SC Option for Infliximab

Posted on by

S Schreiber, S Ben-Horin et al. Gastroenterol 2021; 160 2340-2353. Full text: Randomized Controlled Trial: Subcutaneous vs Intravenous Infliximab CT-P13 Maintenance in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Methods: Overall in this phase 1 randomized, open-label study in patients with either ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease, 66 and 65 patients were randomized to CT-P13 SC (every 2 weeks) and CT-P13 IV, respectively

Key findings: The pharmacokinetic noninferiority of CT-P13 SC to CT-P13 IV, and the comparable efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity profiles

These findings are in agreement with similar studies performed in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

My take: If confirmed with additional studies, it is likely that SC infliximab treatment will be a useful alternative to intravenous infliximab. This is similar to data presented with vedolizumab which is currently administered intravenously.

Graphical Abstract

Looking at the Mycobiome to Distinguish Clostridium difficile Infection vs. Carriage

Posted on by

Y Cao et al. Gastroenterol 2021; 160: 2328-2339. Fecal Mycobiota Combined With Host Immune Factors Distinguish Clostridioides difficile Infection From Asymptomatic Carriage

Key findings:

  • The ratio of Ascomycota to Basidiomycota was dramatically higher in patients with CDI than in Carrier and Control (P < .05).
  • Using 4 fungal operational taxonomic units combined with 6 host immune markers in the random forest classifier can achieve very high performance (area under the curve ∼92.38%) in distinguishing patients with CDI from Carrier.

My take: It is interesting that fecal fungal diversity (mycobiome), in addition to bacterial diversity, is reduced in those with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) compared to both control groups and those with Clostridium difficile asymptomatic carriage.

Related blog posts:

Another reason to get vaccinated

Is Non-Celiac Wheat Sensitivity an Autoimmune Disorder?

Posted on by

A recent study (P Mansueto et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2021; 116: 1015-1023. Autoimmunity Features in Patients With Non-Celiac Wheat Sensitivity). Thanks to Ben Gold for this reference.

The authors prospectively and consecutively studied 91 patients with Non-Celiac Wheat Sensitivity (NCWS) (F?M ratio 7:1); 76 healthy blood donors (HBD) and 55 patients with a diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) unrelated to NCWS served as controls.

NCWS was diagnosed based on absence of celiac serology, absence of villous atrophy (while receiving a gluten-containing diet), negative IgE-testing for wheat allergy (either serum or skin prick tests) along with resolution of symptoms off wheat and symptom reappearance wiht a DBPC wheat challenge.

Key findings:

  • Twenty-three patients with NCWS (25.3%) presented with autoimmune diseases (ADs); autoimmune thyroiditis (16 patients, 17.6%) was the most frequent. The frequency of ADs was higher in patients with NCWS than in HBD (P = 0.002) and in patients with IBS (P = 0.05).
  • In the NCWS group, antinuclear antibodies tested positive in 71.4% vs HBD 19.7%, and vs patients with IBS 21.8% (P < 0.0001 for both).
  • The frequency of extractable nuclear antigen antibody (ENA) positivity was significantly higher in patients with NCWS (21.9%) than in HBD (0%) and patients with IBS (3.6%) (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.004, respectively).
  • Among NCWS with comorbid autoimmunity, duodenal lymphocytosis was present in ~80% and others had eosinophilic infiltration (~90%), both suggestive of ongoing immune activation. (Duodenal eosinophilic infiltration was also noted in ~60% of those who had absence of autoimmune disease too)

The associated editorial by Galipeau et al notes that only 16% of those who self-report as “gluten-sensitive” will actually fulfill the current consensus criteria for a diagnosis of NCWS. The diagnosis is problematic because of the absence of a validated biomarker. While the current study shows association with autoimmune markers, other studies have shown some have markers of immune activation and others with non-IgE-mediated food sensitivities.

My take: These type of studies help us understand NCWS. Yet, without a more definitive biomarker, many people will be on a gluten-free diet needlessly.

Related blog posts:

Dry Tortugas National Park (FL)

New Way to Diagnosis of Wilson’s Disease: ATP7B Peptides

Posted on by

CJ Collins, F Yi et al. Gastroenterol 2021; 160: 2367-2382. Full text: Direct Measurement of ATP7B Peptides Is Highly Effective in the Diagnosis of Wilson Disease

There continues to be challenges in the diagnosis of Wilson’s disease (WD). Genetic testing, per the authors and Vasrome (varsome.com), have found more than 649 pathogenic mutations and another 692 mutations that are VUS. Definitive diagnosis with genetic testing requires 2 known pathogenic variants. Other features, including Kayser-Fleischer rings and ceruloplasmin, have limited sensitivity and/or specificity.

Methods: Two hundred and sixty-four samples from biorepositories at 3 international and 2 domestic academic centers and 150 normal controls were used.

