Unknown's avatar

About gutsandgrowth

I am a pediatric gastroenterologist at GI Care for Kids (previously called CCDHC) in Atlanta, Georgia. The goal of my blog is to share some of my reading in my field more broadly. In addition, I wanted to provide my voice to a wide range of topics that often have inaccurate or incomplete information. Before starting this blog in 2011, I would tear out articles from journals and/or keep notes in a palm pilot. This blog helps provide an updated source of information that is easy to access and search, along with links to useful multimedia sources. I was born and raised in Chattanooga. After graduating from the University of Virginia, I attended Baylor College of Medicine. I completed residency and fellowship training at the University of Cincinnati at the Children’s Hospital Medical Center. I received funding from the National Institutes of Health for molecular biology research of the gastrointestinal tract. During my fellowship, I had the opportunity to work with some of the most amazing pediatric gastroenterologists and mentors. Some of these individuals included Mitchell Cohen, William Balistreri, James Heubi, Jorge Bezerra, Colin Rudolph, John Bucuvalas, and Michael Farrell. I am grateful for their teaching and their friendship. During my training with their help, I received a nationwide award for the best research by a GI fellow. I have authored numerous publications/presentations including original research, case reports, review articles, and textbook chapters on various pediatric gastrointestinal problems. In addition, I have been recognized by Atlanta Magazine as a "Top Doctor" in my field multiple times. Currently, I am the vice chair of the section of nutrition for the Georgia Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics. In addition, I am an adjunct Associate Clinical Professor of Pediatrics at Emory University School of Medicine. Other society memberships have included the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN), American Academy of Pediatrics, the Food Allergy Network, the American Gastroenterology Association, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation. As part of a national pediatric GI organization called NASPGHAN (and its affiliated website GIKids), I have helped develop educational materials on a wide-range of gastrointestinal and liver diseases which are used across the country. Also, I have been an invited speaker for national campaigns to improve the evaluation and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, celiac disease, eosinophilic esophagitis, hepatitis C, and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Some information on these topics has been posted at my work website, www.gicareforkids.com, which has links to multiple other useful resources. I am fortunate to work at GI Care For Kids. Our group has 17 terrific physicians with a wide range of subspecialization, including liver diseases, feeding disorders, eosinophilic diseases, inflammatory bowel disease, cystic fibrosis, DiGeorge/22q, celiac disease, and motility disorders. Many of our physicians are recognized nationally for their achievements. Our group of physicians have worked closely together for many years. None of the physicians in our group have ever left to join other groups. I have also worked with the same nurse (Bernadette) since I moved to Atlanta in 1997. For many families, more practical matters about our office include the following: – 14 office/satellite locations – physicians who speak Spanish – cutting edge research – on-site nutritionists – on-site psychology support for abdominal pain and feeding disorders – participation in ImproveCareNow to better the outcomes for children with inflammatory bowel disease – office endoscopy suite (lower costs and easier scheduling) – office infusion center (lower costs and easier for families) – easy access to nursing advice (each physician has at least one nurse) I am married and have two sons (both adults). I like to read, walk/hike, bike, swim, and play tennis with my free time. I do not have any financial relationships with pharmaceutical companies or other financial relationships to disclose. I have helped enroll patients in industry-sponsored research studies.

ACG Clostridium Difficile Guidelines Plus One

CR Kelly et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2021;00:1–24. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000001278; published online May 18, 2021. Full text PDF: ACG Clinical Guidelines: Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infections

Key points:

  • Guideline recommends AGAINST using probiotics for prevention of C difficile infection (CDI)
  • Guideline cautions AGAINST testing individuals at low risk for CDI (eg. not having diarrhea)
  • Guideline recommends either vancomycin or fidaxomicin (lower CDI recurrence) for all cases of CDI and consideration of metronidazole for nonsevere cases. Fidaxomicin is recommended for CDI recurrence after vancomycin or metronidazole.
  • Guideline recommends combination of highly sensitive test and highly specific test for diagnosis of CDI. “CDI-related complications are rare in NAAT-positive, toxin EIA-negative patients, who, even when untreated, may have clinical courses similar to those without CDI…If both are positive, the diagnosis of CDI can be made reliably. If both are negative, CDI is unlikely. Discordant results when NAAT or GDH is positive and toxin EIA is negative require clinical evaluation and consideration of the possibility of colonization or that the patient has CDI but toxin levels are below the limits of detection (see below).

