by-side in clinical trials.”  Thus far in pediatrics, infliximab is the only TNF approved for clinical use; as such, the other anti-TNF agents have been used primarily when infliximab loses effectiveness.

One drawback with injectable medications has been reduced adherence; up to 50% of patients fail to maintain regular injection interval; in addition, in patients who have had intravenous infusions (rather than patients who are naive) it is preferred over injections (Jay Popp, medical director of Janssen pharmaceuticals–personal communication).

As such, when patients receive infusions (eg. infliximab), closer followup and better adherence are more likely in comparison to injections.  This certainly improves efficacy.

Related blog entries:

TNF-α antagonists and infections

Disease modifying treatment in IBD

Only one chance to make first impression

TNF-α antagonists and infections

Posted on by

In our pediatric patients who receive tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) antagonists, fortunately we see few infectious complications.  In older patients, infections are much more important source of morbidity.  The main TNF-α inhibitors in clinical use include infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, and certolizumab. Two large studies help quantify this risk:

  • Grijalva CG et al. JAMA 2011; 306: 2331-39.
  • Strangeld A et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2011; 70: 1914-20.

The first study assembled retrospective cohorts between 1998-2007 with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and psoriasis/psoriatic arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis (group 3).  This study’s acronym is SABER: Safety Assessment of Biologic Therapy. This data was compiled from 4 large US automated databases.  In total, there were 10,484 RA, 2323 IBD, and 3215 group 3 patients.  1172 serious infections were identified, mostly (53%) pneumonia or skin/soft tissue infections.  Among IBD patients, hospitalization rates were 10.91 (per 100 person-years) for TNF-α antagonists and 9.6 for comparison group.  The rates of hospitalization were similar in RA (8.16 with TNF-α antagonists) and lower in the group 3 patients (5.41 with TNF-α antagonists).   In all groups, baseline glucocorticoid use was associated with a dose-dependent increase in infections.  Overall, there was not an increase risk of hospitalizations with TNF-α antagonists compared with nonbiologic treatments.

The second cited reference examined patients from Germany with RA, enrolled in the RABBIT registry.  Data was available for 5044 patients.  There were 392 serious infections in this cohort with fewer infections noted after 3 years.  Risks for infection included age (>60), chronic lung or renal disease, history of serious infections, and treatment with glucocorticoids.  Treatment with 7.5-14mg conferred at relative risk (RR) of 2.1; treatment with ≥15mg conferred a RR of 4.7.  The rates of serious infections has an exponential change when risk factors are added together.  In Figure 3, estimated risk of serious infections for patients receiving ≥15mg  glucocorticoids along with three additional risk factors was 45% per year; with two risk factors the risk was approximately 20% and with one additional risk factor approximately 10%.

While these studies confirm significant risks of infections with biologic agents, the absolute risk is low particularly when other risk factors are not present.  In pediatric populations, glucocorticoids are the most prominent risk factor.  In addition, the risk of serious infections may be reduced by effective therapy.  In the SONIC study, serious infectious complications were less frequent in patients on combination therapy (infliximab and azathioprine) than with either monotherapy.  This result was likely due to the decreased need for glucocorticoids.

Additional references/relevant previous blogs:

  • NEJM 2010; 362: 1383. Sonic study. Combination AZA/IFX with greater efficacy. 56.8% remission in combo Rx.
  • -IBD 2008; 14: 721.  Pneumocystis jiroveci (carinii) w infliximab -review of 84 cases.  Dig Dis Sci 2007; 52: 1481-84.  PCP most likely to occur on average 3 weeks after 2nd infusion (possibly due to concommitant drug use)
  • -Gastroenterology 2008; 134: 929.  n=100 consecutive IBD patients with opportunistic infections.  Any of drugs associated w ~2.9 OR in adutls (greatest in >50yrs).  OR 14.5 when multiple immune drugs. Steroids more associated with Candida. AZA/6MP more with viral: HSV, VZV (shingles), CMV.  IFX less commonly with infections -though increased histoplasma and atypical mycobacterium
  • -Gastroenterology 2009; 136: 1182.  Review of biologics.
  • -IBD 2007; 13: 769.  Review of safety of wide range of biologics
  • –Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006; 5:621-30.  TREAT registry.  Steroids but not biologics associated with increased mortality risk.
  • Only one chance to make first impression