Key findings:

  • Two ATP7B peptides were found to have a sensitivity of 91.2%, specificity of 98.1%, positive predictive value of 98.0%, and a negative predictive value of 91.5%.
  • In patients with normal ceruloplasmin concentrations (>20 mg/dL), 14 of 16 (87.5%) were ATP7B-deficient. In patients without clear genetic results, 94% were ATP7B-deficient.

Discussion: As with other tests, ATPB7 peptide testing has limitations. Most patients with WD have pathogenic mutations that often result in protein misfolding, absence of decay of messenger RNA and enhanced degradation; hence, low ATPB7 levels; however, disease-causing mutations that affect protein activity but not protein concentration will generate false-negative results.

My take: “ATP7B peptide analysis identified WD patients in a large majority of cases and reduced ambiguities resulting from genetic analysis and Cp (ceruloplasmin) levels. This noninvasive assay can serve as an adjunctive test for the diagnosis of WD and is expected to fundamentally advance the use of proteomic technology for a rapid screening tool.

Related blog posts:

Risks of Vaccines Compared to COVID-19 Infection in 12-17 Year Olds

Posted on by

NY Times: Covid Is a Greater Risk to Young People Than the Vaccines (July 4, 2021)

This article elaborates on the risks of vaccination, especially due to myocarditis, compared to the risks posed by COVID-19 infection. Even using very cautious estimates, the authors find that the risks of hospitalizations, cardiac morbidity, and deaths are likely to be much lower in those who receive the vaccine.

Key points:

  • “Among the 6.14 million Americans 17 and under who have been fully vaccinated, there have been 653 possibly related hospitalizations lasting a day or longer…. If that rate holds, it means that if all 73 million Americans ages 17 and under are eventually vaccinated, there will be around 7,700 hospitalizations.”
  • “So far, 326 Americans age 17 and younger have died of Covid-19.”
  • “If the coronavirus were eventually to infect all 73 million children in the United States, we would conservatively expect Covid-19 to be responsible for around 14,600 hospitalizations….[and] lead to over 27,000 additional hospitalizations from the [MIS-C] syndrome.”
  • Unlike hospitalizations related to vaccines which have typically been brief and uneventful, “Covid-related hospitalizations in adolescents can be long and complicated, with nearly one-third requiring patients to enter the intensive care unit.”
  • “Bad things inevitably happen to a small number of people after any vaccination, a few caused by the vaccines, but most not…The virus is more dangerous.”

My take: 12-17 year olds are at less risk from COVID-19 infection than other age groups, however, this risk is still greater risk than the risk of vaccination. Protecting them with immunizations also protects other vulnerable populations and may decrease the risk of vaccine-resistant variants.

Related article: Eric Topol NY Times: It’s Time for the F.D.A. to Fully Approve the mRNA Vaccines An excerpt: “Now more than 180 million doses of the Pfizer vaccine and 133 million of Moderna’s have been administered in the United States, with millions more doses distributed worldwide. In the history of medicine, few if any biologics (vaccines, antibodies, molecules) have had their safety and efficacy scrutinized to this degree…it’s frankly unfathomable that mRNA vaccines have been proved safe and effective in hundreds of millions of people and yet still have a scarlet “E”.”

Persistent Villous Atrophy in Celiac Disease Despite a Gluten-Free Diet

Posted on by

A recent study (F Fernandez-Banares et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2021; 116: 1036-1043. Persistent Villous Atrophy in De Novo Adult Patients With Celiac Disease and Strict Control of Gluten-Free Diet Adherence: A Multicenter Prospective Study (CADER Study) shows that there is a high likelihood of persistent villous atrophy among adults with celiac disease (CD) despite adherence with a gluten-free diet (GFD). Thanks to Ben Gold for showing me this paper.

Key findings:

  • Among 76 patients (median age 36.5 years) who were prospectively followed for 2 years, persistent villous atrophy was observed in 40 (53%). In this group, 72.5% were asymptomatic (based on Likert scales) and 75% had negative serology
  • Detectable fecal gluten immunogenic peptides (f-GIPs) were present in at least one sample in 69% of patients. (Two samples obtained at f/u visits which were ~every 6 months during study)
  • Excellent or good adherence to GFD was demonstrated in 68.4% of patients based on dietetic evaluations. Only 6 (8%) were clearly nonadherent
  • “There were no significant differences in the rate of clinical and serological remission between patients with villous atrophy and those with mucosal recovery”
  • The authors did not find potentially modifiable predictive factors

Discussion:

  • The authors note that serology is “not useful for monitoring patients on a GFD.” Anti-TTG2 and EMA, in a recent meta-analysis, had a pooled sensitivity of around 50%.
  • “Adults are significantly less likely than children to normalize their duodenal histology.”

