Category Archives: Pediatric Gastroenterology Intestinal Disorder

CCFA: Updates in Inflammatory Bowel Disease 2017 (part 1)

Posted on by

Our local CCFA chapter provided a useful physician CME meeting.  The following are my notes/picutres. My notes may include some errors in transcription and errors of omission.

Nancy McGreal  -Complementary Therapies in IBD

Key points:

  1. Curcumin and VSL#3 are likely helpful
  2. Most complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies are not inherently dangerous, but most are unproven
  3. Biggest risks: Nonadherence rates are increased in patient taking CAM.
  4. Despite the low overall risk of most CAM treatments, Dr. McGreal cautioned against the following:
    1. Cannabis is NOT recommended due to neurocognitive effects. It may mask active disease.
    2. FMT investigational. There are unknown risks but FMT could cause metabolic problems. Donor selection is important and we still have a lot to learn.

This final slide is from CCFA about how to order more patient information brochures.

Disclaimer: These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) and changes in diet should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Outcomes of Children Whose Mothers Have Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Posted on by

A recent study (LR Jolving et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2017; 23: 1440-46) used a nationwide (Denmark) register-based cohort to examine the health outcomes of children whose mothers have inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).  This cohort of 9238 children were compared with nearly 1.4 million children born to women without IBD. Median follow-up time was 9.7 years of the children whose mothers had IBD.

Key findings:

  • Hazard ratio for developing IBD in the offspring was 4.63 if maternal ulcerative colitis
  • Hazard ratio for developing IBD in the offspring was 7.70 if maternal Crohn’s disease
  • “Our data otherwise do not provide evidence for an increased risk of any of the other examined diseases in the offspring.” This included diabetes mellitus, thyroid diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, epilepsy, chronic lung disease, mood disorders, schizophrenia, epilepsy, and anxiety disorders.

Raw numbers for developing IBD:

My take: This study documents the expected finding of an increased risk of IBD among the offspring of women with IBD. No other chronic diseases were increased in this study.

Briefly noted: SM Yoon et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2017; 23: 1382-93.  This retrospective registry study included the following:

  • 314 subjects with Crohn’s disease (CD) who were primary nonresponders, and 179 with CD who were secondary nonresponders
  • 145 subjects with ulcerative colitis (UC) who were primary nonresponders and 74 with UC who were secondary nonresponders

Key findings: “Colonic involvement (OR 8.0) and anti-TNF monotherapy (OR 4.9) were associated with primary nonresponse to anti-TNF agents in CD.” Higher ANCA levels in UC (HR 1.6) were associated with time to loss of response to anti-TNF agents.

 

Combination Therapy with Adalimumab -Is it Helpful?

Posted on by

A recent study (JM Chalbhoub et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2017; 23: 1316-27) performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the effectiveness of Adalimumab (ADA) combination therapy compared with monotherapy.  With infliximab (IFX), the SONIC study, showed that combination therapy with an immunomodulator (IMM) (azathioprine) improved response; combination therapy resulted in reduced immunogenicity, lower rates of infusion reactions, and higher IFX levels.

With the advent of widespread use of therapeutic drug monitoring, some have questioned the need for combination therapy with IFX.  The need for combination therapy for ADA is also a matter of debate.  ADA has less immunogenicity than IFX and it is unclear if combination therapy will improve outcomes. There have been conflicting studies regarding combination therapy with ADA, prompting the current meta-analysis.

The authors identified 24 articles for inclusion from an initial pool of 1194. Key findings:

  • No significant difference between combination therapy and monotherapy was noted for induction of remission (OR 0.86) or response (OR 1.01). The induction of remission is based on data from 3096 patients (1400 on combination treatment).
  • No difference was noted for maintenance of remission (OR 0.97) or response (OR 0.91). The maintenance of remission is based on data from 1885 patients (859 on combination treatment).
  • Patients receiving combination therapy had lower odds of developing antidrug antibodies (OR 0.24)
  • Subgroup analysis in anti-TNF experienced patients showed improved successful induction of remission (OR 1.26) but also more frequent opportunistic infections (OR 2.44)

Overall, the authors conclude that “combination of ADA and immunomodulators does not seem superior to ADA monotherapy for induction and maintenance of remission and response to Crohn’s disease.” They do comment on the recent DIAMOND study which was a randomized open-label top-down strategy trial in anti-TNF-naive and IMM-naïve patients.  While no overall advantage of combination therapy was evident, better endoscopic response (84% vs. 64% with monotherapy) was seen at 26 weeks (but not at 52 weeks).

