Long Term Use of Polyethylene Glycol (PEG 3350)

Posted on by

A Bautista-Casasnovas et al. JPGN Reports 4(4):p e353, November 2023. Open access! Multicentre Study Into the Use of Polyethylene Glycol With Electrolytes Over at Least 6 Months to Treat Constipation in Paediatric Populations

Background: PEG 3350 with electrolytes (PEG+E) is the most widely used osmotic laxative in Europe, and it is normally prescribed for short or limited periods in children, such that there is little information regarding its long-term use (≥6 months).

Methods: This was a retrospective, observational, descriptive, longitudinal, and multicentre study was carried out on 74 children diagnosed with functional constipation.

Patient characteristics:  The mean (±SD) duration of the symptoms of constipation before starting PEG+E treatment was >1 year (15.6 ± 8.4 months). Fecal disimpaction was necessary in 49 children (66.2%) .

Key findings:

  • The mean PEG+E dose used was 1.0 (±0.8) g/kg.
  • The mean duration of PEG+E use was 18.6 (±13.4) months (range 8–73 months), and 59.45% (n = 44) of the patients took the treatment for more than 1 year.
  • 81% (n = 60) of the patients achieved 4 or more weekly bowel movements after having taken PEG+E for at least 3 weeks.
  •  All clinical symptoms (abdominal pain, gassiness/bloating) were reduced considerably, with the resolution of the anal fissures, bleeding, and soiling in all patients.

Polyethylene glycol (the active ingredient in Miralax) is considered a first-line treatment for pediatric constipation and for fecal impaction. “However, caregivers may be hesitant to administer medication over long periods due to a fear of a rebound effect or addiction (23). Indeed, early withdrawal of laxatives is the commonest cause of recurrence (4,5), highlighting the need for longer follow-up studies (8).”

My take: It is helpful to have long term studies of PEG 3350 showing its effectiveness and safety, especially as the medication labels state to not use these medications for more than 7 days.

Related blog posts:

Clarification: However, Ben Enav pointed out that the label also states the following in bold: “do not take more than directed unless advised by your doctor.” The actual label is shown below.

Delayed Commentary

Posted on by

I was a little disappointed (aka first world problem) that this commentary appeared in the February print edition of The Journal of Pediatrics about 4 months after the publication of the analyzed study. This blog commented on this study in October: Disparities Are Abundant in Pediatrics -4 Studies on IBD, SUID, Specialty Referrals and in the NICU re: J Smith et al. J Pediatr 2023; 260: 113522.

DJ Spencer. J Pediatr 2024; DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113839. Open Access! Understanding Health Outcomes in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Contributing Factors that Aren’t so Black and White

“In this issue of The Journal, Smith et al report the results of an historical cohort analysis of 519 children and adolescents with newly diagnosed IBD (2013-2020)… Smith et al ask the question of whether the greater rate of complicated disease in Black patients is related more to delayed diagnosis or access to therapy rather than inherent race-based differences in response to treatment.”

Key points:

  • “In this study, Smith et al importantly identified no difference in initiating standard medical therapies based on race. Specifically, they report no difference in initial corticosteroid usage, time to initiation of maintenance therapy, or time to initiate antitumor necrosis factor therapy. In patients receiving biologics, both Black and White patients received similar loading doses and frequency of therapeutic drug monitoring.”
  • “Despite comparable disease presentation and approach to medical therapy in this study cohort, Black patients strikingly remained only one-half as likely to reach corticosteroid-free remission at 12 months compared with White patients (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.3-0.9).”
  • ” Black patients were less likely to be seen in gastroenterology specialty clinic for follow-up, more likely to present to the emergency department, and more likely to be hospitalized.”
  • “This study described poorer outcomes in Black patients despite similar treatments. However, the authors fail to arrive at a definitive answer as to why this is the case.”

My take: Black patients, even when offered similar IBD treatment, clearly experience inferior outcomes. While access and social determinants of health are important, there may be biological/phenotypic factors (eg. more aggressive disease) that are involved as well. More studies are needed. This editorial is a helpful review -the timing of the editorial in the print edition many months later, though, is a head-scratcher.

Unrelated topic: CDC COVID-19 Recommendation

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced new isolation guidance for Covid-19 this week. At the start of the pandemic, people were recommended to stay home for 10 days after testing positive. At the height of the Omicron wave, that was revised to 5 days. This week, isolation time was revised to 24 hours without a fever and symptoms improving, which is similar to the recommendations for other illnesses.