Biomarkers identify patients who benefit and how

Posted on by

Fecal calprotectin and serum CRP levels are helping to identify which patients benefit most from biologic therapies, how frequently to dose individuals and how well inflammation correlates with changes in CDAI.  Several abstracts from ACG highlight these issues:

Abstract #1175: Fecal calprotectin concentration and clinical remission in patients with active Crohn’s disease treated with certolizumab pegol: results from PRECiSE 1 (Sandborn W et al).

Abstract #1164: Baseline C-reactive protein is associated with disease progression in  patients with Crohn’s disease (Colmbel J-F et al).

Abstract #1165: Association of baseline C-reactive protein with maintenance of remission in patients with moderate to severe Crohn’s disease treated with adalimumab (Sandborn W et al)

Abstract 1175 uses a post hoc analysis of patients with active Crohn’s disease (CD) who were treated with certolizumab or placebo for 26 weeks.  Baseline calprotectin concentrations were higher in patients who achieved remission.  Another interesting finding of this study was that placebo patients did not have improvement in calprotectin levels.  So, even though some patients  had improvement in CDAI scores, indicating subjective improvement, inflammatory activity did not decline.  This is another indicator of how flawed a CDAI is for indicating the effectiveness of an IBD therapy.

Abstract 1164 looked at 238 patients with moderate to severe CD who were randomized to placebo arm in the CHARM study.  These patients were given open-label adalimumab for induction (80 mg week 0, 40 mg week 2) followed by blinded weekly placebo treatment from weeks 4-56 with a switch to open-label adalimumab after week 12 for a disease flare.  Higher baseline CRP levels in patients with moderate or severe CD were associated with higher disease scores after four weeks and after one year.  This suggests that a patient with higher CRP is more likely to have disease progression without adequate treatment.

Abstract 1165 examined the relationship between CRP and remission in CHARM patients. In the high baseline CRP group, 39 patients received adalimumab every other week, 28 weekly, and 34 received placebo.  In the low baseline CRP group, there were 42 every other week patients, 33 weekly, and 39 placebo patients.  In the high baseline CRP group, remission rates were 50% higher in the weekly treatment group compared to the every other week group.  Patients with low baseline CRP had similar results when treated weekly versus every other week.  Thus, patients with high baseline CRP are more likely to benefit from dose escalation and low CRP patients are more likely to have coexistent issues contributing to their symptoms (eg. IBS).

One other caveat: CRP production is geneticallly-determined and some patients do not make CRP in spite of active inflammation.

Related blog entries:

Food as medicine

Speed matters

Additional calprotectin references:

  • -IBD 2010; 16: 482. Calprotectin correlated with inflammation of ileum after pouch creation in children.
  • -IBD 2009; 12: 1851. Calprotectin was the only marker to correlate with endoscopic activity; n=134.
  • -JPGN 2009; 48: 48. Good sensitivity/specificity of calprotectin & lactoferrin. Up to 96% sensitivity & specificity.
  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2008; 6: 1218. Lack of correlation between clinical symptoms and fecal biomarkers. However, biomarkers do correlate with mucosal/endoscopic disease. n=164.
  • -IBD 2008; 14: 1392. Monitoring IBD activity level c calprotectin & lactoferrin; n=15.
  • -IBD 2008; 14: 1229. Clinical utility in assessing histological relapse in kids. n=73 over 8yrs…may allow avoidance of invasive tests; cut off of 275mcg/gm had 97% sensitivity/neg pred value 85% pos pred value/specificity at predicting relapse.
  • -IBD 2008; 14: 669. Fecal calprotectin good at predicting relapse in pediatric IBD w cutoff of 400.