Related blog posts:

Also, I recommend this article in the NY Times about a liver/intestinal transplant surgeon (who has taken care of some of our patients): ‘I Had Never Faced the Reality of Death’: A Surgeon Becomes a Patient

Magnet Safety

Some screenshots from a recent (5/19/21) ‘tweetorial’ on Magnet Safety:

More information on this topic from a previous Bowel Sounds Podcast with Bryan Rudolph (June 2020)

Also there’s a GIF (from Bryan Rudolph’s twitter feed):

Related blog posts:

Preventing Fistulas and Improving Radiologic Remission with Infliximab

Two recent studies show how infliximab improves outcomes in Crohn’s disease.

The first study by Bossuyt et al was a substudy (n=36) of the TAILORIX trial. Key findings:

  • At week 54 of treatment, 36.4% of patients had a radiologic response, 30.3% of patients were in remission, and 71% had endoscopic features of remission
  • Radiologic remission correlated with infliximab trough level at week 14 (P = .049) when the infliximab trough level cut-off value was set at 7.8 μg/mL (area under the curve, 0.74; 75% sensitivity; 86% specificity; 90% negative predictive value; 57% positive predictive value)
  • Radiologic response was also associated with continuous infliximab trough levels above 5.0 μg/mL at all time points) (P = .034)
  • Among patients with both radiologic and endoscopic remission, the median infliximab trough level was 8.5
  • In this study, one interesting finding was that only half of patients with endoscopic remission achieved radiologic remission, especially since the cohort had a short disease duration at the onset of treatment (median duration of 1.5 months)

In the second study by Singer et al with 208 pediatric patients with Crohn’s disease, all patients had baseline cross-sectional imaging. Key findings:

  • 26% had perianal fistulas at baseline
  • 14/136 (10%) developed perianal fistulas within 3 years
  • Non-white race increased the risk of perianal fistula
  • Non-penetrating perianal lesions (NPLs) increased the risk of perianal fistulas (20% in patients with NPLs vs. 4% in those without NPLs)
  • Anti-TNF treatment was associated with a decreased risk of perianal fistulas (HR 0.11); this risk reduction was seen in patients with NPLs also (HR =0.14)
screenshot-1026.png (1478×872)

My take: Good infliximab levels correlate with better outcomes.

Related blog posts:

And from The Onion:

Acute Viral Hepatitis in Spain

J Llaneras et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19: 1030-37. Etiologies and Features of Acute Viral Hepatitis in Spain

This prospective study of adults collected data from an emergency room of an academic hospital in Barcelona (2014-2018).

Key findings:

  • The most common etiologies of acute hepatitis were HBV infection (28%), HEV infection (18%), HCV infection (17%), and HAV infection (14%)
  • Approximately one-third of acute hepatitis cases were in immigrants
  • The main risk factors of the cohort were sexual risk contact and intravenous drug use; 79% of cases of HAV had sexual risk behavior
  • Chronic infections developed in 5/28 patients (18%) with acute HBV infection and 7/17 patients (41%) with acute HCV infection 
The graphical abstract breaks down features for the most common etiologies:
HBV (blue) 28%, HEV (purple-pink) 18%, HCV (maroon) 17%, and HAV (light green) 14%.

Prospective Pediatric Study of the Persistence and Progression of Recurrent Abdominal Pain

J Sjolund et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19: 930-938. Prevalence and Progression of Recurrent Abdominal Pain, From Early Childhood to Adolescence

Using a prospective, population-based Swedish cohort (1994-1996) (BAMSE project), the authors analyzed data from 2455 children with complete follow-up evaluation at ages 1, 2, 12, and 16 years.

Key findings:

  • RAP was reported by 26.2% of children on at least 1 of 3 assessment points, of which 11.3% reported symptoms more than once
  • Children with RAP at 12 years had persistent symptoms at 16 years in 45% of cases and increased risks for RAP (relative risk, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.7–2.8), any AP-FGID (relative risk, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.9–3.6), and IBS (relative risk, 3.2; 95% CI, 2.0–5.1) at 16 years
  • Figure 3 summarizes the overlap of RAP at different time points:
  • **In early childhood (1-2 years of age), 149 (6%) had RAP per parental reports. Only 27 in this group, had RAP noted at 16 years of age which accounted for 7% of the total 16 year old cohort with RAP
  • **At 12 years of age, 98 (4%) had RAP. 44 (45%) of this group continued with pain at 16 years which accounted for 11% of the total 16 year old cohort with RAP

My take: Most children (84%) with RAP at 16 years of age did NOT report RAP at younger ages; however, in children with RAP at 12 years of age, 45% continued to have RAP at 16 years of age.