St Johns Honeymoon Beach

Related blog posts:

How Much of a Drug Markup is Reasonable (for hospitals)?

Posted on by

JC Robinson et al. NEJM 2024; 390: 338-345. Hospital Prices for Physician-Administered Drugs for Patients with Private Insurance

In this study, the authors used 2020–2021 national Blue Cross Blue Shield claims data regarding patients in the United States who had drug-infusion visits. This included 404,443 patients in the United States who had 4,727,189 drug-infusion visits.  The authors examined 57 medications which represent the most expensive physician-administered drugs.

Background:

“Approximately one third of hospitals, including all specialized cancer hospitals, are also eligible for large discounts off drug acquisition prices under the federal 340B Drug Pricing Program.Hospitals thus have two means to generate profits from physician-administered drugs. Hospitals can reduce what they pay to manufacturers for the drugs, especially if they are eligible for 340B discounts, and can increase what they are paid for the drugs by imposing markups on the reimbursement prices they charge to insurers.”

Key findings:

  • The median price markup (defined as the ratio of the reimbursement price to the acquisition price) for hospitals eligible for 340B discounts was 3.08
  • After adjustment for drug, patient, and geographic factors, price markups at hospitals eligible for 340B discounts were 6.59 times as high as those in independent physician practices; price markups at noneligible hospitals were 4.34 times as high as those in independent physician practices
  • Hospitals eligible for 340B discounts retained 64.3% of insurer drug expenditures, whereas hospitals not eligible for 340B discounts retained 44.8% and independent physician practices retained 19.1%.
  • When we look at high drug costs, much is due to price markups NOT due to the manufacturers (which is already a lot). In this study, hospitals eligible for 340B discounts “retained almost two thirds of insurer drug expenditures, passing on only one third to the drug companies.”

My take: In my view, the health care market is messed up.

  • Hospitals charge exorbitant amounts for infusions (and other care) and this is worsening with consolidation
  • Insurance companies are difficult to work with and often deny needed care. Patients and physicians have little leverage to get them to fulfill their obligations.
  • Pharmaceutical companies use a myriad of tricks to increase the costs of their medications (see blog posts below) and charge U.S. consumers much more than what patients pay in other countries
  • Physicians are not incentivized to limit costs for patients/insurers. Many worry their reputations will suffer and they will be exposed to legal liability if thorough evaluations are not performed.
               From NEJM Twitter feed

Related issue:

This tweet from Bernie Sanders illustrates the additional costs that U.S. consumers pay for medications and indicates that legislation may be needed as the ‘market’ is not working well to control costs.

Related blog posts:

Effective and Durable Hepatitis E Vaccine (Phase III Study)

Posted on by

Background (from MedPage Today): HEV is a leading cause of acute viral hepatitis worldwide, resulting in an estimated 20 million infections worldwide and 70,000 deaths every year. HEV primarily occurs in Africa, Central America, and Asia…U.S. incidence of HEV infection is largely unknow in part because of a lack of surveillance or an FDA-approved, commercially available HEV assay. However, an analysis of seroprevalence of HEV among blood donors in the U.S. showed approximately 10% seropositivity for HEV immunoglobulin G (IgG), reflecting past infection, and 0.58% for HEV IgM, indicating recent infection.

Genotypes HEV-1 and HEV-2 are transmitted via contaminated water and are specific to humans. However, HEV-3 and HEV-4 are zoonotically transmitted, often by eating uncooked or undercooked meat and offal of boar, deer, and pig. 

Safety data of the vaccine were reported in an earlier study, showing no serious adverse effects attributed to the vaccine (though data is scarce in vulnerable populations including pregnant women and children)

S Huang et al. The Lancet 2024: DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02234-1. Long-term efficacy of a recombinant hepatitis E vaccine in adults: 10-year results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

In this randomized placebo-controlled study with 112 604 healthy Chinese adults aged 16–65 years, the key findings:

  • During the 10-year study period, there were 13 infections in the vaccine group (0·2 per 10 000 person-years) and 77 in the placebo group (1·4 per 10 000 person-years), corresponding to a vaccine efficacy of 83·1% in the modified intention-to-treat analysis and 86·6% in the per-protocol analysis.
  • In a subset of patients, 254 (87·3%) of 291 vaccinees had vaccine-induced antibodies detectable at the 8·5-year mark.