This study has several limitations.  Overall, there were a small number of randomized trials and the trials had significant heterogeneity.

My take (borrowed from authors): “It is unclear whether the addition of IMM impacts the efficacy of a less immunogenic anti-TNF biologic such as ADA in CD.” Though, in the subgroup of anti-TNF exposed patients, “combination therapy was associated with higher odds of induction of remission.”

Related blog posts:

An Allergy-Immunology View of GI Diseases

Posted on by

Recently, one of our allergy-immunology colleagues, Dr. Kiran Patel, from Emory presented an update on GI Diseases from an allergist viewpoint at one of our GI clinical education meetings. With his permission, many of the slides are noted below.  The slides present a good deal of information, though a lot of nuance and further details were provided by Dr. Patel.

Next few slides discuss typical GI food allergies.  It is not surprising that a lot of allergies manifest with GI symptoms given the amount of immune cells in the intestines and frequent interactions with foods and antigens.

This next slide points out that four of the most common food allergens (cow’s milk, egg, soy, and wheat) are frequently outgrown, whereas with peanuts, tree nuts, fish, and shellfish, it is uncommon to outgrow these allergies..

The next slide discusses potential evaluation.  While the slide states that the positive predictive value of skin prick tests and serum-based IgE tests may be as high as 50%; in fact, when broad panels of allergy tests are ordered, the positive predictive value can be quite low.

Related blog posts:

Dr. Patel did discuss the LEAP study and the LEAP-ON study which overall indicate that early antigen introduction is likely to reduce food allergies. Related blog posts:

 

The next few slides review Food Protein-Induced Enterocolitis Syndrome. Related blog posts:

The next few slides discuss eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).  Allergy testing has not been very helpful in most patients with EoE. Related blog posts:

The last part of Dr. Patel’s talk focused on GI disease (eg. inflammatory bowel disease presentation) of primary immune deficiencies.  In the bottom slide, the diseases that often present with GI symptoms are boxed.

Disclaimer: These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) and changes in diet should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Big Study of Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis -Pediatrics 2017

Posted on by

In July, this blog reviewed a recent big study of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) in adults with more than 7000 patients. A recent study in the pediatric age group enrolled 781 children from 36 institutions: MR Deneau et al. Hepatology 2017; 66: 518-27 (Congratulations to Nitika Gupta and Miriam Vos -in-town colleagues and contributing authors to this study.)

This retrospective study’s key findings:

  • Median age 12 years at diagnosis; 39% were female
  • Autoimmune hepatitis (overlap) was present in 33%
  • Small-duct PSC was present in 13%
  • Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) was present in 76%
  • PSC-IBD and Small-duct PSC (normal cholangiograms) had more favorable prognosis with hazard ratio of 0.6 of developing complications
  • Portal hypertensive and biliary complications were noted in 38% and 25% respectively. After developing these complications, the median survival with native liver was 2.8 years and 3.5 years respectively
  • Survival with native liver was noted in 70% at 5 years and 53% at 10 years
  • Elevations in bilirubin, GGT, and AST-to-platelet count ratio were associated with highest risk of progressive disease.
  • Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) developed in 1% (median, 6 years after diagnosis)

The discussion notes that while pediatric PSC is a progressive disease, complications were slower to develop compared with adult-onset PSC. 10-year survival with native liver is typically lower in adults ~60% (vs 70% in this study).  “Up to one third of adults with PSC may have esophageal varices within a year of diagnosis” compared with only 13% in this cohort.  Dominant strictures are more common in adults, occurring in the majority within 5 years whereas this occurred in 16% of this cohort.

With regard to CCA, the authors note that current recommendations suggest starting to screen for CCA in patients over age 18 years with ultrasound and CA 19-9 at 6-12 month intervals. These studies “could reasonably be extended to PSC patients aged 15 and above and [for those requiring dilatation] of biliary strictures.”

My take: This large pediatric PSC study provides more clarity on the outcomes of patient’s with PSC and the associated conditions.

Related blog posts:

Steps at the High Museum

 

Briefly Noted: Celiac Serology Normalization, Inflammatory Markers in Crohn’s Disease, Nutrition in Neurologically-Impaired

Posted on by
  • DM Isaac et al. JPGN 2017; 65: 195-99.

This retrospective study of 487 pediatric patients shows that it takes a long time to normalize celiac serology/anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody (TTG). The median time was 407 days for the 80.5% of patients that normalized their serology in the study time frame.  The time was 364 days for those who were considered adherent to a gluten-free diet.  Patients with type 1 diabetes were less likely to normalize their TTG levels. Faster normalization occurred in those with lower titers at baseline.