Related blog posts:

This and That: Ear Tubes and Addiction Medicine

Interesting articles from recent NEJM:

A Hoberman et al. NEJM 2021; 384: 1789-99. Tympanostomy Tubes or Medical Management for Recurrent Acute Otitis Media

A quick read of this article suggested very bad news for our ENT colleagues. In this prospective, randomized trial (n=250), the authors did not find a significant advantage of tympanostomy tubes over medical management of acute otitis media (OM) among 6-35 month olds with recurrent OM in an intention-to-treat analysis, the rate (±SE) of episodes of acute otitis media per child-year during a 2-year period was 1.48±0.08 in the tympanostomy-tube group and 1.56±0.08 in the medical-management group (P=0.66).

In an associated editorial (pg 1859-60), (Ellen Wald notes that only 55% of children in the medical management group were actually treated medically throughout the trial making the sample size too small. Her advice: “In a child older than 2 years of age, we can forecast that infections will be fewer in the coming year and that medical treatment should be continued. In the younger child, there is a nearly 50% likelihood that the frequency of infections will continue; the child is likely to have fewer and less severe episodes of acute otitis media with less exposure to antibiotics if tympanostomy-tube placement is undertaken.”

Time to first recurrent episode of acute otitis media (Figure 2). Cumulative percentage of children with recurrent OM with one minus Kaplan-Meier survival estimates according to trial group.

E Poorman. NEJM 2021; 384: 1783-1784. The Number Needed to Prescribe — What Would It Take to Expand Access to Buprenorphine?

This article describes how many physicians are reluctant to treat opioid use disorder. The author notes that “prescribing buprenorphine is one of the most effective ways to save a life. In one study, buprenorphine treatment was associated with a 37% reduction in all-cause mortality during the year after a nonfatal overdose. This reduction is larger than the reduction in mortality associated with any blood-pressure medication, diabetic agent, or statin….But much…will depend on physicians believing that people with a substance use disorder aren’t just “addicts” but are people with a chronic medical disease that we can and should treat.”

ACG Guideline: Upper Gastrointestinal and Ulcer Bleeding

Full Text: ACG Clinical Guideline: Upper Gastrointestinal and Ulcer Bleeding (L Laine et al. Am J Gastroenter: 2021; 116 : 899-917.

Related blog posts:

Good Results with Liver Transplantation Using Hepatitis C Livers

The advent of highly-effective therapy for hepatitis C has led to the use of hepatitis C-infected livers for organ transplantation.

H Bohorquez et al. Liver Transplantation 2021; 27: 548-557. Liver Transplantation Using Hepatitis C Virus–Viremic Donors Into Hepatitis C Virus–Aviremic Recipients as Standard of Care

Methods: The authors would utilize livers from donors with hepatitis C if they had a “normal gross appearance or, in cases in which a liver biopsy was indicated, acceptable histology less than grade 2 inflammation and less than stage 2 fibrosis (Batts-Ludwig classification)”

Key findings:

  • 292 patients, 61 rHCV− received DNAT+ livers (study group), and 231 rHCV− received DNAT− (aviremic donors [nuclear acid test‐negative donors]) (2018-2019)
  • 1‐year post‐LT patient and graft survival were similar between groups
  • In the study group, 4 patients died, and 1 patient required retransplantation within the first year post‐LT (all unrelated to HCV)
  • 51 patients completed DAA treatment, all achieving sustained virologic response for 12 or more weeks (SVR‐12) (one required re-treatment)

Given the limited organ availability, using livers from donors with hepatitis C has the potential to reduce waitlist times and waitlist mortality.

My take: Liver transplantation with hepatitis C has become bidirectional; livers are being received by those with liver failure due to hepatitis C and failed livers are being replaced by donors infected with hepatitis C.

Related blog posts:

Gastric Emptying in Diabetes, Plus Two

Briefly noted: RK Goyal. NEJM 2021; 384: 1742-1751. Gastric Emptying Abnormalities in Diabetes Mellitus

This article provides insight into the topic of gastric emptying with a focus on patients with diabetes. A few key points:

  • Gastric emptying affects glucose homeostasis in patients with diabetes; delayed gastric emptying in patients with type 2 diabetes could have beneficial effects in this regard.
  • Delayed gastric emptying occurs in 40-47% of adults with diabetes; rapid emptying occurs in 20-22%.
  • Upper GI symptoms do NOT correlate with gastric emptying. Prevalence of these symptoms is highest in those with normal gastric emptying (43-52% in those with normal emptying compared with 19-28% with delayed emptying, and 20-37% with rapid emptying)
  • “Functional dyspepsia-like symptoms in gastroparesis may arise not through motility changes but rather through the parallel effects of oxidative stress and inflammation on nocireceptors and on other afferents that produce the symptoms.”