My take: This HEV vaccine markedly decreases the likelihood of acquiring HEV infection.

Related blog posts:

View from Ram Head Trail, St John

Is It RISKy Not To Use Anti-TNF Therapy for Pediatric Crohn’s Disease?

Posted on by

D Geem et al (Senior author: Subra Kugasthasan). Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 22: 368-376. Progression of Pediatric Crohn’s Disease Is Associated With Anti–Tumor Necrosis Factor Timing and Body Mass Index Z-Score Normalization

Congratulations to my colleagues at Emory who led/participated in this study.

This study examined 5-year longitudinal data from the pediatric multicenter RISK cohort (n=1075). RISK=risk stratification and identification of immunogenetic and microbial markers of rapid disease progression in children

Key findings:

  • For children with a low BMIz at diagnosis (n = 294), BMIz normalization within 6 months of diagnosis were associated with a decreased risk for surgery (HR 0.47). Patients without BMIz normalization were enriched for genes in cytokine production and inflammation.
  • Unsurprisingly, baseline B2 (stricturing disease) and B2+B3 (stricturing and penetrating disease) were associated with increased risk of surgery with HR, 4.20 and HR, 8.24 respectively
  • Earlier anti-TNF therapy was associated with a lower hazard rate (HR) of needing surgery


My take: It appears that early anti-TNF therapy lowers the risk of surgery. Improved BMI with treatment is another good prognostic variable. There may be an early window in which effective treatment prevents long-term damage to the GI tract in pediatric patients with Crohn’s disease.

This study has overlapping findings (also with RISK cohort) by Adler et al showing early treatment preventing perianal fistulas. Blog post: Early Treatment Can Prevent Fistulas in Pediatric Crohn’s Disease

Related article: JC McCurdy et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 22: 377-385. Open Access! Comparative Effectiveness of Biologic Therapies in Preventing Penetrating Complications in Patients With Crohn’s Disease

In this observational retrospective study with 40,693 patients: 93% anti-TNF, 3% UST (ustekinumab), and 4% VDZ (vedolizumab), “Anti-TNF therapy was associated with a lower risk of LPD and PPD [luminal and perianal penetrating disease] compared with VDZ, and lower risk of LPD compared with UST.”

Related blog posts:

“Real-World” Dupilumab for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Posted on by

CJ Lee, DS Dellon. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 22: 252-258. Open Access! Real-World Efficacy of Dupilumab in Severe, Treatment-Refractory, and Fibrostenotic Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Rationale for the retrospective study: ” Although it is the first Food and Drug Administration–approved treatment for EoE, eligibility criteria for the clinical trial program excluded several characteristics of the most severe EoE patients seen in clinical practice…Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the real-world efficacy of dupilumab in patients with severe, treatment-refractory, and fibrostenotic EoE.”

This cohort of 46 patients with severe disease including 39 (85%) who had prior esophageal dilatation (mean of 9). Patients had a mean age of 39 and had had symptoms for a mean of 13 years. Patients were considered treatment-refractory as all had received PPIs and topical steroids; in addition, most (87%) had tried elimination diets.

Key findings:

  • The peak eosinophil counts decreased markedly, and postdupilumab histologic response rates were 80% and 57% for fewer than 15 eosinophils per high-power field and 6 or fewer eosinophils per high-power field, respectively. Mean eosinophil count dropped from 70 to 9 following dupilumab treatment.
  • The Endoscopic Reference Score (EREFS) decreased from 4.62 to 1.89 with improvement in all categories: exudates, rings, edema, furrows and strictures.
  • Global symptom improvement was reported in 91% (P < .001).

My take: Many clinical studies are not representative of typical patients with various ailments, often excluding those with the most severe manifestations. This study indicates that dupilumab is an effective agent for patients with severe fibrostenotic eosinophilic esophagitis.

Related blog posts:

Where I Want to Be Right Now (Honeymoon Beach, St Johns)

Spice It Up! Curcumin for Ulcerative Colitis (2024)

Posted on by

S Ben-Horin et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 22: 347-356. Open Access! Curcumin-QingDai Combination for Patients With Active Ulcerative Colitis: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial

This two part study involved a small open-label trial of combination curcumin-QingDai (CurQD) with 10 patients and a placebo-controlled trial with 42 patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC) over 8 weeks.