C-reactive protein references:

  • -J Pediatr 2011; 159: 340. CRP helps identify IBD.
  • -Clin Gastro & Hepatology 2011; 9: 421. CRP predicts response to IFX. n=718. those with high CRP had 91% response vs 83% in pts with NL CRP.
  • -Gastro 2004; 126: 1574-81. Crohn’s review. High CRP suggests likely response to anti-TNFα treatment.
  • -JPGN 2004; 38: 509-12. CRP more reliable than ESR for IBD.
  • -NEJM 1999; 340: 448. Review on acute phase reactants. CRP better than ESR as ESR is an indirect measure (resistance of plasma, due to fibrinogen, to the falling of RBCs) & broader range for CRP.

TNF antagonists and UC

Posted on by

In my fellowship (15 years ago), the use of thiopurines (eg. azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine) for ulcerative colitis was debated.  Many physicians urged colectomy rather than using these drugs which could have long-term consequences.  At the time, the risk of thiopurines was less well-understood.  Over time, the use of these agents has become common when mesalamine products were ineffective.  The same issue comes up with TNF antagonists versus colectomy.

A recent study provides more information on the effectiveness of adalimumab for patients with moderate-to-severe UC but does not settle this debate (Gastroenterology 2012; 142: 257-65).  In this study, termed ‘ULTRA-2’ (Ulcerative colitis long-term remission and maintenance with adalimumab 2), the  efficacy of adalimumab for induction & maintenance of remission was studied in 494 patients.  This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study; average age was 40 years.

Clinical remission in the adalimumab group were 16.5% at 8 weeks (9.3% placebo).  At 52 weeks, 17.3% in the adalimumab group were in remission (8.5% placebo).  Among patients naive to anti-TNF agents, the response rate was 21.3% at week 8 & 22% at week 52.  Safety overall was similar in both groups; however, in the adalimumab group one patient developed gastric cancer and one developed squamous cell carcinoma.

The authors conclude that adalimumab is safe and more effective than placebo in inducing and maintaining remission among patients with moderate-to-severe UC.

A second study, also published this past month, looks at the use of infliximab for maintenance therapy for UC (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012; 18: 201-11).  Patients who had achieved benefit from ACT-1 and ACT-2 studies were followed for three years.  Dosage of infliximab could be adjusted.  A total of 229 patients entered the study.  During the study, 70 patients (30.6%) discontinued infliximab due to adverse effects (10.5%), lack of efficacy (4.8%) or other reasons (15.2%); the majority were able to continue infliximab.  The authors indicate that no new safety issues were identified. Yet, there were two deaths among the infliximab group including a 19 year-old nonsmoker who developed lung cancer and a lethal case of histoplasmosis.

Because the improvement compared to placebo is modest with both of these agents, the question about whether to use these medications or proceed to surgery in UC patients is unanswered.

Additional references:

  • -Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Oct 15;28(8):966-72. Epub 2008 Jul 24.  Long-term outcome of adalimumab therapy for ulcerative colitis with intolerance or lost response to infliximab: a single-centre experience.
  • -Am J Gastroenterol (Oussalah A et al) 2010; 105: 2617-25. Multicenter study of IFX for UC
  • -Gastroenterology 2010; 138: 2282. Severe pediatric UC. 25/33 responded to IFX. colectomy rate 19% at 1 year.
  • -Gastroenterology 2009; 137: 1204 (ed), 1250. lower colectomy rates at 54wks in IFX vs placebo (+concomitant meds): 10% vs. 17%.
  • -Clin Gastro & Hep 2008; 6: 1112. Do NOT use CYA post infliximab and vice versa. n=19. 1 death due to sepsis. Remission rates occur in ~1/3rd but are of short duration.
  • -NEJM 2005; 2462. 69% clinical response @ 8 weeks (vs. 37% placebo) & 45% at week 54 (vs. 20% placebo).
  • -JPGN 2004; 38: 298. 82% short-term response, 63% sustained response; n=16.