Related blog posts:

  • A Alper et al. JPGN 2017; 65: e25-e27

In this chart review, among 135 children, normal ESR and CRP were observed in 28% of children with Crohn disease and 42% of children with ulcerative colitis.

Related blog post: Do you really need both a ESR and CRP?

  • C Romano et al. JPGN 2017; 65: 242-64

This guideline paper details 31 recommendations (some with multiple parts) for the evaluation and management of children with neurologic impairment.  The recommendations include detailed evaluations including knee heights, skinfold thickness measures, DXA scan, routine micronutrient bloodwork, along with a low threshold for oropharyngeal dysphagia assessment.  The paper has recommendations for evaluations of reflux, constipation, and dental problems.  The authors suggest “considering use of enteral feeding if total oral feeding time exceeds 3 hours per day.”

Related blog post: Surgery for reflux works best for those who need it the least

IPAA (Pouch) for Crohn’s Disease and Indeterminate Colitis

Posted on by

A recent review (S Chang, B Shen, F Remzi. Gastroenterology & Hepatology 2017; 13: 466-75 Full text link: When Not to Pouch: Important Considerations for Patient Selection for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis) makes recommendations regarding Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for Crohn’s disease and indeterminate colitis. Key points:

  • In CD patients with isolated colitis and without perianal disease, “there were no differences in the rates of postoperative complications, pelvic sepsis, or pouch failure compared with UC patients” (GE Reese et al. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50: 239-50).
  • Rates of pouch retention for CD (Table 2) ranged from 43% to 94% in 19 studies. Most of these studies had small numbers (less than 40 patients). In the two largest studies with 97 patients and 150 patients, both with ~10 year followup, pouch retention rates were 74% and 87% respectively.
  • “Patients carrying the diagnosis of IC have pouch function on par with patients with UC, with no significant difference in the number of bowel movements…However, ..are more likely to develop CD of the pouch. Nevertheless, pouch failure rates among IC, IBD-unclassified, and UC are similar in multiple cohorts.”
  • Rates of pouch retention for IC ranged from 73%-100% among the 13 cited studies, though only 2 studies reported rates less than ~90%. The two largest studies with ~340 patients had retention rates of ~95% and followup of 3.4 yrs and 10.2 years.

This review also discusses IPAA and other issues including obesity (which increases the likelihood of complications), sphincter dysfunction, elderly patients, and radiation therapy.

Of note, recent ESPGHAN IBD Porto Group guideline for surgical Crohn’s disease management in children (J Amil-Dias et al JPGN 2017; 64: 818-35) at first glance seems to be at odds with Chang et al recommendations:

  • “Statement 8. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is not recommended when a patient has CD. (Agreement 100%)”
  • The body of the report is more nuanced: “There is, however, recent growing evidence that supports highly selective use of restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for CD. These patients have isolated colonic CD and no evidence of ileal or perianal involvement.”

To me, statement 8 should have been worded to include “except in limited circumstances.”  As it stands now, it misleads those who do not carefully review the entire report.

My take: The report by Chang et al makes a strong case for its conclusion: “Although it is true that the diagnosis of CD is a potential contraindication to IPAA, patients with isolated Crohn’s colitis may thrive after pouch surgery.  At this time, patients with isolated Crohn’s colitis (without perianal disease or small bowel involvement) have good pouch retention rates.”  Their review prompted me to look more closely at the ESPGHAN IBD Porto Group guideline; their Statement 8 recommendation is, in fact, quite misleading.

Disclaimer: These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition.

Keyhole view , looking into the Rotunda UVa, of Thomas Jefferson (or TJ for those in the know)

Likelihood of Genetic Disease with Early-Onset Pancreatitis

Posted on by

Another study (MJ Giefer et al. J Pediatr 2017; 186: 95-100) from the INSPPIRE group provides data on early-onset pancreatitis.  Specifically, the group presents clinical information on 342 children with acute recurrent pancreatitis or chronic pancreatitis regarding disease burden and associations with genetic mutations.

Key findings:

Genetic disease is much more common in younger ages:

  • In subset younger than 6 years, 72 of 102 had genetic diseases identified:  PRSS1 in 42, CFTR in 27, SPINK1 in 12, and CTRC in 8.
  • In subset 6-11 years of age, 52 of 90 had genetic diseases identified: PRSS1 in 20, CFTR in 23, SPINK1 in 22, and CTRC in 1.
  • In subset greater than 12 years of age, 39 of 72 had genetic diseases identified: PRSS1 in 13, CFTR in 24, SPINK1 in 6, and CTRC in 1.
  • Testing for newer susceptibility genes were not evaluated as they had not become commercially available: carboxypeptidase 1, claudin 2, carboxylesterlipase, and carboxyesterlipase-hybrid
  • SPINK1 is noted to be present in 1-3% of general population; CTRC mutation occur in 0.7% of healthy controls.