My take: Knowing how quickly the stomach empties rarely helps management. In this review, Dr. Goyal states that “the effective treatment of symptoms in diabetic gastroparesis may be similar to the treatment of functional dyspepsia.”

Also, noted in same issue of NEJM:

TB Corcoran et al. NEJM 2021; 384: 1731-1741. Dexamethasone and Surgical-Site Infection Key finding: A single dose of dexamathosone (8 mg) did not increase the risk of surgical site infection; this is in contrast to long-term glucocorticoid therapy which is a risk factor for infection and wound dehiscence.

J Salwa et al. NEJM 2021; 384: 1684-6. Designing an Independent Public Health Agency. This article makes compelling arguments for separating health agencies from political influence. The FDA, the CDC, and HHS in the previous administration were pressured and undermined. In contrast, the Federal Reserve Board, which has 14 year terms that require ‘removal only for cause,’ was “reliably [able to] exert federal power because of its institutional features as an independent agency.”

From TikTok -twitter feed: The GI Bleeding Paradox (58 secs -humor) @DGlaucomflecken#Gastroenterology#GI#MedTwitter

Are We On the Verge of Pharmacologic Management of Obesity (Again)?

In the 1990s, the combination of fenfluramine/phentermine was popularized as a treatment for obesity. Fenfluarmine, though, was shown to cause potentially fatal pulmonary hypertension and heart valve problems, which eventually led to its withdrawal and legal damages of over $13 billion (per Wikipedia: fenfluramine/phentermine).

Now, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, like liraglutide, are showing promise as agents to promote weight loss, primarily by inhibiting appetite. JR Lundrgen et al (NEJM 2021; 384: 1719-1730. Healthy Weight Loss Maintenance with Exercise, Liraglutide, or Both Combined) show that liraglutide can promote weight loss, especially if combined with exercise.

Methods: After an 8-week low-calorie diet, participants were randomly assigned for 1 year to one of four strategies: a moderate-to-vigorous–intensity exercise program plus placebo (exercise group); treatment with liraglutide (3.0 mg per day-SC injection) plus usual activity (liraglutide group); exercise program plus liraglutide therapy (combination group); or placebo plus usual activity (placebo group)

Key findings:

  • After the 8-week low-calorie diet, 195 participants had a mean decrease in body weight of 13.1 kg.
  • At 1 year, all the active-treatment strategies led to greater weight loss than placebo: difference in the exercise group, −4.1 kg (95% confidence interval [CI], −7.8 to −0.4; P=0.03); in the liraglutide group, −6.8 kg (95% CI, −10.4 to −3.1; P<0.001); and in the combination group, −9.5 kg (95% CI, −13.1 to −5.9; P<0.001). The combination strategy led to greater weight loss than exercise (difference, −5.4 kg; 95% CI, −9.0 to −1.7; P=0.004) but not significantly more than monotherapy with liraglutide (−2.7 kg; 95% CI, −6.3 to 0.8; P=0.13)
  • The side effects of decreased appetite, dizziness, increased heart rate and palpitations were more common in those receiving liraglutide; palpitations were evident in 12% of the liraglutide monotherapy group and 4% of the combination (with exercise) group.

The details of the exercise program are detailed in the methods section; all participants were assigned an instructor and expected to do a minimum of 150 minutes per week of moderate-intensity aerobic physical activity or 75 minutes per week of vigorous-intensity aerobic physical activity.

These results are similar to the 15% weight loss noted at 68 weeks with the GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide.

My take: GLP-1 receptor agonists help individuals lose weight. However, we’ve seen the promise of medical therapy before so we will have to see how the story ends.

Related blog post: Semaglutide: Potential or Problematic New Treatment for Fatty Liver Disease/NASH

Briefly noted: YY Gibbens et al. American Journal of Gastroenterology 2021 April 22. Effects of Central Obesity on Esophageal Epithelial Barrier Function. Key finding:  Obesity+/GER- group demonstrated increased intercellular space, reduced desmosome density, and increased fluorescein leak compared with control subjects. Thus, obesity may worsen esophageal disease by  impairing the structural and functional integrity of the esophageal barrier independent of GER. (Thanks to Mike Hart for this reference)