Background: “Curcumin and QingDai (QD, Indigo) are herbal compounds previously found to be effective in mild–moderate and moderate–severe ulcerative colitis (UC), respectively, but data on their use still are limited.” Curcumin has purported anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties through downregulation of nuclear factor-kB, regulation the JAK/STAT pathways, and through its effects on the NLRP3 inflammasome. Qing Dai, also known as indigo naturalis, is a traditional Chinese medicine that has demonstrated efficacy in promoting recovery from colitis in animal models and prior human trials, potentially acting through activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

Methods: CurQD was administered as 3 capsules of 500 mg herbal extract dry powder QD (a total of 1.5 g) and 3 capsules of 500 mg dry powder curcumin (a total of 1.5 g)

Key findings:

  • Clinical response was observed in 85.7% vs 30.7% (P < .001), clinical remission in 14 of 28 (50%) vs 1 of 13 (8%; P = .01), a 50% calprotectin reduction in 46.4% vs 15.4% (P = .08), and endoscopic improvement in 75% vs 20% (P = .036) in the CurQD and placebo groups, respectively. 
  • In the maintenance arm, 11/15 responders in the CurQD arm maintained remission for an additional 8 weeks with just curcumin alone.

The editorial (pg 235 ) notes the following:

  • The number of patients in the study is small and safety and effectiveness of these agents is not certain. Qing Dai has been associated with a rare risk of pulmonary arterial hypertension (especially with long-term use). Thus, further studies are needed.
  • “Although it may be preferrable to use these agents in combination with therapies with established efficacy, should the patients’ choice be to use alternative therapy as sole agents for treatment, it is important for us to continue to maintain a trusting physician-patient relationship to ensure that our patients are achieving the treatment targets they need to maximize long-term favorable outcomes, irrespective of the therapeutic agent of choice.”

My take: Curcumin (with combination of Qing Dai for induction) was superior to placebo in achieving meaningful clinical outcomes including clinical response, remission, calprotectin improvement and endoscopic improvement. For future studies, I would favor an active comparator like mesalamine rather than placebo.

Related blog post: Spice It Up? Curcumin for Ulcerative Colitis (2015)

Resmetirom for MASH

Posted on by

SA Harrison et al. NEJM 2024; 390: 497-509. A Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Resmetirom in NASH with Liver Fibrosis

This “MAESTRO-NASH” study enrolled 966 adult patients biopsy-confirmed NASH (now termed MASH) and a fibrosis stage of F1B, F2, or F3. Approximately 60% of each arm had F3 fibrosis. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive once-daily d resmetirom at a dose of 80 mg or 100 mg or placebo; Resmetirom is an oral, liver-directed, thyroid hormone receptor beta–selective agonist.

Key findings:

  • MASH “resolution with no worsening of fibrosis was achieved in 25.9% of the patients in the 80-mg resmetirom group and 29.9% of those in the 100-mg resmetirom group, as compared with 9.7% of those in the placebo group (P<0.001)”
  • “Fibrosis improvement by at least one stage with no worsening of the NAFLD activity score was achieved in 24.2% of the patients in the 80-mg resmetirom group and 25.9% of those in the 100-mg resmetirom group, as compared with 14.2% of those in the placebo group (P<0.001)”
  • “Levels of a broad range of atherogenic lipids and lipoproteins, including LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, apolipoprotein B, and lipoprotein(a), appeared to be reduced by resmetirom relative to placebo, findings consistent with those of earlier studies.18,19“
  • Diarrhea and nausea were more frequent in the resmetirom group compared to placebo, though there were no differences in serious adverse effects. Patients in the 100 mg group were more likely to discontinue treatment (~7%) compared to 2% in the other two groups.
  • “In this trial, achievement of a 30% reduction in hepatic fat (MRI-PDFF) or a 120% increase in the sex hormone–binding globulin level appeared to be associated with biopsy responses.”

In their discussion, the authors note that “Noninvasive testing to identify patients with NASH for treatment and to monitor treatment response will be important in clinical practice in which liver biopsy is infrequently used.”

The associated editorial by Kenneth Cusi (pg 559-561) notes the following:

  • Resmetirom had neutral effects on body weight and insulin resistance. 
  • “Treatment affected the pituitary–thyroid hormone axis, with prohormone free T4 levels decreasing by approximately 17 to 21% and mean thyrotropin levels also decreasing.” It is unclear if this has any long-term significance (long-term data needed). ”Careful surveillance to detect early endocrine disease that is related to potential thyroid, gonadal, or bone disease appears warranted to avoid any potential risks from long-term treatment.”
  • When subtracting the placebo effect, he notes that “approximately 2 of 10 patients treated will have NASH resolution and approximately 1 of 10 patients treated will have fibrosis improvement.” Thus, combination therapy may be needed.