Obstructive causes were common.  Pancreas divisum was identified in 38 patients but there was not a great deal of difference among the age groups; similarly, other obstructive causes were identified in about one-third of patients and included sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (n=9), gallstones (n=17), pancreaticobiliary malunion (n=12), biliary cyst (n=11), pancreatic stricture (n=2), annular pancreas (n=3), and duodenal diverticulum.

Disease burden:

  • Exocrine insufficiency noted in 52 (no strong age predilection)
  • Diabetes in 18 (11 of the cases occurred in those >12 years)
  • Constant moderate pain noted in 82 (25 in group <6, 27 in 6-12 group, and 30 in group >12 years)
  • Constant severe pain noted in 18  (4 in group <6, 5 in 6-12 group, and 9 in group >12 years)
  • Average number of hospitalizations in past year was 1 in those ≤12 and 2 in those older than 12.

My take: PRSS1 and CTRC mutations are associated with early onset pancreatitis.

Related blog posts:

Rotunda dome at the University of Virginia

 

 

Clostridium difficile Risk Factors in Children

Posted on by

From J Pediatr -full text: Risk Factors for Community-Associated Clostridium difficile Infection in Children  (DJ Adams J Pediatr 2017; 186: 105-9)

Methods: We performed a case-control study using billing records from the US military health system database

Results (from abstract):

A total of 1331 children with CA-CDI were identified and 3993 controls were matched successfully. Recent exposure to fluoroquinolones, clindamycin (OR 73.00; 95% CI 13.85-384.68), third-generation cephalosporins (OR 16.32; 95% CI 9.11-29.26), proton pump inhibitors (OR 8.17; 95% CI 2.35-28.38), and to multiple classes of antibiotics, each was associated strongly the subsequent diagnosis of CA-CDI. Recent exposure to outpatient healthcare clinics (OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.31-1.39) or to a family member with CDI also was associated with CA-CDI.

Table 2 lists other medications and their risks; for example, corticosteroids had adjusted OR of 1.22 and H2-receptor antagonists had adjusted OR of 3.33.  The OR of fluoroquinolone could not be calculated as 51 cases were exposed compared with 0 controls

In their discussion, the authors note the following:

Our study supports the occurrence of CDI among a population of children who were never hospitalized previously and provides a broad characterization of the medication and epidemiologic exposures associated with pediatric CA-CDI cases. Recent exposure to fluoroquinolones, clindamycin, third-generation cephalosporins, and to multiple classes of antibiotics was associated strongly with the subsequent diagnosis of CA-CDI in children; however, a sizeable minority had no preceding antibiotic exposure.

My take: This large study shows that CDI is more frequent after antibiotic usage and after usage of acid suppression (particularly with proton pump inhibitor) therapy.

Related blog posts:

Calprotectin in Triaging Potential Pediatric IBD Cases

Posted on by

Thanks to KT Park’s Twitter feed for this reference: GA Holtman et al. JAMA Pediatr. Published online August 14, 2017. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1736

An excerpt from abstract:

Results  Of the 16 eligible studies, authors of 8 studies (n = 1120 patients) provided their data sets. All blood markers and fecal calprotectin individually significantly improved the discrimination between pediatric patients with and those without IBD, when added to evaluation of symptoms. The best marker—fecal calprotectin—improved the area under the curve of symptoms by 0.26 (95% CI, 0.21-0.31). The second best marker—erythrocyte sedimentation rate—improved the area under the curve of symptoms by 0.16 (95% CI, 0.11-0.21). When fecal calprotectin was added to the model, the proportion of patients without IBD correctly classified as low risk of IBD increased from 33% to 91%. The proportion of patients with IBD incorrectly classified as low risk of IBD decreased from 16% to 9%. The proportion of the total number of patients assigned to the intermediate-risk category decreased from 55% to 6%.

Conclusions and Relevance  In a hospital setting, fecal calprotectin added the most diagnostic value to symptoms compared with blood markers. Adding fecal calprotectin to the diagnostic workup of pediatric patients with symptoms suggestive of IBD considerably decreased the number of patients in the group in whom challenges in clinical decision making are most prevalent.

From: Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017 Aug 16. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000001202. [Epub ahead of print]