Editorial:

  • The associated editorial by Rej et al (pg 946-948) outline a personalized approach for dealing with persistent villous atrophy:
    • In those with persistent symptoms/positive GIPs/elevated serology/micronutrient deficiency, the first step is careful dietetic assessment. After this, endoscopy could be considered to confirm presence or absence of mucosal healing.
    • In those with no symptoms and no abnormalities, use of monitoring endoscopy needs to be weighed against the costs as well as potential complications.
    • Other points in the editorial: 1. GIPs have poor concordance with mucosal healing and 2. causes of poor mucosal healing include the following: natural slow healing process, super sensitive to gluten, ongoing gluten exposure, and refractory celiac disease.

My take: This study shows that there is ongoing gluten exposure in the majority of patients even in those with excellent or good adherence to a GFD; in addition, it shows that clinical/serological markers are NOT effective in predicting mucosal healing in adults. Nevertheless, it is not clear that followup endoscopy is beneficial.

Related blog posts:

Forbes (7/1/21): 99.5% Of People Killed By Covid In Last 6 Months Were Unvaccinated, Data Suggests

Disclaimer: This blog, gutsandgrowth, assumes no responsibility for any use or operation of any method, product, instruction, concept or idea contained in the material herein or for any injury or damage to persons or property (whether products liability, negligence or otherwise) resulting from such use or operation. These blog posts are for educational purposes only. Specific dosing of medications (along with potential adverse effects) should be confirmed by prescribing physician.  Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, the gutsandgrowth blog cautions that independent verification should be made of diagnosis and drug dosages. The reader is solely responsible for the conduct of any suggested test or procedure.  This content is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified healthcare provider. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a condition

Colorectal Cancer: Rare in Pediatrics

Posted on by

A recent retrospective single-center in Turkey study (2013-2018) reports 5 cases of colorectal cancer (CRC).

E Polat et al. JPGN Reports; 2021 – Volume 2 – Issue 1 – p e039 Full text: Colorectal Carcinoma in Childhood

Key points:

  • Patients were between 12-16 yrs of age and presented with bloody stools and weight loss
  • “CRC in childhood is very rare, usually diagnosed at an advanced stage and often has poor prognosis. CRC in children are mostly sporadic, roughly 10% of cases may have a predisposing condition…familial adenomatous polyposis, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, Gardner syndrome, Turcot syndrome, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, juvenile polyposis of colon, and ulcerative colitis.”

Review of Pyoderma Gangrenosum

Posted on by

K Vaidy et al. JPGN Reports 2020; Full text: Treatment of Pyoderma Gangrenosum in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease

This in-depth report reviews pyoderma gangrenosum including the differential diagnosis, the pathophysiology/genetics, presentation/diagnosis and treatment approaches. Anti-TNF therapy: “Currently available published data support using an anti-TNF-α biologic agent as first-line therapy for severe PG therapy in pediatric IBD, as well as for those cases that have not responded to local therapies.”

Related blog posts -PG:

What Can We Conclude from Five Patients Treated with a Combination of Infliximab and Tofacitinib?

Posted on by

Most often a letter to the editor would not grab my attention. A recent letter did: Full Text: Tofacitinib Is Safe and Effective When Used in Combination With Infliximab for the Management of Refractory Ulcerative Colitis (R Gilmore et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 1302-1303; reply 1303-1304 by JA Berinstein et al.)

This reported case series with 5 patients with severe ulcerative colitis (UC) who received a combination of tofacitinib and infliximab for at least 90 days were retrospectively reviewed. Tofacitinib dosing was de-escalated to 5 mg twice daily after 8 weeks. Thiopurine therapy was stopped with tofacitinib initiation.

Key findings:

  • Median duration of combination therapy was 9 months (range, 4–12 months). At 90 days, all patients had a reduction in Mayo score of ≥3. Four patients improved clinically and biochemically (Table 1), with 3 patients achieving steroid-free remission.
  • The only adverse event reported was one patient developing varicella zoster.

The authors letter title regarding tofacitinib being “safe and effective” is clearly overstated. The reply notes that in limited experience the group from the University of Michigan had a 50-year-old man develop severe pulmonary and CNS disease due to acquisition of legionnaires disease while on combination tofacitinib and infliximab.

My take: (borrowed from reply) “Efficacy and safety data obtained through rigorous randomized trials are needed…it is possible that long-term use of combination tofacitinib and infliximab will lead to an unacceptable risk of infection.”

Another study of tofacitinib: GR Lichtenstein et al. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2021; 27: 816-825. Tofacitinib, an Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitor: Analysis of Malignancy (Excluding Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer) Events Across the Ulcerative Colitis Clinical Program Key finding: With an exposure of 2576.4 patient years & 124 overall cohort tofacitinib-treated patients, 20 developed a malignancy

Related blog post:

Key West, FL