My take: This study brings us a step closer to having a medication which can improve MASH as currently there are no FDA-approved medications. My speculation is that medications which achieve persistent weight loss will have a more pronounced effect on liver health and overall health.

Related blog posts:

IBD Updates: How to Get Rid of Pesky Antibodies to Infliximab, Neoplasia in pouch, Vit D associated with improved IBD outcomes

Posted on by

JZ Jagt et al. JPGN 2024; 78:57–67.Open Access! Effectiveness of strategies to suppress antibodies to infliximab in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease.

Anti‐infliximab antibodies were detected in 52/288 patients (18%)after a median of 15.3 months. Key findings:

  • Of the 49 studied patients, 19 had low titers and 30 had high titers
  • Of 19 low‐ATIs, 16 (84%) underwent treatment escalation with infliximab (IFX)
  • Among 30 patients with high‐ATIs, 17 (57%) continued with IFX; immunomodulators were started in seven patients
  • At 24 months of follow‐up, 73% of low‐ATI patients and 50% of high‐ATI patients could continue with IFX without steroids.
  • Interestingly, a large number of patients (3 of 17 in high titer group that continued IFX and 4 of 19 in the low titer group that continued IFX) did not have follow-up therapeutic drug monitoring (or availability of results)
  • ATIs were positively associated with infusion reactions
  • Overall, the authors conclude that dose optimization and/or use of an immunomodulator can help patients remain on infliximab (high and low titer)

Related blog posts:

SA Urquhart et al. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Volume 30, Issue 2, February 2024, Pages 183–189. The Incidence of Pouch Neoplasia Following Ileal Pouch–Anal Anastomosis in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Key findings: Out of 1319 patients, 10 (0.8%) developed neoplasia following IPAA (median follow-up of 8.6 yrs, mean age at time of IPAA was 36 years).  Presence of extensive colitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, backwash ileitis, and rectal dysplasia at the time of IPAA were significantly associated with increased risk of pouch neoplasia. 

My take: The low rate of neoplasia along with risk factors should be considered in determining surveillance.

M Valvano et al. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Volume 30, Issue 2, February 2024, Pages 281–291. Effectiveness of Vitamin D Supplementation on Disease Course in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

Methods: Randomized clinical trials (n=12) involving IBD patients treated with vitamin D supplementation, compared with placebo, that evaluated the risk of clinical relapse and disease activity were included

Key findings: The pooled risk ratio of clinical relapse was 0.64 (95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.89; I2 = 25%) among 458 IBD patients. (There were only 67 patients with ulcerative colitis in these studies)

Conclusion of authors: “This meta-analysis shows that vitamin D supplementation can reduce the risk of clinical relapse in IBD patients, especially in CD patients in clinical remission.” The dose and duration of vitamin D treatment to reduce the risk of relapse is unclear.

Related blog posts:

Practical Tips for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Posted on by

We recently had Glenn Furuta, MD give our group a terrific lecture on eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).

Some of the key points:

  • The burden of EoE continues to increase.
  • There are clearly several phenotypes of EoE. Some patients may never develop stricturing/fibrostenotic disease  but natural history data continues to evolve.
  • After treatment response, many patients can continue with symptoms. In adults and adolescents, this has been termed ‘esophageal hypervigilance.’ Feeding therapy may be helpful in this circumstance.
  • Adrenal insufficiency: Currently their group tries to screen for this after 4 months of topical corticosteroids and then yearly. It is unusual for them identify adrenal insufficiency if the patient is receiving only a single steroid agent; patients receiving steroids for other conditions like asthma are at higher risk.
  • An esophagram with a barium coated pill can be a useful adjunct to determine if there is esophageal narrowing (this can be missed on endoscopy).
  • For select patients, endoFLIP can characterize distensibility/esophageal function
  • Esophageal strictures: Their group uses Bougie dilators and has had a good experience. No perforations. ~15% with chest pain afterwards.
  • Corticosteroids (topical) can reduce the risk of food impactions in adults.
  • Reviewed use of Dupilimab and its recent approval in EoE for children as young as 1 yr of age (>15 kg)

Some selected slides:

Related blog posts: